ALP EIS Main Report

Table of Contents
Agata Processing Inc. · EIS Limestone Project
Table of Contents
Section Title Page No.
Executive Summary
1 Project Description
1.1. Project Location and Area ................................................................................................ 1-1
1.1.1. Project Impact Areas ........................................................................................................ 1-7
1.2. Project Rationale .............................................................................................................. 1-9
1.2.1. National and Regional/ Local Economic Development .................................................... 1-9
1.2.2. Socio-Economic Benefits ............................................................................................... 1-10
1.3. Project Alternatives ........................................................................................................ 1-13
1.3.1. Siting and Resources Alternatives ................................................................................. 1-13
1.3.2. Technology/ Operation Processes Selection Alternatives ............................................. 1-14
1.3.3. No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................... 1-15
1.4. Project Components ....................................................................................................... 1-16
1.4.1. General Layout of Facilities ............................................................................................ 1-16
1.4.2. Major Project Components ............................................................................................. 1-20
1.4.2.1. Payongpayong Limestone Quarry Area ......................................................................... 1-21
1.4.2.2. Causeway ....................................................................................................................... 1-22
1.4.2.3. Overburden Waste and Marginal Ore Stockpile Area .................................................... 1-22
1.4.2.4. Crushing and Screening Plant ....................................................................................... 1-22
1.4.2.5. Crushed Ore Stockpiles (COS) ...................................................................................... 1-23
1.4.3. Mine Support Facilities ................................................................................................... 1-23
1.4.3.1. Explosive Magazine ....................................................................................................... 1-24
1.4.3.2. Power Requirement and Source .................................................................................... 1-24
1.4.3.3. Road Network................................................................................................................. 1-25
1.4.3.4. Motorpool ....................................................................................................................... 1-25
1.4.3.5. Environment Structures- Siltation/ Sedimentation Ponds .............................................. 1-25
1.4.3.6. Housing Facility, Administration Offices, and Other Buildings ....................................... 1-25
1.4.4. Water Supply .................................................................................................................. 1-27
1.4.5. Wastewater Management .............................................................................................. 1-27
1.4.5.1. Sedimentation and Siltation Ponds ................................................................................ 1-27
1.4.5.2. Domestic Wastewater Treatment ................................................................................... 1-31
1.4.6. Communication Facilities ............................................................................................... 1-31
1.4.6.1. Cellular Network ............................................................................................................. 1-31
1.4.6.2. Postal Communication ................................................................................................... 1-31
1.4.6.3. Television and Internet Network..................................................................................... 1-31
1.4.6.4. Radio Communication .................................................................................................... 1-31
1.4.7. Safety Devices/Emergency Facilities ............................................................................. 1-31
1.4.8 Pollution Control and Waste Management Facility ........................................................ 1-32
1.4.8.1. Pollution Control Strategies ............................................................................................ 1-32
1.4.8.2. Solid Waste Management .............................................................................................. 1-33
1.4.8.3. Hazardous Waste Management..................................................................................... 1-33
1.5. Process/Technology ....................................................................................................... 1-34
1.5.1. Mining Method ................................................................................................................ 1-34
1.5.1.1. Mine Planning and Grade Control .................................................................................. 1-34
1.5.1.2. Overburden Stripping ..................................................................................................... 1-35
Environmental Impact Statement Report Contents

API Agata Limestone Project February 2021- Rev01
Table of Contents
1.5.1.3. Blasting ........................................................................................................................... 1-35
1.5.1.4. Loading, Hauling and Dumping ...................................................................................... 1-37
1.5.2. Ore Processing Method ................................................................................................. 1-37
1.5.3. Ore Shipping .................................................................................................................. 1-38
1.5.4. Maintenance of Mine Facilities ....................................................................................... 1-40
1.5.4.1. Fleet Maintenance .......................................................................................................... 1-40
1.5.4.2 Mine Maintenance .......................................................................................................... 1-40
1.5.4.3. Plant and Camp Maintenance ........................................................................................ 1-41
1.6. Project Size .................................................................................................................... 1-41
1.6.1. Ore Resource ................................................................................................................. 1-41
1.6.2. Ore Reserve ................................................................................................................... 1-42
1.6.3. Mining Schedule ............................................................................................................. 1-43
1.6.4. Plant Capacity and Production Schedule ....................................................................... 1-44
1.6.5. Total Project Area........................................................................................................... 1-44
1.7 Description of Project Phases and Activities .................................................................. 1-46
1.7.1 Pre-Development Phase ................................................................................................ 1-46
1.7.2. Construction and Development Phase .......................................................................... 1-47
1.7.3. Operations Phase........................................................................................................... 1-48
1.7.4 Closure Phase ................................................................................................................ 1-49
1.8 Manpower ....................................................................................................................... 1-50
1.8.1. Personnel Requirements and Hiring Scheme ................................................................ 1-50
1.8.1.1. Pre-Development Phase ................................................................................................ 1-50
1.8.1.2. Construction and Development Phase .......................................................................... 1-50
1.8.1.3. Operations Phase........................................................................................................... 1-50
1.8.1.4. Final Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Phase ......................................................... 1-54
1.9. Project Cost .................................................................................................................... 1-55
1.9.1. Capital Expenditures ...................................................................................................... 1-55
1.9.2. Operating Expenditures ................................................................................................. 1-55
2 Environmental Baseline Conditions for Critical Environmental Parameters, Impact

Assessment and Mitigation
2.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 2-1
2.1 Land Use .......................................................................................................................... 2-1
2.1.1 Land Use Classification .................................................................................................... 2-1
2.1.1.1 Impact with Compatibility with Existing Land Use ............................................................ 2-1
2.1.1.2. Impact with Compatibility as Environmentally Critical Area ............................................. 2-4
2.1.1.3. Impact in Existing Land tenure Issues ............................................................................. 2-7
2.1.1.4. Impairment of Visual Aesthetics ....................................................................................... 2-7
2.1.1.5. Devaluation of Land Value from Improper Waste Management ...................................... 2-9
2.1.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Land Use ............................................. 2-10
2.2. Geology and Geomorphology ........................................................................................ 2-10
2.2.1. Topography, Slope, and Elevation ................................................................................. 2-10
2.2.1.1. Change in Surface Landform and Topography .............................................................. 2-15
2.2.2. Regional Geology and Stratigraphy ............................................................................... 2-17
2.2.3. Local Geology ................................................................................................................ 2-22
2.2.3.1. Change in Subsurface Geology ..................................................................................... 2-22
2.2.4. Geologic Hazard Assessment ........................................................................................ 2-24
2.2.4.1. Inducement of Subsidence, Liquefaction, Landslides .................................................... 2-34
2.2.5. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Geology and Geomorphology ............. 2-36
2.3. Pedology ........................................................................................................................ 2-36
2.3.1. Soil Type and Quality ..................................................................................................... 2-36
2.3.1.1. Soil Erosion, Loss of Topsoil .......................................................................................... 2-40

Table of Contents
2.3.1.2. Change in Soil Quality and Fertility ................................................................................ 2-41
2.3.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Pedology .............................................. 2-42
2.4. Terrestrial Ecology ......................................................................................................... 2-42
2.4.1. Terrestrial Flora .............................................................................................................. 2-44
2.4.1.1. Vegetation Removal and Loss of Habitat ....................................................................... 2-53
2.4.2. Terrestrial Fauna ............................................................................................................ 2-54
2.4.2.1. Threat to existence and/or loss of important local flora and fauna species ................... 2-63
2.4.2.2. Threat to abundance, frequency and distribution of flora and fauna species ................ 2-64
2.4.3. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Terrestrial Ecology ............................... 2-65
2.5. Hydrology and Hydrogeology ......................................................................................... 2-66
2.5.1. Watershed Characteristics ............................................................................................. 2-66
2.5.1.1. Change in drainage morphology/inducement of flooding/Reduction ............................. 2-72
2.5.1.2. Change in stream, lake water depth .............................................................................. 2-72
2.5.1.3. Depletion of water sources/competition in water use..................................................... 2-72
2.5.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Hydrology and Hydrogeology .............. 2-77
2.6. Oceanography ................................................................................................................ 2-77
2.6.1. Impacts to Coastal Oceanography ................................................................................. 2-79
2.6.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Coastal Oceanography ........................ 2-79
2.7. Water Quality .................................................................................................................. 2-80
2.7.1. Physico-chemical Characterization ................................................................................ 2-80
2.7.1.1. Degradation of Water Quality ......................................................................................... 2-89
2.7.1.2. Siltation of Waterbodies ................................................................................................. 2-89
2.7.1.3. Accidental Spills/ Release .............................................................................................. 2-90
2.7.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Water Quality ....................................... 2-90
2.8. Freshwater Ecology........................................................................................................ 2-91
2.8.1. Abundance, Frequency and Distribution of Species ...................................................... 2-93
2.8.1.1. Threat to existence and/or loss species of important local and habitat ......................... 2-98
2.8.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Freshwater Ecology ............................. 2-99
2.9. Marine Ecology............................................................................................................... 2-99
2.9.1. Cover Estimates of Benthic Components of the Coral Reef ........................................ 2-101
2.9.2. Associated Reef Fish Communities ............................................................................. 2-104
2.9.3. Fish Density .................................................................................................................. 2-106
2.9.4. Fish Size Distribution and Size Estimates ................................................................... 2-108
2.9.5. Species Diversity and Cluster Analysis ........................................................................ 2-108
2.9.6. Macrobenthic Invertebrate Communities ..................................................................... 2-110
2.9.7. Threat to Marine Biodiversity ....................................................................................... 2-112
2.9.7.1. Threat to Existence and/or Degradation of Important Local Species and Habitat ....... 2-112
2.9.7.2. Threat to Abundance, Frequency, and Distribution ..................................................... 2-113
2.9.8. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Marine Ecology .................................. 2-115
2.9.9. Meteorology and Climatology ....................................................................................... 2-115
2.9.9.1. Local Microclimate........................................................................................................ 2-115
2.9.9.2. Seasonal Changes from Climate Change .................................................................... 2-118
2.10. Air and Noise ................................................................................................................ 2-120
2.10.1. Air and Noise Quality ................................................................................................... 2-120
2.10.1.1. Fugitive Dust and Noise Generation ............................................................................ 2-124
2.10.1.2. Contribution to Air Emissions ....................................................................................... 2-124
2.10.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Air and Noise ..................................... 2-129
2.11. The People ................................................................................................................... 2-130
2.11.1. Demographics .............................................................................................................. 2-130
2.11.1.1. Displacement of Settlers and Property......................................................................... 2-132
2.11.1.2. Conflict in Land Ownership .......................................................................................... 2-132
2.11.1.3. Change/Conflict Right of Way ...................................................................................... 2-133

Table of Contents
2.11.1.4. Impact on Public Access .............................................................................................. 2-133
2.11.1.5. In migration ................................................................................................................... 2-134
2.11.1.6. Cultural and Lifestyle Change ...................................................................................... 2-134
2.11.2. Public Services ............................................................................................................. 2-135
2.11.2.1. Threat to Delivery of Basic Services ............................................................................ 2-138
2.11.3. Health and Sanitation Profile........................................................................................ 2-138
2.11.3.1. Threat to Public Health and Safety .............................................................................. 2-140
2.11.3.2. Threat to Security ......................................................................................................... 2-141
2.11.4. Employment ................................................................................................................. 2-141
2.11.4.1. Generation of Local Benefits from the Project ............................................................. 2-143
2.11.4.2. Enhancement of Employment and Livelihood Opportunities ....................................... 2-144
2.11.5. Perception Survey ........................................................................................................ 2-144
2.11.5.1. Demographic Profile of Respondents .......................................................................... 2-145
2.11.5.2. Perception Survey Results ........................................................................................... 2-146
3 Environmental Management Plan

3.1 Environmental Impact and Management Plan Objectives………………………………3-1
3.2 Cost of Environmental Management Programs…………………………………………. 3-17
4 Environmental Risk Assessment and Emergency Response Policy Guidelines

4.1 Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA)……………………………………………………4-1
4.1.1 Explosive Materials …………………………………………………………………………..4-1
4.1.1.1 Risk Categorization of Explosion Incident…………………………………………………4-2
4.1.1.2 Hazard Control for Explosive and Blasting Materials…………………………………….4-2
4.1.2 Flammable Substances……………………………………………………………………...4-4
4.1.2.1 Risk Characterization from Fire Incident…………………………………………………...4-5
4.1.2.2 Hazard Control Against Flammable Substances………………………………………….4-6
4.1.3 Toxic Chemical Substances…………………………………………………………………4-6
4.1.3.1 Hazard Control Against Hazardous Substances………………………………………….4-7
4.1.4 Occupational Hazard………………………………………………………………………...4-7
4.1.4.1 Dust Exposure………………………………………………………………………………..4-8
4.1.4.2 Vibration……………………………………………………………………………………….4-8
4.1.4.3 Noise……….…………………………………………………………………………………..4-8
4.1.3.4 Control Against Occupational Hazards…………………………………………………….4-8
4.2 Emergency Response Plan………………………………………………………………….4-9
4.2.1 Emergency Response Team………………………………………………………………4-10
4.2.2 Emergency Communication Protocol………………….………………………………….4-11
4.2.3. Safety and Environmental Emergency Response….……………………………………4-11
4.2.3.1 Personal Injury…………………………………….…………………………………………4-11
4.3.4 Terminating the Emergency Event……………………...…………………………………4-14
4.2.5 Emergency Response Trainings…………….………………………………………….…4-14
5 Social Development Plan and IEC Framework

5.1 Social Development and Management Program…………………………………………. 5-1
5.2 IP Royalty………………………………………………………………………………………5-5
5.3 Information and Education Campaign (IEC)………………………………………………..5-6
6 Environmental Compliance Monitoring

6 Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMoP) and other Monitoring Modules…………………6-1
6.1 Self-Monitoring Plan…………………………………………………………………………...6-1
6.2 Multi-Sectoral Monitoring Framework………………………………………………………..6-1
6.3 Summary of the Environmental Monitoring Plan…………………………………………...6-3

Table of Contents
6.4 Environmental Guarantee and Monitoring Fund Commitments…………………………6-15
6.4.1 Mine Rehabilitation Fund…………………………………………………………………….6-15
6.4.1.1 Monitoring Trust Fund………………………………………………………………………..6-15
6.4.1.2 Rehabilitation Cash Fund……………………………………………………………………6-15
6.4.2 Environmental Trust Fund…………………………………………………………………...6-15
6.4.3 Final Mine Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Fund…………………………………. .6-15
6.4.4 Annual Environmental Protection and Enhancement Program………………………….6-16
(AEPEP) Cost
7 Abandonment and Rehabilitation Program

7. Abandonment and Rehabilitation Program…………………………………………………7-1
7.1 Plan Objectives………………………………………………………………………………..7-1
7.2 Rehabilitation Criteria and Performance Standards……………………………………….7-1
7.3 Progressive Rehabilitation Program…………………………………………………………7-3
7.4 Closure and Decommissioning Plan…………………………………………………………7-3
7.5 Mine Closure Team Schedule………………………………………………………………..7-6
7.6 Final Land Use………………………………………………………………………………....7-7
7.7 Mine Closure Cost……………………………………………………………………………..7-7
8 Institutional Plan for EMP Implementation

8.1 Institutional Set-up……………………………………………………………………………8-1
List of Annexes
A- Sworn Statement of Proponent Accountability

B- Sworn Statement of Preparer Accountability
C- Project Environmental Monitoring and Audit Prioritization Scheme (PEMAPS)
D- Technical Scoping Checklist
E- Ownership Documents
F- Documentation of IEC Activities (Pre-scoping, Public Scoping and Public Hearing)
G- MOA with CBFM Holders
H- Flora and Fauna Inventory
I- MOA with the IPs and NCIP Certificate of Precondition
J- Perception Survey Report and Survey Instrument
K- Final Exploration Report
L- Revocable Permit

Table of Contents
List of Tables
Table No Title Page No.
Table 1-1 MPSA 134-99-XIII Corner Points Survey and Geographical Description ............................ 1-2
Table 1-2 Agata Nickel Laterite Project ECC Corner Points Survey and Geographical Description... 1-4
Table 1-3 Agata Limestone Project ECC Corner Points Survey and Geographical Description ......... 1-4
Table 1-4 Project Impact Areas by Sector ........................................................................................... 1-7
Table 1-5 Projected SDMP Allocation for Years 2022-2026 (PhP) ................................................... 1-10
Table 1-6 Estimated Royalty Payments (PHP) .................................................................................. 1-11
Table 1-7 Estimated Project Benefits from SDMP, Taxes, Fees, and Royalty (PHP) ....................... 1-12
Table 1-8 Project Siting and Resource Alternatives .......................................................................... 1-13
Table 1-9 Technology and Process Alternatives ............................................................................... 1-14
Table 1-10 Summary of Benefits and Consequences from the No Action Alternative ...................... 1-15
Table 1-11 Project component for Agata Limestone Operations ....................................................... 1-17
Table 1-12 Coordinates of the Mining Project Facilities (Major Project Components) ...................... 1-20
Table 1-13 Project component for Agata Limestone Operations ....................................................... 1-21
Table 1-14 Mine Equipment List ........................................................................................................ 1-21
Table 1-15 Waste/MOS stockyard design specifications ................................................................... 1-22
Table 1-16 Crushing Plant Equipment List ........................................................................................ 1-22
Table 1-17 Limestone Project Support Facilities ............................................................................... 1-23
Table 1-18 Power Requirements During ALP Operation ................................................................... 1-24
Table 1-19 Additional Power requirement for ALP Crushing and Screening Operation .................... 1-24
Table 1-20 Current and Proposed Siltation Ponds on Limestone Area ............................................. 1-29
Table 1-21 Drill and Blast Design Parameters ................................................................................... 1-35
Table 1-22 Material Balance (tons per hour) ..................................................................................... 1-38
Table 1-23 Projected Daily Production (tons/day) ............................................................................. 1-38
Table 1-24 Mineral Resource Estimate for Agata Limestone Project (July 2015) ............................. 1-41
Table 1-25 Ore Classification/Category Used.................................................................................... 1-43
Table 1-26 Mineral Reserve Estimate for Agata Limestone Project. ................................................. 1-43
Table 1-27 Daily Production (tons/day) .............................................................................................. 1-44
Table 1-28 Annual Materials Movement Schedule ............................................................................ 1-45
Table 1-29 Project Schedule .............................................................................................................. 1-52
Table 1-30- Project Personnel Distribution (Operations Phase) ........................................................ 1-53
Table 1-31 Summary of Manpower per Operation Phase ................................................................. 1-54
Table 1-32 Summary of Capital Expenditures ................................................................................... 1-55
Table 1-33 Summary of Operating Expenditures............................................................................... 1-56
Table 2-1 Project Area Assessment as an Environmentally Critical Area ........................................... 2-4
Table 2-2 Project Operations Solid Waste Generation ........................................................................ 2-9
Table 2-3 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Land Use ...................................................... 2-10
Table 2-4 Projected Climate Trends for Year 2036-2065 in Agusan del Norte Province .................. 2-32
Table 2-5 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Geology and Geomorphology ...................... 2-36
Table 2-6- Soil Analysis Result (Sampling Point Reference: Figure 2-19) ........................................ 2-38
Table 2-7 River Sediment Metal Analysis (Sampling Point Reference: Figure 2-19) ........................ 2-40
Table 2-8 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Pedology ...................................................... 2-42
Table 2-9 Terrestrial Ecology Survey Stations................................................................................... 2-43

Table of Contents
Table 2-10 Top 3 species with the Highest Importance Value in each site ....................................... 2-48
Table 2-11 The computed diversity metrics (actual values) in the two sampling sites ...................... 2-49
Table 2-12 The herpetofauna species with their conservation and distribution status, abundance and
relative abundance ..................................................................................................................... 2-55
Table 2-13 The herpetofauna species with their abundance and relative abundance ...................... 2-56
Table 2- 14 Composition and Diversity .............................................................................................. 2-58
Table 2-15 Community structure of fruit bats collected ..................................................................... 2-60
Table 2- 16 Vulnerable and Endangered Flora Potentially Disturbed by the Project ........................ 2-64
Table 2-17 Important Local Fauna Species Potentially Disturbed by the Project.............................. 2-64
Table 2-18 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Terrestrial Ecology ..................................... 2-65
Table 2-19 Local Watershed Rainfall-Runoff Characteristics ............................................................ 2-66
Table 2-20 Summary of Stream Flow Measurement within the Project Area .................................... 2-66
Table 2-21 Estimated Mean Monthly Total Stream Total Flow for Project Area Creeks ................... 2-70
Table 2-22- Estimated Mean Monthly Stream Base Flow for Project Area Creeks ........................... 2-70
Table 2-23 Community Water Sources .............................................................................................. 2-72
Table 2-24 Water Supply Sources for Project Operation................................................................... 2-73
Table 2-25 Discharge Measurements at Local Water Supply Sources April 2014 ............................ 2-73
Table 2-26 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Hydrology and Hydrogeology .................... 2-76
Table 2-27 Ocean Current Data by Current Meter Measurements.................................................... 2-76
Table 2-28 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Oceanography ........................................... 2-78
Table 2-29 Sampling Location Reference Table ............................................................................... 2-82
Table 2-30 Surface Water Quality Data (Year 2019) ......................................................................... 2-83
Table 2-31 Drinking Water Quality Data (Year 2019) ........................................................................ 2-85
Table 2-32 Marine Water Quality Data (Year 2019) .......................................................................... 2-86
Table 2-33 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Water Quality ............................................. 2-89
Table 2-34 Inventory of aquatic macroinvertebrates ........................................................................ 2-93
Table 2-35 Mean diversity indices of aquatic macroinvertebrates ..................................................... 2-94
Table 2-36 Aquatic macroinvertebrates from the two study stations and their WQI score ................ 2-94
Table 2-37 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Freshwater Ecology ................................... 2-98
Table 2-38 Bottom Cover of the Coral Reefs Monitored .................................................................. 2-101
Table 2-39 Bottom Cover Description of Monitoring Sites ............................................................... 2-101
Table 2-39 Bottom Cover Description of Monitoring Sites (continued) ............................................ 2-102
Table 2-40 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Marine Ecology ........................................ 2-114
Table 2-41 Climate Data Mean Monthly Values, Butuan City, Agusan del Norte............................ 2-115
Table 2-42 Projected Seasonal Changes in Rainfall and Temperature for Agusan del Norte ........ 2-118
Table 2-43 Ambient Air and Noise Quality Monitoring Stations ....................................................... 2-119
Table 2-44 Ambient Air and Noise Quality Monitoring Data ............................................................ 2-120
Table 2-45 Predicted Annual GHG Emissions from Stationary Sources (2019) ............................. 2-124
Table 2-46 Predicted Annual GHG Emissions from Stationary Sources (2018) ............................. 2-124
Table 2-47- Estimated Annual GHG Emissions from Construction and Development Activities .... 2-125
Table 2-48- Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Mining Activities ........................ 2-125
Table 2-49- Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Abandonment Activities ............ 2-125
Table 2-50- Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions from All Mining Phases .......................................... 2-126
Table 2-51 Estimated Methane emission from waste generated in (2020) ..................................... 2-126
Table 2-54 Estimated Carbon loss via Land Use Change ............................................................... 2-127
Table 2-55 Summary of estimated GHG emission (tons) from the prospective project area .......... 2-128
Table 2-56 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Air and Noise ........................................... 2-128
Table 2-57 Population Data of Impact Communities ....................................................................... 2-129
Table 2-58 Population by Age and Sex ........................................................................................... 2-130
Table 2-59 Population by Educational Attainment ........................................................................... 2-131

Table of Contents
Table 2-60 Public Services and other Social Data for Tubay Municipality ...................................... 2-135
Table 2-61 Health Statistics Data of Tubay Municipality ................................................................. 2-138
Table 2-62 Employment Distribution, Brgy. Lawigan ....................................................................... 2-141
Table 2-63 Employment Distribution, Brgy. Tinigbasan ................................................................... 2-141
Table 2-64 Estimated Project Benefits from SDMP, Taxes, Fees, and Royalty (PHP) ................... 2-142
Table 2-65 Distribution of Participants by Purok Origin ................................................................... 2-143
Table 2-66 Age distribution and length of residency of survey participants .................................... 2-145
Table 3-1- Environmental Management Plan Construction Phase ...................................................... 3-2

Table 3-2- Environmental Management Plan Mine Development Phase ............................................ 3-8
Table 3-3- Environmental Management Plan Abandonment Phase ................................................. 3-15
Table 3-4- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Plan (EPEP) Budget Allocation ................ 3-17
Table 4-1 Properties of ANFO ............................................................................................................. 4-1

Table 4-2 Effects of Explosion Overpressure ..................................................................................... 4-2
Table 4-3 Estimated Explosion Overpressure Effects at Distance ...................................................... 4-5
Table 4-4 Hazardous Waste from ALP ................................................................................................ 4-6
Table 4-5 Possible Safety and Environmental Emergency Scenarios ................................................ 4-9
Table 4-6 Emergency Response Team Roles and Responsibilities .................................................. 4-10
Table 5-1 Project Impact Areas by Sector ........................................................................................... 5-1

Table 5-2 Generalized community development programs under SDMP ........................................... 5-4
Table 5-3 Estimated Royalty Payments (PHP) .................................................................................... 5-5
Table 5-4- IEC Plan .............................................................................................................................. 5-8
Table 6-1 Environmental Monitoring Program (EMoP) ........................................................................ 6-4

Table 6-2 EQPL Used in Drinking Water Quality Monitoring ............................................................... 6-9
Table 6-3 EQPL Used in Surface Water Quality Monitoring ................................................................ 6-9
Table 6-4 EQPL Used in Marine Water Quality Monitoring ................................................................. 6-9
Table 6-5 Sampling Location Reference Table ............................................................................... 6-11
Table 7-1 Overall Final Rehabilitation Schedule…………………………………………………………...7-6

Table of Contents
List of Figures
Table No Title Page No.
Figure 1-1 Agata Limestone Project Location Map .............................................................................. 1-3

Figure 1-2- Agata Tenement Map ........................................................................................................ 1-5
Figure 1-3 Proposed ALP ECC and ANLP ECC Location Map ........................................................... 1-6
Figure 1-4- Project Impact Area Map ................................................................................................... 1-8
Figure 1-5- IP Allocation for Community Development Program ....................................................... 1-11
Figure 1-6- IP Royalty Allocation for Governance.............................................................................. 1-12
Figure 1-7- Site Development Map .................................................................................................... 1-18
Figure 1-8- Route Map ....................................................................................................................... 1-20
Figure 1-9- Drainage Map and Location of Sediment Ponds ............................................................. 1-30
Figure 1-10- Typical staggered V blast pattern and firing sequence ................................................. 1-36
Figure 1-11- Crushing and Screening Plant Flowsheet ..................................................................... 1-39
Figure 1-12- Limestone crushing plant: A – Impact crusher; C1-2 – Conveyors ............................... 1-39
Figure 1-13- Typical screening plant lay-out: ..................................................................................... 1-40
Figure 1-14- Histogram of CaO .......................................................................................................... 1-42
Figure 1-15- Histogram of CaO .......................................................................................................... 1-42
Figure 1-16- Quarry Area for Limestone Project ................................................................................ 1-44
Figure 1-17- Annual Limestone Production ....................................................................................... 1-45
Figure 1-18- Project Process Flow ..................................................................................................... 1-46
Figure 1-19- Process Flow of Mining Operations............................................................................... 1-48
Figure 2-1 Land Classification Map ..................................................................................................... 2-2

Figure 2-2 Forestland Classification .................................................................................................... 2-3
Figure 2-3 Landslide Susceptibility Map and Flood Susceptibility Zones of the Project Area ............. 2-6
Figure 2-4 Tenurial Instruments Map ................................................................................................... 2-8
Figure 2-5- Topographic Map of the ALP Project Area ...................................................................... 2-11
Figure 2-6- Slope Map of the Project Area (Regional View) .............................................................. 2-12
Figure 2-7-Elevation Map ................................................................................................................... 2-14
Figure 2-8 Regional Geology Map ..................................................................................................... 2-19
Figure 2-9 Local Geologic Map .......................................................................................................... 2-20
Figure 2-10 Stratigraphic Column of the Agata MPSA ...................................................................... 2-21
Figure 2-11 Mineral Prospects within the MPSA Area ....................................................................... 2-23
Figure 2-12- Regional Tectonic Map .................................................................................................. 2-25
Figure 2-13- Regional Seismicity Map ............................................................................................... 2-26
Figure 2-14- Liquefaction Susceptibility Map ..................................................................................... 2-29
Figure 2-15 Active Faults Map (MGB, Jagupit Quadrant) .................................................................. 2-30
Figure 2-16- Landslide Susceptibility Map and Flood Susceptibility Zones of the Project Area........ 2-31
Figure 2-17- Geohazard Map of Agusan Del Norte ........................................................................... 2-33
Figure 2-18 Stockpile Areas and Sediment Pond Location Map ....................................................... 2-35
Figure 2-19- Soil and Erosion Susceptibility Map .............................................................................. 2-37
Figure 2-20 Terrestrial Flora and Fauna Study Site .......................................................................... 2-43
Figure 2-21 Flora Sampling Sites in within the Agata Limesone Project …………………………….. 2-45
Figure 2-22 Summary of Classified Flora .......................................................................................... 2-46
Figure 2-23 Top ten Families with the Abundant Number of Floral Species. .................................... 2-46
Figure 2-24 The seven growth habit groupings of plants in the area ................................................ 2-47
Figure 2-25 The comparison of biodiversity indices in the two sampling locations ........................... 2-49
Figure 2-27 The Cluster Analysis of sampling sites using Bray Curtis similarity index. .................... 2-50

Table of Contents
Figure 2-26 Spatio-temporal comparison of the community structure of plants using Bray Curtis
similarity index. ........................................................................................................................... 2-51
Figure 2-28 The number of endemic, invasive and threatened plants in two sampling sites ............ 2-52
Figure 2-29 The number of threatened species of plants .................................................................. 2-52
Figure 2-30 The proportion of threatened to non-threatened species of plants. ............................... 2-53
Figure 2-31 Residency status of the birds observed …………………………………………………… 2-58
Figure 2-32 Feeding guilds of birds observed within and near the proposed project ........................ 2-59
Figure 2-33- Watershed Map of the Agata Project Area .................................................................... 2-67
Figure 2-34 Limestone Project Site Watershed Area ........................................................................ 2-68
Figure 2-35 Watershed Stream Flow Sampling Site .......................................................................... 2-69
Figure 2-36 Groundwater Availability Map ......................................................................................... 2-74
Figure 2-37- Water Source Map ........................................................................................................ 2-75
Figure 2-38 Bathymetric Map Along West Coast of the Project Area ................................................ 2-77
Figure 2-39- Water Sampling Map ANLP Monitoring ........................................................................ 2-80
Figure 2-40- Sampling Location Map for Water Quality, Air Quality and Noise Quality Monitoring for the
Limestone Project ...................................................................................................................... 2-81
Figure 2-41- Map of Collection sites in Payongpayong and Tinigbasan Creeks ............................... 2-91
Figure 2-42 Percent (%) composition of major aquatic macroinvertebrate groups (A), Taxa groupings (b)
and comparison of Taxa Groupings between the two study sites. ............................................ 2-94
Figure 2-43 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of distribution and abundance of aquatic
macroinvertebrates in Payongpayong (P1, P2,P3) and Tinigbasan (T1,T2). ............................ 2-95
Figure 2-44 Marine Resource Assessment Study Area ..................................................................... 2-98
Figure 2-45 Coral Monitoring Stations ............................................................................................... 2-99
Figure 2-46 Family composition and species richness of fish aggregation ..................................... 2-103
Figure 2-47 Species richness of fish assemblages by category …………………………………….. 2-104
Figure 2-48 Density (individuals/300sqm) of fish aggregations by category at the sampling stations
(May 2019) ............................................................................................................................... 2-105
Figure 2-49 Relative fish density (%) by family at the sampling stations (May 2019) ..................... 2-106
Figure 2-50 Temporal pattern in total fish density (individuals/300m2) ........................................... 2-107
Figure 2-51 Size-density distribution of fish assemblages ............................................................... 2-108
Figure 2-52 Temporal pattern in fish biomass (kg/300m2) .............................................................. 2-108
Figure 2-53 Diversity of fish aggregations at the sampling stations during May 2019 .................... 2-109
Figure 2-54 Total number of macroinvertebrate species by sampling period .................................. 2-109
Figure 2-55 Macroinvertebrate Density by Sampling Period ........................................................... 2-110
Figure 2-56 Climatological Map of the Philippines ........................................................................... 2-116
Figure 2-57 Total Monthly and Cumulative Rainfall for Year 2019 .................................................. 2-117
Figure 2-58 Seasonal Change in Rainfall (mm) at Nickel Mine Site (2036-2065) ........................... 2-118
Figure 2-59 Seasonal Change in Rainfall (mm) at Payongpayong Port (2036-2065) ..................... 2-119
Figure 2-60- Air and Noise Quality Monitoring Location Map (ANLP) ............................................. 2-121
Figure 2-61- Air and Noise Sampling Location Near the Project Area ............................................ 2-122
Figure 2-62 Distribution of survey participants in their respective locales by sex ........................... 2-144
Figure 2-63 Participants’ consent on the possible extension of mining operations ......................... 2-145
Figure 2-64 Participants’ responses on the positive impact of mining on various aspects ............. 2-146
Figure 2-65 Participants’ response to possible extraction of limestone ........................................... 2-147
Figure 2-66 Distribution of perceived adverse impacts from the Limestone Project ....................... 2-148
Figure 5-1- Project Impact Area Map ................................................................................................... 5-2

Figure 5-2 Percent (%) Distribution of DHNC Project .......................................................................... 5-3
Figure 5-3 IP Royalty Allocation for Community Program ................................................................... 5-5
Figure 5-4 IP Royalty Allocation for Governance ................................................................................. 5-6
Figure 6-1 Third Party Compliance Monitoring Organization............................................................... 6-3

Table of Contents
Figure 6-2- Sampling Map for Air, Noise, and Water Monitoring ....................................................... 6-11
Figure 6-3 Freshwater Ecology Sampling Map .................................................................................. 6-13
Figure 6-4 Marine Resources Monitoring Location Map .................................................................... 6-14
Figure 7-1 Progressive Rehabilitation and Closure Activities Program Diagram……………………...7-2

Figure 7-2 Annual Progressive Rehabilitation Schedule…………………………………………………7-4
Figure 7-3 Final Mine Rehabilitation Schedule …………………………………………………………...7-5
Figure 7-4 Proposed Final Land Use Concept…………………………………………………………….7-6
Figure 8-1 TMEPEO Functional Diagram………………………………………………………………….8-1

Executive Summary
E.1 Project Fact Sheet

Pertinent Project Information in support of the ECC request is provided in Table E-1.
Table E-1 Basic Project Information

Item Information
Project Name Agata Limestone Project (ALP)

Brgys. Lawigan, Tinigbasan, Municipality of Tubay;
Brgy. Colorado, Municipality of Jabonga;
Project Location
Brgy. E. Morgado, Municipality of Santiago
Province of Agusan del Norte, Caraga Region
Nature of Project Limestone Quarry Operations
Maximum Disturbed Area 554.4 hectares
MPSA No. 134-99-XIII
Mineral Production and Sharing Agreement 4,995 hectares
Issued May 26, 1999
Agata Processing Inc. (API)
Project Proponent
Agata Mining Ventures, Inc. (Project Operator)
Address 22/F BDO Equitable Tower Paseo De Roxas, Makati City
Emilio T. Figueroa III
Contact Person General Manager- Agata Limestone Project
Email: emilio.figueroa@ agatamining.com.ph
Telephone No./ Fax No. (02) 728 84 91 (AMVI Makati)
E.1.1 Ownership
The Project is covered by Mineral Production Sharing Agreement (MPSA) No. 134-99-XIII acquired by
Minimax Mineral Exploration Corporation (Minimax) and has a total area of 4,995 hectares. It was
approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) on May 26, 1999 and
registered with the Mines and Geosciences Bureau on June 17, 1999.
A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was signed by and between Mindoro Resources Limited
(Mindoro) and Minimax on January 19, 1997, allowing Mindoro to conduct mineral exploration and
development activities in the Contract Areas of Minimax in Surigao del Norte and Agusan del Norte
including the MPSA-134-99-XIII tenement. Later, a Deed of Assignment was executed by and between
Mindoro and MRL Nickel Philippines, Inc. (formerly MRL Gold Phils., Inc.) [MRL] and was signed on
June 27, 1997 wherein the rights of Mindoro were assigned to MRL.
On September 25, 2012, MRL Nickel Philippines, Inc, Minimax Mineral Exploration Corporation, TVI
Resource Development Phils., Inc. entered into Agata Processing Option and Joint Venture Agreement
whereby Minimax will transfer the tenement to Agata Processing Inc., a joint venture Company between
TVIRD (60%), MRL (15%), and Minimax (25%).
Minimax entered into an Operating Agreement with Agata Mining Ventures, Inc. (AMVI), wherein
Minimax appointed AMVI as the sole and exclusive operator of the mining property and it was approved
by the MGB on September 18, 2014. AMVI is also a joint venture Company between TVIRD (60%),
MRL (15%), and Minimax (25%).
On April 22, 2014, a Deed of Assignment was executed between Minimax and Agata Processing Inc.
(API) assigning, transferring and conveying to the latter all rights, interests and obligations of the former
under the approved MPSA. This Deed of Assignment was approved by the MGB last June 21, 2016.
All legal documents pertaining to transfer of MPSA is included in the Appendices.
Environmental Impact Statement Report Page | E-1

Executive Summary
E.2 Process Documentation
E.2.1 EIA Team
The EIS Report was completed through the joint effort of the in-house Environmental Management
Team of API, and two (2) third-party consultant groups. The list of the EIA Team members is presented
in Table E-2.
Table E-2 Agata Limestone Project EIS Preparers
No. Name Field of Expertise

Mr. E. Applied Environmental Sciences Consulting
1 Ruben Estudillo Marine Biology
Green Environment Defenders Consultancy
1 Dr. Romell A. Seronay Aquatic Ecology
2 Dr. Meljan T. Demetillo Terrestrial Ecology (Flora)
3 Dr. Eve F. Gamalinda Terrestrial Ecology (Fauna)
4 Engr. Arnold Apdohan Hydrology, Watershed specialist
5 Mr. Leo Jude Villasica Soil Science / GHG specialist
API In-house Technical Team
1 Emilio T. Figueroa III Mining Engineering, Planning and Design
2 Edsel M. Abrasaldo Geology
3 Maria Krystell Banaag Environmental Planning and Management
4 Jesalyn A. Guingguing Environmental Planning and Management
5 Mary Jul S. Libarios Environmental Science
6 Dhana Mae C. Ellarina Mining Engineering
7 Renell V. Palaruan Mining Engineering
8 Marichu L. Batingal Mining Engineering
9 Neil Adrian S. Aynera Mining Engineering
10 John Darwin S. Amag Mining Engineering
11 Aldrin B. Arieta Safety and Health
12 Jonathan Bañez Social Development
There is no Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation Training available yet to be
attended by the preparers prior to the preparation of this document. A request for in-house online
training from EMB-13 will be explored by the proponent to comply with the DRR-CAA training
requirement for the preparers.
The Sworn Accountability Statement of the preparers is provided in the Appendices.

Executive Summary
E.3.2 EIA Study Schedule
In conformance to the procedural requirement prescribed in revised Procedural Manual for DAO 2003-
30 and the public participation requirements of DAO 2017-15: Guidelines on Public Participation under
the Philippine EIS System, API have conducted a series of information, education, and communication
(IEC) activities for the identified primary and secondary impact communities of the Agata Limestone
Project in February and March 2020. Also, in February 2020, a Perception Survey among the residents
of the identified impact communities was completed.
The consolidation of requirements to request for a Public Scoping Activity with the Environmental
Management Bureau was already towards completion when the government put the National Capital
Region and eventually the rest of Luzon under an Enhanced Community Quarantine (ECQ) in response
to the threat of COVID-19 pandemic. This resulted to the suspension of the API’s head office operation,
as well as of the DENR and its line bureaus. Strict work suspension in Metro Manila under the ECQ
status lasted until May 15.
Consultations with the EMB-case in the second half of May indicated that EMB was then developing a
modified guideline for public scoping activities given the restrictions on mass gatherings imposed by
the quarantine regulation. While waiting for the guidelines to be finalized, EMB allowed the proponent
to proceed to the Technical Scoping to discuss the Terms of Reference. This will also allow the
environmental impact assessment activities to commence, on the extent possible. The request letter
for Technical Scoping was formally submitted by API last June 5, 2020. Attached to the request is a
copy of the Project Description Report for Scoping, aerial photos of the Project site, proof of conduct of
IEC activities, and the Initial Perception Survey Report. On July 9, the Technical Scoping Meeting was
done via online conference (Zoom). The Technical Scoping Checklist signed by the EIARC, with the
comments of the EIA Review Committee is included in the Appendices.
Later on, the interim guidelines for the public participation in the EIS process was released and the
proponent was able to conduct the Public Scoping Activity on September 25, 2020. The summary of
the issues and concerns during this activity is summarized in
Given the Technical References for the EIA study, the baseline data gathering, impact assessment and
development of corresponding mitigating measures were documented in the EIS Report. The baseline
environmental conditions presented in the EIS Report are based on the results of the environmental
monitoring programs being implemented for the Agata Nickel Laterite Project (ANLP) given that the
proposed ALP ECC area will overlap with the existing ECC coverage of the nickel project.
The overall schedule for the EIA activities is presented in Table E-3.

Executive Summary
Table E-3 EIA Activities Schedule

Period Activity
IEC Activitities and Initial Perception Survey for Brgy. Tinigbasan and
February 2020 to March 2020
Brgy. Lawigan in Tubay
Submission of Project Description Report and Request for Technical
June 05, 2020
Scoping
July 09, 2020 Project Briefing and Technical Scoping Activity with EMB and EIARC
Year 2019- present Baseline data gathering through ANLP Monitoring Program
July- August 2020 EIS Report Preparation
August 2020 First Draft Report Submission
September 25, 2020 Public Scoping Activity
October 25, 2020 Second Draft Report Submission
December 09, 2020 First EIARC Technical Review Meeting
December 18, 2020 Submission of First EIS Report Revision

1st Publication of Notice of Public Hearing on both national and local
January 14, 2021
newspapers
2nd Publication of Notice of Public Hearing on both national and local
January 21, 2021
newspapers
January 29, 2021 Public Hearing Activity
February 01-19, 2021 EIS Report 2nd Revision Preparation
The relevant environmental studies and monitoring data included in the impact assessment for ALP is
summarized in Table E-4. Results of these studies will be discussed in Section 2 of this report.

Executive Summary
Table E-4 EIA Studies Completed
Date of Implementation Environmental Study In Charge/ Data Source
July 2020 Geohazard Assessment API (In-house)
Terrestrial Flora and Fauna

July 16-19, 2020 Green Environment Defenders Consultancy
Study
Stteamflow Discharge
Year 2014-2019 API (In-house)
Measurement
Ocean Profile, Bathymetric
Year 2012 Gaia South Inc.
Survey
Year 2019 Water Quality API (In-house collection); Fastlab Testing
July 16-17, 2020 Freshwater Ecology Study Green Environment Defenders Consultancy
Marine Environment
Year 2014- 2016 Mr. Ruben Estudillo
Assessment
Year 2018- 2019 Air Emissions API (In-house)
Year 2019 Meteorology API (In-house)
Air Emission Estimation Training by EMB-13

Ambient Air and Noise
Year 2019, Year 2020 Ambient Air and Noise Testing by Berkman
Quality
Systems Inc.
Year 2018 to March 2020 Social Preparation API (In-house)
February 2020 Perception Survey Caraga State University
E.3.3 EIA Study Area
This proposed Agata Limestone Project area is within the 4,995 hectare MPSA area, designated as
MPSA –134-99-XIII, granted to Minimax Mineral Exploration Corporation. The mining claim falls within
the political jurisdictions of Brgys. Lawigan, Tinigbasan, Municipality of Tubay; Brgy Colorado,
Municipality of Jabonga and Brgy. E. Morgado, Municipality of Santiago, Agusan del Norte in Caraga
Region. The overall MPSA Contract Area, encompassing the Agata Project, is bounded by geographical
coordinates 9°10’30” and 9°19’30” north latitude and 125°29’30” to 125°33’30” east longitude. The
location of the MPSA and its technical coordinates are shown on Table E-5.
The EIA study for the Agata Limestone Project (ALP) is focused within a 554.4-hectare area, including
the proposed quarry area, processing plant, stockyards, and the support facilities. The area is within
the MPSA and overlaps with an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) currently issued for the
Agata Nickel Laterite Project (ANLP). The technical coordinates of the proposed ECC area for the ALP
is presented in Table E-6. Its location relative to the MPSA and the ECC of ANLP is shown on Figure
E-1.

Executive Summary
Table E-5 MPSA 134-99-XIII Corner Points Survey and Geographical Description
Corner Latitude Longitude Notes
1 9˚ 10' 30" 125˚ 32' 00"

2 9˚ 11' 00" 125˚ 32' 00"
3 9˚ 11' 00" 125˚ 33' 00" Parcel I
4 9˚ 10' 30" 125˚ 32' 00"
1 9˚ 12' 30" 125˚ 31' 22.5"
2 9˚ 13' 15" 125˚ 31' 22.5"
3 9˚ 13' 15" 125˚ 31' 00"
4 9˚ 13' 30" 125˚ 31' 00"
5 9˚ 13' 30" 125˚ 30' 52.5"
6 9˚ 14' 22.5" 125˚ 30' 52.5"
7 9˚ 14' 37.5" 125˚ 30' 30" Parcel II
8 9˚ 14' 37.5" 125˚ 30' 22.5"
9 9˚ 15' 45" 125˚ 30' 22.5"
10 9˚ 15' 45" 125˚ 30' 30"
11 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 30' 30"
12 9˚ 16' 45" 125˚ 30' 22.5"
13 9˚ 18' 00" 125˚ 30' 22.5"
14 9˚ 18' 30" 125˚ 30' 07.5"
15 9˚ 18' 30" 125˚ 30' 00"
16 9˚ 19' 00" 125˚ 30' 00"
17 9˚ 19' 00" 125˚ 29' 45"
18 9˚ 19' 30" 125˚ 29' 39.3"
19 9˚ 19' 30" 125˚ 30' 00"
20 9˚ 19' 00" 125˚ 30' 00"
21 9˚ 19' 00" 125˚ 31' 30"
22 9˚ 18' 30" 125˚ 31' 30"
23 9˚ 18' 30" 125˚ 33' 30"
24 9˚ 16' 00" 125˚ 33' 30"
25 9˚ 16' 00" 125˚ 33' 00"
26 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 33' 00"
27 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 32' 30"
Table E-5 MPSA 134-99-XIII Corner Points Survey and Geographical Description (continued)
28 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 32' 00"

29 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 31' 30" Excluded
30 9˚ 16' 00" 125˚ 31' 30"
31 9˚ 16' 00" 125˚ 32' 00"
32 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 32' 00"
33 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 32' 30"
34 9˚ 15' 00" 125˚ 32' 30"
35 9˚ 15' 00" 125˚ 33' 00" Parcel II
36 9˚ 13' 30" 125˚ 33' 00"
37 9˚ 13' 30" 125˚ 32' 00"
38 9˚ 13' 00" 125˚ 32' 00"
39 9˚ 13' 00" 125˚ 31' 30"
40 9˚ 12' 30" 125˚ 31' 30"

Executive Summary
Table E-6 Agata Limestone Project ECC Corner Points Survey and Geographical Description
Corner Latitude Longitude
1 125° 30' 29.9988" 9° 16' 09.4944"

2 125° 30' 29.9988" 9° 16' 30.0000"
3 125° 30' 22.5000" 9° 16' 45.0012"
4 125° 30' 22.5000" 9° 17' 14.4816"
1 125° 30' 43.8948" 9° 17' 35.3508"
2 125° 30' 44.0388" 9° 17' 55.4676"
3 125° 31' 09.7788" 9° 17' 55.2876"
4 125° 31' 09.7248" 9° 17' 47.6556"
5 125° 31' 50.9412" 9° 17' 47.3640"
6 125° 31' 50.8332" 9° 17' 32.4528"
7 125° 31' 26.6520" 9° 17' 32.6220"
8 125° 31' 13.9728" 9° 17' 22.2072"
9 125° 31' 08.7096" 9° 17' 22.2432"
10 125° 31' 08.5980" 9° 17' 06.6804"
11 125° 31' 26.1480" 9° 16' 56.4492"
12 125° 31' 25.8960" 9° 16' 09.1452"
13 125° 30' 29.9988" 9° 16' 09.4944"
14 125° 30' 29.9988" 9° 16' 30.0000"
15 125° 30' 22.5000" 9° 16' 45.0012"
16 125° 30' 22.5000" 9° 17' 14.4816"

Executive Summary
Figure E-1 Proposed ALP ECC and ANLP ECC Location Map

Executive Summary
E.3.4 EIA Methodology
The environmental baseline reflected in Section 2 of this EIS Report include third-party study conducted
recently and results of the monitoring activities regularly conducted for the Agata Nickel Laterite Project.
Various data were also collected from local, regional and national government agencies to supplement
the monitoring data collected on site. Specific methodologies and data sources used in the EIA study
relative to land, water, air and noise aspects are summarized in Table E-7.
Table E-7 Methodology of Environmental Baseline Studies

Environmental Study Sampling and Analytical Method/ Data Source
Mapping data from NAMRIA;

Soils and Land Use Land Use and Classification Maps from DENR
Land Use Plan from LGU
Geohazard Assessment Geohazard Mapping based on Local Government Agencies (MGB, Phivolcs) data
Geological Information from In-house reports and
Geology
Secondary sources (published reports, database of MGB, Philvocs)
Terrestrial Ecology Flora: Quadrat Sampling and Transect Method
(Flora and Fauna) Fauna: Transect Method , Observation, and Species collection
On-site observation (rainfall monitoring data);
Hydrology Secondary data sources (PAGASA, published reports)
Watershed Mapping and Streamflow measurements
Oceanography Bathymetric Survey
Water quality sampling based on EMB Water Quality Monitoring Manual;
In-situ measurements (pH, temperature, DO) using portable equipments;
Third party laboratory analysis
a. Metals- Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS)
b. Solids (TSS)- Gravimetric Methods
Water Quality
c. Bacteriology- Multiple fermentation tube technique
d. BOD- BOD Analyzer
e. Chloride- Titrimetric Method
f. Color, Nitrate, Phosphate- Colorimetric Method
g. Oil and Grease- Hexane extraction and gravimetry
Reach-wide benthos (Multihabitat) procedure of SWAMP (2007)
Freshwater Ecology
Paleontological Statistics Software (PAST®).
SCUBA Diving to determine
a. Coral Cover- Photo Quadrat/ Coral Belt Transect Survey
b. Associated Reef Fish- Fish Visual Census/ Transect Survey
Marine Environment
c. Macrobenthic Invertebrates- Coral Belt Transect Survey
d. Siltation Rate- sediment trap monitoring
e. Colony Size- Photo Quadrat/ Coral Belt Transect Survey
On-site observation (rainfall monitoring data)
Climatological data
Secondary data sources (PAGASA, published reports)
Noise level: Sound level meter
Ambient Air and Noise TSP: High Volume- Gravimetric Method
PM10: Gravimetric Method
Perception Survey
People Focused Group Discussion
Secondary data sources (Brgy. Development Plan)

API Agata Limestone Project February 2021 - Rev02
Executive Summary
E.3.5 Public Participation
Following the Public Participation Guidelines under the Philippine EIS System set by DAO 2017-15, the
EIA process started with stakeholder identification to determine the target participants for the series of
Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) activities to be conducted for the project awareness.
Information dissemination regarding the Agata Limestone Project was conducted as early as
September 2018 when the company first initiated for a conduct of Public Scoping. The Community
Relations Office (CRO) of API was able to conduct project presentation to the Mayors of the three (3)
LGUs (the Municipality of Tubay, Jabonga, and Santiago) with the jurisdiction over the MPSA area.
Also included in this general IEC are the following barangays, namely Brgy. Tinigbasan and Brgy.
Lawigan in Tubay; Brgy. Colorado in Jabonga; and Brgy. E. Morgado in Jabonga. A Perception survey
done to these barangays indicated positive acceptance to the project as early as 2018. The company
was preparing for a larger Public Scoping activity around June 2019 when the demand of the prospect
off-take buyer has significantly changed, leaving the ALP with no reliable market for its limestone
products. The ECC application, along with the scoping request was then deferred by API.
When the market for Limestone improved, the company decided to revive the ECC application starting
with the series of IEC activities. The Regional Directors of DENR-MGB 13 and DENR-EMB 13 were
visited for a project presentation. At this point, the impact area of the project is more defined, and which
identified Brgy. Tinigbasan as the host community and Brgy. Lawigan, as the neighboring community.
Both are located within the Tubay municipality. The map of the impact area is shown Figure E-2. The
CRO relaunched a more detailed project presentation and focused group discussion and covered the
LGU officials of the municipality of Tubay, Brgy. Lawigan and Brgy. Tinigbasan. In addition, a Perception
Survey were also conducted among 192 residents of the two impact barangays. The result of the survey
indicated awareness and positive acceptance from the community.
A summary of the IEC Activities conducted for the project is presented in Table E-8. Documentation of
IEC Activities are attached in the Appendices.
Table E-8 IEC Activities for ALP

Period Activity
September 2018 Brgy. Lawigan in Tubay; Brgy. Colorado in Jabonga; and Brgy. E.
Morgado in Jabonga.
July 2019 Withdrawal of ALP ECC Application
February 2020 to March 2020
Brgy. Lawigan in Tubay
July 09, 2020 Project Briefing and Technical Scoping Activity with EMB and EIARC
September 25, 2020 Public Scoping Activity
January 29, 2021 Public Hearing Activity

Executive Summary
The Public Scoping Activity was supposedly scheduled after the submission of Scoping Request in
June 2020, however due to the community quarantine restrictions in mass gatherings, the EMB Central
Office allowed ALP to proceed to the Technical Scoping Meeting. An interim guideline on the public
participation in EIA process was released on July 29, 2020, allowing the conduct of Public Scoping
Activity either through online platform (i.e. video conference) or small group discussion following the
minimum health protocols prescribed by the Inter-Agency Task Force (IATF) for COVID -19
management. The proponent chose the latter and conducted the Public Scoping Activity last September
25, 2020 at Loreta Convention Hall in Cabadbaran City, Agusan del Norte.
The public scoping event, aimed to provide an information regarding the proposed project and solicit
concerns from the stakeholders, was conducted in two sessions to maintain a small group of attendees.
Around 70 people responded to the invitation for public scoping, including the representatives from the
host communities (Brgys. Lawigan and Tinigbasan), local people’s organization, civil society groups,
regional regulatory agencies (DENR, EMB, NCIP), and from the company.
The concerns raised during the open forum are mostly related to the employment opportunities arising
from the Project, particularly on who must be priority for hiring and what are the skills requirement to be
qualified. There were requests for the Company to provide skills enhancement training to improve the
employability of the community members. The Company assured the audience that there is a process
followed in hiring and that skills training program can be included in the current SDMP and implemented
next year.
For the environmental impacts, the concerns mentioned are related to the air and noise pollution from
mining and blasting activities, possibility of landslide from irresponsible mining protocols, and the
possible adverse effect of the project to the water sources. To which the company representatives
responded by assuring that these are all included in the impact assessment study, and that findings
and the proposed mitigation will be presented in the Public Hearing activity.
A summary of the issues and concerns raised during the Public Scoping Activity is presented in Table
E-10, while the documentation of the Public Scoping activity is included in the Appendices.

Executive Summary
Figure E-2 Project Impact Areas Map

Executive Summary
Table E-9- Summary of Issues and Concerns- Public Scoping Activity for Agata Limestone Project
Raised By Issue/ Concern Respondent Response

Morning Session
Ms. Edgielit Pajarillo, Ms. Pajarillo asked if the IPs were already informed and are Mr. Jonathan Mr. Bañez assured that the IPs are already informed
NCIP Santiago OIC aware of the new project, i.e. if they are aware on the possible Bañez, API CRO about the limestone project. He also clarified that the
effects of limestone mining, whether the impactswill be the same Manager limestone project area is within CADT 237 and is way far
with nickel mining. from CADT 092. He added that this sectoral concern will
be further discussed in the afternoon session where the
Ms. Pajarillo also asked for the technical description of the Agata IPs are among the attendees.
Limestone Project to ensure if the project area covers either
CADT 237 or CADT 092. Lastly, she stressed out the importance Mr. Bañez agreed to officially transmit a copy of the
of the IPs being informed about the new project. MOA and the technical description as requested by Ms.
Pajarillo.
Ms. Pajarillo asked for a copy of the MOA to check if the proposed
other minerals apart from nickel is mentioned or is part of it.
Kagawad Glen Capon, Kagawad Capon asked for the mitigating measures that will be Ms. Jesalyn Ms. Guingguingg assured that although the limestone
Brgy. Tinigbasan implemented to address air and noise pollution. He mentioned Guingguingg, API project will involve blasting, the controlled blasting will be
that these impacts are inevitable since there will be blasting MEPEO Manager employed, similar to the practice in the visited Limestone
activities. Operations in Bohol.
Ms. Guingguingg continued by citing specific mitigation

measures that will be implemented such as, blasting only
when necessary and advanced public notification of
blasting schedule. These measures will be provided in
detail during the Public Hearing activity.
She concluded by mentioning a possible learning visit to

the Bohol Limestone operation, for benchmarking so
they can better imagine how the limestone project will be
operated.
Brgy. Captain of Dante Capt. Mandam pointed out that he is most concerned about the
Mandam, Brgy. Tinigbasan welfare of his constituents. He suggested if the company and the
barangay can make an agreement that every demand and
request of his people will be addressed. He also requested if
people from Tinigbasan can be prioritized for employment.

Executive Summary
Table E-10 Summary of Issues and Concerns- Public Scoping Activity for Agata Limestone Project (continued)
Brgy. Captain Mordeno, Capt. Mordeno requested that that the presentation should not Ms. Jesalyn Ms. Guingguingg apologized for not including the
Brgy. Lawigan only focus on the host barangay, but should also include the Guingguingg, API neighboring barangay in the presentation, but assured
neighboring barangay. MEPEO Manager Capt. Mordeno that in the report discussion, both the
host and neighboring barangays are included. She also
clarified that Brgy. Tinigbasan is the host community of
the limestone project and Brgy. Lawigan is a secondary
impact community.
Kagawad Richard Abgao, Kagawad Agbao expressed his concern regarding the skills Mr. Jonathan Mr. Bañez mentioned that the company follows a
Brgy. Tinigbasan qualification of their constituent for the project. He suggested that Bañez, API CRO process regarding skills training. In fact, the company is
being the host community, the company should conduct TESDA Manager already looking for trainings that are suitable for the skills
Training in their barangay to help the people become qualified for needed for theproject.
the job.
Afternoon Session
President of Women’s Madame President expressed his concern on the karstic Ms. Jesalyn Ms. Guingguingg reiterated that the purpose of the public
Association of Brgy. characteristic of limestone, wherein it forms holes or cavities. Guingguingg, API scoping is gathering of concerns. The technical team of
Tinigbasan She is worried that landslide will occur in Brgy. Tinigbasan MEPEO Manager API, in charge of planning and design will be providing a
should the excavation reached its maximum capacity more detailed explanation on this impact, as well as
corresponding measures, during the Public Hearing
activity.
Ms. Guingguingg added that similar to what has been

done to the nickel operation, proper benching and
drainage system will be in place. She reiterated that the
detailed plan will be presented during the public hearing.
Engr. Renell Engr. Palaruan assured the audience that proper mine
Palaruan, API planning and design is employed to determine how to
Mining Engineer mine the area responsibly. He added that stability of the
soil is considered in mine planning, same as the type of
the underlying rock for the proper bench design.
Drainage will also be installed to ensure stability of the
soil and prevent the occuence of landslides. Engr.
Palaruan also ensured that they will take note of this
concern and propoerly study the area so that land slides
will be prevented.

Executive Summary
Afternoon Session
Mr. Raymond Mr. Deguerro informed the audience that in case that
Deguerro, EMB-13 mitigation measures are in place and still landslide
occurred due, the Environmental Guarantee Fund
(EGF), which is required by EMB to be set up by the
proponent, can be used to compensate for damages
resulting from such incidents. He however clarified that
the fund will only be available to compensate damages
from the failure of the company’s mitigating measures,
and not from natural phenomenon unrelated to Agata
operations.
Mr. Narciso Dela Sala Mr. dela Sala first shared how he witnessed Agata has helped Ms. Jesalyn Ms. Guingguingg mentioned that similar concerns on
Officer, Tinigbasan Brgy. Tinigbasan. He cited the significant contribution of the Guingguingg, API employment and skills development were raised during
Farmers and Fisherfolks company in the livelihood assistance, particularly by giving out MEPEO Manager the morning session an that it was mentioned that there
Association (TIFFA) motorized boats that they are able to use for their livelihood. should be trainings for the people of the barangay so
they can acquire the necessary skills to be qualified for
For his question, Mr. dela Sala asked what is the percentage of the job to be offered by the project.
employment will likely be coming from Brgy Tinigbasan.
She mentioned that as of now, the company cannot give
a definite percentage, especially now that the project is
still under study. But she assured that this concern will
be looked at in the project planning.
In his follow up question, Mr. dela Sala asked what will be the Mr. Jonathan Mr. Bañez responded that the tour is already scheduled
benefits of the TIFFA from the Project. He mentioned that if Bañez, API CRO this year but then COVID-19 happened, making it difficult
there is no direct benefit, it is fine as long as the rate of Manager to travel there. He said that when travel restrictions are
employment in the Barangay will increase. no longer in place, the company will ensure that the mine
tour will go as planned.
He added that he went to Garcia Limestone Project site in Bohol
and saw that their expection from a blasting activity is really far He then commended TIFFA for being supportive of the
from what they saw in actual operations. He saw that the air Agata program activities since the beginning and he
pollution he’s expecting from the use of dynamite in blasting is hoped for a continued support from them for the
not really a problem for a limestone mining. He then Limestone Project.
recommended if the company can also bring the people from
Tinigbasan, especially the senior citizens and anti mining
groups, to the Garcia Bohol limestone site so they can see the
actual operation.

Executive Summary
Afternoon Session
Mr. Prudencio Gayo Mr. Gayo expressed his confidence with the Agata’s MEPEO Engr. Anthony AGM Quijano mentioned that the company will continue
President, TIFFA Manager on how she is able to manage environmental impacts Quijano, API to enhance its program on skills enhancement and
using a macro perspective, and how he is not worried of the Assistant General community empowerment where qualified local
landslide issue raised by the President of Women’s Association. Manager applicants are given opporutnities to enrol in TESDA
accredited skills training.
His concern is more on the employment. He recommended that
it is better to prioritize hiring the existing workers when the He futher explained that the Company also promote
Limestone Project commences. And he also suggested that if skills enhancement for its non-skilled employees who are
possible, better if the company can provide skills training for the currently employed in Agata. They acquired their skills
barangay, for instance heavy equipment operation to upgrade education thru the Skills Training Program offered by the
their skill and employability. Company.
As a follow up, Mr. Gayo asked if the SDMP from the nickel
laterite operation will be continued during the limestone project.
Ms. Cora Vertido Ms. Vertiddo asked what are the skills and trainings needed for Engr. Anthony AGM Quijano mentioned that skills immediately needed
representative of St. Anne the limestone project so that the community can prepare to Quijano, API will be related to the crushing plant and heavy
Parish improve their employability. Assistant General equipment oeration. Moving forward, the company will
Manager look into forecasting the necessary skills for the projects
so that they can be developed, say through tarining and
scholarship.
Mr. Carlito Belleza Mr. Belleza asked if Brgy. Tinigbasan will be the primary impact Mr. Jonathan Mr. Bañez responded that Brgy. Tinigbasan may be the
representative of Senior area, why the other barangays are also invited in the public Bañez, API CRO primary impact area but there are also neigboring
Citizens of Brgy. scoping. He thinks that others will easily accept the project Manager communities who will be affected so they have to be
Tinigbasan being not directly affected. He said that the Brgy. Tinigbasan invited in the public scoping.
community will be supporting the project since it is inevitable but Ms. Jesalyn
company should ensure that people from Tinigbasan should Guingguingg, API Ms. Guingguingg added by explaining that the PD 1586:
benefit from employment opportunities. MEPEO Manager Philippine Environmental Impact Statement System
requires that the neighboring communities be identified
as well. She defined primary impact community as where
the project will be situated, that is Brgy. Tinigbasan, while
secondary impact areas are where downstream impacts
such as dust pollution and impacts from the loading
vessel may be experienced, hence should be considered
as well. She emphasized that Brgy. Tinigbasan being the
primary impact area will be getting a bigger share of the
benefits, but the identified neighboring communities will
benefit from the project as well.

Executive Summary
Afternoon Session
Senior Citizen He expressed concern on water resources being affected by the Ms. Jesalyn Ms. Guingguingg explained that the water source of the
representative project operation and appealed if the company can look after air Guingguingg, API community is distantly located in the limestone mining
and water resources to ensure they will not be adversely affected. MEPEO Manager area. However, this will still be part of the study of the
project impacts. The findings on the potential water
pollution, as well as the monitoring and mitigation will
be included in the Public Hearing activity.
Father of St. Anne Parish Father reminded everyone in the audience to think of the long-
term benefit that they will be getting from the project. He
explained that it is easy to get overwhelmed with the immediate
benefits such as salary and SDMP programs that the project will
give the community but in the end, the project will only be 15-
years. The more important aspect is for the community to use the
benefits in preparation for a more sustainable development of the
community and livelihood so that the benefits can be
continuously reaped even after the project ends.
Datu Raymond Moron, Datu Moron clarified if another Certificate of Precondition is Mr. Raymond Mr. Deguerro referred to the NCIP statement that if the
IP Sector required from the company since the CP obtained before is for Deguerro, EMB-13 original CP only refered to the nickel laterite project,
the nickel laterite operations. then it has to be amended.
Mr. Jonathan
Bañez, API CRO Mr. Bañez reiterated that CADT 092 is very far from
Manager CADT 237, and the project is only covered by the latter.
With regards to the CP, he added that the CP and the
MOA did not specified a particular mineral but instead
mentioned “all minerals”.
Mr. Narciso Dela Sala Mr. Dela Sala clarified if the TIFFA will be receiving other share Ms. Jesalyn Ms. Guingguingg mentioned that this can be for further
Officer, Tinigbasan aside from the SDMP, since most of the people from Brgy. Guingguingg, API discussion and may be included as part of the agreement
Farmers and Fisherfolks Tinigbasan are members of TIFFA. MEPEO Manager with the Brgy. Tinigbasan LGU.
Association (TIFFA)
Mr. Carlito Belleza Mr. Belleza reiterated the need to prioritize residents from Brgy. Ms. Jesalyn Ms. Guingguingg noted this request.
representative of Senior Tinigbasan in the project hiring, being the promary impact Guingguingg, API
Citizens of Brgy. community. MEPEO Manager
Tinigbasan
Mr. Flores Mr. Flores expressed he is hopeful that the technical skills Mr. Jonathan Mr. Bañez noted the request and mentioned that the
training can start soon so the people of Brgy. Tinigbasan can be Bañez, API CRO company will start to look for trainings that can be
prepared to apply soon. Manager offered for the community by the following year.

Executive Summary
Public Hearing Activity
In compliance to the guidelines specified in DAO 2017-15 on Public Participation under the Philippine
EIS System, a Public Hearing Activity was conducted thru a combined on-site physical and offsite virtual
attendance via Zoom Conference on January 29, 2021 at the E&G Convention Center, Cabadbaran
City in Agusan del Norte. This activity aims to provide a venue for efficient exchange of information and
views between the proponent and the stakeholders, relative to the proposed amendment to increase
the annual production rate.
Due to the current pandemic situation and community quarantine protocols, the venue was chosen to
accommodate maximum of 500 participants considering the health protocols. The event was attended
by 112 participants on-site and 15 participants virtually from the host community, local government
agencies, barangay and municipal government, and various sectors, including the church, women
organization, youth, IP groups, local fishermen and fisherfolks organization, DepEd representative
attended the activity. Also present were the representatives from DENR-EMB Central Office, EMB-
CARAGA EIA Section Chief and Atty. Delmer Riparip, Legal Counsel of who served as the Public
Hearing Officer.
The proponent presented a brief description of the proposed project, vis–à–vis the limestone mining in
the adjacent existing nickel laterite project, and the findings from the EIA Study conducted. This was
followed by the open forum.
The majority of the raised concerns cited by the stakeholders are about the company’s social
development programs, specifically on the skills, employment opportunities, educational, and medical
assistance to the community. Generally, the stakeholders have no major concerns on the project and
the corresponding environmental impacts presented by the proponed had yield social acceptability. The
proponent assures that programs implemented during the nickel laterite project will also be done in the
limestone project.
A summary of the issues and concerns raised by the community, as well as the proponent response is
presented in Table E-11 below. Documentation of the Public Hearing, including the dissemination of
Public Notice is included in Annex F.

Executive Summary
Table E-11Summary of Issues and Concerns- Public Hearing Activity for Agata Limestone Project
CADT#237 CADT#237 representative Datu Raymond Moron said that Ms. Jesalyn This was duly noted by AMVI.
Representative - Datu the question he meant to ask was already answered during Guingguingg, API
Mapaso Raymond B. the Public Scoping of the ALP last year. He also meant to ask MEPEO Manager
Moron a follow-up question to EnP, Jesalyn Guingguing, regarding
their MOA and the Certificate of Precondition they issued and
along with their discussion and agreement with Mr. Jonathan
Bañez that they would provide a supplemental MOA for the
new limestone project.
TIFFA Representative TIFFA Representative, Mr. Prudencio Gayo asked a question Mr. Jonathan Mr. Jojo Bañez - CRO Manager, responded that SDMP
– Prudencio Gayo addressed to Mr. Jojo Bañez - CRO Manager regarding the Bañez, API CRO cannot have cash advances because the MGB is one
SDMP, if they could have a cash advance to be used for the Manager approving the budget. He instead recommended Mr.
purchase of a water truck for which they will use until the end Gayo to present a one-time, big-time project to be
of the limestone operations which they then will convert to a endorsed by the company for MGBs approval.
passenger vehicle.
LAFFA Representative LAFFA Representative – Mr. Edgard Capon, expressed his Mr. Jonathan Mr. Jojo Bañez - CRO Manager responded that Lawigan,
– Edgar Capon concern over future employment for Lawigan residents being Bañez, API CRO as a secondary impact barangay as stated in their MOA,
at a disadvantage over Tinigbasan residents because the Manager also has a share in employment opportunities.
limestone project directly impacts Tinigbasan.
Ms. Jesalyn EnP. Jesalyn Guingguing of TMEPEO also eased his
Guingguingg, API fears of lower employment rates stating that just because
MEPEO Manager nickel operations will end, does not mean jobs will follow,
she explained that there is still big work to be done during
the laterite operations' final rehabilitation and start of the
new limestone project especially in Lawigan because
they are part of the FMRDP.
EnP. Jesalyn Guingguing, replied that some areas in the

Mr. Edgard Capon asked a follow up question if the on-going laterite operations are going through final rehab, and an
rehab is the final one. official map will be released soon.

Executive Summary
Table E-11 Summary of Issues and Concerns- Public Scoping Hearing for Agata Limestone Project (continued)
Mr. Edgard Capon expressed that he does not believe it to be Ms. Jesalyn EnP. Jesalyn Guingguing, responded that those areas
the final rehab referring to eyewitness accounts and his own Guingguingg, API that they saw are still undergoing mine operations, so it
opinion. MEPEO Manager is not final, but there is a final rehabilitated area that
she assured is more beautiful and greener than the rest
Brgy. Tinigbasan Kagawad Richard of Tinigbasan expressed his support of the Mr. Jonathan This is Duly Noted by AMVI.
Representative – Kag. project given that his only condition as a representative of Bañez, API CRO
Richard O. Agbao Tinigbasan is that whatever was written in the MOA will be Manager
delivered well.
Brgy. Captain Lawigan Brgy. Lawigan representative expressed his support for the Mr. Jonathan This is duly noted by AMVI.
– Hon. Nilo Mordeno project and thanks to everyone involved in the public hearing. Bañez, API CRO
Manager
Ms. Jesalyn
Guingguingg, API
MEPEO Manager
Tubay LGU Tubay LGU Representative expressed his joy over seeing Ms. Jesalyn This is ackonwledged by AMVI
Representative – SB representatives of the barangays and LGUs in attendance and Guingguingg, API
Rodrigo Calumba said his thanks to AMVI for being an example of responsible MEPEO Manager
mining. He also brought up his good experience as part of the
ocular survey team for the limestone project that got the
recommendation of DENR.
St. Anne Parish of Ms. Corazon Vertido, a representative from St. Anne Parish Ms. Jesalyn EnP. Jesalyn Guingguing, responded that the
Santiago of Santiago asked what skills are needed in the project so the Guingguingg, API methodology of limestone mining is very similar to
Representative – affected barangays can better prepare for the employment MEPEO Manager nickel mining, so the same set of skills are needed for
Corazon Vertido opportunities. the new operations such as heavy equipment operators
and electricians for the crushing plant while the rest
would be non-skilled positions.
She also assured that as part of the SDMP project,

extra attention is given to the development of skills
through TESDA training, something that is already
being done in the laterite project and will be replicated
in the limestone project.

Executive Summary
LGU-Tubay A virtual question from Tubay LGU Representative asked if Ms. Jesalyn EnP. Jesalyn Guingguing, responded that there will be
Representative – there is separate MMT for the limestone project. Guingguingg, API a separate MMT because this is a separate project.
Fausto Winston Dela MEPEO Manager
Cena
From Zoom Virtual

Conference
DepEd Representative DepEd representative-Egbert Miron expressed his thanks for Ms. Jesalyn Mr. Jonathan Bañez and EnP, Jesalyn Guingguing,
– Egbert Miron, the continuous support of Agata in the education sector and Guingguingg, API said that the support of the company through SDMP is
Tinigbasan National explained that the Tinigbasan Elementary and Highschool are MEPEO Manager being done every year and the company is open for
High School about to be accredited by SVM and to achieve this, they discussions with the Brgy. Tinigbasan council and
would need a repair of their classrooms and facilities. DepEd to pursue the request.
Mr. Jonathan
Bañez, API CRO
Manager
Senior Citizen’s President Carlito expressed his strong opinion that the SDMP Mr. Jonathan This is duly noted by AMVI
Chapter – Carlito budget for senior citizens is too little and asked for a bigger Bañez, API CRO
Belleza (President) share of the budget because of a growing number of senior Manager
citizens in their barangay.
Women's Organization President Antiga expressed their support for the project and Ms. Jesalyn This was acknowledged by AMVI.
Representative – had no questions assuring the panel that they understood Guingguingg, API
Neneil C. Antiga everything and will be waiting on the project with big hopes. MEPEO Manager
(President)
Provincial LGU A representative from the Provincial LGU of Agusan del Norte Ms. Jesalyn This is duly noted by AMVI
(Agusan del Norte) expressed their thanks and their support of the project and Guingguingg, API
Representative – Adela what they understood from the presentation, they said the MEPEO Manager
G. Antiga company's objectives are clear and part of their commitment
to the company is to help monitor these objectives along with
the communities and the LGUs. As he also observed, Agata
Mining practices responsible mining.

Executive Summary
DENR Caraga – Forester Mike Montalban praised the transparency practices of Ms. Jesalyn This was acknowledged by AMVI
Forester Mike the company and expressed his support for the project. He also Guingguingg, API
Montalban has a suggestion for the barangay to be trained in dispute MEPEO Manager
resolutions to avoid small problems that can be handled by the
local barangay from reaching the AMVI management.
LGU Tubay – Coastal road from Lawigan going to Tubay is ongoing. They Ms. Jesalyn EnP, Jesalyn Guingguing, EME said that the company
Representative asked if their activity would hamper the company’s project. Guingguingg, API knows where provincial road is located and
MEPEO Manager that it will be part of the company’s planning. For the
*Virtual Question proponent to know for the appropriate plan to execute,
the company’s engineers will be sitting down with the
Municipal Engineers of Tubay, so both parties could plan
together so that both projects will not be obstructed.
Minutes of the meeting undertaken after the public

hearing activity to address this concern is also attached
in ANNEX F.
DENR Caraga – Sam Mr. Malayao expressed their excitement over the project and Ms. Jesalyn This was acknowledged by AMVI
Malayao hopes that all conditions during the conduct of the operation and Guingguingg, API
permits required by the governing agencies will be complied by MEPEO Manager
the company.
Mr. Jonathan
Bañez, API CRO
Manager
LGU-Tubay Vice Mayor Will there be installation of Processing plant. Ms. Jesalyn EnP. Jesalyn Guingguing, explained that processing
– Hon. Raquim Cuyos Guingguingg, API plant will be installed since this will be needed in
MEPEO Manager limestone production. She concluded that the process
Question from Zoom plant is included in the ECC component.
Conference
NCIP Representative - NCIP commented on the status of their Certificate of Mr. Jonathan This was acknowledged by AMVI.
Edgielit Pajarillo/ NCIP Precondition for the project that was already issued and Bañez, API CRO
Santiago OIC expressed that as long as the IPs give their consent and Manager
support to the project, there is no problem. NCIP
Representative also said that they look forward to the drafting
and signing of the supplemental MOA requested by the
community..

Executive Summary
LGU Tubay – Mr. Mr. Gilbert of Tubay LGU asked a question regarding the Mr. Jonathan EnP. Jesalyn Guingguing, and Mr. Jojo Bañez - CRO
Gilbert Lague programs within the SDMP if medical and educational Bañez, API CRO Manager, assured him that these programs are already
programs are part of the program. Manager being done in the nickel laterite project and will be done
in the limestone project.
Ms. Jesalyn
Guingguingg, API
MEPEO Manager
Narciso Dela Sala – IFI A question from the public forum raised to the ComRel Mr. Jonathan Mr. Jojo Bañez - CRO Manager, responded that any
Religious Sector manager, Mr. Dela Sala, asked if the company has any CSR Bañez, API CRO humanitarian program outside the SDMP is considered
Representative programs. Manager a CSR.
Brgy. Tinigbasan Hon. Abgao asked if the company can provide an ambulance Ms. Jesalyn Mr. Jojo Bañez - CRO Manager, responded that the
Kagawad – Kagawad for the barangay for emergency purposes. Guingguingg, API company has an ambulance that can be used in
Richard Abgao MEPEO Manager emergency situations and to which Ms. Jessalyn
supplemented that it is stated in the MOA between
AMVI and the barangay that the ambulance and other
Mr. Jonathan company vehicles can be used in cases of emergency.
Bañez, API CRO He also provided his contact number when asked by
Manager the kagawad.

Executive Summary
E.3 EIA Summary
E.3.1 Project Alternatives
There are no alternatives identified for the project site location as it was determined by the setting of
the deposit. The processing facility was strategically chosen to be situated near the mineralized area to
minimize the hauling distance from quarry to plant facility. Moreover, the chosen site is also near the
causeway, where the loading activities will be performed, minimizing handling and hauling cost. There
are also no siting alternatives considered for the auxiliary facilities as most of them are existing facilities
of the ANLP and will be continuously used during ALP operations.
The project siting, water, and power source considerations are summarized in Table E-11.
Table E-10 Project Siting and Resource Alternatives

Component Alternatives Decision Criteria
• Agata North Laterite Project (ANLP) is
Alternative 1: Nickel Laterite ongoing; Nickel Laterite deposit is near
Deposits depletion.
• Gold deposits within the MPSA boundary
Alternative 2: Gold and Copper are currently deemed not economically
Deposits feasible to mine.
• Further exploration work is needed.
Ore Resource
Alternative 3: Limestone Deposit • The limestone deposit is found to be a
(selected) high-grade resource of CaCO 3 /CaO.
• Project can promote continuity of
employment opportunities for the
community after the ANLP ends.
• Project can supplement the demand for
aggregates and cement industries in
Mindanao and nearby regions.
• Location of the limestone ore deposit.
• Site is considered with low flood
Payongpayong, Brgy. Tinigbasan, susceptibility but with high landslide
Mine Site
Tubay (selected) susceptibility according to the Mines and
Geosciences Bureau; therefore, ground
stability techniques should be utilized.
• Identified location of the stockpile area.

Alternative 1: Flat area north of
• Location far from the causeway,
deposit
increasing hauling costs.
Crushing Plant Site
• Location is near relative to both the
Alternative 2: Northwest of deposit deposit and the causeway.
(selected) • Streamlining the transport of ore from
mining to product delivery.
• Current ANLP project is tapping ANECO
Power Alternative 1: Local grid
for the power source.
(selected, main)
• ALP can expand the existing
Resource Utilization
infrastructures up to the crushing plant.
(Power)
Power Alternative 2: Generator sets • Generator sets will be used in case of
(selected, secondary) power interruptions or as additional source
of power.

Executive Summary
Table E-11 Project Siting and Resource Alternatives (continued)
• Payongpayong Creek will be the source of
Water Alternative 1: Payongpayong
freshwater for water lorries and Land Craft
creek (selected)
Resource Utilization Transport (LCT)
(Water) • Payton Creek will be the source of water
Water Alternative 2: Payton Creek
for the campsite/ domestic water
(selected)
requirements.
For the mining method, quarrying which is the most widely accepted method on limestone deposit
recovery is selected. Crushing and screening will also be carried out to produce the desired sizes of
limestone products. The method and technology selection criteria are summarized in Table E-12 below.
Table E-12 Technology and Process Alternatives

• The geology and mineralization within
the area is shallow and suggests a
Surface Mining (Quarrying) surface mining approach following
Mining Method
(selected) technical and economic considerations.
There is no other method considered
given this type of deposit.
• This blasting method is still unproven.
Alternative 1: Electrohydraulic
• Requires large amount of water and
blasting
power utilization.
• Site is not considered an area
susceptible to liquefaction according to
Blasting Alternative 2: Conventional rock PHILVOCS.
blasting (selected) • Controlled blasting to be implemented to
minimize effects of noise, vibrations and
dust.
Alternative 3: Dozer ripping (or no • Ripping will be done when competence
blasting) of the ore will not require blasting.
• Jaw crusher is a commonly used primary
Crusher Alternative 1: Jaw crusher crusher and is best suited for high
hardness rocks.
Comminution • Impact crusher is used to minimize
Crusher alternative 2: Impact production of unwanted fine products.
crusher (selected) • Impact crushers have higher crushing
efficiency than jaw crushers.
E.3.2 Summary of Baseline Characterization
The summary of the baseline data for the Agata Limestone Project is presented within this section. The
baseline characterization focuses on the existing environmental and social conditions relative to the
land, water, air and noise, and people resources.
The majority of the baseline information is from the latest monitoring data of the ongoing Agata Nickel
Project considering that the proposed limestone project will be situated in the same area as the nickel
operations, and that some of the existing facilities will be continuously utilized in the proposed project.
Supplemental information is gathered as necessary, through in-house monitoring, third party
consultants, and data from government agencies, both local and national.

Executive Summary
E.3.2.1 Land Resources
A. Land Use
The project is in the coastal Municipality of Tubay, Agusan del Norte with a total land area of 13,800
hectares and constitutes 5.06% of Agusan del Norte's total area. The urban area covers 2.97% of the
total area, while the rural areas cover the dominant 97.03%. The municipality has 13 barangays, with
the primary impact area in Barangay Tinigbasan while the secondary impact area includes Barangay
Lawigan.
The Agata Limestone Project area is generally characterized by three ecosystem types; forest over
ultramafic rocks, tropical lowland evergreen rain forest and plantations. The ultramafic forest is the
primary vegetation type with only a few tall and large trees. The tropical lowland evergreen forest is
found in patches throughout the Project area and may be remnants of the vegetation that previously
existed. The forest patches are generally found along the ridges and the streams/valleys within the
Project area.
Based on the 2019 Land Classification Map from PENRO Agusan del Norte and the Forest Land
Classification Map from the community, the location of the Agata Limestone Project is classified as
Timber Land-Production Forest. This type is defined as areas of forest lands that can be made available
for timber and agroforestry production, range lands for grazing, and other forest lands special uses. In
terms of the land and forest cover, the largest portion of the Project area is agricultural land planted
with either annual or perennial crops.
B. Geology and Geomorphology
The Project site is largely underlain by the Cretaceous basement rocks of the Humandum Serpentinite
and the Concepcion Greenschist. The former, believed to be a dismembered part of the Dinagat
Ophiolite, is found in thrust contact with the latter and other metamorphic rocks. Humandum
Serpentinite rocks include peridotite, pyroxenite, dunite, serpentinite and minor distribution of gabbro.
On the other hand, Concepcion Greenschist is an interbedded metasedimentary and metavolcanic
sequence. Within the metasedimentary succession are calcareous layers where the recrystallized
limestone deposit is located.
There are several styles of mineralization that occur on the Agata property. These include Au oxide
mineralization in saprolite that is developed over shallowly-buried intrusions, Cu and Au mineralization
associated with quartz veinlet and pyritic stockworks along the margins of monzonitic to dioritic plutons,
Au associated with horizons of disseminated pyrite in sooty carbonaceous limestones, and nickel
mineralization generated by surficial zones of nickel enrichment in laterites that are developed on
ultramafic protoliths.
The limestone deposit is compact and is situated in a single ridge located at Payongpayong area. This
setting conveniently limits the excavated area within 52-hectares at most. The quarry will also have an
additional 14.94-hectare buffer area around the 52-hectare excavation to allow for noise and vibration
effects to be minimized, if not eliminated. The steep slopes at the Payongpayong ridge will be
transformed into moderate, benched terrains that will be engineered to reduce susceptibility to
landslides and erosions.
Geologic hazard assessments done for the Project area focused on six risk categories; tectonic
characteristics, regional seismicity, fault ruptures, liquefaction potential, landslides and flood hazards.

Executive Summary
Due to the location of the project area within a seismically active area, the risks associated with potential
earth movement are the highest and of most concern.
The Project area is located within a seismically active region characterized by the close proximity of
the Philippine Fault Zone. Consequently, the northern Mindanao region, including the Agusan and
Surigao Provinces is susceptible to earthquake generated by the Philippine Trench and its related
subduction zone structures, and by the Philippine Fault System and its associated structures. The
western traces of the Lake Mainit Fault bound the eastern side of Malimono Ridge, making the area
prone to strike-slip earthquakes.
The area around Malimono Ridge and the whole Agusan Valley has been host to a number of
destructive earthquakes in the past. The proximity of the Philippine Fault to within a 2 km distance
from the Project area presents a risk of a potentially large magnitude earthquake occurring in the
future. The Philippine Trench is another source of earthquakes that would likely affect offshore
Mindanao. When the epicenters move inland, these earthquakes tend to be of deeper hypo central
depths due to the inclination of the subduction zone.
The rupture hazard may arise during large earthquakes, with the ground being displaced along the
fault that causes the seismic event. The hazard of rupture therefore is centered, expected along the
trace of the active fault. In the case of the Project area, this hazard can be sited on the trace of the
Philippine Fault along the western edge of the valley located east of the Project site.
Landslides that may accompany intense seismic shaking can potentially occur along steep slopes,
particularly in areas where thick soil or deposits of loose rocks may be present. This threat may
also be present during intense rainfall events, when the soil is saturated with water, and when pore
pressures from water percolating into the ground may render some areas unstable. Ground slopes within
the Project area range from flat to greater than 50%. Based on the earthquake triggered landslide map
from Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB), the Project site is moderate to highly susceptible to
landslides.
Based on the same map from MGB, the prospect area is not considered as flood prone. However, the
coastlines of Sitio Payong-payong were mapped to be prone to storm surges.
C. Pedology
Three (3) soil types and seven (7) soil mapping units were identified and mapped within the MPSA area.
The three (3) soil types consisted of the Malalag clay loam, the Kabatohan sandy clay loam and the
Umigan clay loam. Ground slopes within the Project area range from flat to greater than 50%. Both
the Malalag and Kabatohan soil types can be found on slopes within this range. The Payongpayong
limestone site is part of the Malalag Clay loam at 30-50% slopes and is considered an area with high
susceptibility to erosion.
D. Terrestrial Ecology
Based on a Terrestrial Flora and Fauna Assessment conducted within the limestone quarry project site
and within the adjacent watershed in Brgy. Tinigbasan, the Project area is generally characterized by
three ecosystem types; forest over ultramafic rocks, tropical lowland evergreen rain forest and
plantations. The ultramafic forest is the primary vegetation type with only a few tall and large trees. The
tropical lowland evergreen forest is found in patches throughout the Project area and may be remnants
of the vegetation that previously existed. The forest patches are generally found along the ridges and
the streams/valleys within the Project area.

Executive Summary
The assessment of plants recorded a total of 206 species belonging to 78 families and 145 genera. The
most represented plant families were Moraceae, followed by Arecaceae and Fabaceae and,
Euphorbiaceae and Anacardiaceae. When plants are grouped according to plant habit, results revealed
that trees and shrubs had the highest number of species among the group. A total of 150 individual
trees consisting of 40 species were observed. Vitex parviflora (Tugas), Adinandra robinsonii (Sagimsim)
and Radermachera whitfordii (Magasili) obtained the highest importance value in limestone site while
in Tinigbasan watershed, Artocarpus blancoi (Antipolo), Paraserianthes falcataria (Falcata) and
Gmelina arborea (Gmelina) dominated the area. In terms of important flora species, there were seven
(7) vulnerable, eight (8) endangered and one (1) critically endangered species recorded.
The faunal environment within the survey area is also diverse, observed with a total of five (5) species
of anurans, three (3) species of reptiles, 31 species of birds, and eight (8) species of mammals. Most
of the species identified are categorized from least concern to near threatened.
E.3.2.2 Water Resources
A. Hydrology and Hydrogeology
The Agata Limestone Project is in the catchment of Payongpayong Creek and the road system towards
project site, affecting the Tinagbasan Creek. The drainage basin is bound by a natural topographic and
geologic divide which separate one drainage area or watershed from the other. The drainage basin
supplies water to streams and their tributaries. Streams are classified based on consistency of flows,
namely: perennial, intermittent and ephemeral stream.
The Municipality Tubay depend mainly on springs and creeks for their domestic water requirements.
These water sources are typically located higher than the communities they serve. Concrete spring
boxes and small dams are used to store the water while galvanized iron (GI), polyethylene (PE) and
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes connected to these structures convey the water by gravity to Level 2 and
Level 3 water systems.
B. Oceanography
A localized bathymetric survey was done in the Payongpayong Port location prior to its construction in
Year 2014. The bottom profile showed a gradual bathymetric change from the shore to the 250-meter
length of the causeway. Beds of subtidal boulders or less rough textured rocks and/or large stones with
growths of algae which cover the surface of the rock are a common feature of the first 20 meters
offshore.
After this region is a fringing coral reef in poor to fair condition (20 to 130m away from shore with a
depth range of 1.0 to 6.0m). Sandy substrates make up the remainder of the sea bottom (130 to 250 m
away from the shore with a depth range of 6 to 18m). Much of its surface is covered by a very thin sheet
of silt and mud. The deposited sediment is loosely packed and is highly re-suspendable with only little
disturbance.
C. Water Quality
Water quality sampling and testing is performed internally by the Environment Department at 32
locations as part of the quarterly Multipartite Monitoring Team activity of the nickel project. Out of this
water sampling stations, six stations are within the affected watershed of the Project. These locations
include Downstream Payongpayong Creek, Tinigbasan Creek Confluence of Tributaries, Sitio

Executive Summary
Payongpayong Water Source, Brgy. Tinigbasan Water Source, Payongpayong Coastal Area and the
Tinigbasan Coastal Area.
Water quality monitoring activities include in-situ measurement of physical parameters such as pH,
turbidity, and temperature. Laboratory analysis of chemical parameters include Nitrate, Phosphate, DO,
Ammonia, Fluoride, surfactants, arsenic, cadmium, lead, iron, manganese, total suspended solids, oil
and grease, BOD. The laboratory testing is done by accredited third party laboratories. Bacteriological
testing is also done to determine fecal and total coliform levels.
Results of the surface water testing indicated general compliance with DAO 2016-08 for Class C water
quality standards, except in upstream reforestation, Mantiwas Creek and in Midstream Kalinawan River,
which showed high fecal coliform level above the 200 MPN/ 100 mL DAO 2016-08 standard. The
baseline data collected for these stations in year 2012 already shown elevated coliform levels, which
can be attributed to the human activities, natural decomposition process, and faunal manure deposits
observed during the investigation conducted by the Environment Department. These stations of
concern however, are not within the affected watershed of the project.
All parameters tested for drinking water sampling stations are within the prescribed standards of DAO
2016-08 and meet the AO 2010-010 “Philippine National Standard for Drinking Waters”, except for the
exceedance detected for the fecal coliform in all sampling stations. The drinking water stations do not
have any water treatment facility in place and is open to contamination. The community near the
affected stream was informed of these findings. The concerned barangays have coordinated with the
municipal government on the disinfection of the local water sources. In fact, barangay Tinigbasan have
started using Reverse Osmosis facility to treat and provide clean drinking water to the community.
Barangay Lawigan on the other hand, have a new water source but is not within the scope of the project.
All parameters tested for marine water showed compliance to applicable DAO 2016-08 Marine Water
Quality standard.
D. Freshwater Ecology
The freshwater biological sampling within Payong-payong Creek and Tinigbasan Creek conducted in
July 2020 recorded a total of 18 aquatic macroinvertebrates from 10 families. Majority of the organisms
belong to Phylum Arthropoda which was largely dominated by the Gerridae family.
Water quality index (WQI) is also determined based on the presence of indicator species for
sensitivity/tolerance to pollution. Comparison of WQI values between the two creeks studied indicated
better WQI in Payongpayong Creek, which is based on its WQI value, can be categorized under very
clean water. This is compared to Tinigbasan Creek which fall within the rather clean- clean water range.
E. Marine Ecology
The latest third-party coral monitoring survey conducted in May 2019 within the vicinity of the Payong-
payong Port area and the coral relocation site in Tinigbasan Sanctuary indicated a relatively good to
fair coral cover. Lateritic soil was not observed on the rocky and sandy bottom of the nearshore shallow
reef, south of the pier facility. The encrusting or foliate coral Pavona decussata and the massive/ sub-
massive Porites spp were the most predominant form in the reef area. Individual colonies of these coral
species are still very much intact and in an apparent healthy condition with normal coloration and
pigmentation.
The corals within the study area are being threatened by both natural and human-induced disturbances.
Potential source of stresses and disturbances that were identified during the monitoring period included

Executive Summary
turbidity and siltation, accidental bumping of corals by tugboats and barges, infestation of crown-of-
thorns starfish Acanthaster planci and storm damage.
The survey also looked at the reef fish communities. A total of 140 species belonging to 31 families,
with were recorded at the sampling stations. The damselfishes (Pomacentridae) are observed as the
dominant species in the coral reefs.
Visual census of macroinvertebrates while scuba diving recorded a total of 19 macroinvertebrate

species/taxa that are classified under seven (7) major faunal groups. The tiny reef ascidian Clavelina
sp. and the green ascidian/sea squirt Didemnum sp. were the most common and abundant
macroinvertebrates found in the study area. This was followed by the blue starfish Linckia laevigata,
and the ink-spot sea squirt/ascidian Polycarpa aurata.
E.3.2.3 Air Resources, Noise, and Climate
A. Meteorology and Climatology
The Project area is located within a Type II climate zone as defined by the Modified Coronas Climate
Classification developed by the Philippines Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services
Administration (PAGASA). This particular climate type is characterized by an absence of a dry season.
Rainfall occurs throughout the year with the heaviest rainfall occurring during the months of December
and January.
The mean annual rainfall (1981-2010) at the PAGASA-Butuan Station is 2,058 mm with the period of
October to February being the wettest months. The company maintains its own rain gauges and are
installed at the nickel mine area and another one at the port area in Payong-payong. The mean annual
rainfall recorded at the surface mine site for the five-year period record is 204.66 mm. A slightly lower
precipitation trend was observed at the Payongpayong Port area with annual mean rainfall of 139.79
mm. In both stations, January was observed as the wettest month, while April and May were the driest
months.
The temperature records of the PAGASA Butuan City Station indicate a relatively warm annual average
temperature of 32.2°C(max), 23.4°C(min) and an annual mean of 27.8°C. May, June and August are
the hottest months, while January is the coldest.
B. Air and Noise Quality
Third party monitoring of ambient air and noise were conducted by Berkman Systems Inc. as part of
the quarterly monitoring for ANLP. Included among the stations monitored are the Payong-payong area
and at the Brgy. Tinigbasan community which are both covered within the identified impact area for the
ALP. Results for both stations indicated that the TSP and PM-10 levels detected are in compliance to
the applicable ambient air standards. Morning noise level at the station in Brgy. Tinigbasan slightly
exceeded the noise standard which can be attributed to its location being near a population center.

Executive Summary
E.3.2.3 People
A. Community Profile
The impact area where Project activities will be implemented is in Brgy. Tinigbasan, Municipality of
Tubay. The neighboring community that hosts the support facilities is Brgy. of Lawigan, also within the
municipal jurisdiction of Tubay. Each barangay has a population of around 1,000 individuals and each
with nearly 200 households. The majority of the local inhabitants within and surrounding the Project
area are of Visayan heritage. The area is also the home of the Mamanwa-Manobo indigenous peoples.
In most recent times migrants from the Visayas and Luzon Province s have settled in the area due to
the economic opportunities brought about by the current mining operations.
In terms of educational attainment, only a small percentage of the population was able to complete
tertiary education, around 5%-6% in both impact barangays. More than a third of the population at least
attended primary schooling.
The two (2) mining impact barangay are located along the coastline. For this reason, a good number of
families depend on fishing as their major source of income. Barangays Tinigbasan and Lawigan has an
average production of 17.1 tonnes of fish per year. Livestock raising is also practiced. The current nickel
mining operations is also one of the big employers for labor workers.
Leading causes of mortality among the impact communities vary across municipalities. In Barangays
Lawigan and Tinigbasan, they are infection, pneumonia, hypertension, tuberculosis, and acute
gastroenteritis. There are health care facility and health care workers catering to the health care needs
of the community.
All households of the two (2) impact barangays have access to toilets and safe drinking water. Most of
the water are distributed via a Level II water system of communal source for 2-3 household units. All
barangays of Municipality of Tubay are adequately served with power supply, mainly provided by the
Agusan del Norte Electric Cooperative (ANECO). Communication services is provided through six (6)
cellular sites present in the Tubay municipality.
B. Perception Survey
The Community Relations Office commissioned a group of researchers to conduct a Project Perception
Survey to assess the social acceptability of the proposed development and operation of ALP. A total of
192 residents from the two impact barangays responded to the survey conducted in February 2020.
More than half or 71% of the participants expressed positive acceptance for an extended mining
operation through the Agata Limestone Project. Positive response was accounted from both of the
barangays. The most direct reason given by the participants for favoring the extension is the economic
opportunities from the mining industry.
Most of the survey respondents agreed to the idea that there will be an overall improvement if the mining
activity will continue to operate in the area. Majority cited improvement in education through the
company’s educational assistance program. Other perceived benefits cited are API’s contribution to the
local disaster risk reduction and response management, livelihood opportunities, and health benefits.

Executive Summary
Respondents who answered no expressed their apprehensions on the possible risks that could be
aggravated by mining activities particularly on the environment, health, and geological aspect.
Some also noted that they don’t think the project will provide them with employment opportunities.
E.3.3 Summary of Key Impacts and Environmental Management Plan
A summary of the key impacts and management plan of API for the Construction and Development
Phase, Operations Phase and Abandonment Phase of the Project is summarized Table E-13.

Executive Summary
Table E-13 Summary of Impact Management Plan

Management Plan for Prevention,
Potential Impacts Project Phase/ Activity Target Efficiency
Mitigation and Enhancement
1. Change in surface landform, 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Engineering design to prevent slope • Mine Design Criteria:
topography, terrain and slope. Earthwork. failure. o Bench Height - 25m
2. Construction of Additional • Proper benching. o Berm Width (Safety Catchment) - 5m
Roads. • Establishment of proper drainage to o Overall Slope Angle - 60 Degree
3. Pre stripping activities at the prevent erosion and scouring.
quarry site. • Reshaping and recontouring of mined
4. Clearing and Grubbing out areas.
5. Ore Extraction, Loading, and • Application of Thematic landscaping in • Accomplish at least 90% of the quarterly
Hauling the progressive rehabilitation of improve rehabilitation target following contour planting and
the aesthetic view of the modified land thematic landscaping design.
form.
• Topsoil conservation, storage, and • At least 60% of the Removed Topsoil will be stored
management. for future Utilization.
• There is no overburden to strip,
however, any incidental topsoil would
be removed and stockpiled for future
use.
6. Construction of Crushing Plant • Limited clearing and earth movement • At least 90% Completion of Structure Construction
and other Facilities. according to the approved Mine Within 6 Months.
Development Plan; phasing of activities • Limit disturbance to not more than 60 ha during
(if possible). Quarry Operations.
• Plant design and specifications will be thorough
prior to actual construction and commissioning. The
design of the plant and other facilities will be subject
to required review and approval of the regulators
(DENR) prior to construction and operation.
7. Drilling • Contract an Accredit Third Party • Drilling Parameters:
Contractor to Conduct Drilling Activity. o Bench height 5 m
o Drill depth 5.8 m
• Follow the prescribed drilling o Hole diameter 89.00 mm
specifications. o Burden 3.60 m
o Spacing 4.20 m
o Sub-drill 0.80 m
o Stem height 2.70 m
o Charge length 2.30 m
o Ratio of HE to LE 20% to 30%

Executive Summary
1. Change in surface landform, 8. Blasting • Contract an Accredited Third Party to • Blasting Parameters:
topography, terrain and slope. Conduct Drilling and Blasting Activity o Ammonium Nitrate with Fuel Oil (ANFO)
o Cast Primer 250 gms
• Follow the prescribed blasting o NONEL Surface Connector x 6 metres
specifications. o In-hole delay, 500ms x 12 metres
o Detonating Cords, 6 grams
• Implementation of controlled blasting Cast Primer 250 gms
techniques such as single hole firing, o NONEL Surface Connector x 6 metres
trim blast, and pre-splits. o In-hole delay, 500ms x 12 metres
o Detonating Cords, 6 grams
1. Structure Decommissioning • Follow safety bench and slope • Design Parameters for Safety of Slopes:
2. Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed parameters in post mining landform. o Bench Height: 25 m
Areas o Berm Width (Safety Catchment): 5m
o Overall Slope Angle: 45 degrees
• Follow contour planting and thematic • Accomplish at least 90% of the quarterly
landscaping. rehabilitation target following contour planting
design.
2. Loss of vegetation, topsoil, and 1. Site Preparation Clearing and • Limited clearing and earth movement • At least 90% Completion of Structure Construction
exposure of soil materials Earthwork according to the approved Mine Within 6 Months.
2. Pre stripping activities at the quarry Development Plan; phasing of activities
site. (if possible). • Limit disturbance to not more than 60 ha during
3. Construction of Additional Roads Quarry Operations.
4. Construction of Crushing Plant and
other facilities.
• Plant design and specifications will be thorough
5. Clearing and Grubbing
prior to actual construction and commissioning.
6. Ore Extraction, Loading and
The design of the plant and other facilities will be
Hauling
subject to required review and approval of the
regulators (DENR) prior to construction and
operation.
• Recover at least 10% representatives of each

• Earth balling and transplanting of viable
regenerations. species to be removed.
• Establishment of forest reserve pockets • Establish at least 1-hectare forest reserve within the
or buffer zone within the influence area project site.
where native species are preserved.

Executive Summary
Management Plan for Prevention, Target Efficiency

Potential Impacts Project Phase/ Activity
• Application of high-quality seedling • Produce at least 30% of the total seedling
propagation such non mist cloning and requirement for reforestation.
bioremediation.
• Application of soil erosion control such • Establish 50% slope stabilization measures within
installation of fascines and wattling and the covered area.
plantation hedgerows along the slope.
• Topsoil conservation, storage, and • Recover at least 80% of the topsoil cover for
management. rehabilitation.
3. Disturbance of Flora and 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Provision of Buffer Zones. • Maintenance of buffer zone of at least 25 meters
Fauna: Loss of terrestrial Earthwork away from project periphery.
biodiversity 2. Construction of Additional Roads • Establish at least 1-hectare forest reserve within
the project site.
other Facilities.
4. Pre stripping activities at the • Develop / Enhance a forest land in adjacent buffer
quarry site. zone to recreate an ecological balance.
• Collection of wildlings prior to vegetation • Collect at least 10% representative of each specie
clearing for endemic plant species type per mine parcel
preservation. • Establish a minimum of 1 nursery and/or satellite
nursery in support of the reforestation program.
• Landscaping and revegetation activities. • Accomplish at least 90% of the quarterly

rehabilitation target following contour planting and
thematic landscaping design.
• Replace all affected vegetation with
• Planting of at least 80% native or indigenous
diverse vegetative species to contribute
species.
a stable and compatible ecosystem in
the progressive rehabilitation program.
• 100% Conduct Semi-Annual Flora and Fauna
• Regular Flora and Fauna Monitoring. Monitoring to be conducted every April (50%) and
November (50%).

Executive Summary

4. Disturbance of Flora and 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Provision of Buffer Zones. • Maintenance of buffer zone of at least 25 meters
Fauna: Faunal migration due Earthwork away from project periphery.
to noise 2. Construction of Additional Roads
3. Construction of Crushing Plant and • Establishment of vegetation along roads
• 100% planting of trees along the road.
other Facilities. as ecological curtain.
4. Pre stripping activities at the quarry
site • Planting of faunal feeding tree species • Planting at least 80% indigenous and bird feeding
5. Clearing and Grubbing to attract fast regeneration of disturbed species.
faunal species.
• Periodic conduct of air and noise • 100% Conduct of Air and Noise Sampling. Air and
monitoring.
Noise Quality Sampling (Quarterly) to be
conducted in March (25%), June (25%),
September (25%), December (25%)
• Periodic conduct of Terrestrial Flora and • 100% Conduct Semi-Annual Flora and Fauna
Faunal Inventory. Monitoring to be conducted every April (50%) and
November (50%).
6. Ore Extraction, Loading, and • Application of noise control device in all • 100% installation of noise control device in all
Hauling machineries. machineries.
7. Stockpiling • Implementation of the Standard
8. Crushing Plant Operation Operating Procedure that include • Controlled Blasting will be done Once a Week
Port Operations (Barging and minimization of noise from operation.
Shipping)
9. Drilling • Establishment of vegetation along roads • 100% planting of trees along the road.
10. Blasting as ecological curtain to minimize noise.
11. Structure Decommissioning
12. Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed • Planting of faunal feeding tree species • Planting at least 80% indigenous and bird feeding
Areas to attract fast-regeneration of disturbed species.
faunal species in declared mined out
areas or disturbed areas subject for
progressive rehabilitation.
• 100% Conduct of Air and Noise Sampling. Air and
• Periodic conduct of air and noise Noise Quality Sampling (Quarterly) to be
monitoring.

Executive Summary
conducted in March (25%), June (25%),
September (25%), December (25%)

• Periodic conduct of Terrestrial Flora and • 100% Conduct Semi-Annual Flora and Fauna
Faunal Inventory. Monitoring to be conducted every April (50%) and
November (50%).
5. Increased soil erosion from 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Follow Mine Design Parameters/Criteria • Mine Design Criteria:
exposed soil surface. Earthwork. to Maintain Safety Slope and Minimize o Bench Height - 25m
2. Pre stripping activities at the soil erosion. o Berm Width (Safety Catchment) - 5m
quarry site. o Overall Slope Angle - 60 Degree
3. Construction of Additional Roads. • Maintain slope not more than 70 Degrees.
5. Ore Extraction, Loading, and • Installation of erosion control materials • 50% coverage of slope stabilization measures
Hauling (i.e. coconets, gabion basket, stop within the covered area.
6. Structure Decommissioning logs, wattlings, and fascines) to provide • Quarterly Installation of erosion control measures
7. Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed
slope stability. To be conducted in March (25%), June (25%),
Areas
September (25%), December (25%).
• Progressive Rehabilitation of inactive

• 100% Turn-over of Mined out Areas to MEPEO for
disturbed areas by area stabilization
Final Revegetation every end of the Quarter. Area
and vegetative cover placement (as
with mineable ore will be temporarily revegetated.
applicable).
6. Face/ slope instability resulting 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Design slope with correct elevation and • Maintain slope not more than 70 Degrees.
to landslides. Earthwork level of benches for land stability • 100% Implementation of a Final Mine
2. Pre stripping activities at the Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Plan
quarry site (FMRDP).
3. Construction of Additional Roads
7. Reduced soil fertility 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Topsoil conservation, storage, and • Remove Less than 1m topsoil during extraction
Earthwork management to preserve soil fertility. (Only during first phase of Extraction, No more
2. Pre stripping activities at the topsoil as the Quarry Progresses)
quarry site • Restore at least 80% of the initial Soil Quality prior
3. Construction of Additional Roads to mining.
Executive Summary
5. Ore Extraction, Loading, and
Hauling • Quarterly application soil amelioration. To be
• Amelioration and conditioning of soil conducted in March (25%), June (25%), September
during revegetation.
(25%), December (25%).
• Regular soil quality testing. • 100% planting of leguminous or nitrogen fixing

plants in mined out /disturbed areas.

• Implementation of Sloping Agricultural • Conduct 4 (100%) soil quality testing annually. To
Land Technology along steep slopes to be conducted on: March (25%), June (25%),
prevent erosion such as contour September (25%), December (25%).
planting using leguminous hedgerows
and other nitrogen fixing plants to
enhance the fertility of the soil like
kakawate, flemengia, rensonii, arakish
pentoii etc.
8. Land contamination due to 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Strict implementation of the Hazardous • 100% Availability of Spill Kits and secondary
potential leaks or spills of oils Earthwork. materials storage and handling. containment.
and fuels from equipment use. 2. Pre stripping activities at the
quarry site. • Provision of secondary containment • Weekly Inspection of Contractors' Area and Heavy
3. Construction of Additional Roads. with a capacity of 110% greater than the Equipment. Checking for compliance Envi & Safety
4. Ore Extraction, Loading, and volume of contained liquid. Requirement. (Spill Kits, PPEs, Fire Extinguishers).
Hauling
5. Stockpiling • Requiring of Spill Kit in heavy • Routine spill drill and IEC for employees and
6. Structure Decommissioning equipment. contractors every quarter.
• Regular spill drills to train employees

and contractors of proper spill
management.
• Implementation of Soil Remediation

program (as necessary) prior to
Revegetation.
9. Land contamination from solid 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Implementation of Solid Waste • 100% Establishment of a Solid Waste Facility.
and hazardous waste Earthwork. Management Program • 100% completion of its target for Daily collection of
generation from domestic, 2. Pre stripping activities at the quarry • Good Housekeeping Garbage Establish Material Recovery Facility
office, and industrial activities. site. • No more than 10% increase Housekeeping non-
3. Construction of Additional Roads conformance every internal audit

Executive Summary
4. Construction of Crushing Plant and • Recycling of at least 20% of the monthly generated
other Facilities solid waste.
5. Ore Extraction, Loading, and • Implementation of Hazardous Waste
Hauling Management Program. • 100% Establishment of a Hazardous Waste Facility
6. Crushing Plant Operation
7. Vehicle operation (transportation of
goods and people)

8. Daily office and housing
facility operations
10. Rehabilitation of Mine
Disturbed Areas
10. Tenurial/ Land Use Issues 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Execution of MOA on temporary 100% Progressive rehabilitation of target disturbed
with the CBFMA holders Earthwork relinquishment of overlapping areas. areas thru tree planting and re-vegetation at mine-
2. Construction of Additional Roads out areas to achieve the post mining land-use
3. Ore Extraction, Loading, and • Partnership with local Peoples
Hauling Organization to improve the CBFMA
areas outside the areas of overlap.
11. Inconsistency of the Post 1. Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed • Consultation with Project stakeholders • FMRDP consultation planning every 2 years.
Mining Land Use Plan with the Areas during the periodic review of FMRDP re
CLUP of the LGU/ Land Use 2. Final Turnover of Project Facilities Post Mining Land Use concept • 100% Implementation of a Final Mine Rehabilitation
of the CBFM and Decommissioning Plan (FMRDP) according to
Post Mining Land Use agreed with the
stakeholders.
12. Exposure of Decommissioned 1. Structure Decommissioning • Revegetation of barren areas after • 100% Implementation of a Final Mine Rehabilitation
Structures (Aesthetic Value) decommissioning of structure. and Decommissioning Plan (FMRDP).
13. Water Quality Degradation: 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Provision of Buffer Zones • Buffer zone of at least of >25m between the Areas
Earthwork of Disturbance and Rivers and Creeks.
Sedimentation and siltation in 2. Construction of Additional Roads • Limit disturbance to not more than 60 ha during
local rivers,creeks, and marine 3. Construction of Crushing Plant and Quarry Operations.
water due to local erosion, other Facilities.
dust generation from 4. Pre stripping activities at the quarry • Proper Planning and Establishment of • 100% completion on the construction of water
disturbed areas, and site proper drainage system around active management structures as designed or planned in
accidental ore spillage from 5. Clearing and Grubbing disturbed areas for runoff management: the EPEP.
loading to conveyor belt 6. Ore Extraction, Loading, and
transport to loading facility. Hauling
Executive Summary
7. Stockpiling o Road berms and interceptor
8. Structure Decommissioning canals
9. Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed o Peripheral drains around the
Areas mines, stockpiles, and waste
dumps.

• Installation of erosion control materials • 50% coverage of slope stabilization measures
along slopes (coconets, gabion basket, within the covered area.
stop logs, wattlings, and fascines).
• Installation of silt curtain along the near • 100% Installation of silt curtain and other filtration
shore water to capture silt/ sediment process in water discharge points
materials discharged in the ocean.
• Conduct periodic maintenance of the • 100% completion of regular de-silting of catchment

water management structures. basins (Weekly and or Every after rains)Weekly
inspection of settling ponds and drainage system
evaluation.
• Conduct Period monitoring on the • 100% Conduct of Quarterly Water Quality Sampling
stability and efficacy of the water and Monitoring to be conducted in March (25%),
management structures. June (25%), September (25%) December (25%).
• Conduct of Quarterly Ambient Water • 100% Conduct of Quarterly Water Quality Sampling
Quality Monitoring, Evaluation and and Monitoring to be conducted in March (25%),
Analysis. June (25%), September (25%) December (25%).
• Diversion water run-off from hills away
from the active mining areas and waste
dumps for low quality limestones and
fines raised at 10-meter lifts
• Construction of water retention/

treatment facilities (silt/ sediment
ponds) at catchment areas for sediment
removal prior to discharge of the clear
water to the local streams.

Executive Summary
• Conveyor belt facility to be equipped
with catchment system for ore spillage.
• Regular collection of spilled materials

as part of site maintenance activities.
• Regular Water Quality Monitoring.

14. Water Quality Degradation: 1. Port Operations (Barging, • Installation of silt curtain at the periphery • 100% Provision of Ore Spill Raft, at least 1 Raft Per
Shipping) of the port to capture silt/ ore spillage. Barge/LCT
Siltation of near shore 2. Ore stockpiling
environment due ore spillage • Provision of ore spill raft as catchment
during ore loading activities. during loading. • 100% conduct of Quarterly Marine water quality
monitoring to be conducted in March (25%), June
• Regular Marine Water Quality (25%), September (25%), December (25%)
Monitoring
15. Water Quality Degradation: 1. Ore Extraction, Loading, and • Chemical and Fuel Storage areas • 100% Availability of Spill Kits.
Hauling equipped with spill kits and secondary
Water contamination from 2. Crushing Plant Operation containment. • Weekly Inspection of Fuel and Chemical Storage
accidental spillage of fuel and 3. Stockpiling Building Checking for compliance Envi & Safety
chemicals from daily 4. Port Operations (Barging, • Proper handling and storage of Requirement. (Spill Kits, PPEs, Fire Extinguishers).
operational activities. Shipping) Hazardous Wastes.
goods and people) • Regular spill drills to train employees • Routine spill drill and IEC for employees and
and contractors of proper spill contractors every quarter.
management.
• Hazardous waste disposal and • Schedule disposal upon reaching 80% of the
treatment by DENR accredited facilities. Hazardous Waste Storage Facility capacity.
16. Water Quality Degradation: 1. Port Operations (Barging, • Regulate barges and conduct IEC on • Barge Inspection every month.
Shipping) Barge and Vessel Crew Regarding
Nutrient influx from Company Policies on proper • Routine IEC for barge personnel/ contractors every
contaminated domestic 2. Daily office and housing facility wastewater management. quarter.
wastewater. operations.
• Construction of septic tanks in all office • Zero discharge of untreated domestic wastewater.
buildings and accommodation buildings
for domestic wastewater treatment prior
to discharge.
• Regular Water Quality Monitoring

Executive Summary
• 100% Conduct of Water Quality Sampling and
Monitoring to be conducted in March (25%), June
(25%), September (25%), December (25%).
17. Water Quality Degradation: 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Establishment of Buffer Zone. • Buffer zone of at least of >25m between the Areas
Earthwork of Disturbance and Rivers and Creeks.
Water run-off contamination 2. Construction of Additional Roads • Limited clearing and earth movement
due to contact with exposed 3. Construction of Crushing Plant and according to the approved Site • Limit disturbance to not more than 60 ha during
rocks and loose sediments. other Facilities. Development Plan. Quarry Operations.

4. Pre stripping activities at the quarry • Establishment of proper drainage • Weekly Drainage System Inspection.
site system around active disturbed areas
5. Clearing and Grubbing for runoff management:
Hauling o Road berms and interceptor
Stockpiling canals
o Peripheral drains around the
mines, stockpiles, and waste
dumps.
• Construction of water retention/ • Installation and maintenance of 5-10 Settling ponds
treatment facilities (silt/ sediment before final discharge.
ponds) at catchment areas for sediment
removal and chemical degradation prior
to discharge of the clear water to the • 100% Conduct of Quarterly Water Quality Sampling
local streams. and Monitoring to be conducted in March (25%),
• Regular Water Quality Monitoring June (25%), September (25%) December (25%).
18. Water Quality Degradation: Ore Extraction, Loading, and • Establishment of drainage system (road • 100% Conduct of Water Quality Sampling and
Hauling berms, interceptor canals) around Monitoring to be conducted in March (25%), June
Recharge of contaminated active disturbed areas for runoff (25%), September (25%), December (25%).
water in shallow aquifers management.
• Regular Water Quality Monitoring
• Water Conservation Measures.

19. Threat to Freshwater and 1. Construction of Crushing Plant and • Installation of sediment control materials • Installation and maintenance of 5-10 Settling ponds
Marine Ecology: other Facilities. (i.e silt traps, gabions, silt fence, before final discharge.
2. Pre stripping activities at the quarry wattlings, etc.) along waterways to
o Freshwater Habitat and Marine site prevent flow of silt and contaminants to • 100% Conduct of inspection on settling ponds on a
Habitat degradation from poor 3. Clearing and Grubbing natural water bodies. weekly basis.
water quality (silt deposition

Executive Summary
and discharge of poor quality 4. Ore Extraction, Loading, and • Regular Water Quality Monitoring • 100% Conduct of Water Quality Sampling and
run-off/discharge) Hauling Installation of silt curtain along the near Monitoring to be conducted in March (25%), June
5. Stockpiling shore water to capture silt/ sediment (25%), September (25%), December (25%).
o Impediment in the natural 6. Crushing materials discharged in the ocean.
biological processes of 7. Port Operations (Barging and • 100% establishment of periphery canal along
freshwater/ marine organisms Shipping) • Provision of drainage system and water disturbed areas diverting all silt laden run off to the
due to presence of management structure at the periphery established water management structures.
contaminants. of the disturbed area.

• Construction of water retention/ • 100% implementation of the target maintenance
treatment facilities (silt/ sediment activities per quarter.
ponds) at catchment areas.
• Regular maintenance of the drainage

and water management facilities.
• Provision of ore spill raft as catchment • 100% operation water raft per barge.
during loading.
• Regulate barges and conduct IEC on • Conduct of IEC Campaign once a week or Weekly
Barge and Vessel Crew Regarding Sea based Contractors Meeting to monitor
Company Policies on Water Resource contractors Performance and Environmental
Management. Measures.
• 100% Conduct of Semi-Annual Marine Ecology

• Regular Freshwater and Marine Habitat
Assessment conducted every July (50%), January
Monitoring.
(50%).
• 100% Conduct of Freshwater Ecology Assessment
conducted every year.
• Regular Water Quality Monitoring • 100% Conduct of Water Quality Sampling and
Monitoring to be conducted in March (25%), June
20. Human health impacts from 1. Construction of Crushing Plant and • Provision of drinking water to • 100% Conduct of Water Quality Sampling and
water contamination other Facilities. employees to prevent tapping from Monitoring to be conducted in March (25%), June
2. Pre stripping activities at the quarry untreated sources. (25%), September (25%), December (25%).
site
3. Clearing and Grubbing • Separate water sources for project
4. Construction of Crushing Plant and activities and community use.
other Facilities.
Executive Summary
5. Pre stripping activities at the quarry • Installation of Reverse Osmosis for
site water supply at the Camp facilities.
7. Ore Extraction, Loading, and • IEC on the water quality monitoring • Conduct of Quarterly IEC re: Water Quality
Hauling results to the community. Monitoring Results.
8. Stockpiling
9. Crushing • 100% Conduct of Water Quality Sampling and
Port Operations (Barging and Monitoring to be conducted in March (25%), June
Shipping) (25%), September (25%), December (25%).
• Health programs under SDMP. • Less than 3 cases of morbidity cases related to
water borne illness among employees every month.
• Implementation of quarterly medical missions and

• Regular water quality Monitoring other health programs through the SDMP.
21. Water supply competition 1. Construction of Crushing Plant • Water sources separate from • 100% compliance to the conditions of Water Rights
and other Facilities. community water source. Permit from NWRB.
2. Pre stripping activities at the
quarry site • Conditional Water Rights is secured
3. Clearing and Grubbing from NWRB
Hauling • Regular Flow Rate Measurement and • 100% conduct of quarterly flow rate monitoring on
5. Stockpiling Monitoring the identified water sources.
6. Crushing
7. Port Operations (Barging and • Recycle at least 10% of used water from the
• Implementation of Water Conservation
Shipping) domestic.
Measures such as recycling of water
8. Water spraying for dust • At least 90% recycling of the run-off water contained
from the settling ponds to be used for
suppression in the settling ponds.
plant watering and dust suppression.
9. Daily office and housing facility
operations
• Minimization on the use of water for
domestic purposes. And harvesting of
rainwater.
22. Potential downstream 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Hydrology and Discharge Monitoring • Quarterly discharge monitoring.
flooding due to high flow Earthwork • Daily meteorology monitoring.
velocities and peak 2. Construction of Additional Roads
discharges during rainfall 3. Construction of Crushing Plant and • Construction of drainage control • 100% Conduct of inspection on settling ponds on a
events. other Facilities. facilities for stormwater management. weekly basis.
site • Installation of sediment ponds acting as • 100% completion of regular de-silting of catchment
5. Clearing and Grubbing water retention ponds to attenuate flow. basins (Weekly and or Every after rains)

Executive Summary
Ore Extraction, Loading, and
Hauling
23. Reduced infiltration and water 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Limited clearing and earth movement • Disturbed not more than 60ha during Quarry
holding capacity of the affected Earthwork according to the approved Mine operations.
watershed. 2. Construction of Additional Roads Development Plan; phasing of activities
(if possible).
other Facilities.
site
6. Ore Extraction, Loading, and • Progressive Rehabilitation of inactive • Quarterly turnover of Mined out Areas for
Hauling disturbed areas by area stabilization Progressive Rehabilitation.
and vegetative cover placement (as
applicable). • 100% completion of the quarterly target for area
revegetation.
24. Change in current pattern and 1. Port Operations (Barging, • Careful site selection of Port location • 100% conduct of Annual Coral and Marine Habitat
littoral drifts due to alteration of Shipping) considering the discharge flow of monitoring
wave refraction creeks.
• 100% conduct of Quarterly Marine Water Quality
• Regular Marine Ecology Monitoring Monitoring to be conducted in March (25%), June
Regular Marine Water Quality (25%), September (25%), December (25%)
Monitoring
25. Erosion of shorelines 1. Port Operations (Barging, • Installation of gabion baskets to serve • 100% implementation of seawall.
Shipping) as sea wall to prevent erosion.
• Weekly Causeway Inspection.
• Covering of tarpaulin at the causeway
head during high swell or bad weather • 100% covering of tarpaulin at the causeway head
condition to prevent causeway material during bad weather condition
from eroding.
• Suspension of loading and docking of

barges during bad weather condition.
26. Dust Generation from 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Provision of Buffer Zones from mine • Buffer zone of at least of >25m around the
Equipment Operation Earthwork area to the nearest community. periphery of the disturbed area.
2. Construction of Additional Roads
3. Construction of Crushing Plant and • Deployment of Water Trucks for Dust
other Facilities. • Deployment of Water trucks for Dust Suppression.
Suppression
4. Pre stripping activities at the quarry 1 Water Trucks will at least have 5 Trips Per Shift
with a total of at least 10 Water Trucks Daily. 50
site Regular Ambient Air Monitoring Trips Daily.

Executive Summary
6. Ore Extraction, Loading, and 100% Conduct of Ambient Air Quality Sampling
Hauling (Quarterly) to be conducted in March (25%), June
7. Stockpiling (25%), September (25%), December (25%)
8. Port Operations (Barging and
Shipping)
Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed
Areas
27. Dust generation from vehicle 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Water truck deployment • Deployment of Water trucks for Dust Suppression.
and heavy equipment Earthwork 1 Water Trucks will at least have 5 Trips Per Shift
movement 2. Construction of Additional Roads • Speed limit regulation with a total of at least 10 Water Trucks Daily. 50
3. Construction of Crushing Plant Trips Daily.
and other Facilities. • Regular Ambient Air Monitoring
4. Pre stripping activities at the • Speed limit set at 20 kph for mobile vehicles and 15
quarry site kph for dump trucks and other heavy equipment.
6. Ore Extraction, Loading, and • 100% Conduct of Ambient Air Quality Sampling
Hauling (Quarterly) to be conducted in March (25%), June
7. Stockpiling (25%), September (25%), December (25%)
8. Vehicle operation (transportation
of goods and people)
Areas
28. Dust generation from 1. Stockpiling • Covering stockpiles to prevent dust and • Full cover of stockpile with tarpaulin material.
Stockpiles fines from blowing
• Set the stockpile Location with Natural • 100% Water Spraying Every Day.
Wind Barrier (vegetation as ecological
curtain)
• Regular Water Spraying at the stockpile
area.
29. Health Impacts from Dust 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Deployment of Water Trucks for Dust • Deployment of Water trucks for Dust
Generation: Earthwork Suppression Suppression. 1 Water Trucks will at least have 5
2. Construction of Additional Roads Trips Per Shift with a total of at least 10 Water
o Stunted growth of plants due to 3. Construction of Crushing Plant and Trucks Daily. 50 Trips Daily.
dust deposition. other Facilities.
4. Pre stripping activities at the quarry • Provision of PPEs to employees directly • 100% Provision of Personal Protective Equipment
Health Impacts from dust site working at the active areas.
inhalation 5. Clearing and Grubbing

Executive Summary
6. Ore Extraction, Loading, and • Health programs under SDMP (i.e. free • Implementation of quarterly medical missions and
Hauling medical assistance for the community) other health programs through the SDMP.
7. Stockpiling
8. Vehicle operation (transportation of • Regular road maintenance
goods and people)
9. Port Operations (Barging and • Set the stockpile Location with Natural
Shipping Wind Barrier

11. Rehabilitation of Mine • Enforce appropriate speed limit to • Speed limit set at 20 kph for mobile vehicles and
Disturbed Areas. vehicular movement. 15 kph for dump trucks and other heavy
equipment.
• Regular Ambient Air Monitoring. • 100% Conduct of Ambient Air Quality Sampling
(Quarterly) to be conducted in March (25%), June
30. Chemical emissions from fuel 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Efficient equipment utilization • Daily Inspection of Crushing Plant and Heavy
combustion/ equipment use Earthwork (achieving the same volume of work Equipment to check equipment worthiness.
2. Construction of Additional Roads while maintaining lower diesel
3. Construction of Crushing Plant and consumption for lower gas emissions.)
other Facilities.
4. Pre stripping activities at the quarry • Require regular maintenance of vehicle
site and equipment.
6. Ore Extraction, Loading, and • Regular preventive maintenance.
Hauling
7. Stockpiling • Monitoring of fuel consumption. • Monitoring of fuel consumption. Submission of
8. Vehicle operation (transportation of Energy consumption Report to MGB every
goods and people) Quarter.
Shipping) • Consider buffer zones at areas near • Plant high-rise and thick trees around quarry
10. Structure Decommissioning communities; development of green areas that will serve as a buffer zone Coordinate
11. Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed belt/plantation in the safety zone • Tree Planting activities as part of Progressive
Areas. Rehabilitation.
• Progressive rehabilitation thru tree • 100% Quarterly turn-over of Mined out Areas for
planting to sequester carbon emissions Progressive Rehabilitation.
from quarry and transport operations
• Regular Ambient Noise Monitoring.

Executive Summary
• 100% Quarterly Air Quality Sampling &
Monitoring: March (25%), June (25%), September
(25%) December (25%).

31. Noise generation from 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Installation of noise suppression • 100% Provision of Personal Protective Equipment
crushing plant and Earthwork accessories to the machineries (i.e.
equipment operation 2. Construction of Additional Roads mufflers). • Daily Inspection of Crushing Plant and Heavy
3. Construction of Crushing Plant and Equipment
other Facilities. • Provision of PPEs to employees directly
4. Pre stripping activities at the quarry working at the active areas.
site
5. Clearing and Grubbing • Free medical assistance for the
6. Ore Extraction, Loading, and community.
Hauling
7. Stockpiling • Regular road maintenance.
Shipping) • Use of vegetation buffer to minimize
9. Structure Decommissioning noise.
Areas
• Require regular maintenance of
equipment both inhouse and
Contractors.
• 100% Conduct of Ambient Noise Quality
• Regular plant preventive maintenance. Sampling (Quarterly) to be conducted in March
(25%), June (25%), September (25%), December
(25%).
• Regular Ambient Noise Monitoring.
32. Noise generation from 1. Drilling • Drilling machine shall be fitted with dust • Drilling will be done Once a Week
drilling and blasting. 2. Blasting suppression, collection and disposal
arrangement.
• Deep wetting of drilling zones shall be
done by water sprinkling before starting
drilling.
• During the drilling operations efforts
shall be made to reduce dust generation
by taking appropriate measures

Executive Summary
• Drilling and Blasting operation via Third-
Party experts.
• Implementation of controlled blasting
techniques such as single hole firing,
trim blast, and pre-splits. • 100% Conduct of Noise Quality Sampling
• Regular noise quality monitoring. (Quarterly) to be conducted in March (25%), June

33. Human health impacts from 1. Site Preparation Clearing, and • Provision of Personal Protective • 100% Provision of Personal Protective Equipment
air and noise pollution Earthwork Equipment (PPE) for employees directly
2. Construction of Additional Roads working at the active sites. • Implementation of quarterly medical missions and
3. Construction of Crushing Plant and other health programs through the SDMP.
other Facilities. • Implementation of health programs
4. Pre stripping activities at the quarry under SDMP. 100% Conduct of Air and Noise Quality Sampling
site (Quarterly) to be conducted in March (25%), June
5. Clearing and Grubbing • Regular briefing on safety hazards and (25%), September (25%), December (25%).
6. Ore Extraction, Loading, and safety practices at work
Hauling
7. Stockpiling • Regular Ambient Air and Noise
8. Vehicle operation (transportation of Monitoring.
goods and people)
Shipping)
Areas.
Drilling and Blasting
34. Safety and Health Impacts Blasting • Contract an Accredited Third Party to • Blasting Parameters:
from Blasting: Conduct Drilling and Blasting Activity o Ammonium Nitrate with Fuel Oil (ANFO)
• Implementation of controlled blasting o Cast Primer 250 gms
o Fly Rock Generation techniques such as single hole firing, o NONEL Surface Connector x 6 metres
o Generation of fines and dust trim blast, and pre-splits. o In-hole delay, 500ms x 12 metres
is influenced by several • Follow the prescribed blasting o Detonating Cords, 6 grams
blasting and rock specifications. Cast Primer 250 gms
parameters • Provision of Personal Protective o NONEL Surface Connector x 6 metres
Release of Fumes Equipment (PPE) for employees directly o In-hole delay, 500ms x 12 metres
working at the active sites. o Detonating Cords, 6 grams
Implementation of health programs
under SDMP. • Implementation of quarterly medical missions and
other health programs through the SDMP.

Executive Summary
35. Occupational Hazards from 1. Crushing Plant Operation • Crushing Plant Facility will undergo • Full compliance to the Building Code of the
Issues of Structural stability detailed stability analysis. Philippines.
of the Plant
• Structural analysis takes into
• 100% Daily Toolbox Meetings before each shift.
consideration a number of foreseeable
forces including gravitational (based on
rated capacity), dynamic, wind and • 100% conduct of regular monitoring for signs of
manual forces. instability

• Analysis take into consideration the
machines expected operating
configuration, envelope, and approved
operating conditions (i.e. slope)
• Provision of Personal Protective

Equipment (PPE) for employees directly
working at the active sites.
• Safety Orientation for Employees
• Regular stability monitoring

36. Stability issues from 1. Stockpiling • Proper stockpiling. • Stockpile slope should now be greater than 70
stockpiling (i.e. Rainwater degrees.
absorption and slumping) • Provision of stockpile cover when it • 100% conduct of regular monitoring for signs of
rains. instability.
• Provision of Personal Protective • 100% Provision of Personal Protective Equipment

Equipment (PPE) for employees directly
37. Vehicular accidents 1. Ore Extraction, Loading, and • Defensive Drivers’ Training • 100% Provision of Personal Protective Equipment
Hauling
2. Stockpiling • Safety Orientation for Drivers • 100% Daily Toolbox Meetings before each shift.
goods and people)

Executive Summary
38. Work safety hazards related 1. Structure Decommissioning • Risk Assessment and Management • Mine closure planning and review every 2 years.
to demolition of structures 2. Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed Plan included as part of the Mine
(industrial accidents resulting Areas. Closure Planning
to physical injuries)
• Safety Orientation for Employees • 100% Daily Toolbox Meetings before each shift.
• Provision of Personal Protective

Equipment (PPE) for employees directly • 100% Provision of Personal Protective Equipment
39. Safety hazards related to 1. Structure Decommissioning • Conduct Geotechnical slope stability • 100% Implementation of a Final Mine
long-term structural stability 2. Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed analysis prior to and after final Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Plan
of rehabilitated areas Areas. rehabilitation (FMRDP).
• Third-party stability analysis every 2 years.
• 100% conduct of regular monitoring for signs of
instability
40. Displacement of local 1. Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed • Implementation of Labor Support • Stakeholder consultation on sustainable livelihood
workers and Loss of source Areas Policies and Programs during the early planning.
of income (employment, 2. Final Turnover of Project Facilities stages of operation to improve the
business opportunities, etc.) employment capacity of the workers in • Regular stakeholder consultation on SDMP
from Project closure preparation to the job transition. Program planning and implementation.
• Series of capacity building programs for • 100% Implementation of Sustainable Livelihood

the community which will include under the Final Mine Rehabilitation and
organizational strengthening, capability Decommissioning Program (FMRDP).
assessment, enhancement trainings,
financial management, project
management, etc.
• Post mining sustainable livelihood

program.
• Retrenchment package provided for the

employees in accordance to the Labor
Code.
• Sustainability planning of the livelihood

component of the SDMP.
41. Less income to LGU and 1. Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed • Sustainability planning of the projects • Regular stakeholder consultation on SDMP
National Government due to Areas under SDMP. Program planning and implementation.

Executive Summary
termination of taxes from the 2. Final Turnover of Project Facilities • Capacity building for the locals • 100% Implementation of a Final Mine Rehabilitation
Project and Decommissioning Plan (FMRDP).
• Post mining sustainable livelihood
program.
42. Security Issues: 1. Structure Decommissioning • Maintenance of a Security group • Checkpoints at every entry and exit points of the
o Theft of dismantled facilities/ 2. Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed regularly patrolling the area MPSA.
components with residual Areas.
value. • Security checkpoints to control access • Local coordination (LGU, IPs) through regular
to the area meetings and consultation.
o Intrusion of outsiders/ illegal
claimants in the Project area • Community Relations Office to remain
during the Mine Closure Rehabilitation
Period

Section 1- Project Description
1.1. Project Location and Area
The Mineral Production Sharing Agreement (MPSA 134-99-XIII) in which the Agata Limestone Project
(ALP) is located covers a total of 4,995-hectare area. The tenement is bound by geographical
coordinates 9°10’30” and 9°19’30” north latitude and 125°29’30” to 125°33’30” east longitude,
encompassing the municipalities of Tubay, Jabonga, and Santiago, located within the province of
Agusan del Norte in Mindanao, Philippines. The geographical coordinates of the MPSA is shown on
Table 1-1.
The mining operations and activities for the proposed Limestone Project will be confined within the
MPSA boundary. The existing mine facilities of Agata Nickel Laterite Project (ANLP) will also be used
for the Limestone Quarrying operations. The map in Figure 1-1 shows the Limestone Project area
relative to the MPSA location.
Nearest commercial airports near the site are the Butuan City and Surigao City Airports, where daily
flights to and from Manila and Cebu are available. Commercial sea transport to Nasipit (Butuan City)
and Surigao City are also available. The mine site is approximately 47 kilometers north-northwest of
Butuan City and 73 kilometers southwest of Surigao City. It is accessible by any land vehicle either from
Surigao City or Butuan City via the Pan-Philippine Highway to Brgy. Bangonay intersection in Jabonga,
Agusan del Norte, thence via a 4-km concrete municipal road towards the west, followed by a 6-km
farm-to-market all weather road southwards to the main gate of the project camp. From this point, the
limestone quarry site is connected via a 4-km mine road passing through the existing nickel project
access roads.
There is an existing Environmental Compliance Certificate granted under the MPSA. This is for the
ongoing Agata Nickel Laterite Project (ANLP). The original ECC was issued to MRL Gold Philippines
Inc. in May 2008. Ownership of the ECC was then transferred to Minimax Mineral Exploration in
November 2013; with the ECC conditions remained the same. On April 22, 2014, a Deed of Assignment
was executed between Minimax and Agata Processing Inc. (API) assigning, transferring and conveying
to the latter all rights, interests and obligations of the former under the approved MPSA, including the
ECC. This Deed of Assignment was approved by the MGB last June 21, 2016. Finally, in July 2018,
the ECC was amended for an increased production capacity and was issued under API. The amended
ECC covers a total mining area of 603.06 hectares with annual production capacity of 3.5 million DMT
per year. The geographical coordinates of the ANLP ECC is listed in Table 1-2.
The MPSA includes the Agata North Laterite and Agata South Laterite Prospect but at present, only the
ANLP is being developed. The Agata South prospect, located at the southern portion of the MPSA, is
a potential source for high iron laterite deposit. Exploration activities, including test pitting commenced
in July as additional input for the Final Exploration Report and the 3-Year Work Program being prepared
for submission to MGB. Another related mineral being explored for development within the MPSA is the
Agata Magnesium Oxide Project (AMOP). In-house estimate is available for magnesium oxide resource,
however, the current economics for the commodity does not warrant investment to pursue for
development just yet. This possibility will be revisited in the future. The map of mineral prospects within
MPSA relative to the proposed limestone project is shown on Figure 1-2.
The proposed ALP ECC coverage area is within the MPSA and will cover about 554.4 hectares. The
geographical coordinates is listed in Table 1-2. This area will include the Agata Limestone Quarry, Ore
Stockyards, and other facilities such as access roads, administrative office, power and water source,
drainage system, motor pool, etc. The location of the ECC application area for the Agata Limestone
Project, relative to the MPSA and the ANLP ECC is shown in Figure 1-3.
Environmental Impact Statement Report Page | 1-1

API Agata Limestone Project December 2020- Rev01
The commencement year of Agata Limestone Project is set after the completion of the Agata Nickel
Laterite Project. The use of some of the mine facilities from ANLP will be continued when the ALP start
operating.
Table 1-1 MPSA 134-99-XIII Corner Points Survey and Geographical Description
1 9˚ 10' 30" 125˚ 32' 00"

2 9˚ 11' 00" 125˚ 32' 00"
3 9˚ 11' 00" 125˚ 33' 00" Parcel I
4 9˚ 10' 30" 125˚ 32' 00"
1 9˚ 12' 30" 125˚ 31' 22.5"
2 9˚ 13' 15" 125˚ 31' 22.5"
3 9˚ 13' 15" 125˚ 31' 00"
4 9˚ 13' 30" 125˚ 31' 00"
5 9˚ 13' 30" 125˚ 30' 52.5"
6 9˚ 14' 22.5" 125˚ 30' 52.5"
7 9˚ 14' 37.5" 125˚ 30' 30" Parcel II
8 9˚ 14' 37.5" 125˚ 30' 22.5"
9 9˚ 15' 45" 125˚ 30' 22.5"
10 9˚ 15' 45" 125˚ 30' 30"
11 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 30' 30"
12 9˚ 16' 45" 125˚ 30' 22.5"
13 9˚ 18' 00" 125˚ 30' 22.5"
14 9˚ 18' 30" 125˚ 30' 07.5"
15 9˚ 18' 30" 125˚ 30' 00"
16 9˚ 19' 00" 125˚ 30' 00"
17 9˚ 19' 00" 125˚ 29' 45"
18 9˚ 19' 30" 125˚ 29' 39.3"
19 9˚ 19' 30" 125˚ 30' 00"
20 9˚ 19' 00" 125˚ 30' 00"
21 9˚ 19' 00" 125˚ 31' 30"
22 9˚ 18' 30" 125˚ 31' 30"
23 9˚ 18' 30" 125˚ 33' 30"
24 9˚ 16' 00" 125˚ 33' 30"
25 9˚ 16' 00" 125˚ 33' 00"
26 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 33' 00"
27 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 32' 30"
28 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 32' 00"
29 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 31' 30" Excluded
30 9˚ 16' 00" 125˚ 31' 30"
31 9˚ 16' 00" 125˚ 32' 00"
32 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 32' 00"
33 9˚ 16' 30" 125˚ 32' 30"
34 9˚ 15' 00" 125˚ 32' 30"
35 9˚ 15' 00" 125˚ 33' 00" Parcel II
36 9˚ 13' 30" 125˚ 33' 00"
37 9˚ 13' 30" 125˚ 32' 00"
38 9˚ 13' 00" 125˚ 32' 00"
39 9˚ 13' 00" 125˚ 31' 30"
40 9˚ 12' 30" 125˚ 31' 30"

Section1-ProjectDescription
Figure1-1AgataLimestoneProject LocationMap
Environmental ImpactStatementReport Page | 1-3

APIAgataLimestoneProject December2020-Rev01
Table 1-2 Agata Nickel Laterite Project ECC Corner Points Survey and Geographical
Description
1 125°30' 26.6544" 9°16' 09.5268"

2 125°30' 26.6976" 9°16' 25.4892"
3 125°30' 23.9400" 9°16' 34.5324"
4 125°30' 21.3300" 9°16' 39.7128"
5 125°30' 13.2408" 9°16' 34.3236"
6 125°30' 10.9548" 9°16' 37.5312"
7 125°30' 16.6536" 9°16' 41.3580"
8 125°30' 16.7688" 9°16' 43.9752"
9 125°30' 22.5000" 9°16' 50.4624"
10 125°30' 22.5000" 9°17' 14.4816"
11 125°30' 43.8948" 9°17' 35.3508"
12 125°30' 44.0388" 9°17' 55.4676"
13 125°31' 09.7788" 9°17' 55.2876"
14 125°31' 09.7248" 9°17' 47.6556"
15 125°31' 50.9412" 9°17' 47.3640"
16 125°31' 50.8332" 9°17' 32.4528"
17 125°31' 26.6520" 9°17' 32.6220"
18 125°31' 13.9728" 9°17' 22.2072"
19 125°31' 08.7096" 9°17' 22.2432"
20 125°31' 08.5980" 9°17' 06.6804"
21 125°31' 26.1480" 9°16' 56.4492"
22 125°31' 25.8960" 9°16' 09.1452"
Table 1-3 Agata Limestone Project ECC Corner Points Survey and Geographical Description
1 125° 30' 29.9988" 9° 16' 09.4944"
2 125° 30' 29.9988" 9° 16' 30.0000"
3 125° 30' 22.5000" 9° 16' 45.0012"
4 125° 30' 22.5000" 9° 17' 14.4816"
1 125° 30' 43.8948" 9° 17' 35.3508"
2 125° 30' 44.0388" 9° 17' 55.4676"
3 125° 31' 09.7788" 9° 17' 55.2876"
4 125° 31' 09.7248" 9° 17' 47.6556"
5 125° 31' 50.9412" 9° 17' 47.3640"
6 125° 31' 50.8332" 9° 17' 32.4528"
7 125° 31' 26.6520" 9° 17' 32.6220"
8 125° 31' 13.9728" 9° 17' 22.2072"
9 125° 31' 08.7096" 9° 17' 22.2432"
10 125° 31' 08.5980" 9° 17' 06.6804"
11 125° 31' 26.1480" 9° 16' 56.4492"
12 125° 31' 25.8960" 9° 16' 09.1452"
13 125° 30' 29.9988" 9° 16' 09.4944"
14 125° 30' 29.9988" 9° 16' 30.0000"
15 125° 30' 22.5000" 9° 16' 45.0012"
16 125° 30' 22.5000" 9° 17' 14.4816"

Figure1-2-AgataTenementMap

Figure1-3ProposedALPECCandANLPECCLocationMap

1.1.1. Project Impact Areas
The primary impact barangays include two (2) barangays within the MPSA area, where the Agata
Limestone surface mine and the mine facilities will be located. These include Brgy. Lawigan and Brgy.
Tinigbasan, both within the Tubay Municipality. They will be the most susceptible to the direct and/or
indirect environmental impacts relative to the air and noise quality, watershed functions including stream
flows and water quality, and to disturbance of flora and fauna resources. They are also affected by the
socio-cultural impacts, determined based on several qualitative factors such as livelihood, and cultural
impacts from the Project.
The impact areas and how they are affected by the Project is listed in Table 1-4. Location of the impact
areas are also shown in Error! Reference source not found..
Table 1-4 Project Impact Areas by Sector

Impacts Affected Area
Land Resource Impacts

Clearing of vegetation Brgy. Tinigbasan
Sedimentation of agricultural lands Brgy. Tinigbasan
Overlapping tenurial instruments Brgy. Tinigbasan
Air Impacts
Dust generation Brgy. Tinigbasan, Brgy. Lawigan
Exhaust emission Brgy. Tinigbasan, Brgy. Lawigan
Noise Brgy. Tinigbasan, Brgy. Lawigan
Water Resource Impacts
Siltation of waterways Brgy. Tinigbasan
Diversion of streamflow Brgy. Tinigbasan
Social Impacts
Socio-cultural impacts to IPs CADT 237
Socio-cultural impacts to non-IP communities Brgy. Tinigbasan
Increase in Employment and Business
Brgy. Tinigbasan, Brgy. Lawigan
Opportunities
Land Resource Impacts
Clearing of vegetation Brgy. Tinigbasan
Sedimentation of agricultural lands Brgy. Tinigbasan
Overlapping tenurial instruments Brgy. Tinigbasan
Air Impacts Brgy. Tinigbasan, Brgy. Lawigan

Figure 1-4- Project Impact Area

1.2. Project Rationale
1.2.1. National and Regional/ Local Economic Development
Our country is endowed with rich mineral resources. Responsible development and extraction will
benefit not only the localities where mining projects are located but will benefit the whole country as
well.
The government is generating funds to replenish its treasury depleted because of the economic havoc
the COVID-19 pandemic has wrought and is wreaking. The Department of Finance (DOF), Bangko
Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), and Mines and Geosciences
Bureau (MGB), among others, are correct in espousing for the mineral sector because it can
significantly help in our current economic malady.
The Agata Limestone Project will generate funds for government in terms of Income Taxes, Withholding
Taxes on Payroll, Withholding Taxes on Foreign Stockholders’ Dividends, Withholding Taxes on Profit
Remittance to Principal, Withholding Taxes on Interest Income, Excise Taxes on Minerals, Customs
Duties/Fees, VAT on Imported Equipment, VAT on Sale of Good or Properties, Mine Waste and Tailings
Reserve Fund, Occupation Fees, Evaluation Fees of FS Report/EPEP, Mineral Processing Fee, OTP,
Purchaser’s License to Purchase/Transfer Explosives, Documentary Stamp Taxes, Capital Gains Tax,
among others. The mining industry is recorded as top contributor to the Gross Regional Domestic
Product of the CARAGA Region.
A robust responsible mining industry will also help boost investor confidence-- a very important factor
in the current situation. Local and foreign investors alike, will look at the Philippines as a balanced pro-
development country if it will promote responsible mining. Furthermore, a profitable mining venture will
help strengthen the banking and financial institutions, who normally lends capital for mining projects.
A mining project is a huge employer in a locality and by virtue of its location, spurs development in the
rural areas of the country. This gives the Government an opportunity to divert its resources to the less
fortunate rural areas. For every job created in mining, the International Council on Mining and Metals
(ICMM) estimates two to five more created in other sectors. The Project will provide employment
opportunities to the residents of Tubay, Agusan del Norte.
As a contributor to the supply chain, Agata Limestone Project aims to initially serve the construction
and steel industry, as well as the environmental and agricultural sectors, although very high purity
limestone can eventually be processed for the paper and paints industry. In terms of the product,
limestone applications extend to various industries including glass, paper, fertilizer, food and medical
goods, as well as steel, cement and construction aggregates. Limestone is an essential material that
plays a key role in our daily lives.
Global demand for steel continues to rise to meet the demands of the construction and automobile
sectors. Likewise, the demand for limestone is expected to increase as it is a key raw material for
steelmaking. The main consumers of the Philippine limestone lumps are the steelmakers based in
Taiwan and Japan. The Limestone Project could contribute to the country’s foreign exchange earnings
through exports and will provide additional revenue to the government through taxes for as long as 15
years.

1.2.2. Socio-Economic Benefits
Operation of the Limestone Project is anticipated to provide socio-economic benefits to the Host and
Neighboring Communities through the implementation of the Social Development and Management
Program (SDMP), which include the following:
 Human Resource Development and Institutional Building

 Enterprise Development and Networking
 Assistance to Infrastructure Development and Support Services
 Access to Education and Educational Support Programs
 Access to Health Services, Health Facilities and Health Professionals
 Protection and Respect of Socio-Cultural Values
 Use of facilities/services within the mine camp such as the medical practitioners, ambulance,
service vehicles for emergency situations, etc.
The projected SDMP allocation for five years is estimated at Php 39.6 million. Breakdown per program
sector is shown in Table 1-5.
On top of the community benefits from SDMP, the IP communities will continue to benefit from the
royalty payments while the Project is in operation. Royalty share from the Limestone project will sustain
the improvement of the IP sector and their communities in accordance with their Community Royalty
Development Plan.
Table 1-5 Projected SDMP Allocation for Years 2022-2026 (PhP)

Government Income 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Health, Nutrition and Sanitation

1,083,341 1,143,462 1,054,828 1,008,241 1,051,383
Programs (18%)
Education Programs (18%) 1,083,341 1,143,462 1,054,828 1,008,241 1,051,383
Livelihood Programs (37%) 2,226,869 2,350,450 2,168,258 2,072,496 2,161,177
Public Infrastructure Programs-

902,784 952,885 879,023 840,201 876,153
(15%)
Socio-Cultural and Religious
722,227 762,308 703,218 672,161 700,922
Activities (12%)
Information Education and
1,203,712 1,270,513 1,172,031 1,120,268 1,168,204
Communication (IEC) – (15%)
Development of Mining
802,475 847,009 781,354 746,845 778,802
Technology Geosciences – (10%)
TOTAL 8,024,753 8,470,091 7,813,542 7,468,455 7,788,027
Source: CRO
The Mamanwa-Manobo IP sector has already acquired their Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title
(CADT) Number 237 giving this sector ancestral authority over areas within the Agata MPSA including
the ALP area. They have an existing Community Royalty Development Program (CRDP), which was
duly approved by the NCIP Commission En Banc and is basis of the Indigenous Cultural Communities’
development programs. At present funding for the CRDP is derived from the Agata Nickel Laterite
Project’s royalty payments, and will be continued using the royalty payments from the ALP.

The following tribal groups comprise the CADT 237 holders with their corresponding royalty shares:
• Mamanwa Tribal Management Organization – 23%

• Agata Mamanwa Tribal Organization – 23%
• Mamanwa Manobo Mapaso Tribal Sectoral Organization – 24%
• Coro Mamanwa Management Organization – 30%
Approximately PHP 45.5 million worth of royalty will be received by the IP beneficiaries for the first five
(5) years of the Project, as shown on Table 1-6.
Table 1-6 Estimated Royalty Payments (PHP)

Cost Item Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 TOTAL
IP Royalty 9,213,750 9,804,350 8,977,500 8,583,750 8,977,500 45,556,850
Allocation of the royalty payments they will receive will be used for the implementation of their
Community Royalty Development Plan (CRDP). Fund allocation will be 50% for CADT governance and
50% for IP community development program. The corresponding allocation per program groups is
presented in Figure 1-5 and Figure 1-6.
Figure 1-5 IP Allocation for Community Development Program

Figure 1-6 IP Royalty Allocation for Governance
Benefit of the LGU and the National Government will be in the form of taxes (i.e., business taxes, excise
taxes, withholding taxes, corporate income taxes, and occupational taxes). Other income includes
various permit fees and license fees.
As shown in , approximately Php 392 million will be collected from the Project in the form of taxes,
royalty, SDMP, and fees for the first five years of project operation.
Table 1-7 Estimated Project Benefits from SDMP, Taxes, Fees, and Royalty (PHP)
Volume, DMT 2,047,500 2,178,750 1,995,000 1,907,500 1,995,000 10,123,750
Revenue 921,375,000 980,437,500 897,750,000 858,375,000 897,750,000 4,555,687,500
OPEX 534,983,540 564,672,742 520,902,860 497,897,059 519,201,860 2,637,658,060
SDMP 8,024,753 8,470,091 7,813,543 7,468,456 7,788,028 39,564,871
IP Royalty 9,213,750 9,804,375 8,977,500 8,583,750 8,977,500 45,556,875
Wharfage 18,785,813 19,990,031 18,304,125 17,501,313 18,304,125 92,885,406
Excise Tax 36,855,000 39,217,500 35,910,000 34,335,000 35,910,000 182,227,500
Business Tax 6,449,625 6,863,063 6,284,250 6,008,625 6,284,250 31,889,813
TOTAL 79,328,941 84,345,060 77,289,418 73,897,143 77,263,903 392,124,465

1.3. Project Alternatives
Different project alternatives were evaluated with respect to economics, technical feasibility, social and
environmental impacts and post mining sustainability. The features of each alternative, as well as the
more significant opportunities and constraint, are discussed in the following subsections.
1.3.1. Siting and Resources Alternatives
There is no alternative identified for the project site location as it was determined by the setting of the
deposit. The processing facility was strategically chosen to be situated near the mineralized area to
minimize the hauling distance from quarry to plant facility. Moreover, the chosen site is also near the
causeway, where the loading activities will be performed. This location will minimize the hauling cost.
The adjacent flat area north of the quarry is planned to be the ore stockpile area. The southern side of
the quarry is for infrastructures. Areas on the east side were not considered since it is far from the
causeway.
The project siting, water, and power source considerations are summarized in Table 1-8 below.
Table 1-8 Project Siting and Resource Alternatives

• Agata North Laterite Project (ANLP) is
Alternative 1: Nickel Laterite ongoing; Nickel Laterite deposit is near
Deposits depletion.
• Gold deposits within the MPSA boundary
Alternative 2: Gold and Copper are currently deemed not economically
Deposits feasible to mine.
• Further exploration work is needed.
Ore Resource
Alternative 3: Limestone Deposit • The limestone deposit is found to be a
(selected) high-grade resource of CaCO3/CaO.
• Project can promote continuity of
employment opportunities for the
community after the ANLP ends.
• Project can supplement the demand for
aggregates and cement industries in
Mindanao and nearby regions.
• Location of the limestone ore deposit.
• Site is considered with low flood
Payongpayong, Brgy. Tinigbasan, susceptibility but with high landslide
Mine Site
Tubay (selected) susceptibility according to the Mines and
Geosciences Bureau; therefore, ground
stability techniques should be utilized.
• Identified location of the stockpile area.

Alternative 1: Flat area north of
• Location far from the causeway,
deposit
increasing hauling costs.
Crushing Plant Site
• Location is near relative to both the
Alternative 2: Northwest of deposit deposit and the causeway.
(selected) • Streamlining the transport of ore from
mining to product delivery.

• Current ANLP project is tapping ANECO
Power Alternative 1: Local grid
for the power source.
(selected, main)
• ALP can expand the existing
Resource Utilization
infrastructures up to the crushing plant.
(Power)
Power Alternative 2: Generator sets • Generator sets will be used in case of
(selected, secondary) power interruptions or as additional source
of power.
• Payongpayong Creek will be the source of
Water Alternative 1: Payongpayong
freshwater for water lorries and Land Craft
creek (selected)
Resource Utilization Transport (LCT)
(Water) • Payton Creek will be the source of water
Water Alternative 2: Payton Creek
for the campsite/ domestic water
(selected)
requirements.
1.3.2. Technology/ Operation Processes Selection Alternatives
Quarrying, which is the widely accepted and practiced method on limestone deposit recovery for cement
manufacture, will be used to extract the ore. Other mining activities involved in the limestone extraction
are site clearing, drilling, blasting, loading, hauling, benching, and road and dump maintenance. Mining
will be simultaneous with comminution, or size reduction. Crushing and screening will also be carried
out to produce the desired sizes of limestone products. The method and technology selection criteria
are summarized in Table 1-9 below.
Table 1-9 Technology and Process Alternatives

• The geology and mineralization within
the area is shallow and suggests a
Surface Mining (Quarrying) surface mining approach following
Mining Method
(selected) technical and economic considerations.
There is no other method considered
given this type of deposit.
• This blasting method is still unproven.
Alternative 1: Electrohydraulic
• Requires large amount of water and
blasting
power utilization.
• Site is not considered an area
susceptible to liquefaction according to
Blasting Alternative 2: Conventional rock PHILVOCS.
blasting (selected) • Controlled blasting to be implemented to
minimize effects of noise, vibrations and
dust.
Alternative 3: Dozer ripping (or no • Ripping will be done when competence
blasting) of the ore will not require blasting.
• Jaw crusher is a commonly used primary
Crusher Alternative 1: Jaw crusher crusher and is best suited for high
hardness rocks.
Comminution • Impact crusher is used to minimize
Crusher alternative 2: Impact production of unwanted fine products.
crusher (selected) • Impact crushers have higher crushing
efficiency than jaw crushers.

1.3.3. No Action Alternative
The no action alternative assumes that the Agata Limestone Project will not pursue after the Agata
Nickel Laterite Project is concluded. The benefits and consequences of not continuing with the
Limestone Project are summarized in Table 1-10.
Table 1-10 Summary of Benefits and Consequences from the No Action Alternative
Aspect Benefits Consequences
Environment • Land surface clearing and excavation • The opportunity to expand the Agro-
associated with the surface mining cum-Tourism Project as part of the post
method will be avoided. mining land use plan within the Payong-
• Potential air quality impacts from payong area will be lost.
equipment usage, such as dust • The environmental stewardship will be
emission and diesel emission will be limited to the rehabilitation areas of
avoided. ANLP.
• Potential impacts to water quality and
aquatic environment from siltation due
to mining activity will be avoided.
Health and Safety • Potential health and safety hazards • Opportunity for more and/ or expanded
from the mining activities will be health and sanitation programs to be
eliminated. implemented from continued SDMP for
the impact communities will be lost.
Socio-economic • Influx of people resulting from economic • Opportunity loss for the ff benefits of
boom will be avoided. Project Expansion:
• Potential cultural/ lifestyle changes from
economic development will be avoided. • Social development programs for the
improvement of Health, Education,
Livelihood, and Infrastructure due to
continued SDMP for the impact
communities.
• More skills training and livelihood
assistance programs as part of the
continued SDMP implementation.
• Continuity of household income due to
direct employment from mining and
creation of downstream industries
(business opportunities) and livelihood
programs provided by the Company.
• Continuity of development projects for
the IP community.
National/ Local • Value of the commodity in the area • Development of mineral resources, as
Economy could potentially increase in the future. part of the MPSA agreement with the
Government will not be maximized.
• The support to the government’s drive
to boost the domestic production of
cement and construction aggregates for
the various infrastructure projects
nationwide will not be realized.
• Potential income loss for the LGU and
National Government from the payment
of direct taxes (excise tax, withholding
tax and occupational taxes)

Table 1-10 Summary of Benefits and Consequences from the No Action Alternative (continued)
Aspect Benefits Consequences
National/ Local • Value of the commodity in the area • Potential income loss for the LGU from
Economy could potentially increase in the future. the indirect tax payments from
increased economic activities (i.e.
higher purchasing power of consumers
as a result of direct employment in
mining and creation of downstream
industries (businesses, livelihood, etc.).
• Opportunity of receiving IP royalty
payment due to increased Company
revenue will be lost.
1 . 4 . Project Components
The components will be within a 554.4-hectare area, including the actual quarry area, processing plant,
stockyards, and support facilities. Major project activities include drilling, blasting, excavation, hauling,
stockpiling, crushing, and ship loading. The support facilities are existing structures of the ANLP,
including the offices, accommodations, mess hall, clinic, warehouse, motor pool, contractor’s laydown
areas, fuel depot and storage, environmental structures, and causeway (port facilities) that will be used
to supplement the limestone operation.
1.4.1. General Layout of Facilities
Approximately 554.4 hectares or about 11.10% of the 4,995 hectares MPSA will be the component
area. This, however, may be slightly changed as the mining operation progresses. A large part of the
ANLP ECC shall also be part of the components of the ALP mainly because the main haul roads of the
ANLP project will be transformed as secondary access roads for the ALP. These roads will be used for
transport of supplies and materials. The settling ponds and other environmental structures to address
these secondary impact areas requires to cover a large area to be deemed effective. At certain periods
during the operations phase, some mined out areas shall be subjected to progressive rehabilitation
activities. The component area distribution is summarized in Table 1-11. A site development map
showing the mining facilities, routes, boundaries, and buffer zones are shown in Figure 1-7.
Facilities will be laid out strategically to streamline the flow of the limestone products from the quarry to
the clients. The ALP route map shown on Figure 1-8. demonstrates the flow of transport of raw material.
From quarry, the defragmented limestone will pass through Road 1 and will be transported to the
crushing plant. From the crushing plant, the materials will pass through primary and secondary vibrating
screens and will be segregated into covered stockpiles of limestone products that are ready for delivery
to clients. The stockpiled materials will be transported via 1.5 km covered conveyor belt along Road 1
directly loaded to LCT/barges as final material at the port and will be unloaded to mother vessels for
clients outside the region. Crushed limestone materials may also be hauled to clients within the region
via Roads 2, 3, and 4, exiting at the Mangga Main Gate. Roads 2 and 3 may also be used for transport
of waste and materials for temporary storage at COS2.

Table 1-11 Project component for Agata Limestone Operations

Component Area (ha) % MPSA area
Payong-Payong Limestone Quarry Area 66.94 1.3%

Causeway 5 0.1%
Overburden Waste Storage Area / MOS- Marginal Ore Stockpile 184.15 3.7%
Stockyard and Screening Plant 20.35 0.4%
Crushing plant & Stockpile area 21.93 0.4%
COS1 & COS2 11.93 0.2%
Environment Structures-Nursery 4.65 0.1%
Explosive Magazine Area 0.79 0.0%
Office and Housing Facilities 43.06 0.9%
Power Supply Facility 3.11 0.1%
Motor pool 95.21 1.9%
Roads 53.46 1.1%
Environment Structures (MRF, Hazardous Facility, Settling 0.9%
43.81
ponds)
Total Area 554.4 11.1%

Figure 1-7 Site Development Map

Figure 1-8 Route Map

1.4.2. Major Project Components
The description of the identified major components of the Project is discussed in the following
subsections. The technical description of each is provided in Table 1-12.
Table 1-12 Coordinates of the Mining Project Facilities (Major Project Components)
Component Description Area (ha) Location Corner Latitude Longitude
Delineated 1 9° 16' 17.7276" 125° 30' 32.7672"

Delineated 2 9° 16' 25.4892" 125° 30' 26.6976"
Limestone
Limestone Payong-
Resource 3 9° 16' 45.1848" 125° 30' 46.3644"
Resource Area for 66.94 ha Payong
Quarry Area 4 9° 16' 46.9956" 125° 30' 57.3876"
future Limestone
(with buffer 5 9° 16' 30.8388" 125° 31' 6.4776"
development
zones) 6 9° 16' 20.9928" 125° 30' 57.0168"
Site for Ore 1 9° 16' 40.224" 125° 30' 19.8648"
Sitio
Loading to
Causeway Payong- 2 9° 16' 37.0776" 125° 30' 16.3584"
Shipping Vessel; 5 ha.
payong 3 9° 16' 39.1764" 125° 30' 14.2344"
incudes the 0.77
Shore
ha causeway 4 9° 16' 42.4272" 125° 30' 17.2584"
1 9° 16' 52.0464" 125° 30' 34.4844"
2 9° 17' 0.5244" 125° 30' 32.9796"
Overburden 3 9° 17' 1.464" 125° 30' 35.3556"
Waste Dump site for 4 9° 17' 7.7712" 125° 30' 35.2692"
Agata North
Storage waste materials 5
Storage ore 9° 17' 10.6584" 125° 30' 37.6416"
Area / MOS- located on mined
184.15 ha material 6 9° 17' 7.2708" 125° 30' 42.1992"
Marginal out areas from the
Ore ANLP 7 9° 16' 58.1952" 125° 30' 41.9004"
Stockpile 8 9° 16' 57.5652" 125° 30' 39.6972"
9 9° 16' 55.8732" 125° 30' 37.9404"
10 9° 16' 52.6944" 125° 30' 37.8972"
1 9° 16' 34.5324" 125° 30' 23.94"
2 9° 16' 39.7128" 125° 30' 21.33"
Screening and
3 9° 16' 39.27" 125° 30' 20.4768"
sizing facilities
Sitio 4 9° 16' 40.7064" 125° 30' 19.1232"
with temporary
Screening Payong-
stockpile area for 20.35 ha 5 9° 16' 41.358" 125° 30' 16.6536"
Plant payong
input and output 6 9° 16' 43.9752" 125° 30' 16.7688"
materials
7 9° 16' 45.4692" 125° 30' 22.5"
8 9° 16' 45.0012" 125° 30' 22.5"
9 9° 16' 36.1164" 125° 30' 26.9424"
1 9° 16' 31.0476" 125° 30' 29.4768"
Crushing facilities
Sitio 2 9° 16' 36.1128" 125° 30' 26.9424"
with temporary
Crushing Payong-
stockpile area for 21.93 ha 3 9° 16' 42.5424" 125° 30' 36.918"
Plant payong
input and output 4 9° 16' 39.1044" 125° 30' 39.0996"
materials
5 9° 16' 34.8708" 125° 30' 32.7888"
Crushed ore 1 9° 17' 33.3744" 125° 30' 55.746"
stockyard; storage Sitio
COS1 and area for limetone Payongpayo 2 9° 17' 37.2372" 125° 30' 57.9528"
11.93 ha
COS2 products that are ng
3 9° 17' 33.8712" 125° 31' 5.088"
ready for
shipment 4 9° 17' 37.158" 125° 31' 12.4212"
1 9° 16' 40.764" 125° 31' 20.1864"
Nursery - Area to
Environment grow and 2 9° 16' 43.0428" 125° 31' 19.056"
Structures- propagate plants 4.65 ha Agata North 3 9° 16' 45.8148" 125° 31' 21"
Nursery for rehabilitation 4 9° 16' 45.8616" 125° 31' 22.3392"
works
5 9° 16' 43.1004" 125° 31' 24.0384"
6 9° 16' 40.1232" 125° 31' 21.8856"

1.4.2.1. Payongpayong Limestone Quarry Area
The limestone deposit located at the Payongpayong ridge will be mined by quarrying method. Mining
activities will include drilling, blasting, excavation, loading to hauling equipment, hauling, road
maintenance, and drainage management.
The mine design is based on the principle of maximizing recovery of reserves and minimizing movement
of waste. For this purpose, final berms are designed with different widths ranging from five (5) to thirty
(30) meters. The quarry design criteria are based on similar limestone quarry/mining operations. The
mine design criteria are shown in Table 1-13.
Table 1-13 Project component for Agata Limestone Operations

Parameter Value
Bench Height at least 5 meters

Working Berm Width 5 -30 meters
Batter Angle 60 degrees
Slope Angle 24 - 45 degrees
Ramp Width 10 meters
Mining activities will progress from the topmost elevation to the bottom of the mine (0 msl). Grade control
samples will be obtained from production blast hole drilling. Blast hole sample assays will be the guide
whether the material in the area is suitable for processing, blending, stockpiled as marginal ore, or
labeled as waste material. Areas suitable for processing will be properly delineated in the field using
ribbons, flags, stakes and/or ropes.
Every working bench shall be levelled using heavy equipment before it is defragmented by blasting.
Drilling and Blasting shall be done by a licensed drilling and blasting contractor and supervised by
licensed mining engineers and blast foreman. Whenever appropriate, dozer ripping shall be undertaken
instead of blasting. Service Contractors shall be engaged to provide the equipment and operators for
quarrying and mining operations. Table 1-14 lists the mine equipment complement for the Limestone
Project.
Table 1-14 Mine Equipment List

Equipment Type Model
Dozer CAT D8R

Drill FD HCR900 (76/89 mm)
Hydraulic excavator Komatsu PC850-8R1
Wheel loader CAT 950 GC
10/12W Truck Isuzu CYH, Howo, Chenglong
Offroad dump truck Komatsu HD405-8
Grader GD705-5
Rock breaker
Compactor 10 tons
Water truck 10,000 liter capacity

1.4.2.2. Causeway
The existing causeway already has an approved Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC-R13-
1306-0084) issued by EMB-13 in July 2013. It is located at Sitio Payong-payong, Brgy. Tinigbasan,
Tubay, Agusan del Norte approximately 1.5 km from the limestone quarry area. The ownership of the
existing ANLP facilities such as pier yard, port office, roads, drainage system, and stockyard in Payong-
payong will be transferred to the ALP once ANLP ceases operations.
1.4.2.3. Overburden Waste and Marginal Ore Stockpile Area
There will be no tailings storage facility necessary because there is no tailings produced by the
operations. However, a proper overburden waste and marginal ore stockpile area will be built, complete
with sedimentation control facilities. The technical specifications of the waste and ore stockpiles is
summarized on Table 1-15.
Table 1-15 Waste/MOS stockyard design specifications

Element Description Value
Dump Lift Height Dump lift heights for every berm 15m
Dump Access Width Dump ramp width 10m
Dump Lift Face Angle Dump slope angle at repose 35 degrees
Dump Ramp Grade Dump ramp gradient 10%
1.4.2.4. Crushing and Screening Plant
A crushing and screening plant will be processing the mined limestone to the desired final product.
Mined limestone from the site will be loaded into dump trucks or articulated trucks and hauled to the
crushing facility. The crusher will be located near the mine site for shorter hauling and easy transport
of big limestone rocks. The screening and stockpile facility will be located between the crushing plant
and the port. Limestone products will be conveyed to the port via a 1.0 km conveyor belt. The required
process plant machineries and equipment are listed in Table 1-16.
Table 1-16 Crushing Plant Equipment List

Equipment Type Size Design Duty Unit
CRUSHING CIRCUIT
Vibrating Grizzly 1
Dump Ore Bin 1
Primary Feeder 1
Horizontal Shaft Impactor 51" x 59" Max. feed size 24", 360 t/h max capacity 1
Sacrificial Conveyor 13.14 1
Transport Conveyor 1
Primary Vibrating Screen 5' x 14' Triple deck (80 mm, 40 mm and 20 mm 1
Transport Conveyor 1 2
Secondary Vibrating Screen 4' x 10' Double deck (10 mm and 5 mm aperture) 1

WATER SERVICES
Service Water Tank 100 m3 1
Service Water Pump 1 1
Service Water Pump 2 1
Fire Water Tank 100 m3 1
Fire Water Pump 1 1
Fire Water Pump 2 1
ELECTRICAL SERVICES
Generator set 1 MW 2
PRODUCT HANDLING
Covered conveyor belt 1.0 km 1
1.4.2.5. Crushed Ore Stockpiles (COS)
COS, or crushed ore stockpile, may be stored in a stockyard area prior to shipment to ensure continuity
of ship loading in case of unforeseen delays in production. COS 1and COS 2 will have the same
specifications as the Waste Dump/MOS stockpile area.
1.4.3. Mine Support Facilities
Most of the mine support facilities are already existing at the ANLP. Additional facilities may include
power and water supply, fuel depot, additional access roads, explosive magazine, fabrication shop, and
warehouse. Table 1-17 shows the identified support facilities, along with the technical description of
their location. Additional services to be provided by Service Contractors are drilling and blasting,
suppliers of explosives, plant maintenance, and conveyor maintenance.
Table 1-17 Limestone Project Support Facilities

Corne
Component Description Area (ha) Location Latitude Longitude
r
1 9° 17' 45.4596" 125° 31' 25.0788"

Facility for Agata 2 9° 17' 45.5136" 125° 31' 26.6628"
Explosive
explosive 0.87 ha North
Magazine 3 9° 17' 44.1744" 125° 31' 26.5908"
magazine Magazine
4 9° 17' 44.0916" 125° 31' 25.2156"
1 9° 16' 41.7756" 125° 30' 29.4876"
Sitio
Power Serves as power 2 9° 16' 43.5288" 125° 30' 28.7028"
Payongpa
Supply source to the 3.11 ha
yong 3 9° 16' 45.2064" 125° 30' 30.4524"
Facility crushing plant
4 9° 16' 43.752" 125° 30' 33.1704"
Includes main road
from Mangga gate
Roads to the other 53.46 ha Main road 1
auxiliary facilities
needed for the ALP
1 9° 17' 33.3744" 125° 30' 55.746"
2 9° 17' 37.2372" 125° 30' 57.9528"
Motor
Area for equipment 3 9° 17' 33.8712" 125° 31' 5.088"
Motor pool/ pool and
and truck 95.21 ha
laydown laydown 4 9° 17' 37.158" 125° 31' 12.4212"
maintenance of
area area 5 9° 17' 33.594" 125° 31' 17.6484"
mining contractors.
6 9° 17' 18.4884" 125° 31' 4.584"
7 9° 17' 25.4184" 125°31'12"

Settling ponds -
Environment
The silt pond will
Structures Agata
serve as catchment 48.81 ha 1
North
of eroded soils
prior to discharge
Includes base Agata 1 9° 17' 37.7196" 125° 30' 52.0236"
camp facilities, North
Office and 2 9° 17' 43.1412" 125° 30' 47.214"
assay lab, MRF, 43.06 ha Sitio
Housing
hazardous waste Payong- 3 9° 17' 52.0872" 125° 30' 54.3204"
Facilities
facilities and admin payong
office. 4 9° 17' 43.476" 125° 31' 1.7868"
1.4.3.1. Explosive Magazine
The explosive magazine is a container used as temporary storage of explosive material such as
dynamites, ANFO (Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oil) and blasting accessories. The explosive magazine
building will be constructed in conformance to the standards set by the government. It will have a
double-layer fence constructed along the perimeter of the area and will be secured 24-hours a day as
measures of security. Proper safety signages and warning signs will also be installed.
1.4.3.2. Power Requirement and Source
Power supply for the Project shall be provided by the Agusan del Norte Electric Cooperative (ANECO).
This is the same power supplying the power requirements of the direct and indirectly affected
barangays.
The projected daily power consumption for the ALP is approximately 13,600 kWh. Diesel powered
generator sets will be on standby power and will be used to augment the daily power supply
requirement. A summary of the Project power requirements is in Table 1-18, while Table 1-19 Error!
Reference source not found. shows the additional power needed for the plant which shall be augmented
by diesel-powered generator sets.
Table 1-18 Power Requirements During ALP Operation

Facility Power Requirements Source
Campsite 1,517 Kwh per day

Office complex 2782 Kwh per day Generator Sets and Supply
Motor pool 759 Kwh per day Distribution from ANECO
Total 5,058 Kwh per day
Note: API, 2016
Table 1-19 Additional Power requirement for ALP Crushing and Screening Operation
Facility Power Requirements Source
Vibrating feeder 300 Kwh per day

Primary Impact Crusher 5,200 Kwh per day
2 Generator Sets (1MW each)
Secondary Impactor 2,600 Kwh per day and additional 6-7 MW Supply
Distribution from ANECO
Primary Vibrating Screen 300 Kwh per day
Total 8,510 Kwh per day

1.4.3.3. Road Network
Road network is classified into two (2) major parts—the production haul roads and the support facilities
access roads. Production will use the Quarry-Plant-Causeway roads. Access roads allow logistics of
supplies and access to the support facilities such as the camp, motor pool, and the environmental
facilities. Construction and maintenance of all roads shall be in line with the mine, environmental and
safety parameters.
1.4.3.4. Motorpool
The motor pool /mechanical shop is existing and currently used for the nickel operations. It is equipped
with secondary containment to contain accidental discharge of hazardous liquids. There are also oil and
water separators to prevent oil contamination in the wastewater.
Used oil storage tanks are also present in the area as temporary storage for used oil until they are
removed from the site by an accredited used oil transporter. These pollution control structures are
constructed in accordance with the hazardous waste management guidelines. Regular inspection/ audit
is conducted by the Pollution Control Officer to monitor compliance to the pollution control protocols.
1.4.3.5. Environment Structures- Siltation/ Sedimentation Ponds
There are existing settling ponds covering a total area of 41.99 hectares within the ANLP. These
facilities will be needing minimal maintenance since the ANLP area will already be under final
rehabilitation. About 87% of the ANLP settling ponds will be retained as part of the mitigating measures
to address siltation at the secondary impact areas of the ALP. The ponds that will remain active during
ALP are those located on the mid-western part of the MPSA where the ALP is situated. A new series
of settling ponds will also be constructed at the western part of the quarry area, in addition to the ANLP
settling ponds, addressing potential siltation issues at the ALP secondary impact areas. Their sizes and
location is discussed in detail in Section 1.4.5.
The settling ponds are designed incorporating the engineering parameters, capacities, and purpose.
The ponds are mitigating measures to contain the silt and reduce the speed of the water flow, and for
the deposition of silt. Pollution control components are the interceptor canals, silt traps, settling ponds,
drainage canals, and sumps. As the extraction capacity expands, additional settling ponds will be
constructed to sufficiently manage drainage requirements.
1.4.3.6. Housing Facility, Administration Offices, and Other Buildings
The existing accommodation facility has three (3) buildings - the Managerial, Superintendent, and
Supervisor building. This facility houses selected managers and senior level employees. The housing
complex also features the basketball court and fitness gym for fitness and recreational activities and
the mess hall serving food for accommodated employees.

Photo 1-1 Agata Accommodation Facility
The existing Admin building is housing the Mines, General Services, Information Technology, Security,
HRAD, TMEPEO, COMREL, Finance and Site Management Departments. It also features a meeting
room and a landscaped garden for the employees.
Photo 1-2 Agata Administration Office
The existing Assay Laboratory is situated near the Administration building. The Assay laboratory
consists of the Sample Preparation building and the Chemical Analysis building. The Chemical Analysis
building houses the X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer and the Atomic Absorption Spectrometer and
various laboratory equipment and paraphernalia. This will continued be used for the limestone operation
for quality control analyses.
Photo 1-3 Assay Laboratory

Another support structure is the Fuel Depot. Fuel is currently supplied by three suppliers namely Flying
V, Petron, and Sea Birds Fuel. These fuel suppliers have their own storage tanks and dispensing units
located at the fuel depot. A total of six (6) cylindrical diesel fuel storage tanks with a combined capacity
of 96,000 liters are located at the fuel depot. All tanks are provided with safety control devices such as
leak alarm monitors and flow regulators to prevent leaks. The fuel tanks are fitted with secondary
containment to contain accidental releases. The operation of this facility will be continued during the
limestone project operation.
1.4.4. Water Supply
Multiple creeks and springs around the Project site will supply the water requirements of the Project
Domestic water (7%) is used for bathing, cleaning, and cooking while industrial water (93%) is used for
equipment washing, nursery operation, and dust suppression. The water sources listed below will be
for the following uses:
a. Coboy Creek– Dust suppression

b. Mantiawas Creek – Domestic water supply for housing and office buildings
c. Payong-Payong Creek – Dust suppression; Crushing plant water supply
d. Solana Creek – Crushing plant water supply
e. Paiton Creek– Domestic water supply for Administration Building
f. Agroland Spring - Maintenance at Nursery, MRF, and domestic water supply at security outposts
Compared to the ANLP operations the industrial water consumption for the limestone operation will
increase because the limestone operation will employ wet crushing to minimize dust generation. An
additional of 200,000 liters per month of water will be needed for the crushing operation. Increased
equipment traffic will also require deployment of more water trucks for dust suppression. Domestic water
use on the other hand, is expected to remain the same.
1.4.5. Wastewater Management
1.4.5.1. Sedimentation and Siltation Ponds
There will be no need for a tailings storage facility for the Project. Expected wastewater discharges will
be in the form of sediments in stormwater runoff only. Environmental infrastructure is integral to the
mine plans and will be part of the mining operation standard protocols. The following activities will be
undertaken relative to drainage management.
• Development of proper benching and gradient to address the water drainage and minimize
erosion;
• Construction of peripheral and perimeter drainage around the mine area, stockyards, and waste
dumps to divert water run-off towards the series of catchment ponds
• Development of silt ponds for filtering sediment prior to discharge.
• Construction of silt traps will at various locations along the drains to capture sediments before
discharging to designated siltation ponds.
• Installation of geotextile and break-water boulders on the discharge-end of sedimentation
ponds for catchment, filtering and control of water velocity prior to the discharge
• Constant desilting activity of the silt ponds must be scheduled to maintain the capacity of the
ponds.

Currently, the sediment ponds at the causeway area has a total capacity of 130,782 cu.m. The ponds
can sustain 2.81 days of continuous rain, based on the maximum recorded single day rainfall of 233
mm. Additional ponds will be installed for the limestone operation, as part of the mitigating measures.
A total of 330,300 cu.m of ponds capacity will be constructed for the limestone project. This capacity
can hold a total of 4.53 days of continuous rain based on the max recorded. Shown in Table 1-20 below
is the computation of current capacities of sediment catchment ponds and of the proposed catchment
ponds planned for ALP. The mapped drainage flow, as well as the sediment pond location, is presented
on Figure 1-9.

S e c ti o n 1- P r oj e c t D e s c ri pti o n
T a b l e 1 - 2 0 C u r r e n t a n d P r o p o s e d S ilt ati o n P o n d s o n L i m e s t o n e A r e a
Proposed
Current Pond Capacities
Capacity
Per Area
MA9 MA8 MA7 MA6 MA5 MA4 MA3 MA2 MA1 Pier Admin Limestone
Highest peak rainfall per day

233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233
(mm)
Disturbed Area (ha) 16.54 9.71 18.93 42.42 27.41 22.28 36.31 15.97 5.56 33.03 7.041 33.33
Coefficient 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60% 60%
Water Discharge per day (cu.m) 23,123 13,575 26,464 59,303 28,319 31,147 50,761 22,326 7,773 46,176 9,843 46,176
% silt collected monthly 1.37 2.3 1.19 0.54 0.83 1.02 0.63 1.41 3.95 0.69 3.15 0.69
Combined silt and water 23,443 13,895 26,784 59,623 38,639 31,467 51,081 22,646 8,093 46,496 10,163 46,496
Volume of Ponds (cu.m) 109,335 228,181 50,415 259,230 6,728 58,380 177,539 71,298 29,506 130,782 2,873 210,782
No. of days continuous rain 4.66 16.42 1.88 4.35 0.16 1.86 3.48 3.15 3.65 2.81 0.28 4.53
E n vir o n m e nt al I m p a ct St at e m e nt R e p o rt P a g e | 1- 2 9
A PI A g at a Li m e st o n e Pr oject D ec e m b er 20 2 0- R ev 0 1
Figure 1-9- Drainage Map and Location of Sediment Ponds

1.4.5.2. Domestic Wastewater Treatment
The existing administration building, and staff houses already have established sewage treatment
facility. The treatment system for septic tank is by syphoning through an accredited third-party treater
of DENR. Other domestic wastes such as waste coming from grease traps are being collected and
store in the hazardous waste facility, disposal is thru the accredited treater of DENR. Tap water that is
commonly used for bathing, washing and for other domestic uses is chlorinated. The wastewater is
directed to the septic tank. The limestone project will have less manpower (226) than the existing nickel
project (>350). It is expected that the existing sewerage system will meet the requirement of this new
Project.
1.4.6. Communication Facilities
1.4.6.1. Cellular Network
A cell site of Smart and Globe Company has been established at Jabonga and Santiago municipality
of Agusan del Norte. The signal reaches the entrance area, admin office, motor pool and causeway
area of Agata site.
1.4.6.2. Postal Communication
The Municipal Postal Office handles all the mail services throughout the municipality through the
Philippines Postal Corporation. There are no private companies operating in the Municipality which
handle mail or cargo delivery services.
1.4.6.3. Television and Internet Network
There are a lot of cable networks operating within the Municipality, with unlimited channels depending
on the desire of the client. The company is availing of the G-Sat cable network. Internet provider
KOMSPEC is owned and operated by a private corporation located in Butuan City.
1.4.6.4. Radio Communication
There is an existing radio communication on site. Two (2) radio repeaters are erected at strategic
locations. There is an open channel where all can communicate and another four (4) channels for for
specific uses. The radio channel assignment are as follows:
Channel 1- Used a general channel.

Channel 2- ENVI, General Services and Community Relation Departments.
Channel 3- To be used for personal matter.
Channel 4- Survey Department.
Channel 5- Mines, Safety and Health, Material Management and Assay Department.
A radio repeater is a combination of a radio receiver and a radio transmitter that receives a signal and
retransmits it so that two-way radio signals can cover longer distances or can reach blind-spots.

1.4.7. Safety Devices/Emergency Facilities
Safety control procedures of ALP will adapt the applicable practices from the ANLP operations (e.g.
mine, port, and shipping activities). New protocols to be added will be related to blasting and crushing
operations. Some examples of the control emergency procedures are as follows:
a. Sirens within the industrial premises serves as prior notice and alert the occupants to any danger
or hazard. Sirens when sounded gives the occupant enough time to escape from the danger zone.
Sirens are also used whenever there are blasting operations.
b. Extensometer devices measure changes in length or ground displacements the device can detect
abnormal or critical ground movements that will trigger alarms to warn of imminent danger of
ground or slope failures.
c. Fire alarms, fire extinguisher, and fire trucks are equipment for fire mitigating measures. Fire alarm
tools are installed on facilities like offices, staff house, and fuel depot. They are devices that detect
and warn people through visual, audio, and other means if a smoke, fire, carbon monoxide or
other emergencies are present in an area. Fire extinguishers are active fire protection devices
used to extinguish or control small fires, often in emergency situations only. A Fire truck is used on
an out-of-control fire such as one which has reached the ceiling, engulfed buildings, or bush fires.
The crushing and screening plant will also be installed with fire detection systems and provided
with fire mitigating equipment.
d. Emergency shutdown valves are primarily associated with activities like the crushing and screening
plant wherein the entire operation can be stopped at the push of a button. A safety shutoff valve is
an actuated valve designed to stop the flow of a hazard upon the detection of a dangerous event.
This prevents the progression of the danger that may harm people, equipment, or the environment.
1.4.8 Pollution Control and Waste Management Facility

1.4.8.1. Pollution Control Strategies
Potential air pollution sources on site include the equipment exhaust and dust generation from mining
activities. Dust generated by quarrying, crushing and screening, and hauling activities will be mitigated
through regular deployment of water trucks for spraying. Priority areas for dust control will include the
hauling roads. A more frequent schedule is established during dry season. Regular road grading and
surfacing will also be done at haul roads. Dust from the crushing plant will be addressed by ensuring
that the plant is running in optimum, with negative pressure, with its bins and storage are properly
designed. Final products will be housed in a covered stockyard.
Regular preventive maintenance of the mining fleet mitigates the issue on harmful diesel emissions.
Maintenance activity will be the responsibility of the contractors. Compliance of the equipment providers
to this requirement will be checked through regular inspection by the Safety Department.
Noise impacts will be relatively less critical primarily due to the rural nature of the project site and
distances of the quarrying and crushing plant site from the community. Crushing and sizing equipment
will have noise reduction built into them.
Potential source of water pollution from operation is siltation. Pollution control components to mitigate
this will comprise of interceptor canals, silt traps, settling ponds, drainage, canals and sumps. These
water management facilities will allow the sediment materials in water run-off will to settle prior to

discharge into draining water bodies. Covering of the stockpiles with laminated canvass is another
measure to be implemented to prevent loose soils from being carried by surface run-off which contribute
to siltation.
All motor pools will be equipped with oil-water separator for the generated wastewater from equipment
washing and maintenance. Construction of used oil storage area in the contractor motor pools will be
required to temporary contain the used oil materials, prior to its delivery to the main used oil storage
facility. These pollution control structures will be constructed in accordance with the hazardous waste
management guidelines. Regular inspection will be conducted by the Pollution Control Officer to monitor
compliance to the pollution control protocols.
1.4.8.2. Solid Waste Management
The Solid Waste Management Program is in place and involves daily waste segregation, collection, and
characterization of the domestic waste generated at the mine site and camp facilities.
Photo 1-4 Solid Waste Management Facility
Recyclable wastes are temporarily stored in the Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) while waiting to be
transported or disposed or sold to local scrap buyers. Compostable wastes are used as substrate for
the vermiculture process to produce organic fertilizer for the nursery and reforestation projects. A
contained waste chamber is also available at site for residual wastes, such as plastic sachets, cigarette
butts, pathological waste, and napkins.
1.4.8.3. Hazardous Waste Management
Hazardous wastes that will be likely to be generated from operations include used oil materials, clinic
wastes, lead batteries, ink cartridges, paints, contaminated containers, and used fluorescent bulbs. All
these hazardous wastes shall be deposited at the existing Hazardous Waste Facility.
Hazardous wastes generation, if not managed, have corresponding environmental and health impacts.
For environmental impacts, there will be potential contamination of environmental media, such as soil,
surface water, and groundwater, in case of accidental release to the environment. Personnel exposed
to hazardous materials management is also at risk of the adverse health effects from improper handling.
Potential impacts of hazardous wastes will be minimized through strict implementation of the standard
operating procedures specified in RA 6969. A hazardous waste storage facility is currently used for the
nickel operations. Its use and operation will be continued for the limestone project. The storage area is
provided with secondary containment and sumps to prevent any uncontrolled release of hazardous
materials. Used oil materials will be contained in properly labeled steel drums and will be stacked in

wooden pallets inside the Used Oil Storage area. Clinic wastes will be are disposed in the existing
septic vault.
Photo 1-5 Hazardous Waste Storage Facility
1.5. Process/Technology
1.5.1. Mining Method
General flow of operations will follow the traditional phases of mining—exploration, development,
production and decommissioning stage. There will be overlaps between development and production
to minimize the extent of disturbed areas at a time. Progressive rehabilitation and safety measures will
be incorporated in all mining stages.
Quarrying will be done using conventional methods of drilling, ripping, blasting, loading and hauling.
The order of extraction will start at the highest elevation. As excavation levels reach lower elevation,
the extent of disturbed area increases proportionally with the bench designs to promote ground stability.
Mining recovery is assumed to be high with values ranging from 95% - 100%. Dilution is projected to
be minimal since the nature of the deposit is inherently homogeneous and the mining process is well
established and is widely used. All oversize will be recovered and will undergo rock breaking. Waste to
ore ratio is estimated to be 36%.
1.5.1.1. Mine Planning and Grade Control
Technical services like mine planning, grade control and geodetic survey will be incorporated within the
activity plans to provide the necessary direction and guidance to the operations. Equipment and service
contractors will be carrying out the plans, under the guidance by the in-house personnel.
In-house technical personnel will plan and supervise the mining operations. Medium- and long-term
plans will be generated by the planning engineers using reliable mining software tools like Geovia
Surpac, Geovia GEMS and Geovia Minesched.

A system of grade control protocols and procedures will be implemented to ensure the materials are
properly classified as either ore or waste prior to actual mining. This will also provide advance
information for the mining engineers to adjust mine plans in a timely manner to meet the production
objectives.
Grade control will be done in two stages. First is using drill hole cuttings prior to blasting and the second
is from crushed material transferred via conveyor belts. Materials will be classified based on drill hole
cutting assay prior to crushing. Blasted materials shall be hauled according to quality by dump trucks
from the mine area to a crusher pad at the crushing facility. Materials will be transferred to the feeder
hopper for crushing via a wheel loader.
1.5.1.2. Overburden Stripping
Overburden is the earth and rock materials overlying the ore deposit. These materials will be stripped
to expose the ore body, making it accessible for extraction. Stripping the overburden involves clearing
and grubbing and removal of materials that are below cutoff grade.
Clearing and grubbing will involve the use of dozers and/or excavators to remove the ground vegetation
to expose the overburden earth materials or ore. Chainsaw may be used to cut trees. The topsoil and
organic materials that will be generated by the clearing and grubbing operations will be recovered and
will be stored in separate storage areas. Topsoil will be preserved for future use during the progressive
rehabilitation program and final mine closure reclamation activities.
Waste materials are mostly composed of calcareous materials or metamorphosed schists. These
exposed rock materials that are below cutoff grade will be defragmented thru blasting before loading,
hauling and dumping into the marginal ore stockpile or waste dump.
1.5.1.3. Blasting
Blasting will be done to defragment the limestone materials before feeding to the crusher plant. Blasting
will be done by a licensed drilling and blasting contractor and will be monitored and supervised by in-
house mining engineer/blast foreman. The Table 1-21 Drill and Blast Design Parameters below shows
the drill and blast design parameters and the typical explosives and blasting accessories used in quarry
blasting. The blasting design will utilize the staggered V pattern to maximize breakage of ore and less
crushing, as illustrated in Figure 1-10. When materials can be ripped by dozers or excavators, blasting
will not be used.
Table 1-21 Drill and Blast Design Parameters
Parameter Value
Bench height 5m
Drill depth 5.8 m
Hole diameter 89.00 mm
Burden 3.60 m
Spacing 4.20 m
Subdrill 0.80 m
Stem height 2.70 m
Charge length 2.30 m
Ratio of HE to LE 20% to 30%

Figure 1-10 Typical staggered V blast pattern and firing sequence

The list of blasting accessories that will be needed are as follows:
• Ammonium Nitrate with Fuel Oil (ANFO)

• Cast Primer 250 gms
• NONEL Surface Connector x 6 metres
• In-hole delay, 500ms x 12 metres
• Detonating Cords, 6 grams
The limestone quarry area will be facing away the nearest community. In addition, controlled blasting
will be applied to further mitigate the potential impacts. Some of the possible strategies that will be
adopted are as follows:
• Single hole firing

• Accepted Vibration and Airblast Limits
• Optimized schedule of blasting
• Blast mats
• Use of good stemming materials
• Geological structure mapping
• Seed wave analysis
• Trim blasts and pre-splits
• Wind direction models and forecasts
1.5.1.4. Loading, Hauling and Dumping
Quarrying operations will be undertaken by a qualified contractor. A separate hydraulic excavator will
be used each to excavate the ore and waste material from the quarry. Blasted rocks will be loaded to
dump trucks and delivered to the crushing plant or to the run-of-mine pad.
Limestone crushing plant feed can either be delivered directly from the quarry or hauled from the ROM
stockpile. Direct dumping will be a priority to optimize equipment operation. However, buffer feed stocks
will be necessary as a standard procedure to address any delays such as in case of equipment
breakdown. Allowances will be made for ancillary and support equipment fleet to operate in the quarry
to maintain benches, roads, drainage, dumps and stockpiles.
1.5.2. Ore Processing Method
Comminution through crushing and screening will be employed. Mined limestone from the quarry will
be hauled to the crusher pad using off road dump trucks. There will be two primary crushers and one
secondary crushing-screening modules in operation. Only the 600mm ore top size limestone rocks will
be fed by wheel loaders to the vibrating grizzly. Oversize materials will go directly to the primary impact
crushers, while undersized limestone will be transported to the secondary crusher and screening facility.
Primary screening will be through a triple-deck vibrating screen follows wherein rocks greater than 80
mm will be sent to the secondary impact crusher. Coarse fractions passing the 80 mm screen, but larger
than 40 mm will be conveyed to the medium lumps stockpile. Limestone particles finer than 40 mm will
pass through the middle screen. The fractions between 40 mm and 20 mm will be transported to a
separate stockpile for medium-small lumps.
All lumps finer than 20 mm will be forwarded to a double-deck vibrating screen with top screen aperture
is 10 mm. Particles passing the 20 mm screen, but are coarser than 10 mm, will be forwarded to another
stockpile for small limestone lumps.

Fine limestone particles passing 10 mm and 5 mm screens will be collected into a separate stockpile.
A 10% dust loss for fine limestone will be considered in the design. The projected material balance of
the crushing and screening processing plant is presented in Table 1-22.
Table 1-22 Material Balance (tons per hour)

Primary Screen Secondary Screen
Top Mid Bottom Top Bottom

Material
80mm 40mm 20mm 10mm 5mm
Feed, t/h 882
OS, t/h 242
US, t/h 640
A typical crushing and screening plant layouts showing the essential components of the processing
plant are shown in Figure 1-11, Figure 1-12 and Figure 1-13. Crushed limestone segregated into
different size fractions will be the final plant products. No chemical alteration of the limestone will be
involved. Table 1-23 shows the products and its potential markets.
Table 1-23 Projected Daily Production (tons/day)

Product Size Potential Market
Medium Lumps 80 – 40 mm International Iron and Steel Producers

Medium – Small Lumps 40 – 20 mm International Steel Producers/Local Aggregates Industry
Small Lumps 20 – 10 mm Local Cement Producers/Aggregates/Powerplants/Mining
Fines < 10 mm Powerplants/agriculture industry
1.5.3. Ore Shipping
The sorted and sized stockpiled ore materials will be delivered by dump trucks to ship-sided Land Craft
Transport (LCT) feeder vessels at the existing causeway from the Agata Laterite Project. Barging and
stevedoring services will be tapped from a service contractor.

Figure 1-11 Crushing and Screening Plant Flowsheet
Figure 1-12 Limestone crushing plant: A – Impact crusher; C1-2 – Conveyors

Figure 1-13 Typical screening plant lay-out: B – Primary screen; C – Secondary screen; C3-12 –
Conveyors
1.5.4. Maintenance of Mine Facilities
1.5.4.1. Fleet Maintenance
The company will be using the equipment fleet of Service Contractors. The Service Contractors shall
be liable for the maintenance of all their equipment that will be used in the project. Equipment may
include those heavy and ancillary equipment used in mining, hauling, auxiliary works, blasting, and
vessel-loading. The Company, on the other hand, oversees maintenance of its service vehicles, power
and generator sets, assay laboratory, and infrastructures.
1.5.4.2 Mine Maintenance
Limestone may display karstic characteristics, hence, levelling of pinnacles prior to production stage
proper will be necessary. Drilling and blasting of snake holes may be needed to develop the top
benches. Road development will be complemented using dozer, excavator, grader, and compactor.
Road base course/surfacing will be simultaneously sheeted with rocks of proper size. Vibratory
compactor will be used to level/shape the road to 90% compaction or higher. Whenever possible, roads
will be crowned to prevent water ponding, and will be super elevated to drain water towards the toe line.
Drilling and blasting will be intermittently applied where applicable to fast track road development.

Where applicable, the waste materials will also be used as a surfacing material for the maintenance or
construction of haul roads. Water lorries will also be utilized to minimize fugitive dusts. Perimeter canals
and settling ponds will be installed within and around the active areas to control siltation. The causeway
pier head will be rehabilitated or repaired once a year after the rainy season.
1.5.4.3. Plant and Camp Maintenance
The limestone crushing operation will be continuous all year-round, with a monthly scheduled preventive
maintenance period. Camp maintenance will be performed jointly by the Administration and General
Services Departments.
Pollution control facilities include oil and water separator at the existing motor pools and used oil storage
area. They were be constructed in accordance with the hazardous waste management guidelines.
Regular inspection/ audit will be continuously conducted by the Pollution Control Officer to monitor
1.6. Project Size
1.6.1. Ore Resource
The Agata limestone was first explored and drilled by MRL in 2011. However, the drilling data were not
sufficient to produce a measured resource estimate. API started drilling on 4th quarter of 2014 until 3rd
quarter of 2015 and pursued the limestone project by drilling seventeen (17) more drill holes to
determine and define the orebody for limestone project as measured.
Based on the consolidated drilling data, the estimated Mineral Resource of the Agata Limestone is at
35.6 million DMT of 55.11% CaO at a cut-off grade of 45% CaO. The resource estimate per grade group
is shown in Table 1-24.
Table 1-24 Mineral Resource Estimate for Agata Limestone Project (July 2015)
Grade
Resourc Dens CaCo3 SiO2 Fe2O
group Volume Tonnage CaO%
e ity % % 3%
CaO%
45-50 306,250 2.8 857,500 85.95 48.27 6.82 1.71

50-51 171,875 2.8 481,250 88.84 50.57 4.61 1.25
50-52 168,750 2.8 472,500 90.44 51.58 3.88 0.95
50-53 328,125 2.8 918,750 93.28 52.55 3.04 0.84
INDICA
50-54 656,250 2.8 1,837,500 94.74 53.59 2.13 0.6
TED
50-55 1,256,250 2.8 3,517,500 93.91 54.55 1.37 0.35
50-56 7,775,000 2.8 21,769,999 98.43 55.61 0.28 0.07
50-57 2,065,625 2.8 5,783,750 99.61 56.14 0.22 0.04
TOTAL 12,728,124 2.8 35,638,748 97.31 55.11 0.8 0.21
The Mineral Resource estimate for the Project has been classified as Measured. Due to the limited area
covered by the topographic survey, the extent for orebody modeling is also constrained to define
resources. The drill spacing is at 100 m as such to define the resource orebody of Agata Limestone
Project.

1.6.2. Ore Reserve
The complete drill hole datasets were imported to GEMS drill hole workspace to facilitate orebody
modeling and estimation. The reserve estimation area was constrained within the limits of influence of
the drill holes. Grade interpolation was carried out using Inverse Distance Weighted to the power of 2
(IDW2) for CaO and CaCO3, using GEMS (ver. 6.3) modeling software. The solid wireframe used to
constrain the sample points were derived based on the geological interpretation done by the Exploration
Geologists assigned to the ALP.
The Mineral Resource Report indicates that the block model for the resource is sufficient and consistent
to define the estimates. Statistical validation also shows that the model can be upgraded into a reserve
category by applying certain mining parameters. Figure 1-14 and Figure 1-15 indicate a valid single
domain for the limestone unit.
Figure 1-14 Histogram of CaO
Figure 1-15 Histogram of CaO

Resource shall be considered as reserves if the ore can be economically extracted. Pit optimization
was done using Whittle software. The optimization software is used to define the most profitable pit
shell (or nested pit shells) based from a given set of economic parameters. The economic parameters
generally include product prices, process recoveries, and operating costs. Normally when optimization
is done, a range of metal prices or revenue factors are used to develop a series of nested shells to
understand how the mine will expand or shrink with increasing or decreasing metal value.
The resulting pit shells from the optimization activity will serve as guide in creating a mining plan or pit
design (final pit limit). The cut-off grade applied in the ore reserve estimation is 45% CaO and yields an
average grade of 55.11% CaO. Table 1-25 shows the classification of limestone based on calcium
oxide quality.
Table 1-25 Ore Classification/Category Used

Category %CaO
High grade >54.0

Medium grade 52.5-54.0
Low grade 47.4-52.5
The estimated Ore Reserve is classified as Proven Ore Reserve. It is estimated at 30.3 million tons at
55.19% CaO (Table 1-26) at 45%CaO cutoff grade. The categorization indicates the bulk of the reserve
falling under the high-grade classification. This is sufficient to satisfy the limestone plant requirement.
Table 1-26 Mineral Reserve Estimate for Agata Limestone Project.

Grade
Resource group Volume CaO% SiO2% Al2O3% MgO% Fe2O3%
CaO%
0 30.5 54.81 2.75 0.324 1.34 0.19

42 30.3 55.19 0.75 0.328 1.34 0.19
PROBA-
44 30.3 55.19 0.75 0.328 1.34 0.19
BLE
46.5 30.2 55.22 0.72 0.324 1.34 0.18
48 30 55.26 0.69 0.317 1.34 0.17
1.6.3. Mining Schedule
A quarry design was generated based on the results of the optimization using the mine block model.
Level plans were derived from the mine model which were eventually used as cuts when merged with
the original topography. The slope of the quarry bench was designed at 600. The overall slope ranges
from 240 to 450. The pit design was limited between 0MSL and +245MSL elevations.
Year 0 involves development of haulage roads at the quarry area that will connect to existing
haul/access roads of the ANLP. Production will commence on Year 1 after the haulage and access
roads from the quarry are connected to the process plant yard. Production of limestone shall start in the
same year. Table 1-28 below shows the annual production schedule including waste movement.

1.6.4. Plant Capacity and Production Schedule
For the whole duration of the limestone operation there will be only one processing line producing
crushed limestone. Any changes in the production capacity during operations will be dictated mainly by
the demand conditions in the market.
The plant operations are assumed to be active for fifteen (15) years. Daily production as shown in Table
1-27 will yield an approximate average annual production rate of two (2) million tons per annum.
Production may slightly exceed 2 million tons to exact bench designs by the end of every year.
Table 1-27 Daily Production (tons/day)

Products t/d
Crushed medium lumps (-80 +40 mm) 2,930

Crushed med. Small lumps (-40 +20 mm) 1,414
Crushed small lumps (-20 +10 mm) 951
Fines for sintering (-20+10 mm) 463
Minus 5mm Fines 321
Total 6,079
The crushing and screening operations will be on a 12-hour per day schedule with 30-working day per
month allocation.
1.6.5. Total Project Area
The total project area is 554.4 hectares. It is composed of the quarry site, crushing plant, causeway,
stockyards, waste and topsoil dumps, and the support facilities such as field offices, access roads, and
environmental facilities.
Figure 1-16 Quarry Area for Limestone Project

Table 1-28 Annual Materials Movement Schedule

Ore Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Total
Volume, m3 731,250 778,125 712,500 681,250 712,500 762,500 646,875 787,500 656,250 768,750 662,500 700,000 768,750 665,625 790,625 10,825,000
Tonnes, DMT 2,047,500 2,178,750 1,995,000 1,907,500 1,995,000 2,135,000 1,811,250 2,205,000 1,837,500 2,152,500 1,855,000 1,960,000 2,152,500 1,863,750 2,213,750 30,310,000
Waste Materials
Volume, m3 418,750 184,375 293,750 131,250 125,000 193,750 212,500 271,875 196,875 343,750 256,250 321,875 418,750 275,000 221,875 3,865,625
Tonnes, DMT 1,172,500 516,250 822,500 367,500 350,000 542,500 595,000 761,250 551,250 962,500 717,500 901,250 1,172,500 770,000 621,250 10,823,750
Total Materials Movement
Volume, m3 1,150,000 962,500 1,006,250 812,500 837,500 956,250 859,375 1,059,375 853,125 1,112,500 918,750 1,021,875 1,187,500 940,625 1,012,500 14,690,625
Tonnes, DMT 3,220,000 2,695,000 2,817,500 2,275,000 2,345,000 2,677,500 2,406,250 2,966,250 2,388,750 3,115,000 2,572,500 2,861,250 3,325,000 2,633,750 2,835,000 41,133,750
Figure 1-17 Annual Limestone Production

1.7 Description of Project Phases and Activities
The Agata Limestone Project are divided into four major phases namely: (1) Pre-development; (2)
Development; (3) Operation; and (4) Decommissioning and Rehabilitation or the Mine Closure Phase.
The major activities involved in every phase of the project are described in the following subsections.
Each stage includes activities that have potential identifiable impacts to the environment. Management,
mitigation or adaptation options to address the impacts relevant to the Project are discussed in the
succeeding sections. Specific activities entailed in each project phase is shown on the general process
flow in Figure 1-18 below.
Figure 1-18 Project Process Flow
PRE-DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT
OPERATIONS PHASE CLOSURE PHASE
PHASE PHASE
PHASE1 timeline: 1 year PHASE2 timeline: 1-2 years PHASE3 timeline: 15 years PHASE4 timeline: 4 years
• Scoping and • Access roads • Actual extraction • Implementation of

Definitive feasiblity Development FMRDP
Studies (DFS)
• Site preparation,
• Submission of clearing and earthwork
Requirements to activity
Secure Permits
• Installation of crushing
• Planning and plant and other
Preliminary Design facilities
Activities
• Eng'g and Procurment

of necessary
equipment
Progressive
Revegetation
1.7.1 Pre-Development Phase
The Agata Limestone Project is currently in the Pre-Development Phase. Activities associated with this
phase can be traced back to late 2014, when an initial resource evaluation indicated that the Project
maybe economically viable. This phase included the following activities or milestones:
a. Scoping and Definitive Feasibility Studies (DFS)
The Scoping and DFS were conducted to establish the Project’s social, technical, environmental and
financial aspects, and relate these to the overall benefit of the Project. The scoping study is the first
level of study performed primarily to determine whether the expense of a feasibility study is warranted.
b. Submission of Requirements to Secure Mine Development and Operating Permits
The Company must first secure the necessary endorsements and permits from the concerned
government agencies and local government units before proceeding to mine-development activities.
The process normally involves submission of reports and studies to concerned agencies, particularly
the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) and Environmental Management Bureau (EMB) of the

Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Currently, the process of securing the necessary
permits and licenses is underway and is conducted by the ALP technical team composed of Mining
Engineers, Geologist, Forester, tenement officer and pollution control officer.
c. Planning and Preliminary Design Activities
Planning and preliminary design of the Project has been ongoing since Year 2018. At this stage, the
planning and design are focused on identifying the most appropriate design and operation schemes
that will lead to a sustainable mining project. General mine facility layout, mine production schedule,
quarry design, bench plan, drainage management system, road network, and emergency preparedness
plan and program are started to be developed during the planning phase undertaken by the ALP Mine
Planning Engineers and Safety Engineers.
d. Engineering and Procurement of Necessary Equipment
The equipment to be used during the operation phase of the ALP will be provided by service contractors.
This is to give investment opportunities to the local business players and contribute to the economy of
the municipality. Except for the crushing plant and blasting contractors, all other heavy equipment
service providers are readily available onsite and currently working as part of the Agata Nickel Laterite
Project fleet. Negotiation of terms and conditions and signing of contracts will be conducted prior to the
development phase.
1.7.2. Construction and Development Phase
The ALP operations will mostly be utilizing the existing mine support facilities of the Agata Nickel Laterite
Project. The installation of the crushing plant will be the only major activity during the construction
phase. Once the Project has acquired all the required permits, clearances, and financial approvals, the
construction phase will begin. Procurement of materials as well as bidding for contractors will be initiated
during the pre-development phase. This is expected to be completed in less than a year.
The following activities will be done during the construction and development phase:
a. Access Roads Development
The same road networks of the nickel operations will be initially used to initially access the limestone
project facilities. As the limestone quarrying progresses, new roads will be constructed based on the
mine design. Clearing and grubbing of vegetation during the road development will follow the SOP, that
is, to secure the Notice to Proceed (NTP). It is also part of compliance to the existing Integrated
Management System (IMS) of the company.
b. Site Preparation, Clearing and Earthwork Activity
Project facilities, including the administration office and staff housing area, are already available onsite.
The limestone quarry will be the major area to undergo the vegetation clearing activities. The topsoil
recovered will be segregated and stored for future use in reclamation and rehabilitation. The lumber
retrieved from the felling activities will be used for DENR approved community projects.

The ore stockpile area and overburden waste dumps will be located on the existing mined out portions
of the ANLP. Road construction, grading, and compacting these mined out areas are also among the
primary activities during the development phase.
c. Installation of Crushing Plant and other facilities
New facilities that will be installed for the limestone operations include the crushing plant, the explosive
magazine storage building, and the water management system (i.e. drainage canals and settling
ponds). The use of other ancillary facilities such as the Fuel Depot, Hazardous Waste Management
Facility, Material Recovery Facility (MRF), Nursery, Laydown areas for contractor’s heavy equipment
will be continued from the nickel to the limestone operations.
1.7.3. Operations Phase
Quarrying will proceed according to the approved mine plan. With the development of the access roads,
the installation of the crushing plant and the construction of mine support facilities, the following mine
production activities can commence:
• Mining Operations (Actual Quarrying of Limestone/ Excavation and loading)

• Crushing and Sizing Operations (Crushing and Sorting of Products)
• Blasting Activities (Implementation of Safety Protocols and Standards during Blasting)
• Product Delivery (Loading of Products to Barges)
• Site Maintenance (Road maintenance, dust suppression and water spraying)
The order of specific mining operations activities is shown in the process flow shown on Figure 1-19.
Figure 1-19 Process Flow of Mining Operations

It is also expected that the social, environmental, safety, and other mine operation protocols will follow
the Integrated Management System subscribed by the company. This include the following areas,
among others:
• Environmental Management and Monitoring
• Social Development and Management Program
• Safety and Health Program
• Security Program
• Progressive Rehabilitation Program
• Climate Change Impact Monitoring
• Engineering Mitigation Program
Production is expected to last fifteen (15) years.
1.7.4 Closure Phase
Details of the Closure Phase shall be covered by the revisions to be made in the Final Mine
Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Plan (FMRDP) for the ANLP approved by MGB. With the planned
quarrying operation for the Limestone Project, the company will re-evaluate the approved FMRDP of
the ANLP and submit an amendment of the program to MGB. This version will include details on the
revised rehabilitation schedule, including identification of which facilities/ disturbed areas will be subject
for final decommissioned, rehabilitation, or will be retained for use in the Limestone Project. Mine
closure planning will involve the active participation of the Community Technical Working Group
(CTWG), represented by the different sectors within the impact communities.
The overall objective of the rehabilitation and closure plan is to rehabilitate the Project area in a manner
that will promote a sustainable environment for the community. Key action items in this process includes
the following:
• Implementation of a responsible and environmentally sound decommissioning process.

• Restoration of the floral and faunal biodiversity of the disturbed areas.
• Ensure the sustainability of community programs implemented during the mine operation.
• Promote a self-reliant and sustaining community after the closure of the mining Project.
• Establish the final land use of the Project area such that long term adverse environmental
impacts are prevented or eliminated.
In general, the final land use goal for the disturbed areas will be an agroforestry ecosystem with an
Agricultural Training Hub. It is envisioned that the Project area will host the CARAGA Sustainable
Agricultural Resource and Learning Center through the collective efforts of the Company, LGU, the
CBFMA-PO’s and the DENR. This is in accordance with the vision of the host Municipalities to become
the center of Agri-Tourism and Responsible Mining Industry in the Province.
A ten (10)-year closure program is initially established to meet the objectives of the FMRDP. The first
two years are considered as the active phase of rehabilitation and decommissioning period. This will
be followed by another two (2) years of the passive phase. This phase consists primarily of monitoring,
care and maintenance, and validation of the viability and long-term sustainability of the rehabilitation
program. Internal monitoring and third-party monitoring programs will be continued for another six-year
long-term maintenance period. The goal is to secure a Certificate of Relinquishment of the Project area
by the Year 2030.

The initial FMRDP document for the ANLP identified a budget of Php 270 million for closure,
reclamation and monitoring activities during the 10-year closure period. This is deposited over a seven-
year period, which began in Year 2016. A review of the FMRDP is underway. Among the items for
review include potential changes in final land use as determined by the impact community, closure
costs, implementation schedule and the FMRD Fund deposit schedule.
The overall project timeline is presented in Table 1-29.
1.8 Manpower
1.8.1. Personnel Requirements and Hiring Scheme
1.8.1.1. Pre-Development Phase
During the pre-construction phase, the existing technical personnel of the Agata Nickel Laterite Project
(ANLP) will conduct the required activities such as scoping and definitive feasibility studies, submission
to regulatory agencies to secure the necessary permits, mine planning and preliminary design activities,
and the procurement of necessary equipment. Hiring of third-party experts for the technical aspects of
the permitting and planning will be done, as necessary.
1.8.1.2. Construction and Development Phase
During the construction and development phase, most of the personnel will be employed through the
third-party contractor who will be engaged to install the crushing plant. Workforce from the local
community will still be prioritized but will be subject to qualification screening. Key positions needed
include a limestone quarry engineer and construction foremen who will supervise the overall quarry
development, plant installation and other ancillary facility construction.
1.8.1.3. Operations Phase
The Project will directly employ a total of 226 personnel during the actual operation. A summary of the
peak manpower demand, according to employment categories and department requirements, is shown
in Table 1-30. The limestone operation will be, in as much as possible, utilizing the existing workforce
from the nickel operation. The need for additional manpower will depend on the level of mining activity,
which is contingent to weather condition. Same as the hiring practice in any mining operation, workforce
from the local community provided they meet the employment qualifications. Other indirect project
personnel who will be part of the operation are the service contractors for equipment operation.
Employees from outside the CARAGA region will work under a roster of 5-week continuous workdays,
followed by one-week rest days. This schedule will be subject to occasional changes depending on the
working conditions at the project site. Accommodation facility will be provided for selected management
and technical staff. Meanwhile, employees from the local community will work daily for 8-hours in 6 days
per week and will be provided with shuttle at designated pick up points to the mine site.
Staff and labor costs shall be based on existing rates in Caraga. Labor and Administrative costs are
included in the Service Contractors cost for the use of their equipment. The Service Contractors will be
providing the salary of its drivers, operators, and staff but still subject to existing labor costs in Caraga.

The proposed ALP will continue to employ most of the existing workforce available from the ANLP.
Residents from the host communities will be given priority for employment provided they meet the
qualifications.
The qualifications of key personnel are the following:
1.General Manager – must be a licensed Filipino Mining Engineer with significant experience in mining
and/or processing operations. He/she will be the over-all manager of all aspects of the project.
2. Administrative Manager – must be experienced in Human Resource works and relevant experience
in managing administrative functions.
3. Accounting Manager – must be a licensed CPA with experience in general accounting on mining
projects or related industry. He or she must have proven integrity. He or she must have proven integrity.
4.Tenement Manager – must be knowledgeable in the compliance requirements to LGU, MGB, DENR,
and other agencies with jurisdiction over mining activities. He/she should have at least three (3) years
relevant experience as a Tenement Officer.
5.MEPEO – must be a licensed forester or mining engineer with at least five-year work experience in
implementing environmental management program for mining operation.
6.Mine Engineering Superintendent – must be a licensed Mining Engineer with at least 5-year work
experience in mine planning and engineering works.
7.Grade Control Superintendent – must be a licensed Geologist or Mining Engineer with significant work
experience in Grade Control in a mining operation.
8.Port and Quarry Manager – must be a licensed Mining Engineer, with at least 10-year combined
experience quarrying, mining and port operations.
9.Plant Manager – preferably a licensed engineer (MetE, EM, ME, CE, IE), with at least 10-year
combined experience in handling crushing and processing plant.
10.SHES Manager – preferably a licensed Mining Engineer, with relevant experience in Mine Safety.
11.Marketing Manager – must have a wide experience in marketing mining commodity and
knowledgeable in the current trends and pricing of the limestone products.

S e c ti o n 1- P r oj e c t D e s c ri pti o n
T a bl e 1- 2 9 Pr oj e ct S c h e d ul e
Project Phases Project Timeline

1. Pre-Development Phase
a. Scoping and Definitive Feasibility Studies (DFS)
b. Submission of Requirements to Secure Permits 1 Year
c. Planning and Preliminary Design Activities
d. Engineering and Procurement of Necessary Equipment
2. Development Phase
a. Access Roads Development
1-2 Years
b. Site Preparation, Clearing and Earthwork Activity
c. Installation of Crushing Plant and other facilities
3. Operations Phase
15 Years
a. Actual Extraction Period
4. Closure Phase
4 Years
a. Implementation of the FMRDP
E n vir o n m e nt al I m p a ct St at e m e nt R e p o rt P a g e | 1- 5 2
A PI A g at a Li m e st o n e Pr oject D ec e m b er 20 2 0- R ev 0 1
Table 1-30- Project Personnel Distribution (Operations Phase)
Allocated cost No. Allocated cost No.
1 Grade Control Geologist 2
Site Mgt.
General Manager
Grade Control
Technical Assistant 1 Mapper 2
Subtotal 2 Grade Control Foremen 2
Admin Manager 1 Sampler 8
HR Supervisor 2 Subtotal 14
Human Resource and Administration
Timekeeper 1 Port and Quarry Manager 1

Encoder 4 Mine Supervisor 2
Quarry and Port Operations

Driver 4 Mine Foremen 2
Cook 2 Drilling Supervisor 2
Dishwasher 2 Drill Foremen 2
Laundry helper 4 Checker 4
Utility 4 Spotter 8
Warehouse supervisor 1 Drilling crew 8
Purchaser 1 Port Supervisor 2
Helper 2 Barging crew 8
Subtotal 28 Subtotal 39
Accounting Manager 1 Plant Manager 1
Accounting
Accountant 2 Laboratory Supervisor 2

Cashier 1 Laboratory Foremen 2
Accounting Clerk 4 Laboratory Aide 8
Plant Management
Subtotal 8 Plant Supervisors 2

Tenement Manager 1 Foreman 2
Tenements & Permits
MEPEO 1 Pay loader operator 4

Compliance Officer 2 Crusher operator 4
Liaison Officer 2 Crusher helper 4
DCC 1 Screening operators 4
Clerk 3 Utilitymen 4
Subtotal 10 Sub-total 37
Camp facility Manager 1 SHES Manager 1
Electrician 2 Safety Engineer 2
Helper 4 Safety Inspector 4
Camp Facility Management
SHES Department
Plant Equipment mechanic 2 Doctor 2

PMS mechanic 2 Nurse 2
Heavy equipment mechanic 2 PCO 1
Lube men 2 Forester 3
Fuel Tender 2 Nursery Aide 8
Civil Engineer 1 CRO Supervisor 3
Carpenter 2 CRO Aide 8
Welder 1 Subtotal 34
Labor 4 Marketing Manager 1
Subtotal 25 Marketing Officer 1
Shipping and Marketing
Mine Engineering Supt 1 Market research analyst 2

Cost Control Engineer 1 Communications Officer 1
Encoder 4 Shipping Agent 1
Planning &
2 Logistics Officer 2
Engg
Mine Planning Engineer

CAD Operator 2 Clerk 2
Geodetic Engineer 1 Subtotal 10
Survey Aide 8
Subtotal 19 Grand Total 226

1.8.1.4. Final Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Phase
Manpower will be reduced gradually during the Mine Closure Phase. Four (4) key departments,
including the Environment, Administration, Security, and Community Relations, will be retained to
implement the Final Mine Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Plan (FMRDP). As the rehabilitation
goes from active to passive phases, the retained manpower, mostly from the local community, will be
prepared for the eventual turn-over and management of the rehabilitation area during the long-term
care and maintenance of the rehabilitation area.
The overall manpower requirement for the life of the project is summarized in Table 1-31.
Table 1-31 Summary of Manpower per Operation Phase

Department Pre-Dev Dev’t Operation Final Rehab
Site Management 2 2
Mine Planning and Engineering 4 7 19
Quarry and Port Operations 10 39
Grade Control 14
Plant and Laboratory 37
Shipping and Marketing 10
Tenements and Permits 3 3 9
Safety and Health 3 11
MEPEO 13 20
Community Relations Office 2 11 2
Accounting 2 8
Human Resources & Administration 9 28 15
Camp Facility Management 5 25
TOTAL 7 41 226 37

1.9. Project Cost
1.9.1. Capital Expenditures
The estimated capital cost for the Project is Php 425.48 million (USD 8.51 million). This includes quarry
development, crushing and screening plant construction, development of auxiliary facilities, acquisition
of permits and other statutory requirements, and contingency. A summary of the costs by activity items
are shown in Table 1-32.
Table 1-32 Summary of Capital Expenditures

CAPEX ITEM Million Php Million USD
Limestone Quarry
1 Quarry Development 8.75 0.18
Crushing and Screening Plant
1 Crushing and Screening 137.48 2.75
2 Power (Genset) 110.00 2.20
3 Conveyor system from stockyard to existing causeway (1.5km) 14.03 0.28
4 Equipment Installation Cost 39.23 0.78
Engineering, construction, supervision, project management and
5 11.77 0.24
plant commissioning
Plant Subtotal 312.50 6.25
Table 1-32 Summary of Capital Expenditures (continued)
CAPEX ITEM Million Php Million USD

Auxiliaries
Covered stockyard, fuel tanks, water tanks, lighting, perimeter
1 fencing, sewage, field office, bodega, control room, maintenance 20.00 0.40
shed, guardhouse, bunkhouse
2 Causeway (Concrete and improve existing) 10.00 0.20
3 Waste dump and sedimentation control facilities 25.00 0.50
Access road construction, plantsite preparation, grading,
4 0.30 0.01
surfacing
5 Maintenance Tools and Equipment 0.25 0.01
6 Plant Site Rental and Right of way 5.00 0.10
7 Govt permits, quarry license, ECC and LGU Endorsement 5.00 0.10
Auxiliaries Subtotal 65.55 1.31
CAPEX Subtotal 386.80 7.74
Contingency, 10% 38.68 0.77
CAPEX TOTAL 425.48 8.51
1.9.2. Operating Expenditures
Operating Expenditure (OPEX) covers all relevant cost items in the production of limestone lumps and
fines. OPEX came from in-house estimates, local suppliers and from mining operations here and
abroad. Below are assumed criteria in deriving the OPEX. The summary of the operating expenditures
is shown in Table 1-33.
1. Forex is USD 1 equivalent to Php 50

2. The power rate is USD 0.16 per kWh
3. Diesel fuel is USD 0.64 per liter

Table 1-33 Summary of Operating Expenditures
OPEX ITEM Php/t USD/t
Mining Cost
1 Drilling 8.25 0.15
2 Blasting 11.75 0.22
3 GC Sampling/ Assaying 2.25 0.03
4 Loading, Hauling, Dumping 80.75 1.60
5 Bench, Road, Drainage maintenance 35.75 0.70
6 Barging and Stevedoring 69.25 1.37
Mining Cost Subtotal 208.00 4.16
Crushing and Screening Cost
1 Supervision and labor 2.50 0.05
2 Lease/rental, front end loader with operator and maintenance 10.00 0.21
3 Electric power 35.74 0.74
4 Allowance for maintenance spare parts 0.10 0.00
Plant Subtotal 48.34 1.01
Product Handling Cost
1 Electric power 6.60 0.14
2 Allowance for maintenance spare parts 0.01 0.00
Product Handling Subtotal 6.61 0.14
OPEX TOTAL 262.95 5.26

Section 2– Environmental Baseline Conditions for Critical
Environmental Parameters, Impact Assessment and Mitigation
2.0 Introduction
This section presents the baseline environmental conditions of the Agata Limestone Project. The focus
is on Land, Water, Air and People aspects. Environmental and social baseline data presented in this
report are referenced primarily from the latest monitoring data of the Agata Nickel Laterite Project since
ALP will be located within the same area. Supplemental data gathering, either inhouse or through third
party consultants, were also conducted as necessary to provide updated information on the
environmental setting prior to the commencement of the limestone project.
Secondary documents were also collected from different government agencies including the National
and Local Government Units as well as the Barangay offices. Laboratory testing for soil, water and air
sampling were performed by local laboratories accredited by the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (DENR). The perception of the local stakeholders regarding the Project operations
was accomplished through Focus Group discussions and Key Informant interviews. The social and
community investigations focused on socioeconomics, public health, infrastructure and demographics.
2.1 Land Use
2.1.1 Land Use Classification
The project is in the coastal Municipality of Tubay, Agusan del Norte with a total land area of 13,800
hectares and constitutes 5.06% of Agusan del Norte's total area. The urban area covers 2.97% of the
total area while rural areas cover the dominant 97.03%. The municipality has 13 barangays, with the
top 3 being Barangay Tagmamarkay (19.78%), Doña Telesfora 11.41% and Sta Ana (20.5%). The
primary impact area is in Barangay Tinigbasan while the secondary impact area includes Barangay
Lawigan.
The Municipality of Tubay has a forest/timber area of 7,518.03 hectares or 54.57% while alienable and
disposable area is 6,281.97 hectares or 45.43%. Total built-up area is 148.5 hectares comprising 2.36%
of the total alienable and disposal lands. A total of 7, 212.04 hectares or 52.26% of land are classified
as forest area while the area devoted for agricultural use in the municipality is 4,847 hectares or 35.12%,
mineral land is 598.50 hectares or 4.34%, body of water is 522.96 hectares or 3.79%, open grass land
is 471 hectares or 3.41 and the built-up area covers only 148.5 hectares or 1.08%
The Agata Limestone Project area is generally characterized by three ecosystem types; forest over
ultramafic rocks, tropical lowland evergreen rain forest and plantations. The ultramafic forest is the
primary vegetation type with only a few tall and large trees. The tropical lowland evergreen forest is
found in patches throughout the Project area and may be remnants of the vegetation that previously
existed. The forest patches are generally found along the ridges and the streams/valleys within the
Project area.
2.1.1.1 Impact with Compatibility with Existing Land Use
Based on the 2019 Land Classification Map shown in Figure 2-1 obtained from PENRO Agusan del
Norte and the Forest Land Classification Map from the community shown in Figure 2-2, the location of
the Agata Limestone Project is classified as a Timber Land-Production Forest. This type is defined as
areas of forest lands that can be made available for timber and agroforestry production, range lands for
grazing, and other forest lands special uses. In terms of the land and forest cover, the largest portion
of the Project area is agricultural land planted with either annual or perennial crops.

Section 2– Environmental Baseline Conditions for Critical Environmental Parameters, Impact Assessment and Mitigation
Figure 2-1 Land Classification Map
Source: DENR, PENRO Agusan del Norte (2019

Figure 2-2 Forestland Classification
Source: DENR, PENRO Agusan del Norte (2019)

There will be no change in the current land use, as the area where the additional volume of resource
will be extracted is within the bounds of the existing MPSA area. Nevertheless, cutting and utilization of
timber resources in the area during site preparation, clearing and earthwork activity shall be properly
coordinated with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Lumber recovered from the
clearing activities will be used for DENR approved community projects. Topsoil within these areas at
the quarry site will be segregated and stored for future use in rehabilitation activities. Stockyards and
Waste Dumps will be located at existing mined out portions of the ANLP, road construction, grading
and compacting are the primary activities in the development phase.
2.1.1.2. Impact with Compatibility as Environmentally Critical Area
Based on the Revised Procedural Manual for DAO 2003-30: Implementing Rules and Regulations of
PD 1586, Establishing the Philippine EIS System, twelve categories were used as bases in the
identification of Environmentally Critical Areas (ECA) wherein the project area was evaluated.
Upon careful assessment and data gathering, it is determined that the Agata Limestone Project is
considered an Environmentally Critical Area (ECA) based on the following: potential of occurrence of
natural calamities such as typhoons, and seismic events. Although the area has low flood susceptibility,
it is also identified as high landslide susceptibility based on the geohazard map obtained from the Mines
and Geosciences Bureau as shown in Figure 2-3 below.
Moreover, Indigenous Peoples (IP) group of Mamanwas and Manobos who are residents of the area
were issued by an Ancestral Domain Title CADT 237 by NCIP last December 2018 with the help of the
company. The presence of these Indigenous Peoples (IP) group further supports the ECA determination
of the Project. The ECA assessment which indicates how the Project meets the criteria for an ECA
determination in six of the evaluation categories is summarized in Table 2-1.
The proponent will implement mitigating measures to address land management, including topsoil
management, and visual amenity.
Table 2-1 Project Area Assessment as an Environmentally Critical Area

Project Falls within
Environmentally Critical
ECA Categories Source of Information
Area Description ?
Yes No Uncertain
Area declared by Law as National
Parks, Watershed Reserves, Not listed as a National Protected Area

Wildlife Preserves and Source: Forest Management Bureau
Sanctuaries.
No Designation by Government Agencies, but
Areas Set Aside as Aesthetic, portion of the project site is proposed to be a

Potential Tourist Spots. tourism site after mine life as indicated in the
abandonment plan.
Areas which Constitute the Habitat
Flora and Fauna Assessment conducted by
for any Endangered or Threatened
 Green Envionment Consultancy on July 16-
Species of Indigenous Philippine
19,2020.
Wildlife (Flora and Fauna).
Area of Unique Historic,
Archaeological, Geological or  None.
Scientific Interests.
Areas which are Traditionally IP Community of Mamanwa-Manobo residing
Occupied by Cultural Communities  within the host communities
or Tribes. Source: Field Based Investigation by NCIP

Table 2-1 Project Area Assessment as an Environmentally Critical Area
Project Falls within
Environmentally Critical
ECA Categories Source of Information
Area Description ?
Yes No Uncertain
Geohazard Map, Landslide S
Geologic Hazard Areas 
Source: MGB XIII
Flood Susceptibility Map
Flood-prone Areas 
Source: MGB XIII
Areas Frequently Visited or Hard Rainfall and Climate Data

Hit by Typhoons Source: PAGASA
Located within a Seismically Active Region.
Areas Prone to Volcanic Activities Historical Earthquakes; Active Fault Map.

and Earthquakes Source: Phivolcs
Landslide Susceptibility Map

Areas with Critical Slopes 
Source: MGB XIII
Areas Classified as Prime
 The area is generally covered with
Agricultural Lands
Recharge Areas of Aquifers  None.
Water bodies tapped for domestic
purposes; within the controlled
and/or protected areas declared by No water bodies tapped for domestic

appropriate authorities; which purposes.
support wildlife and fishery
activities.
Mangrove Areas  No mangrove areas
Coral Sanctuary Located in Brgy Lawigan
Coral Reefs 
and Brgy. Tinigbasan in Tubay.
Source: ECA Categories based on DAO 2003-30, Annex 2-1a.

Figure 2-3 Landslide Susceptibility Map and Flood Susceptibility Zones of the Project Area
Source: Mines and Geosciences Bureau

2.1.1.3. Impact in Existing Land tenure Issues
Tenurial instruments identified within the Tubay area are shown in Figure 2-4 and include MPSA on
mining projects, CBFMA and CADT based in the 2019 Tenurial Instruments Map from PENRO, Agusan
del Norte.
Prior to the Project operation of the Agata Nickel Laterite Project (ANLP) a Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) was executed between the Company and the CBFMA holders, signifying temporary
relinquishment of the overlapping areas to the Project operation. Compensation and assistance are
provided to the Peoples Organizations for the continuous improvement of those CBFMA areas that
remain unaffected by the mining operations. Moreover, reforestation activities of the aforementioned
project were developed as Community-Based Forest Management Agreements (CBFMA) entered by
DENR, and the local Peoples Organizations (PO); Tinigbasan Farmers and Fisherfolks Association
(TIFFA) and Lawigan Farmers and Fisherfolks Association (LAFFA). Based from the Agata Nickel
Laterite Project tenement map, approximately 490 hectares is covered by the agreement of which 70%
of the area is for reforestation projects while the remaining 30% is allocated for Agroforestry. While
under the Agata Limestone Project, approximately 50% of the resource area covered by the agreement
with TIFFA to include the same reforestation and agroforestry projects.
The relinquished parcel will be returned to the CBFMA holders after the Project rehabilitation period is
complete and the proponent will continue to comply with the conditions set forth in the MOA during the
Project’s expanded operations. Copies of the Memorandum of Agreements are included in the
Appendices.
2.1.1.4. Impairment of Visual Aesthetics
The closest community settlements and dwellings to the project area are located within 1.3km - 1.9km
north of the northern-most point of the proposed Agata Limestone Project. During preparation of the
area for quarrying, earthmoving machinery and equipment would be visible and there is potential for
dust proliferation along access roads and near operation sites.
Long-term visual impacts of the proposed mine would be addressed by progressive rehabilitation and
establishment of buffer zones on the selected areas primarily along roads within the Project. Since the
road network, port and other existing facilities from the Agata Nickel Laterite Project will be utilized for
the Agata Limestone Project, areas with established vegetative buffer zones, enhancement planting will
be conducted to improve air quality and minimize dust and improve visual aesthetics of the area.
To minimize disturbance, mining activities, including site clearing and excavation, is limited to those
areas identified in the Mine Design for efficient resource extraction. Rehabilitation will be undertaken
in areas that will be allotted as buffer zones or not open to mining. These denuded areas will be
subjected to progressive rehabilitation or temporary rehabilitation following DAO 2018-19. The
undertaking of reforestation programs aims to improve the visual aesthetics within the Project area.
Extensive tree plantation and rehabilitation activities will be added to buffer zones to provide effective
sight screens. This shall include access roads and open areas around the limestone mining operation
which will be planted with fast growing trees to enhance the visual aesthetics and will serve as
vegetation screens to mitigate or offset the visual impacts of the operations.

API Agata Limestone Project Februrary 2021- Rev02
Figure 2-4 Tenurial Instruments Map
Source: DENR, PENRO Agusan del Norte (2019)

API Agata Limestone Project February 2021-Rev02
2.1.1.5. Devaluation of Land Value from Improper Waste Management
Under the Agata Nickel Laterite Project operation, approximately 81 kg per day of solid waste materials
was collected. These consist of a combination of recyclable, biodegradable/compostable, and residual
wastes. The composition of solid waste generated in Year 2019 is summarized in Table 2-2.
Table 2-2 Project Operations Solid Waste Generation

Domestic Waste Materials Composition Actual Volume
Total Biodegradable Waste (kg) 57% 16,893.57 kg

Total Residual Waste (kg) 5% 1,574.85 kg
Total Recyclable (kg) 37% 11,200.47 kg
Total Special Waste (kg) 1% 202.7 kg
TOTAL 29,871.59 kg
Source: ANLP Solid Waste Management, 2019
In compliance with RA 9003, an existing Solid Waste Management Program (SWMP) is already
established and implemented in the ANLP operations. The implemented SWMP covers handling
activities of generated solid wastes from collection up to disposal. Waste receptacles are provided site-
wide, labelled following a unique, company-established labelling protocol so that wastes are segregated
down to its specific material type.
The existing Materials Recovery Facility shall be utilized for the solid waste management activities of
the Project. All waste generators on-site will be required to follow the “No Segregation, No Collection
Policy”. Collection and segregation of wastes will be conducted daily and according to waste
characterization: biodegradable wastes, recyclables, residuals, and hazardous/special wastes.
Collected waste are then utilized in different ways. Biodegradable wastes such as food wastes, paper
and cartons will be used in compost generation in the vermicomposting facility for various nursery
application, while other organic wastes such as collected yard wastes (wood, leaves, bamboo bollards)
will be converted into biochar and charcoal briquettes. Recyclable wastes such as plastic materials,
plastic/glass bottles, rubber wastes will be shredded for cement filling which is only used for minor
concreting activities or disposed-off to accredited buyers/junkshops.
The same management scheme will be adopted and continued for the Agata Limestone Project. The
expanded operation is not expected to result in a significant increase in domestic waste since the
existing manpower and facilities will be used. It is however, anticipated that there will be a significant
change in waste generation during the site clearing activities when the additional facilities for the ALP
is developed. The vegetation waste and cuttings resulting from this activity will be used as feed stock
for the Vermiculture facility and for progressive rehabilitation of previously disturbed areas.

2.1.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Land Use
A summary of the management and monitoring plans relative to the potential impacts arising from land
use impacts is provided in Table 2-3.
Table 2-3 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Land Use

Key Environmental Impact Management Plan Monitoring Plan
Limited disturbance to planned Adherence to ECC conditions and
Impact with Compatibility with
development. Annual EPEP commitments.
Existing Land Use
Topsoil segregation and storage. Solid Waste Monitoring

Impact with Compatibility as
Environmentally Critical Area
Establishment of buffer zones. MMT Quarterly Monitoring
Impact in Existing Land
Enhancement planting and
tenure Issues
landscaping
Impairment of Visual
Progressive rehabilitation activities.
Aesthetics
Implementation of Solid Waste
Devaluation of Land Value Management Program
2.2. Geology and Geomorphology
2.2.1. Topography, Slope, and Elevation
The Municipality of Tubay, and the Province of Agusan Del Norte in general, is composed of flat and
rolling lands. According to the Forest Land Use Plan (FLUP) of Tubay, areas with slope of 18% and
above comprise 55.38% of the municipality’s land area, including the western mountain ranges wherein
the Project site is located.
The Project area is situated in a low lying and gently sloped topography. Elevations do not top 300 msl
at northern part, while the southern part reaches 0 msl. The area has slopes of either gently sloping to
undulating or rolling, to moderately steep. Given these topographical features, the area is not
susceptible to landslides.
The topographic map, slope map, and elevation map of the Project site is shown on Figure 2-5, Figure
2-6, and Figure 2-7, respectively.

Figure 2-5- Topographic Map of the ALP Project Area

Figure 2-6- Slope Map of the Project Area (Regional View)

Figure 2-6- Slope Map of the Project Area (Local Map)
AGATA LIMESTONE
PROJECT

Figure 2-7-Elevation Map

2.2.1.1. Change in Surface Landform and Topography
The limestone deposit is compact and is situated in a single ridge located at Payongpayong area. This
setting conveniently limits the excavated area within 52-hectares at most. The steep slopes at the
Payongpayong ridge will be transformed into moderate, benched terrains that will be engineered to
reduce susceptibility to landslides and erosions. The pre-mining condition of the limestone area, and
the schematic landform change is shown in Photo 2-1.
Water runoff will be directed to the northwestern foot of the ridge thru a designed mine drainage system.
Current nickel operation has settling ponds installed at the foot of the ridge. Additional settling ponds
will be installed at the onset of the Agata Limestone Project.
The proposed crushing and screening sites are also being used as stockyard and access roads of the
nickel project. Site will be levelled and compacted prior to construction.
Changes in landform, and its subsequent effects such as soil erosion and diversion of water discharge,
will be mitigated by restoring disturbed areas to stable conditions while being used in operation and
subjecting them to progressive rehabilitation activities as soon as possible. The progressive
rehabilitation strategies will be done consistent with the post mining land use determined for the
disturbed area.

Section 2– Environmental Baseline Conditions for Critical Environmental Parameters, Impact
Photo 2-1 Limestone Hill for Quarry Operations

2.2.2. Regional Geology and Stratigraphy
The interaction of three major lithospheric plates, namely the Pacific Plate, the Eurasian Plate and the
Indo-Australian Plate, resulted in the development of the present-day tectonic features of the Southeast
Asian Region including the Philippines.
The Philippines is one of the most active and most complex tectonic zones in the world. The
archipelago, considered as the Philippine Mobile Belt (Rangin, 1991), is bounded by two major
subduction zone systems – the Philippine Trench on the east and the Manila Trench on the west.
In the southern Philippines, the island of Mindanao is defined by the Philippine Trench on the east, the
Cotabato Trench on the southwest and the Sulu-Negros Trench arc system on the northwest. Two main
fault systems comprise the region – the Philippine Fault and the Mindanao Fault – including hundreds
of fault splays and lineaments that crisscross the area.
The CARAGA Region in Mindanao straddles the eastern and central physiographic provinces of the
Philippines. The eastern physiographic province is represented by the Diwata Range (Pacific
Cordillera), while the central physiographic province is represented by the Agusan-Davao lowlands
(Basin). Both physiographic features trend north to south and are regionally demarcated by the
Philippine Fault Zone which also segments the Diwata Range in the Lianga, Surigao del Sur area.
The Diwata Range is rugged and has several peaks with elevations ranging from 900 m to 2,500 m.
The western side of the range borders the eastern side of the Agusan-Davao Basin which has steep
slopes. The eastern flank slopes steeply into the Philippine Trench. The eastern coastline is very
irregular with high promontories between bays, wide estuaries, relic channels and stream valleys. On
the other hand, the Agusan-Davao lowland is a 100 km by 45 km north to south structural valley between
the Diwata Range and the Mindanao Central Cordillera (MGB, 1982). It is generally flat and poorly
drained with western hills merging with the Central Cordillera. Agusan River, one of the longest in the
Philippines, drains the northern part of the basin and empties into Butuan Bay.
The southwestern part of the Northern Diwata Range is underlain by a Cretaceous basement, a
Palaeogene plutonic-volcanic complex followed by a sequence of Neogene sedimentary formations and
Quaternary Volcanics.
The basement rocks consist of the Concepcion Greenschist (UNDP, 1984) and metamorphic rocks of
Cretaceous age. The rocks are overthrusted by the Cretaceous to Palaeogene pillowed Pangulanganan
Basalts which in turn are overthrusted by the Humandum Ultramafics. Its emplacement probably
occurred during the late Cretaceous.
The Humandum Serpentinites (Rohrlach, 2005) unconformably overlies the basement schists and
forms as conspicuously peneplaned elevated ground. The ultramafic rocks consist of the serpentinized
peridotites, pyroxenites, serpentinized harzburgites, and dunite, which are fractured and crossed-cut by
fine networks of talc, magnesite and/or calcite veins. The rock was interpreted by UNDP (1984) to be
emplaced over the Concepcion greenschists probably before the Oligocene, and before late Eocene
deposition of the Nabanog Formation. MGB (2002) classified the Humandum Serpentinite as a
dismembered part of the Dinagat Ophiolite Complex, which is established to be of Cretaceous age.

Overlying the Humandum Ultramafics is the Upper Eocene interbedded limestone and terrigenous
clastic sediments of the Nabanog Formation. These are in turn overlain by a mixed volcano-
sedimentary package of the Oligocene Nagtal-o Formation which comprises conglomerate, wacke with
lesser pillow basalt and hornblende andesite, and the Lower Miocene Tigbauan Formation. The latter
is comprised of conglomerates, amygdaloidal basalts, wackes and limestone. Lower Miocene Kitcharao
Limestone and the lower part of the Jagupit Formation overlie the Tigbauan Formation. The Jagupit
Formation consists of conglomeratic sandstone, mudstone and minor limestone. Quaternary deposits
consist of loosely consolidated fluvial, lacustrine, paludal and coastal deposits.
The widespread occurrence of harzburgite, peridotite, pyroxenite, their serpentinized equivalents,

serpentinite, and localized lenses of dunite/serpentinized dunite comprise the lithology in the Project
area. These rocks are confined to broad ridges extending down to the footslopes of the Western Range.
The ultramafic bodies are of probable late Cretaceous age, and were emplaced as part of an ophiolite
sequence during the Upper Eocene (Abrasaldo, 1999). Schists are also present in the extremities of
the laterite area. Several of these rock types were likewise identified in petrographic/mineragraphic
analyses of drill core and rock samples as wehrlite (peridotite), serpentinized wehrlite, serpentinized
websterites (pyroxenite), websterites, serpentinites and cataclasite. Lineaments trending NE within the
ultramafic (and underlying green schist) are interpreted as either fault splays or zones of weakness in
the area.
A regional geologic map of Eastern Mindanao, with major mineral deposits and faults is provided on
Figure 2-8. A more localized Geologic Map is shown on Figure 2-9, while a stratigraphic column of
the MPSA is on Figure 2-10.

Figure 2-8 Regional Geology Map
Source: MRL Gold Philippines (2012)

Figure 2-9 Local Geologic Map
Source: API (2017)

Figure 2-10 Stratigraphic Column of the Agata MPSA
Source: Adopted from UNDP (1984) and UNDP (1987)

2.2.3. Local Geology
The Project site is largely underlain by the Cretaceous basement rocks of the Humandum Serpentinite
and the Concepcion Greenschist. The former, believed to be a dismembered part of the Dinagat
Ophiolite, is found in thrust contact with the latter and other metamorphic rocks. Humandum
Serpentinite rocks include peridotite, pyroxenite, dunite, serpentinite and minor distribution of gabbro.
On the other hand, Concepcion Greenschist is an interbedded metasedimentary and metavolcanic
sequence. Within the metasedimentary succession are calcareous layers where the recrystallized
limestone deposit is located.
Low grade metamorphism developed coarse calcite crystals that occur as veinlets, fracture filling and
replacement. The crystalline limestone is white to buff color; massive to bedded generally striking N60°E
and dipping 32NW; less often exhibit gray bands, laminations and foliations cut by recrystallized calcite
stringers; jointed; weakly weathered; and weakly oxidized. It covers an area of roughly 32 hectares with
an average thickness of 53.28m. Minor schist and calc-schist rocks are also intercalated as irregular
lenses within the bedding contact of the massive crystalline limestone layers.
Mineralization
Besides intercalated lenses, schist and calc-schist rocks also occur as layers interbedded in the
crystalline limestone and andesitic volcaniclastic beds. Schist represents the upper layer of the
formation while calc-schist and volcaniclastic are identified as the lower member.
There are several styles of mineralization that occur on the Agata property. These include Au oxide
mineralization in saprolite that is developed over shallowly-buried intrusions, Cu and Au
mineralization associated with quartz veinlet and pyritic stockworks along the margins of monzonitic
to dioritic plutons, Au associated with horizons of disseminated pyrite in sooty carbonaceous
limestones, and nickel mineralization generated by surficial zones of nickel enrichment in laterites
that are developed on ultramafic protoliths. A map of the mineral prospects within the MPSA is
shown on Figure 2-11.
The Limestone Prospect area comprises an area of variably altered and mineralized limestone which
lies to the south and west of the Assmicor Prospect. The limestones form part of the overlying roof rocks
that are inferred to be intruded by monzonites and monzodiorites that are equivalent to those present
at the Assmicor Prospect. Gold mineralization occurs in Fe-stained carbonates (sideritic) associated
with disseminated pyrite and local brittle fracturing (Climie et al. 2000). The zones of Au mineralization
intersected by drilling appear to be strata bound zones of mineralization that are characterized by
elevated abundances of pyrite and locally by carbonates that are rich in organic material. The observed
style of mineralization, comprising very fine grained and strata bound Au in organic rich calcareous
rocks, is anomalous in arsenic, and has similarities to Carlin-type mineralization.
2.2.3.1. Change in Subsurface Geology
Quarry activities of the Project shall not involve deep subsurface or underground works. Excavation
activities to mine the underlying limestone deposit will range from +170m to 0m MSL. To achieve good
slope stability, bench forming shall extend to the shale and sandstone around the limestone deposit.
Settling ponds that will be constructed at the alluvial plane will be about 5 meters deep. The excavated
materials will be temporarily dumped at the stockpile areas and will be used for road and stockyard
maintenance.

Figure 2-11 Mineral Prospects within the MPSA Area
Source: ANLP Exploration Report (2015)

2.2.4. Geologic Hazard Assessment
Geologic hazard assessments for the Project area focused on six risk categories; tectonic
characteristics, regional seismicity, fault ruptures, liquefaction potential, landslides and flood hazards.
Due to the location of the project area within a seismically active area, the risks associated with potential
earth movement are the highest and of most concern. Discussions of each of the six risk categories are
provided below.
A. Tectonic Setting
The Project area is located within a seismically active region characterized by the close proximity of
the Philippine Fault Zone. Consequently, the northern Mindanao region, including the Agusan and
Surigao Provinces is susceptible to earthquake generated by the Philippine Trench and its related
subduction zone structures, and by the Philippine Fault System and its associated structures. The
western traces of the Lake Mainit Fault bound the eastern side of Malimono Ridge, making the area
prone to strike-slip earthquakes. A regional tectonic map showing these structures is provided on
Figure 2-12.
The Philippine Trench is considered the most seismically active subduction zone in the Philippines. It
is a north-south trending depression located east of Mindanao and the Visayas. The trench marks the
boundary of the westward-subducting Philippine Sea Plate as it thrusts under the Philippine Mobile
Belt. The trace of the fault has been mapped from Davao, in Mindanao to as far north as the East
Luzon Trough.
The Philippine Fault system is a north- and northwest-trending fault system whose branches have
been mapped for 1,200 km from the eastern part of Mindanao to northern Luzon. This fault is the
largest active structural element with seismic activity and is considered to be the most destructive in
the Country. Its trace passes through Davao, through Agusan and near the Malimono Ridge, through
Leyte and Masbate, then through Ragay Gulf and Alabat Island and then into north Luzon. At its
closest approach, the fault is approximately 2 km east of the Project area.
Slip along the Philippine Fault Zone is left lateral causing the land on the east and northeast to move
to the north and northwest. Large historic earthquakes have been clearly associated with this fault.
The most recent events were the 1973 Ragay Gulf earthquake and the 1990 Luzon earthquake.
B. Regional Seismicity
In the northern portion of eastern Mindanao, historical accounts show that offshore areas east of
Mindanao have been subjected to intense seismic activities with hundreds of small to large magnitude
earthquakes. Many of these seismic events are linked to the active subduction of the Philippine Trench
that impinges against the overlying crust of the Philippine archipelago. Most of the major inland
earthquakes occurred along the southern segment of the Philippine Fault Zone. The majority of these
fault-related events cluster within the Agusan Valley. A regional seismicity map showing the spatial
distribution of seismicity in the eastern portion of Philippine archipelago with Magnitudes 2 to 9 from
1907 to 1998 is shown on Figure 2-13.
The area around Malimono Ridge and the whole Agusan Valley has been host to a number of
destructive earthquakes in the past. The proximity of the Philippine Fault to within a 2 km distance
from the Project area presents a risk of a potentially large magnitude earthquake occurring in the
future.

Figure 2-12- Regional Tectonic Map

Figure 2-13- Regional Seismicity Map
Source: Philvocs (2014)

The Philippine Trench is another source of earthquakes that would likely affect offshore Mindanao.
When the epicenters move inland, these earthquakes tend to be of deeper hypo central depths due to
the inclination of the subduction zone.
C. Liquefaction Hazard
Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which the strength and stiffness of a soil is reduced by earthquake
shaking or other rapid loading. Liquefaction and related phenomena have been responsible for
tremendous amounts of damage in historical earthquakes around the world.
Liquefaction occurs in saturated soils, that is, soils in which the space between individual particles is
filled with water. This water exerts a pressure on the soil particles that influences how tightly the
particles themselves are pressed together. Prior to an earthquake, the water pressure is relatively low.
However, earthquake shaking can cause the water pressure to increase to the point where the soil
particles can readily move with respect to each other.
Those areas subject to liquefaction hazards are located within the alluvial deposits and floodplain
areas found in the valley, east of Malimono Ridge. Liquefaction hazards can be prevented by applying
the appropriate type of structure foundation, depending on the soil materials in the construction areas.
Artificial fill should be sufficiently compacted prior to construction of structures. These factors are
considered in the construction of mine facilities. A liquefaction susceptibility map is provided on Figure
2-14.
D. Fault Rupture Hazard
The rupture hazard may arise during large earthquakes, with the ground being displaced along the
fault that causes the seismic event. The hazard of rupture therefore is centered, expected along the
trace of the active fault. In the case of the Project area, this hazard can be sited on the trace of the
Philippine Fault along the western edge of the valley located east of the Project site, as shown in the
Active Faults Map for Jagupit quadrant in Figure 2-15.
E. Landslide Hazard
Landslides that may accompany intense seismic shaking can potentially occur along steep slopes,
particularly in areas where thick soil or deposits of loose rocks may be present. This threat may
also be present during intense rainfall events, when the soil is saturated with water, and when pore
pressures from water percolating into the ground may render some areas unstable. Geohazard
evaluations are important for those areas that may be subject to landslides with attendant property loss
or infrastructure damage.
Based on the landslide and flood assessment done by the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) on
November 2014, Sitio Payong-payong, to which the project is situated, is observed to have mass
movements such as landslides and tension cracks. Ground slopes within the Project area range from
flat to greater than 50%. Based on the earthquake triggered landslide map shown on Figure 2-16, the
Project site is moderate to highly susceptible to landslides. Several areas were identified as susceptible
to landslides and were subject to geohazard studies during the Project development stage.

Slope stability will be of primary consideration in the design parameters set for the surface mine. Mine
benching to be employed during the operations will eliminate very steep slope cuts and will increase
the stability of the mine area. Daily monitoring for signs of instability will also allow for immediate repairs
and provision of additional enforcement to provide slope stability.
Other slope stabilization measures to be employed will include placement of coco nets and gabion
baskets, and establishment of vegetation along slopes to minimize erosion and landslide incidents.
Proper slope drainage system will also be established to facilitate continuous flow of water down slope,
without eroding the soil materials.
The coastlines of Sitio Payong-payong were also mapped to be prone to storm surges. Settlement
along the coastlines is recommended to be regulated. Pre-emptive evacuation shall be done in advent
of strong typhoons. Evacuation sites will have to be established.

Figure 2-14- Liquefaction Susceptibility Map
Source: Philvocs

Figure 2-15 Active Faults Map (MGB, Jagupit Quadrant)
Source: Kyoto University and Philvocs- DOST (2007)

Figure 2-16- Landslide Susceptibility Map and Flood Susceptibility Zones of the Project Area
Source: PPDO, Agusan del Norte

API Agata Limestone Project February 2021-
Rev02
F. Flood Hazard
The active Project area is not considered a flood prone area according to the Mines and Geosciences
Bureau’s Geohazard Map of Agusan Del Norte as shown in Figure 2-17. During high rainfall periods,
Lake Mainit water levels may increase by as much as 1 to 3 m (Tumanda et al., 2004). Also, it is
observed that watermarks on the rocks along the coast are as high as 2.2 m above the normal water
surface elevation. Flood susceptibility zones for the MPSA area also shown on Figure 2-17.
The alluvial plains along big rivers including the Tubay River are frequently affected by seasonal
flooding. This is attributed mainly to the low physiography of river, its inability to accommodate high
flood discharge, and the poor vegetative cover of the headwater. Flash floods usually occur during
heavy rainfall from November to February. Most areas near the waterways have been identified to be
flood prone. Among the areas with highest susceptibility to flooding are the impact municipalities of the
Project, Jabonga, Santiago, Tubay. Historical records of the Provincial DRMMC showed that the
Province experienced heavy floods in 1956, 1962, 1966, 1974, 1975, 1980, and 1981. The last two
flood events incurred damages in the Province estimated at Php 57 million. In the last 10 years, 3 major
typhoon induced flood events were recorded, reaching up to waist level flood water level in some low-
lying areas and have resulted certain roads to be inaccessible. Damages in agriculture and
infrastructure were also experienced.
In year 2011, despite the absence of typhoon, continuous rainfall resulted to the highest flood level
recorded. As roads became impassable, rubber boats became the primary transportation. Typhoon
Agaton in Year 2014 also brought high volume of rainfall which isolated the upstream municipality of
Las Nieves in the southern part of the Province. This is the first flood event to submerge an entire
barangay in flood water. The Typhoon Seniang, on the same year, resulted to flooding that submerged
rice fields and destroyed footbridges.
G. Climate Change
Based on the latest PAGASA Report on the Observed Climate Trends and Projected Climate Change
in the Philippines, the province of Agusan del Norte is projected to have a net decrease in rainfall and
net increase in temperature. This projection is based on a moderate emission scenario and will cover
the period of Year 2036-2065. The temperature and rainfall projections for the province is shown in
Table 2-4.
Table 2-4 Projected Climate Trends for Year 2036-2065 in Agusan del Norte Province
DJF MAN JJA SON
Projected Rainfall Changes

% change mm % change mm % change mm % change mm
-9.8 790.2 -14.2 379.4 -11.4 407.3 -21.2 495.5
Projected Temperature Changes
% change ºC % change ºC % change ºC % change ºC
1.2 27.4 1.3 28.9 1.2 29 1.2 28.6
Note: Median Values for Moderate Emission Scenario; Source: PAGASA, 2018

Figure 2-17- Geohazard Map of Agusan Del Norte
Source: Mines and Geosciences Bureau

A more quantitative discussion is provided in Section 2.10.1.1. Given that the project area will be
receiving less rainfall, both the flooding and landslide hazards in the mine site will be even less. In
mining where activities are contingent to weather condition, drier season is more preferred because it
will allow continuous mining, processing, and loading activities. Given the heavy land disturbance from
mining activities and the stockpiling of large volumes of loose materials, siltation from stormwater run-
off is common. Less rainfall can somehow lessen the erosion and siltation. Nevertheless, water
management facilities will be in place to manage stormwater run-off. Capacities will be computed based
on the maximum expected rainfall in record. A location map of the proposed stockpile areas and
sediment pond facilities is shown on Figure 2-18. A discussion on the capacities of the siltation ponds
is provided in Section 1.4.5.1.
2.2.4.1. Inducement of Subsidence, Liquefaction, Landslides
Mine subsidence is the movement of the earth’s surface resulting from natural causes such as
earthquakes and from human activities such as underground mining or the extraction of groundwater
from aquifers. Over time, gravity and the weight of rock overlying the voids cause the layers of rock to
shift and collapse into the void.
The collapse and void may continue upward toward the ground surface where it may cause the creation
of sinkholes, cracks, tilting and sags. The extent and degree of subsidence depends on the surface
topography, geologic conditions and distance between the mine workings and ground surface. Mine
subsidence can occur abruptly or gradually over many years.
The general potential for limestone to demonstrate karst topography increases the potential for
subsidence from the creation of sinkholes. However, since the area with limestone materials will be
mined and will not serve as foundation for any infrastructure, subsidence hazard is low. Subsidence
and collapse activity are minimal from surface mining and quarrying. If ever, impacts will generally be
localized, affecting a relatively small area within the overlying surface. Just the same, blasting activities
will be controlled to minimize underground disturbance. The limestone material to be mined is deemed
competent enough to withstand controlled blasting activities.

Figure 2-18 Stockpile Areas and Sediment Pond Location Map

2.2.5. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Geology and Geomorphology
A summary of the management and monitoring plans relative to the potential impacts arising from
geological and geomorphological impacts is provided in Table 2-5.
Table 2-5 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Geology and Geomorphology

Change in surface Restoration of final landforms to stable Adherence to Mine and Operations
landform/geomorphology/ conditions and useable topographic Plans. Compliance with engineering
topography/ terrain/slope conditions to support post mining design criteria. Implementation of
rehabilitation programs. final mine closure plans.
.
Active implementation of progressive
rehabilitation activities.
Change in sub-surface Limiting the disturbance within the
geology/underground planned operations area.
conditions
Integration of slope stabilization (i.e
benching) to mining activities.
Inducement of subsidence, Implementation of controlled blasting
liquefaction, landslides, mud / e.g. pre-splitting, single hole firing,
debris flow, etc. trim blasting, etc.
Active implementation of progressive

rehabilitation activities.
2.3. Pedology
2.3.1. Soil Type and Quality
Soil characterization was done by Gaia South in Year 2012 through soil auger borings at representative
sampling soil mapping sites within the project area. Location of each sampling points was recorded in
GPS and is shown in Figure 2-19.
Guidelines from the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) were used as reference in soil
profiling description. The soil color was determined using the Munsell Color Chart, while the slope
gradient was also identified using an Abney Hand Level. In addition, soil samples were gathered for
physico-chemical analyses (texture, pH, N, OM, P, K, and CEC) at the Bureau of Soils and Water
Management (BSWM), while heavy metal analysis (As, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Hg, Ni, Pb) was done at Ostrea
Mineral Laboratories Inc.
Three (3) soil types and seven (7) soil mapping units were identified and mapped within the MPSA area.
A map of the soil type distribution within the Project area is shown in Figure 2-19.
The three (3) soil types consisted of the Malalag clay loam, the Kabatohan sandy clay loam and the
Umigan clay loam. The Malalag clay loam was developed from the weathering of the metamorphic
igneous rocks while the Kabatohan sandy clay loam was developed from the weathering of the
ultramafic rocks. The Umigan clay loam was developed from the weathering of river and alluvial
deposits.

Figure 2-19- Soil and Erosion Susceptibility Map

Ground slopes within the Project area range from flat to greater than 50%. Both the Malalag and
Kabatohan soil types can be found on slopes within this range. The Umigan soil type is found on slopes
ranging from flat to 3% gradients. The soil mapping units were defined by the slope of the land surface
for each soil type.
The Malalag clay loam, 8% to 18% slopes was noted in the gently sloping to sloping valley of Brgy.
Binuangan and on the rolling terrain from Brgy. Tagpangahoy to Brgy. Tinigbasan on the western
watershed of the Jabonga-Tubay elongated mountain range.
The Malalag clay loam, 30% to 50% occurs on the steep hump-like spur between Brgys. Binuangan
and Tagpangahoy, and on the steep slopes of Sitio Payong-payong watershed.
Kabatohan sandy clay loam, 8-18% slopes occur on the plateau-like sloping ridge top between Brgy.
E. Morgado and Sitio Sua, Brgy. Lawigan, and on the foot slope at Brgy. E. Morgado.
Kabatohan sandy clay loam, 18-30% slopes occurs on the side slopes of the plateau-like ridge top on
both the eastern (Brgy E. Morgado) and western (Sitio Sua, Barangay Lawigan) sides.
Kabatohan sandy clay loam, 30-50% slopes occurs on the upper slopes of the watershed from Brgy.
Binuangan to Sitio Sua, Brgy. Lawigan on the western side.
Kabatohan sandy clay loam, >50% slopes occur on the upper slopes of the watershed from Brgy.
Binuangan to Brgy. Tagpangahoy.
Umingan clay loam, 0-3% slopes occur on the flat to almost flat river terrace/alluvial plain along the
Kalinawan River at Brgy. E. Morgado.
The result of the physico-chemical analyses performed for the soil samples collected is summarized in
Table 2-6.
Table 2-6- Soil Analysis Result (Sampling Point Reference: Figure 2-19)
Kabatohan Sandy Clay Umingan
Malalg Clay Loam
Loam Clay Loam
Sampling Station
Site No. 1 Site No. 2 Site No. 3 Site No. 5-6 Site No. 7 Site No. 6
8-18% 8-18% 30-50% 8-18% 30-50% 0-3%
Moderately Moderately Moderately Moderately
Well Well
Drainage Well Well Well Well
drained drained
drained drained drained drained
Sandy Clay Sandy Clay
Textured Clay loam Clay loam Clay loam Clay loam
loam loam
Soil Depth (cm) 40cm >100cm 70cm >100cm >100cm >100cm
8-18 % 8-18 % 30-50 % 8-18 % 30-50 % 0-3 %
Slope (%)
slopes slopes slopes slopes slopes slopes
pH 6.15 5.4 5.8 5.88 5.88 6.66
Total Nitrogen 0.045 0.056 0.065 0.016 0.046 0.014
Organic matter 1.6 2.05 2.5 2.19 3.58 1.57
Phosphorus (mg/kg) 2.8 0.2 1.55 1.6 0.9 1.0
Potassium (cmol/kg) 0.16 0.06 0.1 0.045 0.14 0.07
CEC (cmol/kg) 19.24 20.26 34.75 3.17 18.36 20.17
Cadmium (mg/kg) 4.47 3.74 4.08 8.61 5.11 5.21
Cobalt (mg/kg) 43.49 35.00 65.12 298.77 343.26 280.15
Copper (mg/kg) 78.62 34.23 77.57 53.51 23.64 48.22

Table 2-6 River Sediment Metal Analysis (Sampling Point Reference: Figure 2-19) continued
Kabatohan Sandy Clay Umingan
Malalg Clay Loam
Loam Clay Loam
Sampling Station
Site No. 1 Site No. 2 Site No. 3 Site No. 5-6 Site No. 7 Site No. 6
8-18% 8-18% 30-50% 8-18% 30-50% 0-3%
Iron (%) 4.08 3.23 4.33 30.47 10.04 11.60
Nickel (mg/kg) 145.62 113.37 415.26 5,297.5 2,234.68 4,654.79
Lead (mg/kg) <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
Mercury (mg/kg) 0.018 0.025 0.026 0.108 0.059 0.037
Copper (ppm) 3.29 0.67 2.34 1.40 1.17 1.86
Zinc (ppm) 0.49 0.71 0.66 1.65 1.3 0.57
Iron (ppm) 81.14 37.39 84.74 19.84 100.25 89.32
Manganese (ppm) 11.18 71.04 57.98 29.99 141.07 29.79
Malalag clay loam, 8-18% slopes in site 1 and 2 are moderately well drained clay loam soil. Soils are
slightly acidic. Total nitrogen, organic matter, phosphorus and potassium are all very low, making the
natural fertility of this soil poor. Cation exchange capacity is medium. For metals, copper, zinc, and
manganese are low in both sites. The. The heavy metal (arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, copper, nickel, lead
and mercury) content in both sites are all below the contamination level as prescribed by the Taiwanese
and Dutch standards.
Malalag clay loam, 30-50% slopes in site 3 is moderately well drained, characterized by irregular/broken
soil profile depth due to embedded weathering rocks. Soil is slightly acidic. Soil fertility is poor, with total
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium at low levels, same with the organic matter. The cation exchange
capacity is high. Copper, zinc, and manganese are very low, while iron is medium. The heavy metals
(arsenic, cobalt, copper, lead and mercury) are below the contamination level as prescribed by the
Taiwanese and Dutch standards, except for nickel.
Kabatohan sandy clay loam, 8-18% slopes in site 4 & 5 is well-drained, deep sandy clay loam soil. Soil
reaction is slightly acidic. Total nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and cation exchange capacity are very
low. Organic matter is low, hence poor natural fertility. There were also detected concentrations of
copper, iron, zinc, and manganese. The heavy metals (arsenic, copper, lead and mercury) are below
the contamination level as prescribed by the Taiwanese standards, except for cadmium and nickel
which exceeded the contamination level. Iron content is above the range of natural iron in soil of 0.3–
10%.
Kabatohan sandy clay loam, 30-50% slopes in site 7 is well-drained deep sandy clay loam soil. Soil
reaction is slightly acidic. Natural fertility of the soil is also poor with very low content of Total nitrogen,
phosphorus, potassium, and organic matter. Iron, manganese, zinc, and copper were detected at low
to medium levels. The heavy metals (arsenic, copper, lead and mercury) are below the contamination
level of the Taiwanese standards. Exceptions include cadmium and cobalt which both exceeded the
same standard. Iron content of 10.04% is on the highest range of natural iron in soil.
Umingan clay loam, 0-3% slopes in site 6 is moderately well drained, deep clay loam soil. Soil is neutral.
Similar to the previous soil types, the soil fertility is low, with the Total nitrogen, organic matter,
phosphorus and potassium at very low levels. Copper, zinc, iron, and manganese are still detected in
this soil type. The heavy metals (arsenic, copper, lead and mercury) are below the contamination level
as prescribed by the Taiwanese standards. While the cadmium, cobalt and nickel content exceeded the
prescribed levels. Iron with 11.60% is above the range of natural iron in soil.

2.3.1.1. Soil Erosion, Loss of Topsoil
Erosion susceptibility within the MPSA area is identified based on four (4) criteria—rainfall, soil depth
and texture, land use/vegetation and slope. The erosion susceptibility for the different land use units
ranged from slightly susceptible to moderately susceptible. As shown on Figure 2-19, the
Payongpayong limestone site is part of the Malalag Clay loam at 30-50% slopes and is considered an
area with high susceptibility to erosion.
In relation, a recent Soil Loss Estimation Study conducted by students of the Caraga State University
along the Malimono Ridge of Agusan Del Norte indicated that erosion risk along the steep slopes of
Malimono Ridge is considered medium (erosion rate ranging 13.7- 26.7%) to high (erosion rate 26.7-
47.4%). The calculated annual average soil loss the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE)
ranges from 8,216 to 17,755 ton/ha/yr.
Also included in the Gaia South study is sampling of river sediments at thirteen (13) locations within the
Project area to characterize the quality of the soil lost by erosion and transported to the local streams.
Twelve (12) creeks were sampled and eight (8) heavy metals were tested. Results of the sediment
sample testing and the station locations are summarized in Table 2-7.
Table 2-7 River Sediment Metal Analysis (Sampling Point Reference: Figure 2-19)
Sampling Arsenic Cadmium Cobalt Copper Iron Nickel Lead Mercury
Station (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (%) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)
SEDQ 1 <0.017 2.56 31.64 156.86 7.09 98.44 <0.10 0.021

SEDQ 2 1.60 2.20 137.37 31.61 7.85 1237.85 <0.10 <0.004
SEDQ 3 <0.01 1.95 116.32 27.12 7.82 2621.13 154.06 <0.004
SEDQ 4 0.71 2.19 165.43 16.33 10.32 4196.00 <0.10 <0.004
SEDQ 5 14.70 1.83 51.86 136.91 4.80 903.77 23.30 <0.004
SEDQ 6 16.49 2.01 63.70 65.60 5.98 125.05 <0.10 0.055
SEDQ 7 9.79 1.75 48.94 113.49 5.84 499.20 <0.10 0.195
SEDQ 8 6.07 2.01 26.19 152.54 5.96 36.86 <0.10 <0.004
SEDQ 9 3.39 1.84 22.94 183.94 5.85 58.71 28.31 <0.004
SEDQ 10 <0.01 1.74 46.03 94.0 5.51 785.66 <0.01 <0.004
SEDQ 11 4.13 2.29 53.74 34.71 5.26 1131.64 <0.01 <0.004
SEDQ 12 2.50 3.46 36.82 49.79 3.77 347.47 41.93 <0.004
SEDQ 13 4.13 2.20 47.68 71.0 5.59 598.84 <0.10 <0.004
List of River Sediment Sampling Locations:

SEDQ 1 Kalinawan River at confluence with Bangonay River
SEDQ 2 Nangka Creek downstream of road culvert along Nangka Creek
SEDQ3 Paiton Creek upstream of road culvert along Paiton Creek
SEDQ 4 Mantiawas Creek upstream of Mantiawas Reforestation Area
SEDQ 5 Duyangan Creek downstream of small scale mining tailings disposal and upstream of road culvert
SEDQ 6 Agata Creek downstream of road culvert
SEDQ 7 Dinaringan Creek downstream of Dinaringan Creek and upstream of confluence with Kalinawan River
SEDQ 8 Kalinawan River at midstream of the river
SEDQ 9 Sua Creek No. 1 downstream of Sua Creek No. 1

SEDQ 10 Sua Creek No. 2 downstream of Sua Creek No. 2
SEDQ 11 Payong payong Creek downstream of Payong payong
SEDQ 12 Tinigbasin Creek along the confluence of two tributaries of Tinigbasin Creek
SEDQ 13 Tagpangahoy Creek
Since majority of the support facilities will be reused from the nickel operations, the crushing plant
construction site and the limestone lime area are considered to be the major sites to subject to surface
clearing and topsoil loss. Development phase will require removal of topsoil and overburden waste
materials to access the deposit for extraction. Based on the current mining plan, approximately 52
hectares will be disturbed by the quarry operations. Development of additional roads will also contribute
to loss of topsoil materials. Active excavation sites from construction activities and mining operations
will be contributing to soil erosion.
To mitigate impacts from erosion, vegetation clearing, and topsoil removal will be limited to the identified
areas of disturbance to maintain a small footprint. The surface mine design is characterized by mine
benches to promote slope stability. For road construction, slope stabilization materials such as
installation of coco net, geotextile, wattlings, and fascines will be installed as necessary. They will
provide slope stability to minimize soil transport and sedimentation within local streams. This is in
addition to the appropriately designed drainage system to manage the stormwater runoff.
Furthermore, reforestation and landscaping activities will be done to minimize exposed soil surface.
When the land is covered with vegetation, the roots of the plants and trees interlock and interlace to
bind the soil particles. This helps by not allowing the soil particles to be carried away by wind or water
and not allowing free flow of water over the soil which prevent erosion of soil by flowing water.
2.3.1.2. Change in Soil Quality and Fertility
Storage and placement of soil and rock overburden, if improperly done may result in the burial and loss
of topsoil and exposure of underlying rocks, which will be less productive medium for future reforestation
activities. Consequently, less wildlife will thrive in unproductive areas because they are unable to
provide sufficient food source and cover. Without rehabilitation, areas stripped with topsoil must go
through a weathering period, which may take many years before vegetation can be re-established.
To prevent soil loss and soil quality degradation, management of the overburden/topsoil materials will
be performed as follows:
• Soil profiling will be undertaken to initially mark the topsoil depth ranging from 50 to 300mm.
• Subsequently the topsoil or overburden will be removed in slices of 100mm using a bulldozer.
• The topsoil will be collected and brought to the designated overburden /stockpile area for
interim storage. Each stockpile area will be designed to hold a specific volume with the
placement of material in a staged manner to increase the stability and prevent landslides and
slope failures.
• The overburden/topsoil piles will be ramp piled and/or covered with laminated sack to prevent
erosion. Diversion of surface runoff around the area will also be maintained. During this holding
period, the topsoil materials will be conditioned to retain its productivity or fertility.

• Compaction of the topsoil will be prohibited during stockpiling. The quality of topsoil in the
stockpile will be maintained by measures including protection against contamination from other
materials, minimizing stockpiling periods and prevention of erosion by surface runoff or wind.
Spraying will also be done to maintain the moisture content of the soil.
• Introduction of soil ameliorants to the topsoil to maintain and improve the quality of the soil until
rehabilitation commences. The stockpiled overburden/ topsoil will then be backfilled or return
to the mined-out area for restoration.
2.3.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Pedology
A summary of the management and monitoring plans relative to the potential impacts arising from
soils and soil quality changes is provided in Table 2-8.
Table 2-8 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Pedology

Soil Erosion, Loss of Topsoil Limited footprint to planned areas of Progressive Rehabilitation based
disturbance. on the Environmental Protection
and Enhancement Program.
Installation of slope stabilization
methods (i.e. benching and terracing at Final Mine Rehabilitation and
the quarry area and roadsides) and Decommissioning Plan.
materials (i.e. coco nets, geotextiles,
etc.)
Proper drainage system around

disturbed areas.
Increase in ground cover/ vegetation

by reforestation.
Landscaping at and around auxiliary

areas and facilities.
Change in Soil Quality/Fertility Interim storage of removed topsoil. Progressive Rehabilitation based
on the Environmental Protection
Proper topsoil storage (non- and Enhancement Program
compaction, spraying, covering, soil
conditioning with ameliorants, etc.)
2.4. Terrestrial Ecology
A terrestrial flora and fauna baseline assessment of the limestone area was conducted by Green
Environment Defenders Consultancy during the period July 16-19, 2020. The “Guidelines on
Biodiversity Assessment and Monitoring System for Terrestrial Ecosystems” was the primary basis used
in the conduct of the Biodiversity assessment with a slight modification as to its methods particularly in
the collection of herpetofauna. The study covered the assessment of two watersheds: limestone quarry
project site – the primary impact area, and the adjacent watershed Tinigbasan site. The areas are
shown on Figure 2-20 and location coordinates of the sampling plots are identified in Table 2-9.

Figure 2-20 Terrestrial Flora and Fauna Study Site
Table 2-9 Terrestrial Ecology Survey Stations

Study Area Point Latitude Longitude
1 9°16'20.90"N 125°30'30.90"E
2 9°16 '25.50"N 125°30'39.90"E
3 9°16'26.80"N 125°30'47.90"E
Payong-Payong (Site1
4 9°16'28.02"N 125°30'50.10"E
5 9°16'34.04"N 125°30'50.00"E
6 9°16'41.40"N 125°30'57.60"E
1 9°16'8.80"N 125°30'44.90"E
2 9°16'13.00"N 125°30'50.60"E
3 9°16'17.42"N 125°30'55.56"E
Tinigbasan (Site 2)
4 9°16'20.40"N 125°30'57.40"E
5 9°16'18.70"N 125°31'1.50"E
6 9°16'16.70"N 125°31'4.90"E
The Project area is generally characterized by three ecosystem types; forest over ultramafic rocks,
tropical lowland evergreen rain forest and plantations. The ultramafic forest is the primary vegetation
type with only a few tall and large trees. The tropical lowland evergreen forest is found in patches
throughout the Project area and may be remnants of the vegetation that previously existed. The forest
patches are generally found along the ridges and the streams/valleys within the Project area.

2.4.1. Terrestrial Flora
Maps from the company were used to initially assess and identify the terrestrial flora biodiversity
assessment area. A Rapid Resource Assessment was employed to determine the present condition of
floral species within the direct impact of the proposed Project. Two sites were identified: Site 1 was
located within the direct impacts are possibly observed (Limestone Forest) and Site 2 was located in
Sitio Tinigbasan adjacent to Site 1 and outside the proposed quarry project (Figure 2-21). Two kilometer
transect were established in each identified site. Along the transect, six (6) plots were established
measuring 20 by 20 meter. These plots were used to measure the species richness and diversity of the
flora. Smaller subplots measuring 5 by 5 meters was also employed for the lower canopy and ground
cover. All species of flora were accounted inside the established plot. A GPS was used to determine
the location of each plot. Transect walks were also done between plots. The Transect Walk is a rapid
biodiversity assessment technique that employs a hike, recording of species, and physical attributes.
This method seeks all major ecosystems, determines stratified zones, and map the areas across the
established transects.
In situ identification of plant species was conducted along the 20 by 20 meter quadrat and along the
two (2) kilometer transect. Sampling sites of terrestrial flora covering Payong-payong and Tinigbasan
watershed is presented in Figure 2-21.
Plant species were identified through the help of local guides, photographs, field taxonomic keys and
books (Madulid, 1995; Barcelona et al.1996; Rojo, 1999). The plants were identified to the lowest taxon
possible. Documentation of diagnostic features (i.e flowers, fruits, leaves, and roots) was also
conducted. Assessment of status of each species was determined whether threatened, endemic, rare
or economically important. The floral species was assessed based on the National List of threatened
Philippine Plants (DAO 2017) and the IUCN (2019).
Species diversity indices were analysed using species richness, abundance, evenness, and dominance
and Shannon diversity. The trend of diversity profile was generated to compare the diversity between
sites. Paleontological Statistics software (PAST) was used to analyse the diversity indices. The most
important species in the area was determined using the species importance value (SIV) index (English
et al., 1997). The forest structure data (i.e. tree abundance and composition) were analysed using
PRIMER 6 software. Multivariate analyses employing the cluster, nMDS, ANOSIM, and SIMPER were
performed.

Figure 2-21 Flora Sampling Sites in within the Agata Limesone Project in Tubay, Agusan Del Norte

A. Taxonomic Values
The assessment of plants recorded a total of 206 species belonging to 78 families and 145 genera as
shown on Figure 2-22. There were 181 species of angiosperms belonging to 66 families and 130
genera, while 25 species, 12 families and 15 genera for Pteridophytes. Of the 206 species, 116 species
were recorded within the plot. Comparatively, Site 2 (85 species) has a the higher number of species
than the Limestone forest (61 species). Attached in the Appendices is a complete list of the Flora
observed during the inventory.
The most represented plant families were Moraceae (15 species), followed by Arecaceae and
Fabaceae (9 species) and, Euphorbiaceae and Anacardiaceae (8 species), as shown in Figure 2-23.
The Moraceae family commonly known as mulberry or fig family has many representative species with
cosmopolitan distribution and widely spread in different habitats of the tropical region. Family Fabaceae
can thrive well in ultramafic areas with low amounts of essential nutrients because of its ability to fix
nitrogen in the atmosphere with the help of associated Rhizobacteria in their roots. Family Arecaceae,
or the palm family, have various growth forms and can grow best in moist and shady areas and usually
among the most cultivated plant families.
Figure 2-22 Summary of Classified Flora
200
Angiosperm Pteridophyte
150
COUNTS
100
50
0
No. of Species No. of Genera No. of Families
Figure 2-23 Top ten Families with the Abundant Number of Floral Species.
Meliaceae
Araliaceae
Rubiaceae
Clusiaceae
Apocynaceae
Anacardiaceae
Euphorbiaceae
Araceae
Fabaceae
Arecaceae
Moraceae
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
No. of Species

The plant species recorded in the area were characterized into seven (7) plant habit groupings including
herbs, grass, vine, palm, ferns, fern allies, and trees and shrubs. When plants are grouped into plant
habit, results revealed that trees and shrubs (119 species) had the highest number of species among
the group (Figure 2-24). The least number of species belongs to the fern allies with only 3 species.
Figure 2-24 The seven growth habit groupings of plants in the area
140
120
NO. OF SPECIES
100
80
60
40
20
0
Fern allies Grass Palm Herb Fern Vine Trees and
shrubs
B. Species Importance Value
Dominance and ecological success of a species is expressed as a single value in terms of Importance
Value Index (IVI). This index utilizes three parameters: relative frequency, relative density and relative
dominance or basal area. In case of shrubs and herbs, only two (2) former parameters were taken into
consideration. High IVI values of a species indicate its high regeneration capacity and greater ecological
amplitude.
A total of 150 individual trees, consisting of 40 species were found within the established plots in site 1
and site 2. Vitex parviflora (Tugas), Adinandra robinsonii (Sagimsim) and Radermachera whitfordii
(Magasili) obtained the highest importance value in site 1 while in site 2, Artocarpus blancoi (Antipolo),
Paraserianthes falcataria (Falcata) and Gmelina arborea (Gmelina) dominate the area (Table 2-10).
The results suggest that these species are the most influential and important species with higher counts
and greater frequency per unit area. The removal of these species in the area may have an effect to
the survival of the other species. Furthermore, many wildlings and samplings of these species were
found in the vicinity indicating that these particular trees had a very good capacity for regeneration.
Collections of wildlings as well as cuttings from these species prior to its removal will be prioritized for
propagation and this shall be incorporated as part of nursery standard operating procedures and final
mine rehabilitation process under the Land Resource Management of ALP based from the
established/existing measures and practices from the ANLP. The method of propagation shall include
non-mist cloning from collected cuttings and direct nursery potting from collected wildlings to ensure
success rate.
The established Central and Satellite nurseries from the ANLP shall be retained for use during the
operation, progressive rehabilitation and final mine rehabilitation activities of the Agata Limestone
Project. The Central Nursery which can accommodate and propagate 600,000 seedlings will be used
mainly for propagation of forest-tree and endemic species, while the Satellite Nursery which can
accommodate 25,000-30,000 seedlings is used mainly for the propagation of fruit-bearing tree species.

Another satellite nursery is also established for the ornamental plants in line with the objective of
employing thematic landscaping in the final rehabilitation areas. The operation of these nurseries will
be in accordance to the established Land Resource Management Procedure under ISO 14001:2015
Environmental Management System of the company.
Site 1 has more species of trees (31) but stunted in growth compared to site 2, with 21 species with
bigger and taller species. The DBH of trees in Site 1 has a mean diameter of 18.13cm while site 2 has
21.55cm. Among the species, A. blancoi is the most distributed tree species in whole area and was
observed to have the largest canopy cover. The average height of trees in area ranges from 3 meters
to 20 meters. As such, the vegetations are dominated by naturally stunted trees in a limestone forest.
Table 2-10 Top 3 species with the Highest Importance Value in each site
Site Species SIV (%)
Sit 1 (Limestone Forest)

Tugas Vitex parviflora 24.42
Magasili Radermachera whitfordii 18.34
Sagimsim Adinandra robinsonii 17.59
Site 2 (Tinigbasan)
Antipolo Artocarpus blancoi 35.17
Falcata Paraserianthes falcataria 33.52
Gemelina Gmelina arborea 28.56
C. Diversity and Community Structure
The floristic data collected in the two sampling sites were subject to biodiversity analyses. The diversity
measurements were calculated using species richness, evenness, and dominance, abundance, and
Shannon diversity.
The project area has a composite Shannon diversity (H’) of 3.97 which is considered a “high diversity”
based on classification set by Fernando et al., 1998 (Table 3). Other attributes showed a generally
higher abundance (404 individuals) and species richness (116), moderate evenness (0.64), and lower
dominance (0.02). There is no significant variation (p>0.05, n=6) of plant diversity between sites, and
that, both the limestone forest (H’=3.49) and Brgy.Tinigbasan (H’=3.76) harbors a high diversity of
plants (Table 2-11, Figure 2-25).
The high diversity in limestone forest is attributed mainly to lower dominance (0.04) and higher
evenness (0.74). The analysis also detected a significantly lower evenness (p<0.05, n=6) in Limestone
forest than in Tinigbasan. This suggests that no particular species dominate the area and that most of
the species present are evenly distributed across the site. On the other hand, the relatively higher
diversity in Tinigbasan might be explained by the higher abundance (282 individuals), richness (85
species) and, lower dominance (0.03) of plant species.

Table 2-11 The computed diversity metrics (actual values) in the two sampling sites
Diversity Variable Limestone (S1) Tinigbasan (S2) Overall Diversity
Species Richness 61 85 116

Abundance 122 282 404
Dominance 0.04 0.03 0.02
Shannon Diversity 3.49 3.76 3.97
Evenness 0.74 0.66 0.64
Figure 2-25 The comparison of biodiversity indices in the two sampling locations

The community structure of plants based on species abundance was analyzed using a series of
ecological community structure analysis including cluster analysis, non-metric multidimensional scaling
(nMDS), Analysis of Similarities (ANOSIM), and Similarity Percentages (SIMPER). Prior to the analysis,
the abundance data was transformed using square root transformation technique and was subject to
Bray-Curtis similarity coefficient. Then, the similarity matrix was used to analyze the community
structure of plants using the previously mentioned analyses.
The Bray Curtis Cluster and nMDS analyses were used to find natural grouping patterns of sampling
units (plots) with similar species assemblages (Figure 2-27). The cluster analyses showed two grouping
patterns at 25% similarity. The two sampling sites clustered independently into two separate groups.
They are composed of 6 plots from Tinigbasan (plus plot 2 in limestone) as one big group, and the five
plots from Limestone forest as a separate group. However, higher Bray Curtis similarity (30%) revealed
three clustering groups. Tinigbasan plots were divided into two: plot 2, 3, 4, 5 as one group, while plot
1, plot 6 both from Tinigbasan, and plot 2 from limestone forest as another group. The third group is
the clustering of five plots located within limestone forest. These findings were consistent with the result
of nMDS analysis as shown in Figure 2-26. The ordination showed a clear dispersion of plant
communities in the two sites similar to the grouping as depicted in cluster analysis.
The nMDS also showed a stress value of 0.15 suggesting a good representation of the differences in
the dataset. The clustering and proximity of plots within a group as depicted in the graph indicates
higher similarity of plant community which likely share similar species composition. Conversely, the
separation of the sampling plots as a distinct group relative to the other indicates lower species similarity
which likely have a unique set of plant species composition.
Figure 2-26 The Cluster Analysis of sampling sites using Bray Curtis similarity index.

Figure 2-27 Spatio-temporal comparison of the community structure of plants using Bray Curtis similarity
Using ANOSIM, the differences between the two sampling sites as observed in nMDS and Cluster
analyses are highly significant (Global R=0.7, p<0.001). The ANOSIM result showed moderate to high
dissimilarity of species between the two sites. Hence, the plant species composition and structure differ
significantly between limestone forest and Tinigbasan site. Despite the similarly higher diversity, it can
be argued that both sites harbors unique plant species grouping, and that, some species can only be
found and dominates, thereby shaping the community structure of the area. This further suggests that
the combination of diversity, vegetation and community structure analysis and determination is
necessary to better inform decision making.
D. Endemicity, Conservation Status and Invasiveness
The area holds a higher number of endemic species (34) and threatened species (16) (Figure 2-28).
Endemic species means that the species can only be found in the Philippines, and/or in a specific area
in the country (highly endemic). Threatened species are plants that face the brink of extinction due to
variety of factors (e.g. Habitat degradation, Land-use changes etc.), and can be categorized into three;
vulnerable, endangered, and critically endangered.
There are 7 vulnerable, 8 endangered and 1 critically endangered species, which is 8% (16 out of 206
species) of the total number of species recorded (Figure 2-29 and Figure 2-30). The above-mentioned
species of plant communities are not only observed in the direct impact area. There are four (4)
threatened species that can be found only in the direct impact area, (hereto referred as Payong-payong
site), however, there are also four (4) species located in adjacent site (Tinigbasan site). Other seven
(7) species can be found in both study sites. The list of threatened species, with the specific site/s where
they can be found is included in the Appendices.
The presence of endemic and threatened species demonstrates the need of concerted and pragmatic
conservation and management efforts from the company and other stakeholders in order to preserve
these species in the area. This includes establishment of a small portion of forest reserve (referred in
the report as buffer zone) within the direct impact area for the protection and conservation of these
species.

Continuing the best Land Resource Management practices of ANLP, the collection of wildlings of
threatened species in the area for planting in the proposed forest reserve will be prioritized. A suitability
assessment shall be done prior to the establishment of forest reserve.
The propagation and an establishment of forest reserve shall follow the following criteria:
• Good to excellent regeneration potential (e.g numerous seedlings or wildlings);

• Healthy and good forest condition (e.g larger over story trees with high DBH and Height);
• Proximity to the water source.
Furthermore, a suitability assessment shall be done prior to the establishment of forest reserve.
On the other hand, there are also invasive plants (17 species) present in the area, primarily
angiosperms (15 species; Figure 8). Some of these are listed as the top worst invasive species in the
world including Chromolaena odorata (Hagonoy) and Scleria scrobiculata (Daat). Invasive species are
known to have a negative impact on naturally growing native species because of competition of
resources, space and light attenuation as well as alteration of habitat or ecosystem.
Figure 2-28 The number of endemic, invasive and threatened plants in two sampling sites
35
30
No. of Species
25
20
15
10
5
0
Endemic species Threatened species Invasive species
Angiosperms Pteridophytes
Figure 2-29 The number of threatened species of plants
18
16
16
14
12
No. of Species
10
8
8 7
6
4
2 1
0
Critically endangered Endangered Vulnerable Total

Figure 2-30 The proportion of threatened to non-threatened species of plants.
Threatened Non-threatened
8%
92%
2.4.1.1. Vegetation Removal and Loss of Habitat
The removal of vegetation is incidental to the quarry operation and effectively removes some specific
habitats currently present within the area. Noise generated by equipment and human traffic can also
disturb species sensitive to sound. Animals that have broad habitat range may also be hindered in their
feeding behavior. All of these factors will affect the biodiversity of the area. It is anticipated the fauna
will either adapt to the new habitat changes or migrate to other areas with similar habitat.
Vegetation removal is one of the unavoidable impacts of quarrying/mining and consequently the loss of
habitat of faunal species. However, the removal or exposure of the land resources will be limited to the
quarry/mine area, waste, stockpile and crushing area. Approximately 66.94 hectares of the MPSA will
be subject to direct disturbance while the infrastructure and access roads will disturb another 487.06
hectares. The total disturbed area will be approximately 554 hectares.
Using the classical area frame sampling approach derived from the satellite image interpretation, a
conservative forest area cover was estimated. The potential dominant tree and vegetation species to
be affected by the operations is coconut trees and miscellaneous naturally grown trees. The final
number of trees that will be affected by the operations will be determined during the actual field survey
for the Tree Cutting Permit application to the DENR.
Significant portion of the disturbed area will be affected by forest vegetation removal. This is a direct
impact of the quarry/mining operations but is considered short term. Progressive rehabilitation activities
including reforestation will mitigate this impact somewhat during the operations period. Final mine
rehabilitation and reclamation will further help to mitigate this impact following mine closure.

The consequent loss of vegetation will cause a loss of habitat for the wildlife species in the area. The
baseline information however is indicative of the current disturbance with about 30% of the ECC
application area converted to agricultural area. Some species of birds and the low turnout of bats,
reptiles and amphibians were assumed to be indicators of the already present disturbance within the
vicinity of the Project area.
2.4.2. Terrestrial Fauna
A. Amphibians and Reptile
A 3-day rapid assessment on the herpetofauna was conducted in the proposed quarry area in the
limestone ecosystem in Payong-payong on July 17-19. 2020. In addition, the adjacent Tinigbasan
watershed was also covered in the baseline survey. Within the 2-kilometer transect line in the study
sites established, the collection of herpetofauna was done during peak hours in the morning when
species are active basking and hunting for food, 0900 to 1200 hours. Searching was also done in the
late afternoon (1600 to 1800 hours) and during the night (1900 to 2200 hours) when herpetofauna are
on their way to resting place and hibernate. The extensive, intensive opportunistic technique was
employed in collecting the samples.
The 3-day rapid assessment yielded only five species of anurans and three species of reptiles. Anurans
include Rhinella marina, Limnonectes magnus, Limnonectes leytensis, Occidozyga laevis, and
Pulchrana grandocula. Of the five species of anurans, L. magnus (Photo 2-2) of Family Dicroglossidae
is categorized as Other Threatened Species (OTS) of DAO 2019-09 (Table 2-12). This indicates that
the species is vulnerable to being endangered in the near future and their population is declining. Also,
out of the five anurans, three are Philippine endemics (60%), one non-endemic species (20%), and one
invasive species (20%). Anurans accounted for 88.24% of the total individuals of herpetofauna collected
during the sampling. For reptiles, all species captured and recorded are categorized as Least Concern,
two species are Philippine endemics (D. bimaculatus and G. mindorensis), and E. multifasciata is the
only non-endemic reptile species collected. The sighted flying lizard, Draco bimaculatus was hard to
capture since they are highly mobile and like other reptiles, this agamid is a cryptic species. The G.
mindorensis (Photo 2-3) is likely to be found in secondary and limestone forests. The species also is
commonly observed in places near residents and in houses and accounted for 5.88% of the recorded
herpetofauna in the study sites.
Photo 2-3 Gekko mindorensis, (Taylor, 1919)

commonly named as “Mindoro Narrow-disked Photo 2-2 The Limnonectes magnus (Stejneger,
Gecko” is a Least Concern and Philippine endemic 1910) commonly named as “Mindanao fanged frog”
species. is a Near Threatened and Philippine endemic species

Table 2-12 The herpetofauna species with their conservation and distribution status, abundance and relative
abundance
Philippine Abundance
Species Common Conservation Distribution
Family Name Red List (Rel.abundance,
Name Name Status Status
Status %)
Rhinella
Bufonidae Cane Toad OWS LC ↑ IAS 2 (2.94)
marina
Dicroglossidae Mindanao
Limnonectes
Fanged OTS NT ↓ PE 22 (32.35)
magnus
frog
Limnonectes Leyte Wart
OWS LC ↓ PE 1 (1.47)
leytensis Frog
Occidozyga Common
OWS LC ─ NE 3 (4.41)
laevis puddle frog
Ranidae Pulchrana Big-eyed
OWS LC ─ PE 32 (47.06)
grandocula frog
Two-
Draco
Agamidae spotted OWS LC ─ PE *3 (4.41)
bimaculatus
flying lizard
Gekkonidae Mindoro
Gekko narrow-
OWS LC ─ PE 4 (5.88)
mindorensis disked
gecko
Scincidae Eutropis Common
OWS LC ─ NE *1 (1.47)
multifasciata Mabuya
Total 68
Legend: Philippine Red List Status = OTS- Other Threatened Species, OWS- Other Wildlife Species (DAO2019-09) ;
Conservation status = LC- Least Concern, NT- Near-Threatened; Distribution Status = NE- Non Endemic, PE- Philippine
Endemic, IAS- Invasive Alien Species; Population Trend = ↑- Increasing, ↓- Decreasing, ─ - Stable, ? – Unknown; *sighted

Table 2-13 The herpetofauna species recorded in the study sites with their abundance and relative
abundance
Inside Outside Inside

(Limestone (Tinigbasan (Limestone
Family Name Species Name Common Name
Site) Site) Site)
2020 Data 2018 Data 2020 Data
Amphibians
Bufonidae marina Cane Toad 1 (7.14%) 17 (8.63%) 1 (1.85%)
Dicroglossidae leytensis* Leyte Wart Frog - 1 (0.51%) 1 (1.85%)
Mindanao
L. magnus* 13 (92.86%) 113 9 (16.67%)
Fanged frog
Common
laevis* - 1 (0.51%) 3 (5.56%)
puddle frog
Ranidae grandocula* Big-eyed frog - 39 (19.80%) 32 (59.26%)
Polypedates Common Tree
Rhacophoridae - 11 (5.58%) -
leucomystax Frog
Reptiles
Two-spotted
bimaculatus* - 2 (1.02%) 3 (5.56%)
flying lizard
Agamidae
Hydrosaurus Philippine
- 4 (2.03%) -
pustulatus* Sailfin Lizard
Cyrtodactylus Mindanao Bow-
- 1 (0.51%) -
agusanensis* fingered Gecko
Mindoro
Gekkonidae mindorensis* Narrow-disked - 4 (7.41%)
Gecko
Hemidactylus Common
- 1 (0.51%) -
frenatus House Gecko
Common
E. multifasciata 1 (0.51%) 1 (1.85%)
Mabuya
Lamprolepis
Emerald Skink - 1 (0.51%) -
Scincidae smaragdina*
Misamis
Tropidophorus
Waterside - 1 (0.51%) -
misaminius*
Skink
Ahaetulla Jade Vine
- 2 (1.02%) -
prasina Snake
Colubridae
Chrysopelea Golden Flying
- 1 (0.51%) -
paradisi Snake
Naja
Elapidae Samar Cobra - 1 (0.51%) -
samarensis*
Total # of individuals (N) 14 197 54
Species Richness (R) 2 16 8
Total # of endemic species 1 (50%) 9 (56.25%) 6 (75%)
Table 2-13 shows the abundance and relative abundance of species during the 2020 field sampling is
decreasing compared to 2018 data, wherein there were 197 individuals and 16 species captured and
recorded. The abundance of species is the most significant ecological quantity required for
understanding the dynamics of populations and decision-makings in biodiversity management and
conservation (Yin and He, 2014). In the recent rapid assessment conducted in Payongpayong, data on
species abundance was hard to record because speeding sampling period. Rapid assessment does
not give comprehensive data on the species abundance, which is important in assessing risk of
endangered species, monitoring invasive species, managing threatened species populations, and
identifying keystone species in an ecosystem. With the recent results, it is not conclusive to compare
the populations in different times considering the time allotted to collect the samples.

Reptiles and amphibians are very sensitive to environmental pressures (Barrows, 2011; Solania and
Gamalinda, 2018; Böhm et al. 2016). Any change in the limestone ecosystem of the site, Payongpayong
perhaps influence the abundance and diversity of herpetofauna in the area. The dispersal process of
these organisms is not long range, hence, any disturbance along their route might eliminate them.
Based on the previous and recent results of the study, one of the possible reasons for the decline
number of species collected aside from the time spent in collecting the samples is the on-going activities
near the study site. Noise and other human activities may influence the foraging behavior, reproduction,
and survival of amphibians and reptiles.
B. Bird Assessment
Rapid assessments of birds were conducted within and outside (Tinigbasan Site) the proposed
limestone mining project of Agata Mining Ventures Inc in Tubay, Agusan del Norte. The survey was
limited only to a total of 12-man hours. Eight (8) man hours were spent in the two (2) kilometer transect
within the proposed project and four (4) man hours in the one kilometer transect outside the proposed
project. The map showing the location of the sampling sites and points is presented in Figure 2-21. In
general, the vegetation cover within and outside the proposed limestone project is mixed agricultural.
However, the area of the proposed project is more forested compared to the adjacent sampling which
is highly dominated by coconut and planted trees species.
A total of 217 individuals of birds belonging to 22 families, of 29 genera and 31 species were recorded
in this survey (Table 2- 14). One hundred sixteen individuals (116) from 14 families, 16 genera and 18
species were observed within the proposed limestone mining site, while 101 individuals from 18 families
consisting of 23 genera and 24 species were listed outside. Mostly are resident species, followed by
endemic species (Figure 2-31). The five most abundant species listed in the survey are Pycnonotus
goiavier (20%), Haliastur indus (12%), Dicaeum australe (6%), and Aplonis panayensis and Cinnyris
jugularis with 5% observation respectively. The families Pycnonotidae (26%), Accipitridae (12%),
Dicaeidae (7.8%), Columbidae (7.3%), and Nectariniidae (6.5%) are the most dominant families
observed. The rarest are the families Alcedinidae, and Pandionidae, Ardeidae and Pittidae with 0.92%
and 0.42% observations respectively.
Rapid assessment of birds were conducted within and outside the proposed limestone mining project
of Agata Mining Ventures Inc in Tubay, Agusan del Norte. The procedure particularly followed the
simple line transect count which was limited only to a total of 12 man hours. And the outside transect
was traversed for four (4) man-hours every 5:00 to 9:00 in the morning. Eight (8) man-hours were spent
in the two kilometers transect within the proposed project. The transect was divided into eight (8) central
points marked at every 250 meters and traversed at every 5:00 to 9:00 in the morning and in the
afternoon at 3 to 6 PM for a period of two days. Birds seen were recorded in a prepared data sheet.
Meanwhile, the extent of the outside transect is only one kilometer since it already reached the
population center.
A complete list of the inventoried birds, along with their conservation status are provided in the
Appendices.

Figure 2-31 Residency status of the birds observed within and near the proposed limestone project
Table 2- 14 Composition and Diversity

Classification Limestone Area Tinigbasan Site Total
Family 14 18 22
Genera 16 23 29
Individuals 116 101 217
Species 18 24 31
Shannon_H 2.47 2.83
Evenness_e^H/S 0.66 0.70
Photo 2-4 Representative photos of birds recorded in the sampling sites.

The diversity of birds was determined using the PAST software version 3. Species diversity and
richness is a bit lower in the Limestone area (H’=2.47), while moderate diversity (H’=2.83) was noted
at Tinigbasan site. Majority of the listed birds are resident species (53%) while 32% are endemic. There
are also near endemic (6%) and introduced and migrant species with 3% respectively. There is no
threatened species listed during the survey.
The feeding behaviours of birds were noted and were grouped into nine as shown in Figure 2-32.
Results showed that most of the birds listed are frugivores (28%) followed by insectivores (25%) and
omnivores (19%). The rarest are the carnivores, piscivores, granivores with 3% respectively. Obtaining
information of the feeding types of the birds provides a clue for the type of habitat in an area.
Monitoring species composition, relative abundance, and diversity of birds provide baseline that can be
useful for future environmental measures.
Figure 2-32 Feeding guilds of birds observed within and near the proposed project
C. Mammal Fauna
Eight (8) mammalian species belonging to four (4) families, represented by three (3) non-volant
mammals namely: Philippine warty pig (Sus philippensis mindanensis), Asian civet cat (Paradoxurus
hermaphroditus), and common field rat (Rattus tanezumi) were recorded. Of the non-volant mammals,
only R. tanzumi was captured in a live trap during the sampling period. Meanwhile, the Philippine warty
pig and Civet cats were not captured however, their notable occurrence was observed in the area.
Indices of presence were detected such as foot markings, fecal remains, and other remnants of species
activities. Five Mega-chinopteran fruit bat species were also recorded in this survey belonging to
Pteropidae family represented by Cynopterus brachyotis, Ptenochyrus jagori, Ptenochyrus minor,
Rousettus amplexicaudatus, and Macroglossus minimus.
A total of 195 of individuals of fruit bats were captured comprising of: P. jagori with 73 (37.44 %) and
was most abundant followed by C. brachyotis 41 (21.03%), R. amplexicaudatus 40 (20.51%), M.
minimus 21 (10.77%), and P. minor 20 (10.26%) recorded least. All fruit bat species were encountered
in both sampling sites. The majority is recorded within Limestone site, with 114 (58.46%), while
Tinigbasan has 81 (41.54%) captured. This survey recorded 108 (55.38%) of male fruit bats and 87
(44.62%) females. Adult dominated the age-structure composition with 144 (73.85%) abundance, while

juvenile has 51 (26.15%) total captured fruit bats (Table 2-15). This survey also reported three (3)
species of mammals that are endemic in the Philippines represented by P. jagori, P. minor, and S.
philipppinsis mindanensis.
In terms of Conservation status, only S. philipppinsis mindanensis is threatened species categorized as

Vulnerable by International Union Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and endangered species categorized
by DENR-Administrative Order (DAO-2010), this species was recorded only in Tinigbasan site.
Meanwhile, the other seven (7) species classified as Least Concern. A complete list of the inventoried
mammals, along with their conservation status are provided in the Appendices.
Table 2-15 Community structure of fruit bats collected within Payong-payong and Tinigbasan
watershed, Tubay Agusan del Norte
Species Limestone Site Tinigbasan Site Total Abundance (%)
Ptenochyrus jagori 49 24 73 37.44
Ptenochyrus minor 13 7 20 10.26
Macroglosos minimus 15 6 21 10.77
Russettus amplexicaudatus 26 14 40 20.51
Cynopterus brachyotis 11 30 41 21.03
Sex
Male 84 24 108 55.38
Female 65 22 87 44.62
Ages
Juvenile 39 12 51 26.15
Adult 110 34 144 73.85
Photo 2-5 Captured Mammals within the MPSA,

Tubay, Agusan del Norte: A. Ptenochyrus jagori B.
Ptenochyrus minor C. Cynopterus brachyotis, D.
Rousettus amplexicaudatus E. Macroglossos
minimus F. Rattus tanezumi

C.1. Non-volant mammals
This survey recorded Philippine warty pig (Sus philippensis mindanensis); a member of the Suidae
family with two pairs of warts and a tuft of hair extending warts closest to the jaw outwards. The
conservation status of this species is categorized as Vulnerable by IUCN and endangered species
classified by DAO-2010. The distribution is confined and endemic to the Greater Mindanao faunal region
(Oliver 1995, 2001). Previously, this species was abundant from sea-level up to at least 2,800 meters
in virtually all habitats (Rabor, 1986). Now it is common only in remote forests (Heaney et al., 1987). In
this survey, foot marks and other indices of warty pig presence observed in the Tinigbasan sampling
site that depicts this species’ activities, indicating that the said mammal is still present in the area.
Asian palm civet (Paradoxurus hermaphroditus) was also recorded in Tinigbasan area. Indices of
presence observed in this area a consumed fruit remains and fecal matter of a civet cat. This species
is native to some Asian countries and widely distributed to forest habitats, including the Philippines. It
usually inhabits in primary forest, but also occurs at lower densities in a secondary and selectively
logged forest (Grassman, 1998). This species is thought to lead a solitary lifestyle, except for brief
periods during mating (Thohari and Santosa, 1986: Joshi et al., 1995). It is both terrestrial and arboreal,
showing a nocturnal activity pattern with peaks between late evening until after midnight. The Asian
palm civet is an omnivore feeding foremost on fruits such as berries and pulpy fruits. Accordingly, it
helps to maintain tropical forest ecosystems through seed dispersal as this species eats fruits and
insects (Grassman, 1998). This species is widely distributed in the different faunal regions in the
country, including Greater Mindanao with Least Concern conservation status.
Common field rat (Rattus tanezumi) is a highly adaptable non-native rat species that is commonly found
in and around villages and agricultural areas. In the Philippines, it is common in disturbed lowland and
montane forest up to 1,800 meters (Heaney et al., 1998). This species is commonly found in rice field
habitats. Agricultural areas are mostly affected since rice has been identified as the main component
of the R. tanezumi diet during the ripening to harvest stage of the rice crop. However, during off-season
months, when rice grain was absent, insects, snails, and crabs were identified as dominant food items
of this wild rats (Brown et al., 2017). The recent survey captured five individuals of R. tanezumi in
Limestone site, particularly in a semi-agroforest area vegetation harbors with coconut trees and other
fruit trees that may favor the proliferation of this species. During the survey, coconut and fruit remain
consumed by R. tanezumi was observed in the area.
C.2 Volant Mammals
This survey reported five species of fruit bats from the Pteropodidae family comprising: Cynopterus
brachyotis, Ptenochyrus jagori, and Ptenochyrus minor, Rousettus amplexicaudatus, and
Macroglossus minimus. Of these fruit bat species, only P. minor and P. jagori are endemic species in
the Philippines (Figure 1; Table 1). Both species are common inhabitants of primary, secondary forest,
and occurrence may be attributed to the intact primary forest in the area. However, these species
sometimes are forced to venture out in disturbed habitats to find suitable places that also harbor fruit
trees in forested land for foraging activities (Rickart, 1993).
In this survey, P. jagori was captured in both sampling sites with a total of 73 individuals. This Philippine
endemic bat is widely occurring throughout the archipelago except in the Palawan region. This species
plays a vital role in forest regeneration that served as seed dispersers of trees in- and outside of the
forest. Several individuals within the forest were observed foraging where vegetation is dominated with
fruit trees member of the Moraceae family. This bat species will occasionally roost at the openings of

caves. The current survey reported this species as the most abundant bat species captured with
37.44%.
Meanwhile, P. minor is the Philippine endemic where it is found only in the Mindanao faunal region and
some island in the Visayas. It has been recorded from sea level to 1,600 meters above sea level. This
species assessed as least concern, which common and widespread in arrange of suitable habitats. It
is common in primary lowland and mountain forests and sometimes present in moss forests and can
also be common in lightly degraded secondary forests. Its population is considered stable, and the
species occurs in several protected areas (Heaney et al. 1998; Flores et al., 2015). This species is co-
existed at upper elevation with P. jagori, and it was also reported that this found uncommon in lower
elevation mossy-montane forest that had been subjected to habitat alteration (Heaney et al., 2006). In
this survey, this species was also encountered in both sampling sites Limestone and Tinigbasan site
with 13 and 7 number of individuals respectively, this species was recorded with the least captured bats
(10.26%) in this survey.
Reusettus amplexicaudatus is a species of megabat or Old-World fruit bat, and it has brown or grey-
brown bodies; their heads are usually darker than their underparts. This species is widely distributed in
subtropical and tropical areas. They prefer lower elevations near coasts and roost in large limestone
caves near the primary and secondary forest. R. amplexicaudatus fly over water barriers and the
agricultural regions to reach their foraging and roosting sites (Kompanie, 2001). This species appears
to have the same seasonality and synchrony of reproduction with the other three nectarivorous
Philippines bats (Zubaid, 2004; Mould, 2012). In this survey, R. amplexicaudatus was encountered in
both sampling sites, 26 individuals were captured in Limestone site, and 14 in Tinigbasan, and it has
20.51% total abundance.
Macroglossus minimus (long-tongued fruit bat) is amongst the smallest of the family Pteropodidae
(Gunnell et al., 1996). This species is commonly found in urban coastal areas to denser forested areas
at elevations from sea-level up to 1500 meters (Michleburgh et al., 1992). M. minimus usually roosts in
rolled leaves either in-ground plants or trees or under tree branches and roofs. They feed primarily on
nectar, pollen, and also drinks the juices of soft fruit (Nowak, 1991). This survey recorded a 10.77%
abundance of this species and encountered in both sampling sites with 15 individuals in the Limestone
area and six individuals in the Tinigbasan area.
Cynopterus brachyotis is the most frequent species that can thrive in a semi disturbed and disturbed
habitats. In this preset survey, this species was recorded the most abundant in Tinigbasan area with a
total of 30 individuals captured, and 11 individuals in Limestone site this species recorded high
abundance (21.03%) next to P. jagori. C. brachyotis is common throughout the Philippines and is
widely distributed in Southeast Asia. This species is generally brown to yellowish-brown with a brighter
collar (Nowak, 1997). They prefer to roost in small groups in trees, under leaves, and in caves. They
are frugivorous and prefer aromatic fruit, especially mangoes, and feed on small fruits by sucking out
the juices and soft pulp and eating nectar and pollen (Payne et al., 1985). This fruit bat species plays
an essential role in regenerating forests as seed dispersers of pioneer tree species (e.g., Ficus spp.) in
open areas.
Fruit bats age-sex structure is the composition of a population in the area this determined by the number
or proportion of males and females and age category (Table 2). This survey observed fair distribution
of males and females in both sampling sites though the bat population is dominated by males with 108
individuals (55.38%) while females have 87(44.62%). It is worth noting that some encountered female
bats during sampling periods were lactating and were carefully released immediately to avoid bats
species from stress. The population's age-sex structure is the collective result of preceding trends in

fecundity, mortality, and migration. Information on age-sex composition is essential for the description
and analysis of many other types of demographic data. This survey recorded the age structure of bats
community dominated by adults in both sampling sites comprising 144 (73.85%) total number of
individuals captured while juvenile has only 51(26.15%).
The abundance of captured adults and male bats might be explained in their reproductive seasonality;
pregnancy rates increased in females in July and peaked by females until September. Delpietro et al.
(2017) reported that lactating females increased from this month to September to a peak of 60% in
February. The bat's age-structure in a population is influenced by season timing in response to their
habitat and climate factor. For example, plants undergo from flowering to pollination to fruit-bearing
season. Most bats species are highly dependent on the availability of food items as essential
requirements for gestation and reproduction. A recent survey implies that the bat population in the area
has a stable population to withstand. Determining the sex-age structure of the bat's community is
essential to determine the fecundity and productivity of bats species to assess the decreasing or
increasing trend of population crucial for conservation.
In general, bats (Chiroptera) provide several ecosystem services and reflect the status of the plant
populations on which they feed and pollinate as well as the productivity of insect communities (Jones
et al., 2009). Fruit bats play an essential role in the environmental recovery of a particular area, which
has experienced extreme degradation. Most notably in agricultural and mining areas such as the
Caraga region. In addition to that, they can be a keystone species in which large aggregations of bats
create guano used in fertilizing fields. They pollinate flowers of important orchard crops such as durian,
and they contribute to forest restoration by dispersing tree seeds. The present survey implies that forest
habitat Limestone and Tinigbasan area can still support and be suitable for fruit bats to thrive in where
current data reported that sampling sites could harbor fruit bats species that were also found in intact
forest. The recovered species is a signpost of a forest habitat that experienced moderate disturbance.
These endemic or range-restricted species typically are viewed as less tolerant of a disturbance than
are widespread species, presumably because of greater ecological specialization (Brown, 1995).
The adjacent forested area of the Tinigbasan site possesses a habitat that can be a relocation site for
bats and other mammal species. Mammal community, species diversity, and abundance are excellent
indicators to assess a particular area due to their sensitivity to habitat changes in the environment, such
as vegetation, ground cover, and food resources (Whitmore, 1984; Gitonga et al., 2016). The total
capture of this present survey indicates that the area has a moderate abundance of bat species. It is
worth noting that the current study recorded some bat species that can serve as keystone species
essential for the recovery of particular habitat that experienced extreme environmental degradation.
With this information, it recommended designating a conservation site for bats and other mammal
species found in these areas.
2.4.2.1. Threat to existence and/or loss of important local flora and fauna species
Based on the baseline data, the dominant tree species in the canopy, intermediate and ground forest
layers that will be potentially cut include the Vitex parviflora (Tugas), Adinandra robinsonii (Sagimsim)
and Radermachera whitfordii (Magasili). Tugas is considered Endangered tree species.
Other Endangered and Vulnerable species that will be possibly cut are presented in Table 2- 16. Tree
species identified as Endangered and Vulnerable are based on International Union for Conservation of
Nature 2020. All other floral species potentially affected by the Project construction and operation,
identified during the baseline assessment, are considered common species within the country and the

region. Preservation of this species is already implemented by the Company thru the establishment of
a cloning facility. Relative to the faunal wildlife, the primary disturbance area will be concentrated at the
Quarry Area. This area is more vegetated than the other proposed features of the Project and provide
a more extensive habitat. Faunal species potentially to be impacted are summarized in Table 2-17.
Table 2- 16 Vulnerable and Endangered Flora Potentially Disturbed by the Project

Species Common Name Conservation Status
Anisoptera thurifera Palosapis Vulnerable
Artocarpus blancoi Antipolo Vulnerable
Cyathea contaminans Anonotong Endangered
Diospyros philippinensis Kamagong gubat Endangered
Litsea leytensis Bantuling Endangered
Myristica philippenses Duguan Endangered
Pterocarpus indicus Narra Endangered
Securinega flexousa Anislag Vulnerable
Shorea negrosensis red lawaan Vulnerable
Vitex parviflora Tugas Endangered
Xanthotemon verdugonianus Mangkono Endangered
Table 2-17 Important Local Fauna Species Potentially Disturbed by the Project
Taxa Common Name Scientific Name Conservation Status
Amphibian Mindanao Fanged frog Limnonectes magnus Near-Threatened
Most of the species identified within the proposed construction and operation areas of disturbance are
classified Least Concern. Only one Near Threatened Frog was identified within the operation area.
Migration of the species located within the disturbed areas to other undisturbed habitat areas is
possible. The close proximity of the relatively undisturbed habitat areas e.g. Tinigbasan watershed that
houses some endangered species and the availability of wildlife movement corridors will minimize the
impacts on the faunal species.
2.4.2.2. Threat to abundance, frequency and distribution of flora and fauna species
With respect to the important forest species and distribution, Vitex parviflora (Tugas), Adinandra
robinsonii (Sagimsim) and Radermachera whitfordii (Magasili) will be the most at threat species. These
species have been identified as the highest Species Importance Value (SIV) and the most dominant
species. These species were the most influential and important species with higher counts and greater
frequency per unit area. Construction and operation activities will significantly impact the Tugas,
Sagimsim and Magasili given its abundance within this particular area.
Artocarpus blancoi (Antipolo) was the most distributed tree species in whole area and was observed to
have the largest canopy cover. The average height of trees in area ranges from 3.0meters to 20 meters.

As such, the vegetation is dominated by naturally stunted trees in a limestone forest. Other vegetative
species are well and evenly distributed. Removal of this species within the impact area will significantly
change in the diversity values of the area.
Relative to the faunal environment, most of the species identified are categorized from least concern to
near threatened. A decrease in the abundance, frequency and distribution of the faunal species
observed at the proposed quarry area may be significant during the construction and operation of the
Project. Other areas may exhibit higher values in abundance but similar frequency and distribution
values in the future. This is due to the migration of the species from the disturbed areas to adjacent
areas not impacted by the Project. The adjacent forested area of the Tinigbasan site possesses a
habitat that can be a relocation site for herpetofauna, bats and other mammal species. A no poaching
of faunal species policy will be strictly enforced during the operations and closure phases of the
operation.
Changing the landscape will directly impact movement ecology of wildlife particularly slow-moving
fauna. It is expected the fauna will either adapt to the new habitat changes or migrate to other areas
with similar habitat. The adjacent forested area of the Tinigbasan watershed can be a relocation site for
wildlife fauna.
2.4.3. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Terrestrial Ecology
A summary of the management and monitoring plans relative to the potential impacts to flora and
fauna is provided in Table 2-18.
Table 2-18 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Terrestrial Ecology

Vegetation Removal and Loss Implementation of Progressive AEPEP/ MMT
of Habitat Rehabilitation and Preservation of tree
species thru cloning
Threat to existence and/or Offsetting of facilities. Establishment Annual Flora and Fauna Monitoring
loss of important local flora of biodiversity preservation zone.
and fauna species
Threat to abundance, Offsetting of facilities. Establishment AEPEP/ MMT
frequency and distribution of of biodiversity preservation zone.
flora and fauna species

2.5. Hydrology and Hydrogeology
The Agata Limestone Project is located in the catchment of Payongpayong Creek and the road system
towards project site, affecting the Tinagbasan Creek. The drainage basin is bounded by a natural
topographic and geologic divide which separate one drainage area or watershed from the other. The
drainage basin supplies water to streams and their tributaries. Streams are classified based on
consistency of flows, namely: perennial, intermittent and ephemeral stream.
2.5.1. Watershed Characteristics
Based on its geographical location, two (2) sub- western watersheds of the ANLP site are directly
affected by the Project activities, these are Payongpayong Creek (W12) and Tinigbasan Creek (W13).
All these drains westerly directly to Payongpayong Bay. The western watersheds encompass a total
tributary area of approximately 73.7 The individual watershed areas range in size from 23 hectares to
50 hectares. ANLP Project area watershed map, Figure 2-33.
The primary impact of the project site is within the Payongpayong Creek. Tinigbasan North Creek which
is the adjacent watershed divide is considered as the secondary impact watershed. These two creeks
have separate draining outlets directly towards Tubay Bay. A watershed map of the project site is shown
in Figure 2-34.
Streamflow characteristics of the affected bodies of water are measured at sampling sites shown on
Figure 2-35. The streamflow measurements are presented in Table 2-19, Table 2-20 Table 2-21, and
Table 2-22.
Table 2-19 Local Watershed Rainfall-Runoff Characteristics

Estimated Estimated
Mean Annual Mean Annual
Catchment Drainage Coefficient of Annual Annual
Rainfall Runoff Depth
Basin Area (sq.km) Runoff Losses Runoff
(mm) (mm)
(MCM) (MCM)
Payongpayong
2.057 2,891 481,958 0.57 0.045 991.4
Creek
Tinigbasan
Creek 1 (Near 0.48 2,891 411,264 0.36 0.018 197.4
Project Site)
Tinigbasan
1.243 2,891 465,934 0.18 0.050 579.2
Main Creek
Table 2-20 Summary of Stream Flow Measurement within the Project Area
Tributary
Stream Width Flow Area Mean Velocity Discharge Unit Discharge
Creek Name Watershed
(m) (m^2) (m/s) (m^3/s) (m^3/s/km^2)
(km^2)
Payongpayong
2.057 0.3 0.013 0.47 0.006 0.003
Creek
Tinigbasan
0.48 No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data
North Creek
Tinigbasan
1.243 1.14 0.043 0.3 0.013 0.010
South Creek

Figure 2-33- Watershed Map of the Agata Project Area

Figure 2-34 Limestone Project Site Watershed Area

Figure 2-35 Watershed Stream Flow Sampling Site

Table 2-21 Estimated Mean Monthly Total Stream Total Flow for Project Area Creeks (in cubic peters per second)
Drainage
Discharge Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Creek Area
Units 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 30 31 30 31 31
(sq.km)
Payongpayong Creek
m^3/s 18.93 7.62 7.80 6.67 6.47 10.85 7.97 7.67 9.33 9.23 9.82 13.48 18.93
(2014-2019)
Payongpayong Creek
m^3/s/km^2 9.20 3.70 3.79 3.24 3.14 5.27 3.87 3.73 4.54 4.49 4.77 6.55 9.20
Unit Stream Flow
Tinigbasan North Creek
m^3/s 4.27 1.53 1.45 0.85 1.25 2.40 1.28 1.12 1.87 1.90 2.03 2.95 4.27
(2014-2019)
m^3/s/km^2 8.8889 3.1944 3.0208 1.7708 2.6042 5 2.6736 2.3264 3.8889 3.9583 4.2361 6.1458 8.8889
Unit Stream Flow
Tinigbasan South Creek
m^3/s 11.40 4.65 4.93 4.05 4.05 6.50 4.72 4.50 5.67 5.45 5.90 8.15 11.40
(2014-2019)
m^3/s/km^2 9.17 3.74 3.97 3.26 3.26 5.23 3.79 3.62 4.56 4.38 4.75 6.56 9.17
Unit Stream Flow
Table 2-22- Estimated Mean Monthly Stream Base Flow for Project Area Creeks (in cubic meters per second)
Drainage
Discharge Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Creek Area
Units 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 30 31 30 31 31
(sq.km)
Payongpayong Creek
m^3/s 2.057 3.92 3.75 4.13 4.00 4.13 4.00 4.60 4.65 4.50 4.65 4.50 4.65
(2014-2019)
Payongpayong Creek
m^3/s/km^2 - 1.90 1.82 2.01 1.94 2.01 1.94 2.24 2.26 2.19 2.26 2.19 2.26
Unit Stream Flow
m^3/s 0.48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(2014-2019)
m^3/s/km^2 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unit Stream Flow
m^3/s 1.243 2.58 2.35 2.58 2.50 2.58 2.50 2.58 2.58 2.50 2.58 2.50 2.60
(2014-2019)
m^3/s/km^2 - 2.08 1.89 2.08 2.01 2.08 2.01 2.08 2.08 2.01 2.08 2.01 2.09
Unit Stream Flow

2.5.1.1. Change in drainage morphology/inducement of flooding/Reduction in stream
volumetric flow
Changes in topography due to the construction and operation of the limestone quarry will alter the
natural drainage pattern of the area. Some natural bodies of water may be rechanneled to divert the
water flow away from the disturbed areas. The removal of vegetation may reduce infiltration and water
holding capacity of the watershed, resulting to higher flow velocities and peak discharges during rainfall
events. These impacts, however, will likely be reversible once the progressive rehabilitation programs
are initiated and the post mining closure and reforestation activities are implemented.
Construction and operation of the Limestone Quarry Area, Stockpile and Crushing plant will have the
most visible and pronounced impacts on the watershed(s) drainage patterns. These will be direct and
both short term and long term. They are also unavoidable and can likely be considered as irreversible.
Midstream portion of Payong-payong creek will be filled with limestone materials. The creek will be
rechanneled or divert the water flow away from the disturbed areas. Natural stream flows as they
currently exist will no longer be present. The peak flows during rainfall events will likely be higher due
to the removal of vegetation and faster watershed response times for surface water runoff. Construction
of drainage control facilities and conveyance canals will also increase the watershed response time and
contribute to higher flow velocities and peak discharges.
2.5.1.2. Change in stream, lake water depth
Removal of vegetation and exposure of the underlying rock at the Quarry will reduce the infiltration
capacity and water holding capacity within the watershed. This will result in less vadose zone and
groundwater storage and may reduce the longer-term flows from springs and seeps. This in turn may
reduce the longer-term watershed base flow. This will likely be reversible once the progressive
rehabilitation programs are initiated and the post mining closure and reforestation activities are
implemented.
The more significant impact to watershed base flow yields is associated with trans-basin diversion of
water from one watershed into another. This may occur as operations water demands exceed the
available water with Payong-payong Creek watershed. Water may be diverted from one of the other
two immediate watersheds. The impact will likely be limited due to the close proximity of each
watershed.
2.5.1.3. Depletion of water sources/competition in water use
The Municipality Tubay depend mainly on springs and creeks for their domestic water requirements.
The location of water supply sources and the population they serve are summarized in Table 2-23.
These water sources are typically located higher than the communities they serve. Concrete spring
boxes and small dams are used to store the water while galvanized iron (GI), polyethylene (PE) and
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes connected to these structures convey the water by gravity to Level 2 and
Level 3 water systems. A regional map of the groundwater sources is shown on Figure 2-36, while a
map of the different water sources near the project site is presented in Figure 2-37.

Table 2-23 Community Water Sources
Water Source Location Station No. Service Coverage
Brgy. Lawigan, Tubay CR3 100 Households

Brgy. Lawigan, Tubay CR4 30 Households in SItio Sua
Brgy. Tinigbasan, Tubay SP 2 169 Households
Source: AMVI,2020; Note: Reference Figure 2-37 for water source locations.
The presence of shallow wells in the Tubay River floodplain indicates that the groundwater level in this
area is shallower than 6 meters. While there are no wells in the adjacent mountains any occurrence of
groundwater in this area will reside mainly in the weathered zone and will be situated shallower than
the base of the weathered zone. Since groundwater moves from high to low elevation head, it will follow
the topographic gradient and generally move from the mountains towards the floodplain. The
groundwater in the floodplain will follow the direction of Tubay River and move southward to similarly
discharge at Butuan Bay near Tubay town proper. The aquifers in the floodplain are recharged from
direct rainfall infiltration, infiltration from the Tubay River and its tributaries and groundwater movement
from high to low areas. Based on the water balance, the area takes in approximately 6% of the rainfall
as groundwater recharge.
These water sources serve the communities surrounding the Project area but none of these resources
can be affected by the project activities. Water requirement for the project activities shall be taken from
other sources near to the project site, hence there will be no competition on the water use.
The sources experience reduced discharge during the drier seasons and increased turbidity during the
rainy seasons. There are no long-term data relative to the discharge rates of these water sources.
Water supply for the mining operations is sourced from creeks and springs situated within or near the
Project area and the Tubay River near the Project area. A list of the sources and flow rates are
presented in Table 2-24. Daily consumption is approximately 1,400 liters for domestic use and another
20,400 liters for industrial use. This results in a total daily water demand of 21,800 liters. Drinking water
is supplied by others and is not sourced from the Project operation sources identified in Table 2-25.
The supply sources for the Project needs have a discharge capacity in excess of 500,000 liters per day.
This is significantly greater than the Project needs and allows for an increased supply availability for the
community. Based on the available supply, the community water demands are not expected to be
affected by the Project water demands. The community supply sources will remain intact and
operational throughout the Project operations period. The opportunity is also available for further
development of the different sources in the future such the community water supply needs increase.

Table 2-24 Water Supply Sources for Project Operation

Source Station Number Location Flow Rate
Coboy Creek CR9 778,262.69 E / 1,028,003.34 N 0.83 liter/ sec

Mantiawas Creek CR10 778,128.81 E / 1,028,227.17 N 0.82 liter/ sec
Payon payong Creek CR11 775,591.35 E / 1,026,092.37 N 0.99 liter/ sec
Solana Creek CR12 776,320.30 E / 1,026,513.93 N 0.81 liter/ sec
Paiton Spring SP11 776,907.00 E / 1,028,329.00 N 1.03 liter/ sec
Sua Spring SP12 776,213.80 E / 1,028,158.16 N 0.96 liter/ sec

Kalinawan River CR13 778,561.89 E / 1,028,029.41 N 0.43 liter/ sec
Payongpayong Spring SP13 777,081.93 E / 1,026,595.35 N 0.77 liter/ sec
Source: API, 2016; Note: Reference Figure 2-37 for water source locations.
Table 2-25 Discharge Measurements at Local Water Supply Sources April 2014
CR-1 CR-2 CR-4
0.4 L/sec 0.6 L/sec 0.3 L/sec

34,560 L/day 51,840 L/day 25,929 L/day
Source: API, 2014

Figure 2-36 Groundwater Availability Map
PROJECT
SITE

Figure 2-37- Water Source Map

2.5.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Hydrology and Hydrogeology
A summary of the management and monitoring plans relative to the potential impacts to flora and
fauna is provided in Table 2-26.
Table 2-26 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Hydrology and Hydrogeology

Change in drainage Provision of buffer zones between the Develop master infrastructure
morphology/inducement of areas of disturbance and rivers and drainage plan for the project area.
flooding/Reduction in stream creeks.
volumetric flow
Erosion control measures including
diversion canals, soil stabilization
programs and re-vegetation of
disturbed areas to reduce the soil loss
potential.
Change in stream, lake water Development of overall Drainage Plan Establish stream flow monitoring
depth to balance volume flow of water within stations at selected locations in the
the Project site. project.
Depletion of water Implement water recycling and Prepare and monitor water balance
sources/competition in water conservation data to determine input and output
use Programs. requirements in the process
operation and determine areas for
Iec programs for water use and water potential water conservation
Conservation. measures.
2.6. Oceanography
A baseline study from Gaia South Inc. before the construction of Port facility was conducted. Three
oceanographic stations were established along the Butuan Bay coastline. The first station (OC1) is
located near Binuangan, the second station (OC2) is located near Tagpangahoy and the third station
(OC3) is located near Payong-payong. Ocean current data was collected from current meters moored
at the three stations (5 meters below the ocean surface) and by drogues near each of the current
meters. Current velocity and seawater temperature data are summarized in Table 2-27.
Table 2-27 Ocean Current Data by Current Meter Measurements

Ebb Tide Current (cm/sec) Flood Tide Current (cm/sec)
Seawater
Station
Current Velocity Direction Current Velocity Direction Temperature (C)
OC 1 1.4 to 24.4 WSW to NNW 3.2 to 12.8 WNW to N 28.9 to 29.5

OC 2 2.8 to 16.4 To NW 0.6 to 29.0 To NW 28.9 to 29.8
OC 3 2.0 to 24.0 SSE to WSW 4.8 to 16.0 S to SE 29.25 to 30.25
Source: Gaia South Inc.(2012)
Bathymetry data were collected at the 3 stations to establish their depth profile. The depth profile at
Station OC1 (Binuangan) indicates a gradient of 5.3% within the first 140 meters from the shore with a

maximum water depth of 10 meters. From 140 meters to 220 meters from the shore the gradient
increases to 47.9% with a maximum water depth of 40 meters.
The depth profile at Station OC2 (Tagpangahoy) indicates a gradient of 13.6% within the first 70 meters
from the shore with a maximum water depth of 10 meters. From 70 meters to 200 meters from the
shore the gradient increases to 39.1% with a maximum water depth of 47 meters.
The depth profile at Station OC3 (Payong-payong) indicates a gradient of 2.4% within the first 440
meters from the shore with a maximum water depth of 10 meters. From 440 meters to 560 meters from
the shore the gradient increases to 23.8% with a maximum water depth of 38 meters.
A more localized bathymetric survey was done in the Port location prior to its construction in Year 2014
and is shown in Figure 2-38. The bottom profile showed a gradual bathymetric change from the shore
to the 250 meter length of the causeway. Beds of subtidal boulders or less rough textured rocks and/or
large stones with growths of algae which cover the surface of the rock are a common feature of the first
20 meters off shore. After this region is a fringing coral reef in poor to fair condition (20 to 130m away
from shore with a depth range of 1.0 to 6.0m). Sandy substrates make up the remainder of the sea
bottom (130 to 250 m away from the shore with a depth range of 6 to 18m). Much of its surface is
covered by a very thin sheet of silt and mud. The deposited sediment is loosely packed and highly re-
suspendable with only little disturbance.
Figure 2-38 Bathymetric Map Along West Coast of the Project Area
Source: Gaia South Inc. (2012)

2.6.1. Impacts to Coastal Oceanography
Ports may cause changes in current patterns and littoral drifts due to alteration of wave refraction,
diffraction, and reflection and consequently lead to erosion in shore zones. Altered currents and
reflected waves may cause changes in river flow and waterfront drainage. Breakwaters and landfills
also cause water stagnation behind the structures, which accelerate sediment deposition at the sea
bottom.
Careful site selection was employed to mitigate the impacts. The lay-out of the Port is such that the
access road development does not interfere with the flow of Payong-payong Creek. Beach erosion is
prevented by establishing gabion baskets to serve as sea wall.
The extraction volume will not entail expansion of Port facility; hence no further alteration of the seabed
from reclamation will occur. Impacts to coastal oceanography identified from the existing operation will
be the same given the expanded operations.
2.6.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Coastal Oceanography
A summary of the management and monitoring plans relative to the potential impacts to
oceanography is provided in Table 2-28.
Table 2-28 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Oceanography

Impact Management Plan Monitoring Plan
Change/disruption in water Planned site selection to reduce Adherence to Annual EPEP

circulation pattern, littoral footprint. MMT Activities
current, and coastal erosion
and deposition Construction of pier facility according
to approved design.
Installation of gabion baskets as sea

wall
No causeway expansion for the ALP.

2.7. Water Quality
2.7.1. Physico-chemical Characterization
Water quality monitoring sampling and testing is performed internally by the Environment Department
as part of the quarterly audit by the ANLP Multipartite Monitoring Team. A total of 32 locations are
sampled, of these, 17 locations are surface water streams and creeks, nine (9) are groundwater or
spring sources and six (6) locations are marine water sources. Out of this water sampling stations, six
(6) stations are within the affected watershed of the Limestone Project. These locations are FW-11
Downstream Payongpayong Creek, FW-12 Tinigbasan Creek Confluence of Tributaries, DW-2 Sitio
Payongpayong Water Source, DW-3 Brgy. Tinigbasan Water Source, MW-2 Payongpayong Coastal
Area and MW-3 Tinigbasan Coastal Area.
The location of each sampling point (surface water, drinking water and marine waters) is shown on
Figure 2-39 and Figure 2-40. The location reference for each station is shown in Table 2-29. Sampling
activities are done weekly or monthly depending on the requirements and parameters monitored.
Water quality monitoring activities include in-situ measurement of physical parameters such as pH,
turbidity, and temperature. Laboratory analysis of chemical parameters include Nitrate, Phosphate,
Hardness, DO, Ammonia, Fluoride, surfactants, arsenic, cadmium, lead, iron, manganese, total
suspended solids, oil and grease, BOD. The laboratory testing is done by accredited third party
laboratories. Bacteriological testing is also done to determine fecal and total coliform levels.
Selection of sampling stations were based on the topographic characteristics and watershed
delineations within the Project area. Surface water sampling stations begin at or near the mouth of the
river or creek and progress upstream. Sampling locations are selected from both the west and east
watersheds to support full water quality characterization of the Project area. This applies to all rivers,
creeks and streams including intermittent and ephemeral creeks.
Furthermore, the sampling stations are distributed following these criteria; number of contributing
tributaries and pollutant discharges, safety, accessibility and Project activity considerations that may
affect the water quality of the affected stream.
Marine sampling stations in Butuan Bay were selected based on geographical location, tidal and sea
current movement of the water. Samples are taken 50-150 meters from the shoreline or from the activity
area to establish ambient conditions of the water prior to and during the activity.
Groundwater stations for drinking water monitoring are selected based on the geographical location of
the source within the Project area and level of importance to the community.
Results of the laboratory testing were compared to the DENR standard for Class C freshwater and
Class SC marine water, respectively; while drinking waters results are compared to Philippine National
Standard for Drinking Waters (PNSDW). Water quality data reported in the Quarterly Self-Monitoring
Report is presented in Table 2-30, Table 2-31, Table 2-32 for the surface water, marine water, and
drinking water sampling stations, respectively.

Figure 2-39- Water Sampling Map ANLP Monitoring

Figure 2-40- Sampling Location Map for Water Quality, Air Quality and Noise Quality Monitoring for the Limestone Project
Environmental Impact Statement Report ` Page | 2-81

Table 2-29 Sampling Location Reference Table (Reference Figure 2-39 and Figure 2-40)
River/Creek Station No. Description
Kalinawan River (Tubay River) FW-1 Confluence with Bangonay River

Nangka Creek FW-2 Downstream Road Culvert
Paiton Creek FW-3 Upstream Road Culvert
Mantiawas Creek FW-4 Upstream Reforestation
Duyangan Creeks FW-5 Downstream SSM Area
Agata Creek FW-6 Downstream Road Culvert
Guinaringan Creek FW-7 Upstream Confluence with Kalinawan River
Kalinawan River FW-8 Midstream Kalinawan River
Sua Creek 1 FW-9 Monitoring Station Removed
Sua Creek 2 FW-10 Downstream Reach
Payongpayong Creek FW-11 Downstream Payongpayong Creek
Tinigbasan Creek FW-12 Confluence of Tributaries
Tagpangahoy Creek FW-13 Downstream Road Culvert
Binuangan Creek FW-14 Confluence of Tributaries
Binuangan Creek FW-15 Intertidal Zone Butuan Bay
Kalinawan River FW-16 Downstream Confluence with Santiago River
Kalinawan River FW-17 Near Tubay Bridge
E. Morgado, Jabonga DW-1 Brgy. E. Morgado Water Tank
Payongpayong, Tinigbasan DW-2 Sitio Payongpayong Water Source
Tinigbasan, Tubay DW-3 Brgy. Tinigbasan Water Source
Tagpanghoy, Tubay DW-4 Brgy. Tagpangahoy Water Source
Binuangan,Tubay DW-5 Brgy. Binuangan Water Source
Lawigan Coastal Area, Tubay MW-1
Payongpayong Coastal Area MW-2 Note:
Tinigbasan Coastal Area MW-3 SW- Surface Water
Tagpanghoy Coastal Area MW-4 MW- Marine Water
Binuangan Coastal Area MW-5 DW- Drinking Water
La Fraternidad Coastal Area MW-6

Table 2-30 Surface Water Quality Data (Year 2019) (Reference:
DENR Sampling Stations
Parameter
(Class C) FW-1 FW-2 FW-3 FW-4 FW-5 FW-6 FW-7 FW-8
BOD 7 mg/l 0.63 0.74 0.51 0.75 0.83 0.60 0.28 0.32
Chloride 250 mg/l 4.25 5.17 4.53 4.27 2.83 3.60 2.73 4.87
Color 75 TCU 6.67 6.67 6.67 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
DO 5 mg/l (min) 7.03 7.81 7.63 7.73 8.19 7.45 8.27 6.98
200 MPN/ 100
Fecal Coliform 54.00 56.33 75.00 >4065.5 155.67 143.33 94.00 430.67
mL
Nitrate (NO3-) 7 mg/L 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.08
pH 6.5-9 8.07 7.26 7.91 8.11 7.89 8.42 7.95 7.94
Phosphate 0.5 mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
Temperature 25-31°C 26.17 26.53 26.21 26.66 26.72 26.06 26.23 26.89
TSS 80 mg/l 57.67 31.00 39.33 63.33 60.00 33.00 45.33 22.33
Oil and Grease 2.0 mg/l <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
BOD 7 mg/l 0.63 0.74 0.51 0.75 0.83 0.60 0.28 0.32
Chloride 250 mg/l 4.25 5.17 4.53 4.27 2.83 3.60 2.73 4.87
Color 75 TCU 6.67 6.67 6.67 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
DO 5 mg/l (min) 7.03 7.81 7.63 7.73 8.19 7.45 8.27 6.98
Manganese 0.2 mg/l <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
Arsenic 0.02 mg/l 0.01 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Cadmium 0.005 mg/l <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002
Lead 0.05 mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Nickel 0.2 mg/l 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Note: TSS baseline 106 mg/L (FW1. FW2, FW3, FW4, FW5); 672 mg/L (FW8)
Source: ANLP Self-Monitoring Report (2019)

Table 2-30 Surface Water Quality Data (Year 2019)

Parameter
(Class C) FW-10 FW-11 FW-12 FW-13 FW-14 FW15 FW-16 FW-17
BOD 7 mg/l 0.40 0.52 1.25 0.50 1.08 0.71 0.51 0.70
Chloride 250 mg/l 4.33 3.50 7.73 3.37 5.00 24.10 5.13 5.33
Color 75 TCU 9.33 4.67 6.00 4.67 5.3 4.85 9.21 8.4
DO 5 mg/l (min) 7.94 8.04 7.79 7.88 7.73 8.18 7.27 7.95
200 MPN/ 100
Fecal Coliform 151.67 153.33 176.50 94.50 156.00 253.67 493.33 336.33
mL
Nitrate (NO3-) 7 mg/L 0.09 0.21 0.05 0.09 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.09
pH 6.5-9 8.17 8.16 8.69 7.58 8.16 7.26 8.19 7.92
Phosphate 0.5 mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
Temperature 25-31°C 26.21 26.15 26.21 27.08 26.90 26.05 26.16 26.41
TSS 80 mg/l 33.33 37.67 27.00 40.33 32.33 41.67 55.33 56.67
Oil and Grease 2.0 mg/l <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Manganese 0.2 mg/l <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
Arsenic 0.02 mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.011 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Cadmium 0.005 mg/l <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002
Lead 0.05 mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Iron 1.5 mg/l 0.40 0.20
Mercury 0.002 mg/l <0.001 <0.001
COD <3 <3
Ammonia 0.05 mg/L 0.01 0.02
Fluoride 1 mg/L 0.09 0.21
Surfactants 1.5 mg/L <0.01 <0.01
Source: ANLP Self-Monitoring Report (2019); Additional Water Quality Testing for COD, Ammonia, Flouride, Surfactants, Iron and Mercury (2020)

Table 2-31 Drinking Water Quality Data (Year 2019)

Sampling Stations
Parameter PNSDW
DW-1 DW-2 DW-3 DW-4 DW-5 DW-6 DW-7 DW-9 DW-10
BOD 7 mg/l 0.99 0.70 0.72 0.69 0.77 0.72 0.87 0.91 0.75
Chloride 250 mg/l 2.25 1.81 1.49 2.48 2.40 2.79 2.99 2.50 2.89
Color 10 CU <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3
DO 5 mg/l (min) 6.64 7.03 7.39 7.34 7.26 7.54 7.53 7.36 7.21
<1.1 MPN/ 100
Fecal Coliform 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 6.28
mL
Parameter Baseline DW-1 DW-2 DW-3 DW-4 DW-5 DW-6 DW-7 DW-9 DW-10
Nitrate (NO3-) 50 mg/L 0.07 0.15 0.11 0.13 0.23 0.12 0.18 0.32 0.21
pH 6.5-8.5 7.40 6.73 7.06 7.05 7.08 7.57 7.41 7.93 7.93
Phosphate (PO3−) 0.5 mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
Temperature 25-30°C 26.74 27.69 27.20 27.08 28.28 27.51 26.98 26.00 25.79
TSS 80 mg/l 50.50 38.00 53.75 22.25 35.25 32.50 50.50 44.50 30.67
Oil and Grease 1.0 mg/l <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Manganese 0.4 mg/l <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
Iron 1.0 mg/l 0.09 0.09 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
Arsenic 0.01 mg/l <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
Cadmium 0.003 mg/l <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002
Lead 0.01 mg/l <0.00875 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Nickel 0.7 mg/l 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Parameter (added) PNSDW DW-1 DW-2 DW-3 DW-4 DW-5 DW-6 DW-7 DW-9 DW-10
Iron 1.0 mg/l <0.06 <0.06
Mercury 0.001 mg/l <0.001 <0.001
COD <3 <3
Ammonia 0.05 mg/L 0.03 0.03
Fluoride 1.5 mg/L 0.26 0.24

Table 2-32 Marine Water Quality Data (Year 2019)

Parameter
(Class SC) MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 MW-6
BOD N/A
Chloride N/A 17525.00 20020.00 18400.00 64550.00 17565.00 18425.00
Color 75 TCU 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.00 4.50 3.50
DO 5 mg/l (min) 7.06 6.72 6.84 6.63 6.57 7.00
Fecal Coliform 200 MPN/ 100 mL 170.25 169.75 105.25 143.00 125.75 99.50
Nitrate (NO3-) 10 mg/L 0.13 0.37 0.14 0.10 0.25 0.49
pH 6.5-8.5 7.88 7.95 7.80 7.65 7.72 8.04
Phosphate 0.5 mg/l BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
Temperature 25-31°C 26.58 26.90 26.70 27.32 26.71 26.95
TSS 80 mg/l 30.00 67.00 45.75 34.00 24.71 24.00
Oil and Grease 3.0 mg/l <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
Manganese 0.4 mg/l <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
Arsenic 0.02 mg/l <0.011 <0.011 <0.011 <0.011 <0.011 <0.011
Cadmium 0.005 mg/l <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002
Lead 0.05 mg/l <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Nickel 0.06 mg/l 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Manganese 0.4 mg/l <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
Parameter (added) (Class SC) MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 MW-6
Iron 1.5 mg/l <0.06 0.20
Mercury 0.002 mg/l <0.001 <0.001
COD 11 49.00
Ammonia 0.05 mg/L o.03 0.26
Fluoride 1.5 mg/L 0.26 0.95
Note: TSS baseline 106 mg/L (FW1. FW2, FW3, FW4, FW5); 672 mg/L (FW8)

Results of the water testing for surface water, drinking water, and marine water presented in Table 2-
30 Table 2-31, Table 2-32, respectively, showed that all Physico-Chemical parameters are within the
DENR Standard. The pH values ranged from 7.2to 8.16, which were well within the normal limits for
marine or freshwater bodies, per DAO 2016-08 Class C and Class SC water quality standards.
Total suspended solids (TSS) include both inorganic and organic substances present in the water and
are retained in a 0.45 um filter paper .The TSS levels in Surface Water varied from 22 to 63 mg/L., 23
to 50mg/L in Ground Water, and 24 to 67 mg/L in Marine Waters, all are within the DENR Standard.
The detectable levels of Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD5) ranged from 0.40 to 0.90 mg/L, basically
this level is low compared to the DENR Class C and SC waters requirement to maintain BOD5 of up to
7 mg/L.This BOD reading is inversely proportional to the DO levels detected in all stations sampled
which is above the maintaining level of 5mg/L. This result indicates good quality of water both in surface
and ground water in terms of the amount of oxygen in the water system to sustain life.
On the other hand, all stations sampled gave Manganese, Iron, Arsenic, Cadmium, Mercury and Lead levels below
the DENR threshold limit. High concentrations of coliforms, both total and fecal, were also recorded at most stations
particularly in FW 4, FW 8, DW1, DW2, DW3, DW4, DW5, DW6, DW7, DW8, DW9 and DW10. Total and fecal
coliforms are expected to be high in streams draining populated areas as these receive surface runoff that contain
human and domestic animal wastes. Fecal coliform counts in FW4 and FW8 ranged from 430 to >4065 MPN/100
mL.
Station FW4 (Mantiawas Creek) is an intermittent creek where presence of domestic and wild animals
is seen. Station FW8 (Midstream Kalinawan River) on the other hand is a river community where
artisanal small-scale miners are inhabiting, also livestock are being raised along the river. This physical
condition of FW4 and FW8 brings the water system susceptible to bacteriological contamination.
Fecal coliforms were also detected in all drinking water monitoring stations with a total count of above
8MPN/100mL compared to the normal limit of <1.1 MPN/ 100 mL for drinking water.
Root cause analysis revealed that the readings on bacteriological contamination may however be
suspect for several reasons:
• Locals defecating along the stream. Employees (both from company and contractors) may fail
to use comfort room
• Water source is open to environment. No protective cover installed for the concrete water tanks.
• Possible that reservoir design and piping system is inadequate
• Fecal contamination is due to animal wastes in the area. Baseline data from Yr 2007 shows
high content of coliform even before mining operation has started
Several actions had been undertaken to address this problem on bacteriological contamination in
partnership with the local community. These include among others;
• Conduct IEC with the local community to discuss the effects of human waste to the natural
water supply used for drinking.
• Construct additional comfort rooms at strategic locations within the mine site
• Construct covers for concrete tanks that supply drinking water for the local community
• Application of Water Treatment like chlorination.
• Periodic Conduct of Water Quality Monitoring

2.7.1.1. Degradation of Water Quality
Limestone is a sedimentary rock composed mainly of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). During quarry
activities, limestone materials will be exposed to natural elements, including rainwater which is weakly
acidic in nature. Calcium carbonate reacts with rainwater to form the calcium bicarbonate following the
chemical equation below:
CaCO3(s) + H2O(l) + CO2(g) → Ca(HCO3)2(aq)
The soluble calcium carbonate can be carried by stormwater runoff to the nearby streams or can
infiltrate to the rock fissures to reach the groundwater, causing water hardness. When heated, the
soluble calcium carbonate in hardwater can decompose back to the insoluble calcium carbonate,
forming limescale.
Hardwater is generally safe to drink but may cause negative impacts for domestic usage. Some
synthetic detergents are less effective when used with hardwater in washing of clothes, leaving clothes
stiff, rough and less bright in color Hardwater is also responsible for the scaling of bathroom fixtures
and mirrors, requiring extra cleaning effort. In bathing, hair washed with hardwater may feel sticky. It
also leaves soap curd film in the skin, which interferes with the removal of dirt and bacteria. Heated
hardwater forms limescale, which coats the heating elements of appliances, making them less efficient.
Limescale can also clog up heated water pipes causing reduction in water flow, hence the need for
replacement.
In addition, streams and rivers can be altered when mines pump excess water from a limestone quarry
into downstream natural channels. This increases the danger of flooding, and any pollutants or changes
in water quality affects the surface water.
Stormwater management will be the primary mitigation measure to address this water quality issue.
The limestone quarry area will be installed with drainage canals to direct the stormwater runoff to the
in-pit sumps and/or sediment ponds. Regular water quality monitoring of waterbodies potentially
impacted by the Project operations will be continuously done. Monitoring parameters will include
hardness, metals, solids, pH, and bacteriological content. Results of laboratory analysis of the samples
will be reported in the quarterly Self- Monitoring Reports submitted to DENR-EMB.
2.7.1.2. Siltation of Waterbodies
In addition, exaction activities from mining and construction may lead to accelerated erosion rate and
transport of sediment materials to nearby water bodies during rainfall events. This will be mitigated by
the provision of safety berms and drainage canals along the roads, mine areas, and stockpile areas.
The stormwater runoff will be directed to water management facilities (i.e silt impoundments, silt
collector sumps, in-pit ponds, diversion banks) constructed at strategic locations based on topography.
Maintenance of these structures includes embankment stabilization and regular desilting to maximize
their capacity. Some erosion control materials, such as wattlings, fascines, gabion baskets, and
geotextile filter, to be installed along the waterways will supplement the drainage management in
mitigating the impacts of sedimentation.

2.7.1.3. Accidental Spills/ Release
Other possible sources of water contamination may come from the accidental spillage of chemical
reagents, fuel oils and petrochemical products. To mitigate such emergency, storage areas will be
equipped with secondary containment structures. In addition, spill management protocols will be in
place. Spill drill will regularly be conducted for employees and contractors through the Safety
Department. Used oils and contaminated materials will be disposed properly according to DENR
guidelines.
2.7.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Water Quality
A summary of the management and monitoring plans relative to the potential impacts to water quality
is provided in Table 2-33.
Water quality monitoring of surface and marine waters impacted by the Project operations is and will
be continuously done internally by the Environment Department. Results of laboratory analysis of the
samples are reported in the quarterly Self- Monitoring Reports submitted to DENR-EMB.
Table 2-33 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Water Quality

Water Hardness, Siltation, Drainage Planning Internal and Third-Party monitoring
Chemical Release of required water quality
Installation of stormwater runoff parameters, including:
management facilities (drainage Hardness, BOD, chloride, color,
canals, sump, in pit canals, diversion DO, fecal coliform, nitrate, pH,
ditch, etc.) phosphate, temperature, TSS,
COD, ammonia, flouride,
Construction of water management surfactants, oil and grease, trace
structures (silt impoundments, silt metals
collector sumps, in-pit ponds, diversion
banks, etc.).
Regular Maintenance of water

management system (repairs,
desilting).
Installation of erosion control materials

(wattlings, fascines, gabion baskets,
and geotextile filter) along waterways.
Compliance to chemical storage,

handling, and transport of hazardous
waste and chemicals.
Spill management training and

protocols.

2.8. Freshwater Ecology
Freshwater biological sampling was conducted in July 16-17, 2020. Two stations: (1) Payongpayong
and Tinigbasan creeks were subject to collection of macroinvertebrates. The methodologies used is
briefly discussed below.
A. Study Period and Location
Freshwater biological sampling was conducted on July 16-17, 2020. The weather during the collection
of samples was rainy to cloudy. Two stations: (1) Payong-payong and Tinigbasan creeks were utilized
for the collection of macroinvertebrates. For each study stations, three subpoints, 50 m in length each,
were established and sampling areas are shown in Figure 2-41.
B. Diversity of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates
Sampling was conducted following the Reach-wide benthos (Multihabitat) procedure of SWAMP (2007)
with some modifications. Each study station covered three 50-meter reach for the collection of
macroinvertebrates as replicates. 500µm D-net; 0.3 m width (-1.0 ft. frame width) was used and was
placed in the water as to the mouth of the net perpendicular to face the flow of the water. 10 jabs or
kicks were undertaken over the length (50 meter) of every replicate. The jabs obtained from the habitats
were composited obtaining a single homogenous sample. Sampling points were alternated between
the left, center and right positions along a transect (25%, 50% and 75% of wetted width, respectively.
Samples collected from every jab were placed in the container or vials and were preserved in 10%
formalin with its corresponding label and with sample identification.
C. Sorting, Photo Documentation and Species Identification
In the laboratory, the composited samples were thoroughly rinsed with running water in a 500 µm –
mesh sieve to remove fine sediments. Macroinvertebrates were then sorted and counted. The sorted
organisms were placed in glass vials and were preserved using 95% ethanol. Vials were labeled with a
code which stands for stream name, sampling location and taxonomic group. Collected samples were
identified up to the lowest practical level, generally genus or species with the aid of LASEZ (Leica
Application Suite) ver. 1.7.0. Larger organisms were documented with the use of digital camera.
Macroinvertebrate guide for identification from the internet and journals were used for identification.
Macroinvertebrates were classified as to their tolerance value depending on their response to specific
changes in water conditions.
D. Taxa Groupings
Macroinvertebrates collected were initially grouped into 3 Taxa groups—Taxa 1, Taxa 2 and Taxa 3
based on their sensitivity or tolerance to pollution or aquatic disturbance (Barbour et al., 1999). Taxa 1
members are pollution sensitive organisms found in good water quality and include species belonging
to orders Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Tricoptera, and Coleoptera. Taxa 2 species can exist in wide
range of water quality conditions or generally moderate water quality and these would include species
belonging to orders Hemiptera, Diptera, Odonata, Decapoda, and Veneroida; Taxa 3 specimens are
species that can exist in a wide range of water quality conditions and highly tolerant to poor water
quality. These taxa would include Tubificida, Gastropoda, Hirudinidae, Cerithioidea, and Isopoda.

Figure 2-41- Map of Collection sites in Payongpayong and Tinigbasan Creeks

E. Measuring Water Quality Using Water Quality Index (WQI)
Species were scored according to their classification using a matrix that has its corresponding points of
a particular macroinvertebrate species regardless of its abundance. The sum was obtained for all
scored species and divided to the total of species scored. The resulting value is the WQI.
Diversity indices, namely Abundance, Evenness, Richness and Shannon – Weiner Index of diversity as
well as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were determined using the Paleontological Statistics
Software (PAST®).
2.8.1. Abundance, Frequency and Distribution of Species
A total of eighteen (18) aquatic macroinvertebrates from 10 families were identified and they are listed
in Table 2-34. Majority (72%) of the organisms belong to Phylum Arthropoda (Figure 2-42) which was
largely dominated by the Gerridae family with 5 species. No representative members of the
Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies), and Trichoptera (caddisflies) /EPT group were
observed. Observation of species representing EPT indicate excellent water conditions. By taxa
groupings of the specimen collected based on sensitivity or tolerance to pollution, majority (82%) of the
species belong to the Taxa 2 category. Taxa 2 species can exist in wide range of water quality
conditions or generally moderate water quality. No representative of the Taxa 1 group (pollution
sensitive organisms found in good water quality) were observed (Figure 2 B). Location wise, more Taxa
2 representatives were observed in the Payongpayong station, than in Tinigbasan (Figure 2C). In terms
of diversity, more species and accumulated number of individuals were noted in Payongpayong Creek
compared to Tinigbasan, as shown in Table 2-35.
Comparison of the Water Quality Index (WQI) values between the two stations indicate better WQI in
Payongpayong (WQI=8.55) with that of Tinigbasan (WQI=6.66), which would indicate that
Payongpayong Creek belong to the “very clean water category”, whereas Tinigbasan fall within the
“rather clean- clean water range (Table 2-36). The WQI is based on the presence of indicator species
for sensitivity/tolerance to pollution and should best be accompanied by other water quality parameters
to further understand and characterize the status of water inhabited by these aquatic
macroinvertebrates.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) show that some notable species, particularly gerrids (i.e.
Limnometra sp), were common in the stations, but were abundantly observed in Payongpayong (Figure
2-42). The bloodworm Polypedilum sp (Chironomidae)—an indicator of pollution was only observed in
the lower sections of Tinigbasan, in particular near households where domesticated pig pens were
established very near the creek. Aside from key species found both for the two stations, abundance of
collected macroinvertebrates can be seen as an important factor in the PCA , as more individuals and
species can be seen in Payongpayong.

Table 2-34 Inventory of aquatic macroinvertebrates and their corresponding Taxa groupings based
on sensitivity/ tolerance to pollution
Phylum Order Family Scientific name Common names Taxa
Hemiptera Notonectidae Nychia sp. Back swimmer 2
Hemiptera Gerridae Lymnometra sp. Giant Water strider 2
Hemiptera Gerridae Gerris sp.1 River skater 2
Hemiptera Gerridae Gerris sp. 2 Vertical stripped strider 2
Hemiptera Gerridae Metrobates sp. Short bodied strider 2
Arthropoda Hemiptera Gerridae Metrocoris sp. Short bodied strider 2
Hemiptera Veliidae Rhagovelia obesa Small water strider 2
Odonata Coenagrionidae Ischnura sp. Damselfly 2
Odonata Libellulidae ---------- Dragonfly nymph 2
Decapoda Palaemonidae Macrobrachium sp 1 Large freshwater shrimp 2
Decapoda Palaemonidae Macrobrachium sp 2 Freshwater shrimp 2
Small sized-freshwater
Decapoda Palaemonidae Palaemonid sp.1 2
Shrimp
Non-biting midge/blood
Diptera Chironomidae Polypedilum sp. 3
worm
Gastropoda Thiaridae Melanoides tuberculata Red rimmed melania 3
Gastropoda Thiaridae Stenomelania sp. Black melania 3
Mollusca Gastropoda Thiaridae Thiara scabra Spike tail snail 3
Gastropoda Ancylidae ---- Freshwater limpet 2
Gastropoda Neritidae Theodoxus sp. River nerite 2
Taxa 1- Pollution sensitive organisms found in good water quality

Taxa 2- Can exist in wide range of water quality conditions; generally moderate water quality
Taxa 3- Can exist in wide range of water quality conditions; highly tolerant to poor water quality

Figure 2-42 Percent (%) composition of major aquatic macroinvertebrate groups (A), Taxa groupings
(b) and comparison of Taxa Groupings between the two study sites.
Table 2-35 Mean diversity indices of aquatic macroinvertebrates in Payongpayong and Tinigbasan
Creeks
Diversity Indices Payongpayong Tinigbasan
Taxa_S 13.33333 10
Individuals 113.3333 100.5
Dominance_D 0.1895 0.22005
Simpson_1-D 0.8105 0.77995
Shannon_H 2.044333 1.795
Evenness_e^H/S 0.624833 0.61475
Table 2-36 Aquatic macroinvertebrates from the two study stations and their WQI score
Species Payongpayong WQI Tinigbasan WQI
Nychia sp. 1 5 4 5
Limnometra sp. 125 5 20 5
Gerris sp 1 21 5 9 5
Gerris sp2 23 5 4 5

Table 2-36 Aquatic macroinvertebrates from the two study stations and their WQI score
Species Payongpayong WQI Tinigbasan WQI
Metrobates sp.1 16 5 3 5
Metrocoris sp.1 9 5 0 0
Rhagovelia obesa 5 5 2 5
Damselfly 6 6 1 6
Dragonfly nymph 6 6 0 0
Macrobrachium sp 1 3 4 0 0
Macrobrachium sp 2 4 4 0 0
Palaemonid sp.1 11 4 0 0
Polypedilum sp. 0 0 3 2
Melanoides tuberculata 21 3 41 3
Stenomelania sp. 26 3 32 3
Thiara scabra 1 3 3 3
Unidentified limpet 30 6 41 6
Theodoxus sp. 32 3 35 3
Total (individuals) 340 77 201 60
No. of Families 9 9
No of families/WQI 8.55 6.66
WQI Legend: 7.6-10--very clean water; 5.1-7.5--rather clean- clean water; 2.6- 5.0--rather dirty water- average; 1.0- 2.5--dirty
water; 0--very dirty water (no life at all)
Figure 2-43 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of distribution and abundance of aquatic
macroinvertebrates in Payongpayong (P1, P2,P3) and Tinigbasan (T1,T2).

Photo 2-7 Aquatic macroinvertebrates in Payongpayong and Tinigbasan Creeks: A- Macrobrachium

sp 1, B- Macrobrachium sp 2, C-Palaemonid sp.1, D-Melanoides tuberculata, E- Stenomelania sp. F-
Thiara scabra, G-Dragonfly nymph, H- Unidentified limpet, I-Theodoxus sp., J-Polypedilum sp.
Photo 2-6 Aquatic macroinvertebrates in Payongpayong and Tinigbasan Creeks: A-Limnometra sp.,
B- Gerris sp 1, C-Gerris sp2, D-Metrobates sp., E-Metrocoris sp., F-Nychia sp., G-Rhagovelia obesa

2.8.1.1. Threat to existence and/or loss species of important local and habitat
Vegetation clearing and soil stripping activities from the Project operation may lead to increased
sediment transport to the surrounding water bodies. Siltation impacts on streams is related to both
suspension of silt materials on the water surface, evident as water turbidity; and sediment deposition at
the bottom of the waterbed. These may likely affect the survival of aquatic organisms. Suspension of
silt materials may impair the feeding mechanism of filter feeders (i.e. fish, shrimps, crabs, worms, and
mollusks) which eat by straining suspended matter and food particles from water. At very high
suspended sediment loads, clogging and abrasion of gills can interfere with oxygen uptake of fishes
which can be fatal. Turbid waters can also reduce the light penetration which is essential for
photosynthetic processes of the producers.
Base on the baseline assessment along the Payongpayong Creek, only freshwater macro invertebrates
were recorded. Among the macro invertebrates, only two Macrobrachium species (shrimp) with limited
number of individuals are edible. If the midstream portion of Payongpayong Creek will be filled with
limestone materials, this shrimp will either not survive or move upstream. One unavoidable and
irreversible impact due to the Project will be the loss of the midstream section 0.9 of aquatic habitat
within the Payongpayong Creek watershed.
In consideration with the surrounding marine environment, the geotextile material used for arresting silt-
laden run-off are only installed in discharge points and outlets which directs to the ocean. The type of
material used is made of non-woven, bonded fiber geotextile which is produced by the interlocking of
fibers, have higher flow rates and permittivity. And compared to its woven counterparts, non-woven
geotextiles have less UV resistance which means it reacts to UV light, prone to degradation
overtime and suitable for short-term applications. Because of this, geotextile used in the causeway
is periodically replaced and during off-season period, some areas are not installed with silt-curtains
to allow natural marine wildlife activity. Moreover, installation and monthly monitoring of these
geotextiles are undertaken only by trained Coastal Resource Management (CRM) personnel and
trained divers.
2.8.1.1 Threat to abundance, frequency and distribution of species
The primary potential impact anticipated is associated with threats to the abundance, frequency and
distribution of the shrimp species. This will occur due to loss of habitat.

2.8.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Freshwater Ecology
A summary of the management and monitoring plans relative to the potential impacts to freshwater
ecology is provided in Table 2-37.
Table 2-37 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Freshwater Ecology

Threat to existence and/or loss Erosion control measures Water Quality Monitoring Program
species of important local and
habitat Runoff- management system Freshwater Ecology Monitoring
Threat to abundance, (drainage canals and water
frequency and distribution of management ponds)
species
Silt control measures (silt fence,
gabions, etc.)
2.9. Marine Ecology
In Year 2013, approximately 8,000 individual live hard corals from the fringing reef of Payongpayong
Bay were relocated upon the recommendation of a Marine Biology expert to mitigate the potential
adverse impacts on the living hard corals and the associated reef communities from the rock-filling and
piling works to be done as part of the port facility construction. The relocation site identified was a coral
reef area within the Tinigbasan Fish Sanctuary It is about 350 meters south of the constructed Port
Facility, and about 300 meters away from the shoreline as shown on Figure 2-44. Since then, a coral
monitoring program within the coral relocation site was established.
Figure 2-44 Marine Resource Assessment Study Area

The baseline data presented in this section represents the latest coral monitoring results conducted on
May 10-12, 2019. The commissioned third-party marine biology expert was Mr. E. Applied
Environmental Sciences Consulting Firm (MEAESCF). Monitoring activities focused on the near shore
environments within three reef stations, including the Coral Relocation Area within the Tinigbasan
Marine Sanctuary (Sites 1-3), Tinigbasan Fish Sanctuary (Site 4), the Port construction site in
Payongpayong reef (Site 5), and a control station within the Lawigan Marine Sanctuary (Station 6).
Their relative location is shown in Figure 2-45.
The monitoring program includes the following activities:
• Coral and Reef Condition Assessment

• Associated Reef Fish Communities Survey
• Macrobenthic Invertebrate Communities Survey
Figure 2-45 Coral Monitoring Stations
Source: Coral Monitoring Report, MEAESCF (2019)

2.9.1. Cover Estimates of Benthic Components of the Coral Reef
Observations were made along the 10-meter permanent coral belt transects established at three (3)
reef stations within the Coral Relocation Site (Sites 1, 2 and 3). Three (3) more transect stations were
added in the area: the first one is situated outside the Coral Relocation Site but still inside the Tinigbasan
Marine Sanctuary (Site 4), the second one is located outside of the sanctuary fronting Sitio Payong-
payong Proper/near or south of the Agata Causeway-Jetty Facility (Site 5), and the third one is on a
reef flat at the Coral Garden Site (Site 6) which is located north of the Agata Causeway-Jetty Facility
(Figure 2-45).
The coral cover photo quadrat surveys were undertaken using fixed photo transects. At each reef
station, one 10-m long transect line was set on the reef top using architect’s fiberglass tape (Photo 2-
10). The permanent transects were marked by insulated electrical wire (Photo 2-9).
These permanent markers provide positioning points for relocating the same locations during
subsequent sampling periods. In this technique, small sections of the reef are photographed periodically
enabling the monitoring of the fate of individual corals through time.
Photo 2-9 Laying of a 10-m photo quadrat line transect Photo 2-8 The permanent transect marked by
using architect’s fiberglass tape insulated electrical wire
The percentage distribution of the major parameters or attributes of the bottom cover from the
photographs of the transect were estimated by recording the identity of items lying beneath a grid of 99
points on a template over laid on each print. A summary of the bottom cover for each of the six (6)
monitoring sites is presented in Table 2-38.

Table 2-38 Bottom Cover of the Coral Reefs Monitored

Reef Transect Station
Attribute Code No. Site 1 – Site 2 – Site 3 – Site 4 – Site 5 - % Site 6 –
% Cover % Cover % Cover % Cover Cover % Cover
Hard coral- living, normal color 100 42.2 56.5 55.5 29.9 23.4 44.9
Hard coral- living, pale or white 200 - 0.2 - 9.3 - -
Hard coral- dead, covered/fouled
by microalgae or mixture of
microalgae and trapped fine 300 39.3 34.5 38.8 5.0 1.0 4.9
sediments
Soft Coral 400 6.0 5.6 5.7 0.2 1.9 3.9
Algae 500 0.2 - - - - 0.2
Other living 600 0.7 3.2 - 2.3 - -
Rock (covered/fouled by
microalgae, or mixture of
11 11.6 - - 53.3 47.2 43.9
microalgae and trapped fine
sediments)
Sand (clean) 12 - - - - - 0.5
Silt/mud 13 - - - - 26.5 1.7
TOTAL 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Hard /Soft
Total Live Coral Cover (%) Corals 48.2 62.1 61.2 30.1 25.3 48.8
Combined
Coral Reef Condition Fair Good Good Fair Fair Fair
As shown in Table 2-38, the highest mean live hard coral cover for this monitoring period was observed
at Site 2 -Coral Relocation Plot No. 2 (56.5%), followed by Site 3 - Coral Relocation Plot No. 3 (55.5%),
Site 6 - Coral Garden/”Dyesa Reef” (44.9%), Site 1 - Coral Relocation Plot No. 1 (42.2%), and Site 4 -
Tinigbasan Marine Sanctuary (29.9%). The least was observed at Site 5 - Payong-payong Reef
(23.4%). A more detailed description of the bottom cover per site is presented in Table 2-39.
Table 2-39 Bottom Cover Description of Monitoring Sites

Survey Station Bottom Cover Description
Live hard coral cover (normal color) during this survey period was 42.2% and
soft coral cover consisting of Sarcophyton at 6.0%. Recent dead hard coral
covered by microalgae was estimated at 39.3%. Rock cover (fouled/covered by
Site 1: Coral Relocation
microalgae) also characterized the transect location of the reef at 11.6%.
Plot No. 1
Macroalgae and other living (a giant clam) components were also noted on this
reef transect (0.2 and 0.7%, respectively). Normally, no silt/mud cover was
observed on the reef transect as well as within the coral relocation plot.
A dominance of live hard corals, normal color (56.5%) and recently dead hard
corals covered by microalgae (34.5%) were observed on this photo transect. Soft
corals consisting usually of Sarcophyton and other living component
Site 2 - Coral Relocation
(macroinvertebrate ascidians) were also observed at 5.6 and 3.2% cover,
Plot No. 2
respectively. Bleached live hard coral cover was estimated at only 0.2%. No
silt/mud cover was observed on the reef transect as well as within the coral
relocation plot.
Live hard coral cover (normal color) during this survey period was the second
highest at 55.5% and soft coral cover at 5.7%. A recently dead hard coral
(covered by microalgae) was estimated at 38.8%, the second highest. No
Site 3 - Coral Relocation
silt/mud cover was observed on the reef transect as well as within the coral
Plot No. 3
relocation plot.

Table 2-40 Bottom Cover Description of Monitoring Sites (continued)

Survey Station Bottom Cover Description
A high cover of rock substrate fouled/covered by microalgae (53.3%) and low live
hard coral cover (29.9%) characterized this photo transect quadrat. Soft coral
and other living component (ascidians and sponges) also characterized the
Site 4 - Tinigbasan Marine
transect location of the reef (0.2 and 2.3%, respectively). Dead hard coral cover
Sanctuary
(fouled by microalgae) was also noted on this reef transect (5%). No silt/mud
cover was observed on the reef transect as well as within the immediate vicinity
of the station.
Similar to all other reef stations surveyed, an excellent underwater visibility was
observed on this reef site at the time of sampling. Live hard coral cover (normal
Site 5 - Payong-payong color) was estimated at 23.4%. Soft corals were also observed at 1.9% cover. A
Reef Site high rock cover (fouled by a mixture of microalgae and trapped fine sediments)
was estimated at 47.2%. Silt/mud occupied only some portions of the reef
transect at 26.5% cover.
a dominance of live hard coral cover, mostly normal color (44.9%). Soft coral
cover was observed at 3.9%. A recently dead hard corals (covered by a mixture
Site 6 - Coral Garden Reef of microalgae and trapped sediment) was also observed on the reef (4.9%).
Site Likewise, a high rock cover (fouled by a mixture microalgae and sediments) was
also observed on this reef transect at 43.9%. An evidence of silt/mud cover was
observed on this reef transect but only about 1.7%.
Lateritic soil was not observed on the rocky and sandy bottom of the nearshore shallow reef, south of
the pier facility (Photo 2-11). The encrusting or foliate coral Pavona decussata and the massive/
submassive Porites spp were the most predominant form in this reef area. Individual colonies of these
coral species are still very much intact and in an apparent healthy condition with normal coloration and
pigmentation while no mortality was evident.
Photo 2-10 Snapshots of the coral reef immediately south of the jetty/causeway facility showing Pavona decussata
in healthy condition (May 2019)
The healthy conditions of these hard coral species can be attributed largely to the presence of geotextile
silt curtains in the area. The use of silt curtains could control siltation and reduce turbidity. Moreover,
coral species (Pavona decussata and Porites spp.) are more resistant to stressful condition (high
sedimentation / siltation or turbidity) than other coral types. The construction of the sedimentation ponds
significantly reduced sediment input into the nearby marine environment.

2.9.2. Associated Reef Fish Communities
A total of 140 species belonging to 31 families were recorded at the four (4) established sampling
stations. This result is higher when compared to the last survey done in January 2018, which has a total
of 45 species belonging to 12 families of fish. A comparative data on composition between the
monitored sites are shown in Figure 2-46.
Figure 2-46 Family composition and species richness of fish aggregation at the sampling stations
(May 2019)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
CRS PPS TMS DRS
Family 9 7 9 6
Species 48 29 33 30
Family Species
The coral reef relocation site (CRS) had higher species richness with a total of 48 species belonging to
nine (9) families followed by Tinigbasan Marine Sanctuary (TMS) with 33 species and nine (9) families.
The two areas such as Payongpayong Site (PPS) and “Dyesa” Reef Site (DRS) which are located near
the pier facility had recorded a total of 29 and 30 species under seven (7) and six (6) families,
respectively.
Most of the fish species recorded in all sampling stations belongs to major types while few types of
indicator and target species have been observed in all sampling stations, except in PPS wherein zero
number of target species has been observed (Figure 2-47). Mixed assemblages of damselfish and
wrasses were observed in all sampling stations. Their dominance could further be influenced by the
exposure of the stations to strong currents and the structure of the underlying coral community and
other reef attributes. These factors might also cause the variation in species richness across the
sampling stations. Some of the dominant and less mobile fish species were shown in Photo 2-12 and
Photo 2-13.

Figure 2-47 Species richness of fish assemblages by category at the sampling stations (May 2019)
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
CRS PPS TMS DRS
Indicator 1 1 3 1
Major 40 28 22 26
Target 8 8 1
Indicator Major Target
Photo 2-11 Fish assemblages and bottom structures in the Coral Relocation Site
(CRS), Tinigbasan Marine Sanctuary (TMS), Payong-payong Site (PPS), and “Dyesa”
Reef Site (DRS).

Photo 2-12 Some of the most

conspicuous species at the sampling
stations: a. Amphiprion clarkii (Bennett,
1830), b. Chaetodon lunulatus (Quoy
and Gaimard, 1825), c.
Plectroglyphidodon lacrymatus (Quoy
and Gaimard, 1824), d. Dascyllus
trimaculatus (Ruppel, 1829) an
2.9.3. Fish Density
The recent survey has recorded a typical dominance of major types of species in all sampling stations
with densities ranging from 735 to 1,384 individuals/300 m2. This was followed by target and indicator
species with 0 – 48 individuals/300m2 and 4 – 27 individuals/300m2, respectively (Figure 2-48).
Figure 2-48 Density (individuals/300sqm) of fish aggregations by category at the sampling stations
(May 2019)
Fish Density
1500
Density (ind./300m2)
1000
500
0
CRS PPS TMS DRS
Indicator Major Target Total

As one of the most ecologically diverse and important fish family on coral reefs (Wilson et al.,2008),
damselfishes (Pomacentridae) contributed 84.21 to 93.85% of the total fish density at the sampling
stations (Figure 2-49). The charcoal damsel (Pomacentrus brachialis), neon damsel (Pomacentrus
coelestis), and lemon damsel (Pomacentrus moluccensis) were relatively higher in most of the sampling
stations. The dominance of these species might be attributed to the reef features of the stations and its
exposure to water current. Both damselfishes are common in areas with branching corals and prefer
seaward reefs exposed to currents where there is sufficient amount of plankton to feed on (Allen, 1991;
Allen, 2000). Coral demoiselle or yellow-tipped damsel (Neopomancentrus nemurus) was relatively
higher in the reef area in Payong-payong Site (PPS). Such species form plankton-feeding aggregations
on the reef slope and inshore reefs (Allen et al., 2003; Kuiter and Tonozuka, 2004).
Figure 2-49 Relative fish density (%) by family at the sampling stations (May 2019)
It was also observed that fish densities in all of the monitoring stations significantly increased during the
latest monitoring. The temporal patter of fish densities across the 4 monitoring sites are shown on
Figure 2-50

Figure 2-50 Temporal pattern in total fish density (individuals/300m2) at the sampling
stations from August 2014 to May 2019
2.9.4. Fish Size Distribution and Size Estimates
The length of fish individuals in all sampling stations rarely exceed in 40-cm in total length (TL) except
for the species of Blue-spotted puffer (Arothron caeruleopunctatus) which is recorded at PPS area.
Most of the sizes (total length) of fish species in the sampling stations are under 16-cm (Figure 2-51).
The fish biomass in the area ranges from 53.64 – 98.80 kg/300m2 (Figure 2-52). Higher fish biomass
was recorded in CRS with 98.80 kg/300m2, followed by TMS, PPS and DRS with the fish biomass of
86.89 kg/300m2, 53.64 kg/300m2, and 52.80 kg/300m2, respectively. An increasing fish biomass trend
has been observed in the current survey when compared to the past surveys conducted from August
2014 to January 2018. This may imply a healthier and suitable environment. Seasonal migration,
foraging, reproduction, recruitment, mortality, existing reef structures and other natural factors are other
probable influence on the composition and fish biomass in the area.
2.9.5. Species Diversity and Cluster Analysis
The fish assemblages at CRS had the highest species diversity based on the Shannon index (H’) with
2.61, followed by TMS and DRS with H’ value of 2.56 and 2.55, respectively (Figure 2-53). Lowest
species diversity was observed at PPS) with H’ value of 2.00. Such area (PPS) has recorded low
species richness and high dominance of single fish species. The condition may be further associated
with habitat complexity and various environmental perturbation that limits the occurrence of other
species. These conditions may reflect habitat perturbation (e.g., sedimentation, loss of reef complexity,
and low water transparency) that limits the occurrence of other species and the dominance of few
species that can tolerate and adapt to a disturbed environment.

Figure 2-51 Size-density distribution of fish assemblages at the sampling stations (May 2019)
Figure 2-52 Temporal pattern in fish biomass (kg/300m2) at the sampling stations from Aug 204 to May
2019

Figure 2-53 Diversity of fish aggregations at the sampling stations during May 2019
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
CRS PPS TMS DRS
Shannon 2.6081 2.0027 2.5554 2.5491
Eveness 0.67015 0.059476 0.73085 0.74946
Simpson 0.88934 0.75474 0.88536 0.88861
Margalef 6.6195 4.2373 4.6212 4.3303
Shannon Eveness Simpson Margalef
2.9.6. Macrobenthic Invertebrate Communities
A visual census of macroinvertebrates was conducted while scuba diving along the 10-m long transect
lines attached to reefs. All macroinvertebrates within a two-meter wide swath covered by the transect
length (an area of 20m2) were identified, enumerated and counted. The sizes of censused
macroinvertebrates exceeded one (1) cm. Photo and video documentation at each reef transect was
also done to supplement and support data from the visual census survey.
A total of 19 macroinvertebrate species/taxa that are classified under seven (7) major faunal groups
were recorded in the present sampling period in May 2019, which was higher compared to the last
sampling period in January 2018 with 11 species, as well as in all the previous sampling periods.
Figure 2-54 Total number of macroinvertebrate species by sampling period
20
16
12
0
April-May
Aug-14 Mar-15 Nov-15 Oct-16 May-17 Jan-18 May-19
2016
Total Number 13 10 11 12 11 14 11 19

As shown on Figure 2-54, there was an increase in the total number of macroinvertebrate species in
all transect stations except at Station CRS2 - Coral Relocation Plot No. 2 wherein the total number of
species recorded has decreased from the last sampling period in January 2018. The highest number
of species was observed at Station TMS- Tinigbasan Marine Sanctuary with twelve (12) species,
followed by Stations PRS-Payong-payong Reef with ten (10) species, CRS1- Coral Relocation Plot
No.1 with nine (9) species, CRS3 – Coral Relocation Plot No. 3 with eight (8) species, and CGS- Coral
Garden/”Dyesa Reef” with seven (7) species. The least was observed at Station CRS-2 – Coral
Relocation Plot No.2 with four (4) species.
The tiny reef ascidian Clavelina sp. and the green ascidian/sea squirt Didemnum sp. were the most
common and abundant macroinvertebrates found in the study area. This was followed by the blue
starfish Linckia laevigata, and the ink-spot sea squirt/ascidian Polycarpa aurata. There were also
bivalve scallops Pedum spondyloideum found most abundant at Stations CRS1, CRS3 and TMS. The
crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster planci), which is causing coral bleaching, was only observed
along the reef transect at Stations CRS3 and TMS. A complete inventory of the macroinvertebrates
observed is included in the Appendices.
In terms of density, a total of 952 macroinvertebrate counts/20m2 were recorded during the monitoring
in May 2019. There was a consistent increase in the total density of macroinvertebrates from the
beginning of the study up to the present sampling period as shown in Figure 2-55.
Figure 2-55 Macroinvertebrate Density by Sampling Period
1000
800
600
400
200
0
April-May
Aug-14 Mar-15 Nov-15 Oct-16 May-17 Jan-18 May-19
2016
Density (count/20sqm) 69 74 97 219 307 715 757 952

2.9.7. Threat to Marine Biodiversity
2.9.7.1. Threat to Existence and/or Degradation of Important Local Species and Habitat
The corals within the study area are being threatened by both natural and human-induced disturbances.
Disturbance can be defined as “any relatively discrete event in time that disrupts ecosystem,
community, or population structure and changes resources, substrate availability, or the physical
environment” (Pickett and White, 1985 as cited by Rogers, 1993). The nature of the disturbance, and
hence the resulting biota, varies according to reef site.
Typically, among the possible external stresses and / or disturbances that were identified during last
monitoring period were:
a) Turbidity and siltation/sedimentation,

b) Accidental bumping of corals by tugboats and / or barges;
c) Infestation of crown-of-thorns starfish Acanthaster planci;
d) Storm damage; and
e) Low salinity.
A. Increased turbidity and sedimentation.
The most important single cause of reef degradation is sedimentation resulting from human terrestrial
activities (Yap and Gomez, 1985). Turbidity (resuspended solids) and sedimentation/siltation above
normal levels can adversely affect marine organisms and habitats, particularly coral reefs and seagrass
beds and the communities they support (Griffen, 1975 as cited by Williams, 1983). Experimental
application of sediments onto living coralline tissues has demonstrated detrimental effects including
expulsion of zooxanthellae, cellular damage and, after complete burial, death (Rogers, 1983). Siltation
effects are clearly manifested in the coral reefs surveyed (such as in Payong-payong Reef Site, along
the causeway-jetty area and on the adjacent reef immediately north of the causeway-jetty facility) where
blankets of fine sediment are typical. Turbidity increases light attenuation and consequently decreases
photosynthetic activities. Settling sediment tend to cover, smother and foul surfaces of coral colonies.
B. Accidental bumping of corals by tugboats and barges
Accidental bumping of the nearby coral formations at Tinigbasan Marine Sanctuary (TMS) and Coral
Relocation Site (CRS) by tugboats and barges may occur during bad weather since the occurrence of
storm waves and monsoon surges is typical in the area. In addition, the close proximity of the TMS to
the port/loading area poses the threat of major ship groundings. This is likely to happen since the
distance of the existing causeway-jetty facility from the sanctuary is only about 300-m.
C. Predation by the crown-of-thorns starfish Acanthaster planci.
Acanthaster planci is may be the only venomous starfish in the world. The crown-of-thorns (COT) is a
predator of corals. It feeds by everting its stomach out of its mouth in a thin sheet that covers all or part
of a coral colony and digesting the coral tissue from the skeleton. After several hours, the starfish moves
away leaving as a portion of dead coral that is starkly white. This feeding site soon becomes darkened
with algae (Colin and Arneson, 1995). This echinoderm species was found to be present along the reef
transect at Stations CRS3 and TMS.

Adapting the ANLP’s Coastal Resource Management Program, the CRM activities for the ALP will
include collection of COTs. Trained and employed local divers schedule the collection based on actual
sightings during monthly monitoring activities and identified seasonal changes in the area. The collected
COTs are weighed before being disposed by means of deep ground burying. Furthermore, coastal
communities of Brgy. Lawigan and Tinigbasan is tapped in monitoring the proliferation of COTs and to
assist the Company’s Environmental Fish Warden in employing appropriate management response to
address the issue on the outbreak of starfish predators.
D. Storm Damage
The reef-building corals are strong and often dense structures that can resist the physical forces
generated by normal waves in the study area. It is presumed, however, that turbulences caused by
wind-driven waves during a very strong typhoon can overturn large coral heads and tear loose epifauna
from their substrata. Powerful storms can affect reefs down to 20-35 m and deep reef zones generally
experience less disturbance than shallow zones (Rogers, 1993).
Last year, several typhoons (e.g., Typhoon Ompong in September 2018) passed through the area. This
might have caused some damages at Site 6 – Coral Garden/”Dyesa Reef” as a result of the mechanical
force exerted by the pounding surf associated with the typhoon. The typhoon caused significant
decrease in total live hard coral cover along the reef transect (from 79.0% in January to 44.9% in May
2019). Another noticeable difference during the last sampling period in January 2018 and the present
sampling period in May 2019 was the significant increase in rock substratum (from 20.0% up to 43.9%
cover) covered by microalgae with trapped fine sediments. This remarkable may be associated with the
strong storm wind-generated waves that presumably can stir up deposited sediments which settle on
reef organisms such as microalgae.
E. Low salinity
Coral reefs occur under natural conditions at salinities ranging from 25 to 42 ppt (Coles and Jokiel,
1992). Most species of corals show very little tolerance to low salinity waters such that they are generally
absent near mouths of rivers or creeks. Example of this is the shore area close to the mouth of Payong-
payong Creek. The presence of this creek often results in local influx of large volumes of freshwater
that may cause extensive damage to both branching and massive corals in shallow water habitats close
to creek mouth especially during the rainy months, or passage of typhoon events.
The latest monitoring data indicated a decreased coral cover substantially from 47.6% in January 2018
down to 29.9% in May 2019. This can be attributed principally to reduced salinity that led to mortality of
coral organisms in shallow water. A survey of literature suggests that most species of reef corals are
killed when salinity is reduced to 15 to 20 ppt for 24 hour or more (Coles and Jokiel, 1992; Jockiel et
al., 1993).
2.9.7.2. Threat to Abundance, Frequency, and Distribution
The impacts on marine organisms are effects of changes in water quality and bottom contamination.
Siltation of the near shore water due to runoff or discharge of silted water from the open or disturbed
areas is a primary concern for the ALP operation. Fine soil particles, when discharged in the ocean,
settle at the bottom and cover the biota and the physical habitat at the ocean floor. Exposure to these
fine materials may impede the natural biological processes of the marine organisms, such as their

feeding and reproduction, and can be detrimental to their health. Furthermore, the presence of the Port
may accelerate sediment deposition in the stagnant water behind the structure.
The transport of silt and sediment materials to the marine environment is controlled by the establishment
of drainage system consists of interceptor canals, designed to direct the surface run-off to the water
management structures (settling ponds, silt collector sumps, in-pit ponds). This allows for the removal
of suspended solids in water, prior to its discharge into the receiving water bodies. Catchment rafts
stationed under barge ramps are also used during barge loading to manage ore spillage. As a final line
of defense in case of drainage system failure and heavy rainfall events, the silt curtain installed around
the causeway helps contain the silt materials and minimize the potential sedimentation impact to marine
habitat.
The silt curtain is usually made with geotextile material, which is a geosynthetic, permeable fabric; the
same material currently used for embankment stabilization in the sediment ponds.This type of polyester
fabric is not water soluble and reacts only to UV, hence is eco-friendly. Alternatively, jute sacks made
with natural abaca fibres, are also used in the production of the silt curtain. Either way, the women from
the local community are involved in manually putting together the fabric to produce the silt curtain.
Effluents from barges, including bilge water and domestic wastes, when mixed with marine water can
lead to eutrophication and reduced oxygen levels of water due to insufficient mixing. This is also a threat
to the survival of marine organisms. This impact is prevented through the conduct of IEC for barge
operators on the proper wastewater disposal. Regular barge inspection by the PCO enables checking
of the compliance to the disposal protocols.
The hard corals with respect to the near shore marine environment, which is adjacent to the Project
area, potentially impacted coral community found within the Port construction site is already relocated
in a nearby marine sanctuary. Marine vessels, if not properly maneuvered, can damage the coral reef
in the sanctuary. Mitigating measures include installation of buoy markers within the coral reef area to
prevent barges from entering, and installation of solar powered blinkers as guide for the navigation of
marine vessels. A lookout tower is also established for monitoring by the deputized coast guards.
The Company’s management protocols relative to the marine resources are embodied in the Coastal
Resource Management Program (CRMP) developed to strengthen marine conservation measures and
protect the nearby marine sanctuaries. This is adopted from the established Integrated Coastal
Resource Management Program (ICRMP) of Tubay, which has long been implemented by its LGU,
through the Community Based Resource Management Project (CBRMP) of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and Department of Agriculture (DA).
Through their ICRMP, Tubay was able to establish a Municipal Coastal Resource Management
Framework which serves as a guide in conducting the following: a) Delineation of boundaries of
Municipal waters (in coordination with the Municipal Government of Jabonga and Cabadbaran), b)
Preparation of zoning and management plans covering the Municipal water of Tubay, c) Strengthening
the fisherfolk organizations and the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council (FARMC),
d) Formulation of organizational and institutional mechanisms, e) Identification of procedures for dealing
with pollution (form liquid and solid waste) recreational, and educational.
In 2007, this ICRMP was adopted by the Company in partnership with the LGU of Brgy. Lawigan and
Tinigbasan of Tubay, the Tinigbasan and Fisherfolks Association (TIFFA), Lawigan Farmers and
Fisherfolks Association (LAFFA) and the Municipality of Tubay. In coordination with the Municipal
CBRMP Coordinator of Tubay and the active participation of the local fisherfolks, the ICRMP for
Barangay Lawigan and Tinigbasan was continually improved under the implementation of the Annual
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Program (AEPEP) of the Company.

2.9.8. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Marine Ecology
A summary of the management and monitoring plans relative to the potential impacts to marine
resources is provided in Table 2-40.
Table 2-41 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Marine Ecology

Siltation of near shore marine • Installation of erosion control materials Coral and Marine Habitat
water due to erosion and ore along slopes (coconets, gabion basket, monitoring
spillage during loading activities. stop logs, wattlings, and fascines).
• Establishment of drainage system Regular Marine Water Quality
Marine habitat degradation from (road berms, interceptor canals) Monitoring and Assessment
siltation around active disturbed areas for runoff
management.
Health effects on marine animals
• Installation of silt fences, silt curtain
Discharge of contaminated bilge along waterways to capture silt/
water from barges. sediment materials discharged in the
waterways.
Domestic solid waste and • Installation of raft under the loading
wastewater discharge from ship ramp to catch ore spill.
crew. • Geotextile silt curtain installed around
the causeway as last line of defense to
Coral reef damage from marine contain the silt materials in water.
vessels • Orientation to barge crew members on
proper housekeeping and waste
management practices.
• Regular inspection of the barge and
ship by the PCO.
• Buoy demarcation and blinkers for
navigational guide of marine vessels
• Construction of a look-out tower and
deployment of local fish wardens for
easy monitoring of activities.
2.9.9. Meteorology and Climatology
2.9.9.1. Local Microclimate
The Project area is located within a Type II climate zone as defined by the Modified Coronas Climate
Classification developed by the Philippines Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services
Administration (PAGASA). This particular climate type is characterized by an absence of a dry season.
Rainfall occurs throughout the year with the heaviest rainfall occurring during the months of December
and January. A climate classification map showing the project area is shown on Figure 2-56.
The northeast monsoon blows from November to April and is responsible for the high amount of rain
that falls during this period. The southwest monsoon prevails during the rest of the year but since it
approaches the country from the southwest, Agusan del Norte is partly shielded from its full effect.

The Philippine Area of Responsibility (PAR) is visited by an average of 20 typhoons every year, with
about 8 or 9 of them crossing the Philippines. The peak of the typhoon season is July through October,
when nearly 70% of all typhoon develop. Most disturbances traverse Luzon and Visayas while typhoons
rarely cross Mindanao. The site of the proposed limestone project is within the area visited by
approximately two to three typhoons per year.
The mean annual rainfall (1981-2010) at the PAGASA-Butuan Station is 2,058 mm with the period of
October to February being the wettest months. Other meteorology and climate data available for the
Butuan station include temperature and evaporation. Temperature data and Monthly mean rainfall
values for the period Years 1981 to 2010 are shown in Table 2-41.
Table 2-42 Climate Data Mean Monthly Values, Butuan City, Agusan del Norte
Temperature Temperature Temperature
Rainfall Monsoon
Month (max) (min) (Mean)
Season
(mm) (C) (C) (C)
January 318 30.2 22.5 26.3 Northeast

February 225 30.8 22.5 26.6 Northeast
March 145.4 31.8 22.8 27.3 Northeast
April 109.7 33.1 23.5 28.3 Northeast
May 115.5 33.7 24.2 28.9 Southwest
June 154 33.1 24 28.5 Southwest
July 143.9 32.6 23.7 28.2 Southwest
August 105.6 32.9 23.9 28.4 Southwest
September 126.3 32.9 23.7 28.3 Southwest
October 178.4 32.4 23.6 28 Southwest
November 197.9 31.7 23.4 27.5 Northeast
December 238.2 30.8 22.9 26.9 Northeast
Annual 2,058 32.2 23.4 27.8 -
Source: Rainfall Data and Temperature, PAGASA Butuan City; PAGASA Climatological Normal Values.

Figure 2-56 Climatological Map of the Philippines
Climate Map based on the

Modified Coronas Classification
Very Frequent(32%)
FREQUENCY OF TROPICAL CYCLONES
Frequent (16%)
Frequent (19 %)
Less Frequent (7%)
PROJECT
Frequent(25%)
Rare (1%)
Source: PAGASA

The temperature records of the PAGASA Butuan City Station indicate a relatively warm annual average
temperature of 32.2°C(max), 23.4°C(min) and an annual mean of 27.8°C. May, June and August are
the hottest months based in the mean temperature rising to an average of 28.6°C. The coldest month
is January, which has an average temperature of 26.3°C.
Daily meteorological monitoring is also done in-house by the Environment Department to record the
local precipitation trends that may not be reflected in the regional data. Two rainfall monitoring stations
are established in the Project area; one rain gauge is stationed near the surface mine and another is
installed at the causeway/ port area in Payong-payong. Meteorology data for the period Year 2019, for
Agata Mine Site and Payong-payong monitoring stations are shown in Figure 2-57
Figure 2-57 Total Monthly and Cumulative Rainfall for Year 2019 – Agata Mine Area Station
Agata Mine Site Payong-payong PAGASA
600 1400
1200
500
1000
400
800
300
600
200
400
100 200
0 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
The mean annual rainfall recorded at the surface mine site for the five year period record is 204.66 mm.
January was the wettest month, with a mean rainfall depth of 486.55 mm; while April was the driest
month with a mean rainfall depth of 0.8 mm and a total rainfall depth of 60.11 mm.
A different precipitation trend was observed at the Payong-payong Port area with annual mean rainfall
of 139.79 mm. January had the highest mean rainfall depth of 295.12 mm. May was the driest month
with a mean rainfall depth of 39.58 mm.
2.9.9.2. Seasonal Changes from Climate Change
In Year 2019, PAGASA updated their climate projections for the Philippines in their report entitled
Observed Climate Trends and Projected Climate Change in the Philippines. Using climate models, the
average climate information collected over the period of Year 1971-2000 was used to derive the
projected changes in temperature and rainfall for the mid-20th century (Year 2036 to Year 2065), over
73 major provinces of the Philippines.

Three projected patterns of changed were included in the report. They include the lower driest possible
(lower bound), the wettest possible (upper bound), and the most likely change to be observed (median).
Two scenarios were considered in this modelling: the moderate level GHG emissions (RCP 4.5) and
the high level GHG emission (RCP 8.5).
The PAGASA climate change projections for the Province of Agusan del Norte is shown in Table 2-42.
The modeling results shown is the median changes based on moderate emission scenario. As seen in
the projected values, the province is predicted to have a net decrease in rainfall and net increase in
temperature throughout the year.
Table 2-43 Projected Seasonal Changes in Rainfall and Temperature for Agusan del Norte
DJF MAN JJA SON
Projected Rainfall Changes

% change mm % change mm % change mm % change mm
-9.8 790.2 -14.2 379.4 -11.4 407.3 -21.2 495.5
Projected Temperature Changes
% change ºC % change ºC % change ºC % change ºC
1.2 27.4 1.3 28.9 1.2 29 1.2 28.6
Note: Median Values for Moderate Emission Scenario; Source: PAGASA, 2018
Using the baseline rainfall values in Year 2019 and applying the projected rainfall changes, the
projected rainfall values in the limestone project area and Payong-payong Port is shown in Figure 2-
58 and Figure 2-59, respectively.
Figure 2-58 Seasonal Change in Rainfall (mm) at Nickel Mine Site (2036-2065)
900.00
800.00
700.00
Rainfall (mm)
600.00
500.00
400.00
300.00
200.00
100.00
0.00
DJF MAN JJA SON
baseline rainfall 821.13 131.10 243.87 285.55
projected rainfall 740.66 112.48 216.07 225.01

Figure 2-59 Seasonal Change in Rainfall (mm) at Payongpayong Port (2036-2065)
700.00
600.00
500.00
Rainfall (mm)
400.00
300.00
200.00
100.00
0.00
DJF MAN JJA SON
baseline rainfall 599.29 180.39 550.12 374.68
projected rainfall 540.56 154.77 487.41 295.25
The most significant decrease in rainfall is predicted towards the end of the year, with a net decrease
of 21% or equivalent to 60.5mm less rain at the nickel mine area and around 80mm less rain at Payong-
payong Port.
In mining where activities are contingent to weather condition, drier season is more preferred because
it will allow continuous mining, processing, and loading activities. With the heavy land disturbance from
mining activities and the stockpiling of loose ore materials, siltation from stormwater run-off is usually
common. However, the overall decrease in rainfall and higher temperature may somehow slow down
the erosion rate but may contribute to dust generation. Water management facilities will be in place to
manage stormwater run-off during rainfall events. Capacities of structures will be computed based on
the maximum expected rainfall in record. In drier days, dust control will be employed by spraying
through water trucks.
2.10. Air and Noise
2.10.1. Air and Noise Quality
The ambient air and noise quality monitoring is done at seven (7) sites listed in Table 2-43 and is shown
on the sampling map in Figure 2-60 and Figure 2-61.
Among all sampling stations, only A-4, A-5, and A24-6 are within the vicinity of the project (Figure 2-
61). The 4 others are not likely to be affected by the limestone project activities but will also be included
to serve as control stations for future monitoring during the operations and post operations periods.
Table 2-44 Ambient Air and Noise Quality Monitoring Stations

Station Designation Air Monitoring Station
A-1 Admin building compound

A-2 Between Pit 1 and Pit 2 of ANLP
A-4 Pier yard
A-5 Pier yard near Causeway
A24-6 Brgy. Tinigbasan, Tubay - Near Brgy. Hall
A24-7 Brgy. Lawigan, Tubay - Near Brgy. Hall
A24-3 Brgy. E. Morgado, Santiago- Near Kalinawan

Parameters monitored include Total Suspended Particulates (TSP), Particulate Matter less than 10
micros (PM10) and Noise Level. Air and noise monitoring all falls within the NPCC standard for both
Class D (Industrial) and Class A (Residential) categories.
Air and noise quality data presented in Table 2-44 is the average of the quarterly monitoring conducted
in Year 2019.
Table 2-45 Ambient Air and Noise Quality Monitoring Data

Parameter NPCC Class D A-1 A-2 A-4 A-5
Noise Level (dB) 75.00 55.00 52.50 45.50 47.50
TSP (ug/Ncm) 300.00 12.70 13.88 1.60 1.60
PM10 (ug/Ncm) 200.00 <1.675 6.00 1.60 1.60
Parameter NPCC Class A A24-3 A24-7 A24-6

Noise Level Morning (dB) 50.00 47.75 47.50 54.67
Noise Level Daytime (dB) 55.00 57.00 50.50 55.67
Noise Level Evening (dB) 50.00 47.75 45.75 54.00
Noise Level Nightime (dB) 45.00 45.00 44.75 53.00
TSP (ug/Ncm) 230.00 12.07 18.71 16.00
PM10 (ug/Ncm) 150.00 0.94 0.71 1.29
Source: ANLP SMR, 2019
Results indicated that the TSP and PM-10 levels detected, both within the project site and in the
community, are complying to the applicable ambient air standards. Morning noise level at Station A24-
6 slightly exceeded the noise standard which can be attributed to its location being near a population
center.

Figure 2-60- Air and Noise Quality Monitoring Location Map (ANLP)

Figure 2-61- Air and Noise Sampling Location Near the Project Area
Environmental Impact Statement Report ` Page | 2-122

2.10.1.1. Fugitive Dust and Noise Generation
Dust suppression is through direct water spraying using water trucks. Areas to be cleared and disturbed
are limited to those identified in the mine plan to minimize footprint. Establishment of vegetation curtain
along the roads, and the periphery of the disturbed areas activities is done to reduce wind velocity and
to minimize dust dispersion. Another measure is the regular maintenance, such as grading and
compacting, for all access and haul roads. Speed regulation protocols for moving vehicles; especially
those involve in hauling, transporting, stockpiling and loading are also in place. Regular preventive
maintenance of all heavy equipment and light vehicles, and tree plantations around the mining area
which serves as buffer for airborne dust.
Potential sources of noise around the mine site are on and off-road vehicles, blasting operations by the
use of explosives, heavy equipment and crusher plant, and power station. Noise and vibration from
equipment operation can be nuisance to the surrounding community. It can also drive away faunal
species sensitive to noise.
Noise Management to have a quarterly noise monitoring at identified monitoring stations, construction
of noise barriers to the main noise source to minimize the impact to the community, provision of PPE’s
to workers such as mufflers or ear plugs and use of PPE’s in heavy machinery, large vehicles, and
controlled blasting will be strictly implemented, restriction of hours of activity (heavy vehicle mobilization
is minimal during night time, light vehicles are restricted from travelling during night time).,blasting will
be done at a fixed schedule and employees and concerned community will be notified through siren
before and after the activity. Equipment maintenance and installation of mufflers can minimize noise
generation. Establishment of buffer zones in the periphery of the mining areas can control both dust
and noise impacts to the nearby community.
2.10.1.2. Contribution to Air Emissions
A. Stationary GHG Sources
Carbon dioxide, Methane, and Nitrous oxide were estimated from the fuel usage of Generator Sets and
Tower light that represents stationary sources for Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) in the ANLP Operations.
Table 2-45 and Table 2-46 shows the predicted annual GHG from stationary sources identified from
2018 – 2019.
Results revealed that the total GHG emissions from stationary source will be approximately 100 tonnes
of CO2. It was worth noting however, that these values were relatively low compared to several records
on GHG emission from stationary sources in other mining projects. This can be attributed to the
stationary sources limited to Generator sets and Tower lights, whereas other operations utilize high
intensity heating equipment such as Furnace, Boiler, Over and LPG. For the ALP operations, additional
sources of emission will be the crushing plant.

Table 2-46 Predicted Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Stationary Sources (2019)
Fuel CO2 CH4 N2O
Carbon Fuel
Quantity Emission Emission Emission
Sources Type tons tons tons
Used Factor Factor Factor
Generator
Sets and Diesel 38143.07 2.71 103.47 0.00014 0.1121 0.00014 1.66
Tower light
Generator
Sets and BioDiesel 778.43 - - 0.00038 0.0062 0.00087 0.21
Tower light
GWP - 1.00 21.00 310.00 -
Total
- - 103.4707 - 0.1184 - 1.86
Emission
Total GHG Emission (tons CO2)= 105.45
Table 2-47 Predicted Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Stationary Sources (2018)
Fuel CO2 CH4 N2O
Carbon Fuel
Quantity Emission Emission Emission
Sources Type tons tons tons
Used Factor Factor Factor
Generator
Sets and Diesel 34130.46 2.71 92.58 0.00014 0.1003 0.00014 1.48
Tower light
Generator
Sets and BioDiesel 696.54 0 0.0000 0.00038 0.0056 0.00087 0.19
Tower light
GWP 1 21.00 310
Total
92.59 0.1059 1.67
Emission
Total GHG Emission (tons CO2)= 94.3607
B. Mobile GHG Sources
Similar with Stationary sources, the GHG emission from mobile sources were also estimated from the
total fuel usage during the nickel operation. Shown on Table 2-47, Table 2-48, and Table 2-49 are the
estimated GHG emission for the different mining activities from construction, development, and
abandonment phases.
The ore extraction activity, including the loading and hauling of mined materials to the stockpile area,
accounts for the greatest emission of 338.2 tonnes of CO2 equivalent. The stationary sources identified
for the ALP Operations include mining equipment, haul trucks, and light vehicles. These are the same
with that of ANLP operations, so emissions of similar magnitude are anticipated.

Table 2-48- Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Construction and Development
Activities
GHG Emissions (t CO2e)
Activity
Diesel Use CO2 CH4 N2O
Construction and Development 16,500 43.86 0.05 0.80
Site Preparation Clearing, and Earthwork 12,000 31.90 0.04 0.59
Pre stripping activities at the quarry site 42,000 111.65 0.13 2.05
Construction of Additional Roads 15,000 39.88 0.05 0.73
Water management Ponds and Canals 6,000 15.95 0.02 0.29
Total 91,500 243.25 0.28 4.46
Source: API
Table 2-49- Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Mining Activities
Activity
Clearing and Grubbing 52,000 138.24 0.16 2.54
Stripping 18,200 48.38 0.06 0.89
Ore Extraction (Loading Hauling) 124,800 331.77 0.39 6.09

Waste generation from daily operational
3,900 10.37 0.01 0.19
activities
Water management Ponds and Canals 5,200 13.82 0.02 0.25
TOTAL 204,100 542.59 0.63 9.95

Source: API
Table 2-50- Estimated Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Abandonment Activities
Activity
Benching, grading and earthwork for the
closure of the disturbed areas (surface mine, 28,600 76.03 0.09 1.39
water management structures, etc)
Decommissioning or Rehabilitation of Mine
Facilities (Office and Housing Buildings, 5,200 13.82 0.02 0.25
Motorpool, Storage Areas, Nursery, and Pier
Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed areas 5,200 13.82 0.02 0.25
Source: API

Table 2-51- Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions from All Mining Phases
Activity Total GHG Emission (t CO2e)
Construction and Development 44.72
Site Preparation Clearing, and Earthwork 32.52
Pre stripping activities at the quarry site 113.83
Construction of Additional Roads 40.65
Water management Ponds and Canals 16.26
Clearing and Grubbing 140.94
Stripping 49.33
Ore Extraction (Loading Hauling) 338.24
Waste generation from daily operational activities 10.57
Water management Ponds and Canals 14.09
Benching, grading and earthwork for the closure of the disturbed areas 77.51
Decommissioning or Rehabilitation of Mine Facilities 14.09
Rehabilitation of Mine Disturbed areas 14.09
TOTAL 906.9
C. Carbon Loss from waste Decomposition
The type of carbon loss via decomposition of waste materials especially in semi-saturated condition is
methane. This was estimated by segregating waste materials and determining its weight or volume
against the total waste generated.
Four type of solid waste most commonly generated by the project were identified for calculation of
methane emission. Among them, the biodegradable waste, particularly the food waste had the highest
volume generated and translated into the highest methane emission source. Methane emission from
2018 – 2020 ranges from 140 – 230 tons per year. The highest methane generated was recorded last
2018 as shown in Table 2-51, Table 2-52, and Table 2-53.
Table 2-52 Estimated Methane emission from waste generated in (2020)

Total Methane
% DOC by
Factor Waste Type Waste (kg/year) DOC Emitted
Volume
(tons/year)
A Paper and Textiles 6433.44 21.54

Garden and Park
B 255.47 0.86
Waste, Non-Food
15.45 141.75
C Food Waste 11268.52 37.72
D Wood, Straw Waste 1022.75 3.42
Total Waste (2020) 18980.18


Total Methane
% DOC by
Volume
(tons/year)

Garden and Park
B 202.07 0.68
Waste, Non-Food
25.18 231.07
C Food Waste 16893.58 56.56
Total Waste (2019) 29870.98

Total Methane
% DOC by
Volume
(tons/year)

Garden and Park
B 653.38 2.19
Waste, Non-Food
25.39 232.99
C Food Waste 14805.29 49.56
Total Waste (2018) 29283.89
D. Land Use Change
Specific land use change will be from grassland and mixed perennial to open area which brought about
vegetation clearing during construction and pre development phase. Vegetation hold the active
component of carbon in the system and removing them also removes carbon in the area. The estimated
loss of carbon is greater than 2000 ton corresponding to the planned area to be converted which is
approximately 50 ha. This is shown on Table 2-54.
Table 2-55 Estimated Carbon loss via Land Use Change

Total Carbon loss
Estimated Carbon Carbon Estimated
Land Use to be Change Area (ha) (tons C/ Total
Storage (ton C/ha) be loss
Area)
Grassland 2.14 12.1 25.894 2199.65
Mixed (Agroforestry) 47.88 45.4 2173.752
Total Area 50.02
Summarizing the emissions from various sources, it is shown on Table 2-55 that mobile sources are
the most significant sources of GHG emissions in the quarry operations. These sources include the
heavy equipment and light vehicles to operate in the mine site.

Table 2-56 Summary of estimated GHG emission (tons) from the prospective project area
Total GHG
Carbon Souces 2018 2019 2020
Emission
Stationary Sources 94.368 105.45 0 199.82
Mobile Sources 10067.48 368.83 0 10436.31
Waste 233.00 231.07 141.75 605.82
Land Use Change 0 0 2199.65 2199.65
TOTAL GHG EMISSION 13441.59
To mitigate the potential impacts from the harmful GHG emissions, mine development plan will be
strictly followed to maximize the equipment use. Equipment and plant maintenance will also be done
regularly for better fuel burning efficiency. Blasting activities at the quarry site will be controlled and will
only be done as necessary. Hauling roads and routes will be planned in such a way that hauling distance
is minimized. Ecological/ vegetation curtain and buffer will be established within the periphery of the
active mining and stockpile areas to minimize dispersion of particulates. The reforestation activities
during progressive rehabilitation can also help in carbon sequestration.
2.10.2. Management and Monitoring Plan Relevant to Air and Noise
A summary of the management and monitoring plans relative to the potential impacts to air and noise
is provided in Table 2-56.
Table 2-57 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Air and Noise

Particulates and chemical Mine Planning Regular Ambient Air and Noise
emissions from mining Monitoring for TSP, PM10, SOx,
activities and vehicle use. Controlled blasting NOx and CO.
Carbon sequestration from Source Emission Monitoring for

Chemical emission from reforestation activities. mobile vehicles, heavy equipment
wastes and land use change and generator set exhaust.
Plant and equipment maintenance.
Planned hauling routes
Buffer zones and vegetation curtains.
Waste management.
Dust generation from Water truck deployment and speed

equipment operation limit regulation.
(construction and operation)
Regular road maintenance
Maintenance of buffer zone in Project

area periphery

Table 2-56 Summary of Management Plan- Impacts to Air and Noise
Noise generation from plant Establishment of vegetation along Regular Ambient Air and Noise
operation and equipment use. roads as ecological curtain. Monitoring for TSP, PM10, SOx,
NOx and CO.
(Community nuisance and Equipment maintenance and muffler
faunal migration) installation. Source Emission Monitoring for
mobile vehicles, heavy equipment
and generator set exhaust.
2.11. The People
2.11.1. Demographics
A. Population
The impact area where Project activities will be implemented is in Barangay Tinigbasan, Municipality of
Tubay. The neighboring community that hosts the Administrative building, Assay laboratory and
facilities to include the accommodation quarters of staff and mess hall is Barangay of Lawigan, also
within the municipal jurisdiction of Tubay.
Total land area of the municipality is 13,809 hectares comprising 5.1% of the total land area of the
province of Agusan del Norte.
Summary of the size and population of the two barangays is shown in Table 2-57.
Table 2-58 Population Data of Impact Communities

Increase or
Municipal Impact Population Population
Municipality Decrease from Class
Land Area (ha) Barangay (2016) (2019)
2016
Lawigan 814 724 11.1% 5th Class

Tubay 13,809
Tinigbasan 1,003 1,026 2.29% Municipality
Source: PSA, CSU-SIA, 2017
In Brgy. Tinigbasan, the working age group of 18-49 forms the 42.5% of their population, while the
senior citizens aged 65 and above has the lowest count. This relatively the same with Brgy. Lawigan
with 49% of their population are the work group (18-49), and the old dependents aged 65 above is only
4% of the total residents. The comparative population distribution in the two barangays, per age group
and sex is presented in Table 2-58.
Barangay Tinigbasan registered 216 household and barangay Lawigan has 169 as reflected in their
Barangay Development Plans for 2018 - 2022.
The majority of the local inhabitants within and surrounding the Project area are of Visayan heritage.
The area is also the home of the Mamanwa-Manobo indigenous peoples. In most recent times migrants
from the Visayas and Luzon Provinces have settled in the area. Most residents speak the Cebuano
dialect; Tagalog is reasonably understood and spoken when necessary.

Table 2-59 Population by Age and Sex
Brgy. Tinigbasan Brgy. Lawigan
Age Group
Male Female Male Female
0-6 128 58 45 42
7-17 154 76 78 86
18-49 272 164 187 166
50-64 76 41 46 44
65 above 35 22 10 20
Total 1,026 724
Source: Actual Interview, 2019
B. Indigenous Peoples
Mamanwas are ancestral people of several indigenous people in the Northern area of Surigao,
Philippines dating back to the earlier centuries. The Mamanwas inhabit the mountains in Northeast
Mindanao. They are less in number and more scattered and nomadic. The Mamanwas are a different
in their looks and physical features compared to the lowlanders. They generally did not adopt the
lowlanders’ way of living even if they were already Christianized. They had been rooted for centuries in
the indigenous culture which is very difficult to understand. They speak their own dialect which
noticeably has some phonetic similarities with that of Surigaonon.
The Agusan Manobo is one of eight (8) tribal groups that comprise a cluster of tribes known generally
as Manobo and inhabits the island of Mindanao. The Agusan Manobos number about 60,000 and live
in the flood plains along the Agusan River and adjacent foothills of North Central Mindanao. Unlike
other tribes of Mindanao who live in rugged, remote mountains, the Agusan River Manobos live in an
area that annually becomes a vast inland lake due to flooding.
On July 14, 1999, with guidance of the NCIP, MRL Gold Philippines, Inc., previous operator of the Agata
MPSA and now known as MRL Nickel Philippines, Inc., executed a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) with its host Mamanwa and Manobo Tribes that led to the execution of a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) for its Agata Nickel Laterite Project. This then led to the eventual compliance of the
Free and Prior Informed Consent (FPIC) and the issuance of a Certificate of Precondition by the NCIP
on February 6, 2008. A copy of the MOA and the Certificate of Precondition is included in the
Appendices.
C. Education
In terms of educational attainment, close to 1/3 of the population of Brgy. Tinigbasan were able to attend
primary school, while only 5% were able to finish college. Higher educational attainment was completed
by the residents of Brgy. Lawigan with 21% are high school graduate. Nearly 6% graduated from
college. These are shown in Table 2-59.

Table 2-60 Population by Educational Attainment

Pre High High
Elementary Elementary College College No
Brgy. School School School
level Graduate level Graduate Schooling
level Level Graduate
Tinigbasan - 330 103 132 176 155 46 84
Lawigan 25 167 92 139 152 54 43 52
2.11.1.1. Displacement of Settlers and Property
The area is classified as a mineral land and will undergo development and eventual operations if
statutory and regulatory requirements are fulfilled. The implementation of the Project will result in actual
physical disturbances of the land, which are inherent in mining projects. These disturbances will be
mitigated through progressive rehabilitation and mine decommissioning strategies, which are integral
part of the overall mine plan. A Final Mine Rehabilitation & Decommissioning Plan for the Project has
been developed consistent with existing rules and regulations
The ALP area will not entail any displacement of people and their personal properties since these were
already negotiated and relocated during the construction of Agata Nickel Laterite Project’s causeway.
The residents who are mostly informal settlers along the shore of sitio Payongpayong signed a
Memorandum of Aggreement with API on December 19, 2012. The Municipal Local Government of
Tubay facilitated the MOA.
There are still land properties that need to be acquired for the quarrying operations. However, there are
no people living in these properties nor any significant structure built in them. Resettlement of settlers
will not be necessary.
There will be an increased equipment and vehicle movement when the ALP becomes operational. This,
however, will be along the hauling roads near the quarry and pier facilities. Increased mobility of people
and equipment will also be mostly within the immediate area of the Project.
2.11.1.2. Conflict in Land Ownership
The Project is located in a land classified as mineral land by the Philippine Government and covered
by an MPSA approved on May 26, 1999 and denominated as MPSA No. 134-99-XIII.
A portion of the Project area is covered by the Community-Based Forest Management Agreement
(CBFMA) of Tinigbasan Farmers & Fisherfolks Association (TIFFA), which was issued years after the
MPSA was granted. It is worth mentioning that the Proponent did not insist over its legal rights to
displace CBFMA and Community-Based Resource Management Plan (CBRMP) holders particularly
TIFFA, Lawigan Farmers & Fisherfolks Association (LAFFA), and E. Morgado Integrated Forest
Developers & Multipurpose Cooperative (EMIFDMC) when it operated the ANLP despite the
Proponent’s prior rights, instead, it finalized deals with these POs through MOAs. This way, the
Proponent showed that it can work in harmony, and in accord, with the community.
A portion of the Project area was also erroneously covered by Certificates of Land Ownership (CLOAs),
inadvertently granted by the Department of Agrarian Reform in March 2013, fourteen (14) years after
the granting of the Agata MPSA. Within the proposed quarry area, majority of the area covered by these

CLOAs have been cancelled by the DAR, pursuant to its Decision of 23 October 2014, which Decision
had long attained finality.
Land properties covered by TCTs and Tax Declarations are also present in the Project area. Some of
these had already been acquired by the Proponent. It will endeavor to acquire the remaining land
properties it may need, for safe and effective operations of the Project, through just and reasonable
arrangements, to avert conflicts which may arise with those landowners.
2.11.1.3. Change/Conflict Right of Way
The northeastern and northern areas of the limestone deposit are currently used by the ANLP as
stockpile areas of its nickel laterite DSO. Ingress and egress through these areas will not be a problem
concerning rights of way from private landowners.
Just and reasonable acquisition of the land properties located in the immediate surrounding areas will
ensure no conflict will arise pertaining to rights of way.
2.11.1.4. Impact on Public Access
There are plans to connect the provinces of Agusan del Norte and Surigao del Norte through a coastal
road that will pass through the coastal barangays of Tubay and Jabonga. In Tubay, a pilot road had
been constructed many years back and little progress has been made so far along the Binuangan-
Tinigbasan stretch. Once completed, this will become a major access from La Fraternidad down south
to Lawigan and thence to Jabonga to the north passing through the northern section of the Project area.
Safety of the local population with regards to vehicle movements will be prioritized. When the Tubay-
Jabonga coastal road becomes operational, a traffic management plan will be implemented in close
coordination with the Tinigbasan and Lawigan BLGUs and the Tubay MLGU.
At this point, vehicular movements along that portion of the coastal road that will pass through the
Project are contemplated to include but not be limited to the following:
• The company or trucking contractor will be required to hire local drivers and train drivers and
helpers to ensure a safe operation.
• The company or the trucking contractor will deploy trained local traffic spotters with radios in
strategic portions along the road.
• Traffic management will be coordinated with the LGUs.
• Sections of roads that will incur traffic build up and will be managed by traffic spotters and using
passing bays so that the trucks do not contribute to traffic bottlenecks especially where the road
narrows. This will help to harmonize and enhance experience for casual driving residents or
visitors.

2.11.1.5. In migration
In-migration will be inevitable to the area where livelihood and commerce is available. Qualified
residents of Barangays Tinigbasan and Lawigan will be given priority employment in the ALP but it is
expected that non-residents of these two (2) barangays will have a significant share in the employment
during the quarrying operations.
Non-Tinigbasan and non-Lawigan residents who cannot be accommodated by the Company’s housing
facilities may opt to transfer their residences to these barangays during the term of their employment.
This means room and house rentals will be brisk during the duration of the ALP. Some may opt to
acquire or rent land properties within these impact barangays and their peripheries. Areas like Sua in
Lawigan or Lucbon in Tinigbasan may see in-migration including construction of houses.
The proponent will prioritize the engagement of qualified local manpower. However, if no qualified local
applicant is available, outsiders will also be considered. Employees who are not residents of the host
and neighboring barangays will be accommodated using the proponent’s housing facilities.
Furthermore, the economy of barangays Tinigbasan and Lawigan is expected to rise during the life of
the ALP. This will result in business entrepreneurs setting up businesses in these two (2) barangays.
However, security protocols will be in place to regulate entry to the project area. Coordination with the
LGU and local authorities will also be done.
2.11.1.6. Cultural and Lifestyle Change
The quarrying operations of the Agata Limestone Project (ALP) will not bring about significant cultural
changes to the Indigenous Cultural Communities who own CADT 237 nor to the non-IP residents of the
host and neighboring barangays. The Manobo-Mamanwa IP are settled in the barangays far away from
the quarrying operations.
There are no archaeologic, paleontologic, historical, religious, aesthetic or major cultural structures
present in the Project area and its immediate surroundings that will be physically impacted by the
operations. During the Field -Based Investigation of the NCIP, which was part of the Free and Prior
Informed Consent (FPIC) process, it was established that there is no historical or archaeological
landmarks within the host IPs’ ancestral domain, nor information relating to the presence of historical
sites in the host and neighboring barangays.
The operations of ANLP since 2014 and the community preparations prior to this ensure that cultural
and lifestyle impacts will be insignificant. Majority of the local inhabitants in the general project area are
of Visayan heritage and the Mamanwa-Manobo IPs have been living with them too long and have
already influenced their culture.
The Mamanwa-Manobo community structures, religious practices, and other cultural practices will not
be affected by the operations of the Agata Limestone Project.
The Community Relations Office of API, established by virtue of DAO 2010-12 to ensure and facilitate
the community extension program of the company to the communities, will continue to support the local
cultural activities through its support to Socio – Cultural Program component of the SDMP.

2.11.2. Public Services
A. Water Supply
As of Year 2016, all of the 385 households registered within Barangay Tinigbasan and Barangay
Lawigan have already access to safe drinking water. Most of the water are distributed via a Level II
water system of communal source for 2-3 household units. This indicates an improvement relative to
Year 2012 condition wherein only 90% of the total households were serviced with safe drinking water
supply. Several water supply facilities, both provisions of new sources and improvement of the existing
ones, were provided by the Company through the implementation of its SDMP Program in the Nickel
Laterite project.
B. Power
Service for electricity in Agusan del Norte is mainly provided by ANECO or Agusan del Norte
Electric Cooperative, Inc. Data shows that since 2016, all barangays of Municipality of Tubay are
adequately served with power supply.
The Project will use electric power from ANECO. The projected daily power consumption for the ALP is
approximately 5,000 kWh. Diesel powered generator sets will be on standby power and will be used to
augment the daily power supply requirement.
C. Communication
Cities and Municipalities of Agusan del Norte have access to mobile communication and landline
telephone services. The telcos serving the area are: Bayantel Telecommunications, PhilCom, Cruz
Telephone Company, PLDT, and Globe Telecom. Internet usage in the province has also increased
mostly for business use. The municipality of Tubay has landline and mobile phone services. In 2016,
six (6) cellular sites were established in the area include the following: Globe (3), Smart (2), and Sun
(1). Data from the impact barangays indicate approximately 11,000 mobile phone subscribers.
D. Tourism and Recreation Centers
The impact communities offer eco-tourism and their natural beauty for tourists to enjoy. The latter
consists of natural caves, marine sanctuary, rivers, and white sand beaches. The natural topography
and marine resources found in the area attract tourists with interests in swimming and snorkeling.
E. Waste Management Facilities
With regards to the solid waste management, the latest data on facilities and practices show improving
solid waste management.Presently, Tubay has an existing Material Recovery Facility and a dumpsite.
Barangays Tinigbasan and Lawigan have their own material Recovery Facilities and a system of
collecting their solid wastes. Solid Waste Management is implemented in the community; proper waste
segregation is observed in every household.
F. Social Infrastructure and Protective Services
In terms of social assistance facilities, each barangay is equipped a Day Care Center, a Women’s
Center, a Senior Citizen’s Office, a KALAHI Office, and a help desk to address concerns related to
Violence Against Women and Children (VAWC). The presence of the different social assistance
facilities shows that the municipality is actively supporting the needs of its barangay constituents.

Municipality of Tubay has one (1) municipal police station manned by PNP and non- uniformed
personnel, one (1) Fire Station with one (1) Fire Truck and manned by BFP personnel.
Table 2-60 below provide information on the impact barangays’ public services and other social data.
Data are from the Brgy. Development Plan.
Table 2-61 Public Services and other Social Data for Tubay Municipality
Service Tubay
Year 2016 Year 2019
Brgy. Tinigbasan Brgy. Tinigbasan
Education Elementary Schools- 1 Elementary Schools- 1
High Schools - 1 High Schools - 1
Day Care Centers-1 Day Care Centers-1
Brgy. Lawigan Brgy. Lawigan

Elementary Schools- 1 Elementary Schools- 1
High Schools - 1 High Schools - 1
Day Care Centers-0 Day Care Centers-1
Brgy. Tinigbasan – Brgy. Tinigbasan
Housing No. of Household – 212 No. of Households- 216

No. of Household - 125 No. of Households- 169
Social Assistance Day Care Centers- 1 Day Care Centers- 1
Facilities Women Center- 1 Women Center-1
Senior Citizen Office- 1 Senior Citizen Office- 1
KALAHI Office- 1 KALAHI Office-1
VAWC Desk- 1 VAWC Desk-1
Day Care Centers- 1 Day Care Centers- 1

Women Center- 1 Women Center-1
Senior Citizen Office- 1 Senior Citizen Office- 1
KALAHI Office- 1 KALAHI Office-1
VAWC Desk- 1 VAWC Desk-1
Protective Services Brgy. Tanod-21 Brgy. Tanod - 30

Brgy. Tanod-14 Brgy. Tanod - 20
1 Municipal Police Station Police Personnel - 35 PNP

Police Personnel – 31 PNP 1 Municipal Police Station
1 Municipal Police Station
Fire Protection 1 Municipal Fire Station 1 Municipal Fire Station
Services 1 Fire Truck 1 Fire Truck
BFP Personnel - 15
Brgy. Tinigbasan
No fire station/ fire truck Brgy. Tinigbasan
No fire station/ fire truck
Brgy. Lawigan
No fire station/ fire truck Brgy. Lawigan
No fire station/ fire truck

Table 2-60 Public Services and other Social Data for Tubay Municipality (continued)
Service Tubay
Year 2016 Year 2019
Solid Waste Brgy. Tinigbasan, Lawigan Brgy. Tinigbasan: Brgy. MRF Faciity
Management Solid Waste Management is implemented installed
in the community. Proper waste
segregation is observed in every Brgy. Lawigan: Brgy. MRF Facility
households. installed
Infrastructure Brgy. Tinigbasan Brgy. Tinigbasan

Bridge-0 Bridge-0

Bridge-0 Bridge-0
Communication Brgy. Tinigbasan Brgy. Tinigbasan
1,007 Mobile Phone subscriber mobile phone subscriber – 1, 421

960 Mobile Phone subscriber Mobile phone subscriber – 1,236
Tourism and Brgy. Tinigbasan Brgy. Tinigbasan
Recreation White Beach White Beach
Fish Sanctuary
White Beach White Beach
And Fish Sanctuary And Fish Sanctuary
Agricultural Crop Brgy. Tinigbasan Brgy. Tinigbasan
Area and Production Corn- 2.7 t/ ha Corn – 27.35 ha
Banana- 2.9 t/ ha Banana – 273 ha
Coconut- 2.7 t/ ha Coconut – 342 ha

Corn- 2.7 t/ ha Corn 0
Banana- 2.9 t/ ha Banana – 1000 ha
Coconut- 2.7 t/ ha Coconut – 2000 ha
Livestock Carabao- 12 heads Carabao- 12 heads
Production Cattle- 5 heads Cattle- 5 heads
Goat- 22 heads Goat- 22 heads
Swine- 34 heads Swine- 34 heads
Poultry- 380 heads Poultry- 380 heads

Carabao- 18 heads Carabao- 18 heads
Cattle- 18 heads Cattle- 18 heads
Goat- 28 heads Goat- 28 heads
Swine- 105 heads Swine- 200 heads
Poultry- 220 heads Poultry- 250 heads
Brgy. Tinigbasan Brgy. Tinigbasan – 17.1
Fisheries Production 15 tonnes
Brgy. Lawigan Brgy. Lawigan – 19.4
16.2 tonnes
Source: Brgy. Development Plan

2.11.2.1. Threat to Delivery of Basic Services
Generally, the Project will not compete with the host and neighboring barangays in terms of social
services. On the contrary, the Project will help augment the existing social services offered by BLGUs
to its constituents in the areas of health and safety, public infrastructures, and other social services
through the Project’s Social development and Management Program (SDMP).
The two coastal barangays of Tinigbasan and Lawigan tap their electricity from ANECO, a local
distributor. ANECO has ample power supply for the immediate future especially when Agusan Power
Corporation’s Lake Mainit hydroelectric project will be operational by 2021. Thus, the Project will not
compete with the residents in terms of electric power supply. It also has standby generating sets should
power source become problematic.
On water resources, API has existing three (3) Conditional Water Permits granted by the National Water
Resource Board (NWRB) that will be directly utilized by the Project during the quarrying operations.
These are in: Solana Creek, Payong-payong; Payong-payong Creek in Payong-payong; and Agroland
Spring in the main nursery pertaining to water resources. The Company, through its ANLP SDMP, is
helping to upgrade the water distribution system of its host and neighboring communities.
The implementation of its SDMP for ANLP has also assisted its host and neighboring barangays to
improve their social services in the areas of health, education, livelihood, public infrastructures and
socio-cultural programs. Improvements were undertaken for public schools, scholarship grants were
given to poor but deserving students, and school supplies were distributed to students. Health
component included the improvement of health centers, provisions for medicines and medical
assistance, and regular medical and dental missions for the impact communities. It is envisioned. that
the same will be replicated in Agata Limestone Project’s host and neighboring barangays.
2.11.3. Health and Sanitation Profile
As of Year 2016, Municipality of Tubay has strengthened its Rural Health Unit (RHU). On a barangay
level, each is equipped with a barangay health center, manned by at least 5 barangay health workers
and a registered nurse.
As to sanitation facilities like safe water supply in the impact areas, the 2 barangays claimed that 100%
or all households already have access to safe water through different levels of water conveyance
system. Sanitary toilet and basic facilities among all the affected households are also available. Each
household practices solid and waste disposal. A general improvement in water supply and sanitation
facilities is noted relative to the Year 2016 records.
Increase in population is evidently shown in Brgy. Tinigbasan while a decrease in the population in
Brgy. Lawigan from Year 2016 to Year 2019. The mortality rate for the 2 impact barangays showed a
slight increase, while, maternal death rate remained zero among all the impact barangays since Year
2012.
Unchanged, the identified leading cause of morbidity for the impact Barangays of Tubay is the upper
respiratory tract infection. A common leading cause is pneumonia, hypertension, acute gastroenteritis,
and tuberculosis. Accident and wound injury are less prevalent.
Leading causes of mortality among the impact communities vary across municipalities. In Barangays
Lawigan and Tinigbasan, they are infection, pneumonia, hypertension, tuberculosis, and acute
gastroenteritis.

A summary of the health profile of the two impact barangays are presented in Table 2-61.
Table 2-62 Health Statistics Data of Tubay Municipality

Service Tubay
Year 2016 Year 2019
Brgy. Tinigbasan 1.82 Brgy. Tinigbasan - .005
Birth Rate
Brgy. Lawigan 1.99 Brgy. Lawigan - .05
Brgy. Tinigbasan 0.8 Brgy. Tinigbasan – 0.1
Mortality Rate
Brgy. Lawigan 0.3 Brgy. Lawigan - 0
Brgy. Tinigbasan- 0.9 Brgy. Tinigbasan -0
Infant Mortality Rate
Brgy. Lawigan- 0.7 Brgy. Lawigan - 0
Maternal Death Brgys.Tinigbasan -0 Brgys. Tinigbasan – 0
Rate Brgy. Lawigan - 0 Brgy.Lawigan – 0.3
Leading Causes of Brgys. Tinigbasan, and Lawigan Brgys.Tinigbasan, and Lawigan
Morbidity Infection Infection
Pneumonia Pneumonia
Hypertension Hypertension
Tuberculosis Tuberculosis
Acute Gastroenteritis Acute Gastroenteritis
Leading Causes of Brgys. Tinigbasan, and Lawigan Brgys.Tinigbasan, and Lawigan
Mortality Congestive Heart Failure Congestive Heart Failure
Cancer Cancer
Acute Myocardial Infarction Acute Myocardial Infarction
Cardiopulmonary Diseases Cardiopulmonary Diseases
No. of Health Care Brgy. Tinigbasan – 1 Brgy. Tinigbasan – 1
Facility Brgy. Lawigan - 1 Brgy, Lawigan - 1
No of. Health Brgy. Tinigbasan Brgy. Tinigbasan
Professionals Brgy. Health Worker- 8 Brgy. Health Worker- 12
Brgy. Health Worker- 6 Brgy. Health Worker- 10
Household with Brgy. Tinigbasan Brgy. Tinigbasan
access to safe water 201 Households (100%) 216 Households (100%)
192 Households (100%) 169 Households (100%)
Toilet Facilities 201 Households (100%) 216 Households (100%)
basic sanitation 201 Households (100%) 201 Households (100%)
facilities Brgy. Lawigan Brgy. Lawigan
Household with solid Brgy. Tinigbasan Brgy. Tinigbasan
waste disposal 201 Households (100%) 216 Households (100%)
system Brgy. Lawigan Brgy. Lawigan
Source: Brgy. Development Plan

2.11.3.1. Threat to Public Health and Safety
Large-scale quarrying involves intensive movements of people, heavy and light equipment, quarry
materials, products, supplies, etc. These, in turn, generate environmental pollution and pose significant
concerns for the employees, contractors, and the community members. Chronic or acute exposure to
cotaminated air and water can lead to adverse health effects. Surface mine studies identify dust and
respiratory health risks as the most common health issue. This can include incidences of tuberculosis,
asthma, and chronic bronchitis. Water contamination from domestic waste generation on the other
hand, can lead to gastrointestinal diseases.
Pollution control measures implemented by the Company is expected to minimize the health impacts
from pollution. Employees who are expected to be exposed to health and safety hazards will be
provided with personal protective equipment. Safety briefing during the regular toolbox meetings will
help the workers to be aware of the potential risks in their workplace that they can manage. The Safety
Department will also be conducting regular trainings and drills on safety protocols and accident/
emergency response for both the communities and the company workers.
Potential air pollution sources on site include the equipment exhaust and dust generation from mining
activities. Dust generated by quarrying, crushing and screening, and hauling activities will be mitigated
through regular deployment of water trucks for spraying. Priority areas for dust control will include the
hauling roads. A more frequent schedule is established during dry season. Regular road grading and
surfacing will also be done at haul roads. Dust from the crushing plant will be addressed by ensuring
that the plant is running in optimum, with negative pressure, with its bins and storage are properly
designed. Final products will be housed in a covered stockyard.
Regular preventive maintenance of the mining fleet mitigates the issue on harmful diesel emissions.
Maintenance activity will be the responsibility of the contractors. Compliance of the equipment providers
to this requirement will be checked through regular inspection by the Safety Department.
Noise impacts will be relatively less critical primarily due to the rural nature of the project site and
distances of the quarrying and crushing plant site from the community. Crushing and sizing equipment
will have noise reduction built into them.
Potential source of water pollution from operation is siltation. Pollution control components to mitigate
this will comprise of interceptor canals, silt traps, settling ponds, drainage, canals and sumps. These
water management facilities will allow the sediment materials in water run-off to settle prior to discharge
into draining water bodies. Covering of the stockpiles with laminated canvass is another measure to be
implemented to prevent loose soils from being carried by surface run-off which contribute to siltation.
All motor pools will be equipped with oil-water separator for the generated wastewater from equipment
washing and maintenance. Construction of used oil storage area in the contractor motor pools will be
required to temporary contain the used oil materials, prior to its delivery to the main used oil storage
facility. These pollution control structures will be constructed in accordance with the hazardous waste
management guidelines. Regular inspection will be conducted by the Pollution Control Officer to monitor
Influx of people into the Project site and into the host communities may create risks associated with
spread of virus, for instance COVID-19 infection.. Regular and effective IEC campaigns will be
conducted geared towards community health and safety protocols to help community officials in
managing such infection.

Provisions for facial masks, etc. will be included in the SDMP P/P/As under the Health category. At
present, ANLP has retrofitted one of its accommodation facilities into an 18 room COVID-19 quarantine
facility. This will be maintained and be made available to residents subject to health and safety protocols
of the Proponent.
The company will ensure that constant monitoring on health issues in the community will be addressed
in coordination with Safety and Health Dept. and Brgy. Health Centers. Health programs will also
account for almost 20% of the Development of Direct, Host and Neighboring Communities (DHNC)
component of the SDMP. Among the major projects are regular medical missions in coordination with
Municipal Health Unit and Brgy. Health Centers, provision of medical supplies and equipment, and
capacity building for emergency response among the community members.
Through community participation, the Company will be assessing the health profiles of the communities
to identify the medical needs and priorities of the community, and eventually develop action plans to
address the health issues.
The Company will utilize the expertise of its existing medical team composed of three (3) Doctors, three
(3) Nurses, Eighty Seven (87) trained First Aiders, three (3) Nurses from the Contractors, and Eighteen
(18) competent ERT members. The company clinic is also open 24 hours daily, offering free medical
consultation to both employee and community members. The company ambulance is also available to
cater to medical emergencies of the community.
Sharing the safety and health culture to the stakeholders, the company partnered with Agusan del
Norte Provincial Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (PDRRMC) in cascading the
company ERT’s emergency response exepertise to the community level. This gave birth to the
formation of the Agata Community Emergeny Response Team (ACERT). All of the best practices on
health and safety from ANLP will be continued and adopted during the ALP operations.
2.11.3.2. Threat to Security
Given the high value nature of the Project, entry of unlawful elements in the mine site can be a security
threat to the Company, its employees, and community members. The Company will maintain its Security
Department who is in charge of securing the MPSA. They will continue working in close coordination
with the local security forces. Security detachments will be stationed within the mine site to regulate
mine site access from vehicles and individuals.
2.11.4. Employment
The town of Tubay is included in the Lake Mainit Development Alliance (LMDA). The developmental
focus of this group is on biodiversity conservation, agriculture, fishery, tourism, and mining
development. Presented in Table 2-62 and Table 2-63 are the employment distribution of the residents
of the two impact barangays. Labor, fishing, and farming are the top livelihood sources identified. The
current ANLP operations is one of the big employers for labor workers.

Table 2-63 Employment Distribution, Brgy. Lawigan

Occupation Number Percentage Monthly Income
Farming 105 14.50 Php 2,400.00

Fishing 152 20.99 Php 3,200.00
Labor Employment 301 41.57 Php 8,320.00
Professionals 41 5.66 Php 18,000.00
Business (small) 46 6.35 Php 6,000.00
Unemployed 52 7.20 -
Others 27 3.73 -
Table 2-64 Employment Distribution, Brgy. Tinigbasan

Government Employee 22 2.14 Php 10,000.00

Farming 186 18.13 Php 2,400.00
Fishing 252 24.56 Php 3,200.00
Labor Employment 305 29.73 Php 8,320.00
Professionals 64 6.24 Php 18,000.00
Business (small) 52 5.07 Php 6,000.00
Vendors 34 3.31 Php 3,000.00
Table 2-63 Employment Distribution, Brgy. Tinigbasan (continued)

Unemployed 52 5.07
Gold Panning 18 1.75 Php 10,000.00
Carpentry 26 2.54 Php 5,000.00
Pump Boat Operation 15 1.46 Php 3,500.00
The two-mining impact barangay are located along the coastline. For this reason, a good number of
families depend on fishing as their major source of income. Barangays Tinigbasan and Lawigan has an
average production of 17.1 tonnes of fish per year.
The Municipality of Tubay is self-sufficient in terms of agricultural crops. Major crops include rice, corn,
coconut, vegetables, and root crops. Tubay has 5,275 hectares devoted to coconut plantation.
Vegetables and root crops are the secondary produce of Brgys. Tinigbasan and Lawigan. They are
producing 2.7 tonnes of corn per hectare and 2.7 tonnes per hectare of coconut. Agricultural crop
production data from Year 2016 and Year 2019 have not shown significant change.
Livestock raising is also practiced in Brgys Tinigbasan and Lawigan such as; native chicken and duck.
Other livestock raised in the area are goats, cattle and carabaos, the latter being utilized for tilling their
land. Hog raising is also included among the livelihooid projects implemented through ANLP Social
Development Management Program.

2.11.4.1. Generation of Local Benefits from the Project
Locally, the Project will bring economic benefits into the impact barangays and into the town of Tubay
itself. ALP will be a significant contributor to the GDP of Tubay. The relatively stable price of non-metallic
minerals like limestone as compared to its metallic counterparts will be an economic advantage.
Although the price of limestone is low compared to metallic ores, it is not subjected to highly volatile
prices, hence continuity of operations is expected especially if the market expands. Among others, the
benefits the host communities will enjoy from the Project will be:
• Royalties to the IP communities;

• Local taxes;
• Portion of excise taxes levied on mineral products;
• Employment of residents both directly and through livelihood programs;
• Social Development and Management Programs (SDMP);
• Capacity building in the area of technical skills, emergency response, etc.;
• Enhancement of the tourism sector; and
• Enhancement of the agricultural sector
The IP communities will continue to benefit from the royalty payments while the Project is in operation.
Royalty share from the Limestone project will sustain the improvement of the IP sector and their
communities in accordance with their Community Royalty Development Plan.
Benefit of the LGU and the National Government will be in the form of taxes (i.e., business taxes, excise
taxes, withholding taxes, corporate income taxes, and occupational taxes). Other income includes
various permit fees and license fees.
As shown in Table 2-64 , approximately Php 392 million will be collected from the Project in the form of
taxes and fees and projects for the first five years of its operation.
Table 2-65 Estimated Project Benefits from SDMP, Taxes, Fees, and Royalty (PHP)
Volume, DMT 2,047,500 2,178,750 1,995,000 1,907,500 1,995,000 10,123,750
Revenue 921,375,000 980,437,500 897,750,000 858,375,000 897,750,000 4,555,687,500
Opex 534,983,540 564,672,742 520,902,860 497,897,059 519,201,860 2,637,658,060
SDMP 8,024,753 8,470,091 7,813,543 7,468,456 7,788,028 39,564,871
IP Royalty 9,213,750 9,804,375 8,977,500 8,583,750 8,977,500 45,556,875
Wharfage 18,785,813 19,990,031 18,304,125 17,501,313 18,304,125 92,885,406
Excise Tax 36,855,000 39,217,500 35,910,000 34,335,000 35,910,000 182,227,500
Business Tax 6,449,625 6,863,063 6,284,250 6,008,625 6,284,250 31,889,813
TOTAL 79,328,941 84,345,060 77,289,418 73,897,143 77,263,903 392,124,465

2.11.4.2. Enhancement of Employment and Livelihood Opportunities
The Project will employ 226 employees during production stage. A significant percentage of these will
be sourced from the impact barangays. Skills enhancement and capacity building for the residents will
be undertaken to increase their employability and provide options for sustainable income sources.
There is an existing Memorandum of Agreement signed between API and the host communities of the
ANLP, stipulating that 50% of the manpower that will be hired for will be sourced out from the community
provided they are qualified. It is also stipulated in the MOA to capacitate residents through skills training
for possible employment not only in the project but also elsewhere. Employment will be flexible such
that equal opportunities will be given to all genders depending on skills requirements and qualification.
The same will be adopted and continued for the ALP Operations.
Livelihood programs will be implemented to improve economic activities in the barangays. The
proponent will assist in marketing the product of the livelihood programs similar to its current practice
in the Mabakas Farm located in Sitio Coro, Barangay Colorado, Jabonga. The company can link
livelihood proponents to gov’t agencies, private sectors, etc. to help increase productivity and product
salability.
Generation of downstream industries is also expected to trigger employment, business, and livelihood
opportunities for the local communities. Supply of food and other products will be sourced locally.
Transport of people and goods will be brisk when the Project commences. Residents will be able to
take advantage of this and may venture into land and water transport business. Sari-sari stores, local
barber shops, eateries, lending business etc., is expected to abound in the communities thereby
stimulating the local economy.
2.11.5. Perception Survey
Agata Processing Inc, through its Community Relations Office, commissioned a group of researchers
to conduct a Project Perception Survey to assess the social acceptability of the proposed development
and operation of ALP. A total of 192 residents from the two impact barangays namely, Brgy. Tinigbasan
(111 participants) and Brgy. Lawigan (81 participants) responded to the survey conducted in February
2020.
The sample size was determined through a stratified random sampling technique wherein the updated
population in terms of number of households (HH) from Barangay Tinigbasan and Barangay Lawigan
were taken with respect to their population per purok. Given the 385 households and using 95% level
of confidence and margin of error of 0.05, a sample size of 81 and 111 households were identified for
Brgy. Lawigan and Brgy. Tinigbasan, respectively. Table 2-65 shows the distribution of samples for
every purok in each barangay.
Table 2-66 Distribution of Participants by Purok Origin

Barangay Purok 1 Purok 2 Purok 3 Purok 4
Lawigan 33 (40.3%) 20 (25.2%) 12 (15.1%) 16 (19.5%)

Tinigbasan 22 (19.44% 65 (59.26%) 10 (8.33%) 14 (12.96%)
Total 55 85 22 30

After the sample size was determined, the actual survey participants were identified through a
systematic random assignment. Participants were subjected to one-on-one interview using a survey
questionnaire of 6 items mostly answerable by a Yes or a No. The survey instrument used is attached
in the Appendices. The survey activity ran for two weeks, starting last week of February through the
first week of March 2020.
Survey data were then encoded, then data cleansing and statistical analysis followed. Descriptive
analysis involved determining the mean, standard deviation, frequency tables, and making the graphical
presentations. Result of the survey is summarized below.
2.11.5.1. Demographic Profile of Respondents
A. Participant Distribution by Sex
Out of 192 survey participants, 62% are females and only 38% are males. Female dominated the survey
participation, in both barangays as shown in Figure 2-62.
Women dominated this survey since they are the ones usually available in the households. Most of the
males were working during the period of data collection. This statistics between sexes is also noteworthy
since literature from various psychological research in social role theory suggests that women are
generally more perceptive than men (Ashforth and Mael, 1989; Biddle, 1986).
Figure 2-62 Distribution of survey participants in their respective locales by sex
B. Participant Distribution by Age and Residency
In terms of age, the survey participants have a mean age of 45.86 as shown in Table 2-66. This
suggests that most of the survey participants are already mature in terms of deciding and giving out
their opinions on certain topics or issues. Piaget (2008) described that when individuals reach their
mental maturity they move beyond concrete experiences and begin to think abstractly, reason
logically and draw conclusions from the information available, as well as apply all these processes
to hypothetical situations.

Table 2-67 Age distribution and length of residency of survey participants

Barangay Total Brgy. Lawigan Brgy. Tinigbasan
Mean Std. Dev Mean Std. Dev Mean Std. Dev

Age 45.86 15.088 44.99 14.394 46.5 15.409
Years of
32.23 20.618 32.1 20.561 32.32 20.471
Residency
2.11.5.2. Perception Survey Results
The data and analysis presented in this section are the perceptions and observations of the survey
participants from Barangay Tinigbasan and Barangay Lawigan. Perceptions in this discussion pertains
to the participants’ understanding and feelings that give meaning to their individual experience toward
their environment and which make sense to them. A copy of the Perception Survey report will be
included in the Appendices.
A. Acceptability on Extended Mining Operation
More than half or 71% of the participants expressed positive acceptance for an extended mining
operation through the Agata Limestone Project. Positive response was accounted from both of the
barangays. The most direct reason given by the participants for favoring the extension is the economic
opportunities from the mining industry. This consist availability of employment opportunities, livelihood
projects, perceived improvement of the community from the ANLP, and SDMP projects for the
community. Figure 2-63 below show the distribution of responses from Brgy. Tinigbasan and Brgy.
Lawigan.
Figure 2-63 Participants’ consent on the possible extension of mining operations
There were also respondents who gave a conditional yes, subject to some important conditions on the
set agreements between the barangay and the mining company.
Respondents who answered “No” expressed their apprehensions on the possible risks that could be
aggravated by mining activities particularly on the environment, health, and geological aspect.
Some also noted that they don’t think the project will provide them with employment opportunities.

B. Perceived Benefits from the Project

Most of the informants in Barangay Lawigan and Tinigbasan agreed to the idea that there will be an
overall improvement if the mining activity will continue to operate in the area. As reflected in
Figure 2-64, 96% of those who are in favor of the ALP cited the project’s assistance to education as
a major benefit from the project. Potential educational benefits cited included availability of educational
assistance through. scholarship programs and provision of school materials/supplies. They also
mentioned their hope to have a school boat as means of transportation for the children/students.
Figure 2-64 Participants’ responses on the positive impact of mining on various aspects
Other top benefits with more than 90% of the respondents answered included the company’s
contribution to Disaster Risk Reduction and Response Management (DRRRM) (90.3%) in form of
relief goods, socio cultural benefits (91%) in terms of assistance to barangay and church activities,
livelihood opportunities (91%), and health benefits (92%) in form of medical assistance. These positive
responses can be credited on the awareness and/or availment of mining projects through the Social
Development and Management Plan (SDMP).
C. Awareness to other Mineral Deposits in the Area
Majority or 80% of the respondents indicated awareness that other deposits aside from nickel is
available in the area. They were able to identify four (4) other mineable materials including limestone
(65%), gold (25%), copper (7%), and rock aggregates (3%). Most of them claimed that they learned the
information from the company.

D. Social Acceptability on the Limestone Mining
Both barangays expressed their support to the project, with 58% of the total respondent said they
are in favor for the Limestone mining activities. The breakdown of response per barangay is shown
on Figure 2-65.
Figure 2-65 Participants’ response to possible extraction of limestone
Those who are in favor of the Limestone mining operations cited economic opportunities from the
project, such as employment for the residents, as the primary reason. They believe that the benefit
extends, not just for those who will be employed, but for the whole community as well. They think that
the new project will have an additional support to the existing Social Development and Management
Program (SDMP).
For the other 42% who answered no to Limestone operations expressed their fear regarding the
possible environmental degradation to their respective communities from dust generation and water
contamination.
E. Perceived Negative Impacts from the Project
Perceived adverse impacts from the project can be categorized as Ecological Risks, Geological Risks,
and Socio-economic Risks. The different impacts and the respondents’ response are shown on Figure
2-66.
For the Environmental risks, the respondents expressed fear of potential air pollution (30%), water
discoloration (10%), and noise from blasting activities (10%).
In terms of Geologic Risks, the respondents identified possible landslide (12%) and flooding (5%). The
same response emerged when asked of their opinion on the potential expansion of the mining
operation wherein those who are not in favor of the mining extension expressed concern on possible
land deformation. Socio economic concerns cited by the respondents include relocation (7%),
underemployment (6%) and loss of traditional livelihood (6%).

Figure 2-66 Distribution of perceived adverse impacts from the Limestone Project
92
90
60
80 43 45
34 36
70 20 23 25
11 14 12
5 10 8
2 3
9
60 1 5
50
Risks and Hindrances Tinigbasan
F. Suggestions to Improve Project Operations
When solicited with recommendations on how the company can improve the project operations, the
respondents suggested that the company must conduct a proper impact assessment of mining impacts
and implement mitigating measures to ensure environmental protection.
Some wants transparency through an open communication with the company. They are suggesting that
a Memorandum of Agreement, discussed with sectoral representatives, should be crafted first before
the conduct of the new project.
Prioritization of local hiring is also highly suggested. Some expressed concern on selective hiring due
to lack of skilled workers in the locality and that highly skilled and technical people are mostly outsiders.
They added that there are skilled laborers who are brought in from the outside by the contractors.
There should also be a scheme for scholarship priority courses to harmonize the local needs. they are
suggesting identifying priority courses appropriate for the community, such as medical practitioners,
agriculturists, and tourism management.

Section 3 – Environmental Management Plan
3.1 Environmental Impact Management Plan Objectives
This section summarizes the mitigation, enhancement and management measures for the most
significant impacts from each Project component identified for the different environmental sectors
discussed in Section 2. The different mitigation measures and management plans are presented for
each phase of the Project.
In addition to the mitigation plans, the impact management plan also includes identification of
responsible or lead persons in charge of the implementation of the activities, the cost involved and
guarantees, if applicable. The guarantee may be in the form of financial agreements, memorandum of
agreements or certificates of approvals. These are intended to serve as assurance that the identified
mitigation, enhancement or management options will be implemented. In many cases, the mitigation
and management plans are part of the Progressive Rehabilitation programs to be implemented in
accordance with the Annual Environmental Protection and Enhancement Plan and provide the
foundation for implementation of the Final Mine Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Plan.
The company has an existing Environmental Management System (ISO 14001:2015) as part of its IMS
(Integrated Management System) Certification. All standard operating procedures (SOPs), work
instructions (WI) and process flow will be incorporated and implemented all throughout the life of the
Agata Limestone Project.
Specific environmental management plans to address impacts during Construction, Operation, and
Closure Phase are presented in Table 3-1, Table 3-2, and Table 3-3, respectively.

Table 3-1- Environmental Management Plan Construction Phase
Guarantee or
Project Phase/ Environmental Management Plan for Prevention, Responsible
Potential Impacts Cost Allocation Financial
Activity Component Enhancement, and Mitigation Entity
Agreements
Site Preparation Land Change in surface landform, Topsoil conservation, storage, and Annual
Clearing, Resources topography, terrain and slope. management. Environmental
Earthwork and Topsoil is minimal due to the Protection and
development of geomorphology of the deposit location, it Enhancement
Additional access MEPEO AEPEP Cost Plan (AEPEP)
varies from none to 15 cm. There is no
roads
overburden to strip, however, any
incidental topsoil would be removed and MRFC, MMT,
stockpiled for future use. TSHES
Disturbance of flora and fauna Collection of wildlings prior to vegetation
ISO 14001:2015
during clearing and roads clearing for endemic plant species
Certification
development preservation.
Landscaping and revegetation activities
MTF, RCF
Following slope stability techniques during MEPEO/PCO AEPEP Cost
construction (i.e. benching).
Replace all affected vegetation with
diverse vegetative species to contribute a
stable and compatible ecosystem in the
progressive rehabilitation program
Increased soil erosion from Progressive Rehabilitation of inactive
exposed soil surface disturbed areas by area stabilization and
MEPEO AEPEP Cost
vegetative cover placement (as
applicable).
Loss of vegetation and topsoil and Limited clearing and earth movement
exposure of soil materials according to the approved Site Mines Dept. AEPEP Cost
Development Plan.
Land contamination due to Requiring of Spill Kit in heavy equipment Mines Dept.
potential leaks or spills of oils and used during clearing Contractors, AEPEP Cost
fuels from equipment. PCO
Reduction in soil fertility Installation of erosion control materials to
provide slope stability.
Soil amelioration and conditioning during
revegetation MEPEO AEPEP Cost
Implementation of Sloping Agricultural
Land Technology along steep slopes to
prevent erosion

Table 3-1- Environmental Management Plan Construction Phase (continued)

Guarantee or
Project Phase/ Environmental Management Plan for Prevention, Mitigation Responsible Cost
Potential Impacts Financial
Activity Component and Enhancement Entity Allocation
Agreements
Site Preparation Water Threat to aquatic resource Installation of sediment control materials MEPEO, AEPEP Cost Annual
Clearing, Earthwork Resources biodiversity (i.e. silt traps, gabions, silt fence, wattlings, PCO Environmental
and development of Aquatic Resource & habitat etc.) along waterways to prevent flow of silt Engineering Protection and
Additional access degradation. and contaminants to natural water bodies. Dept Enhancement
roads Threat to aquatic resource Regulate barges and conduct IEC on Barge Plan (AEPEP)
MEPEO,
biodiversity and Vessel Crew Regarding Company PCO
Policies on Water Resource
Aquatic habitat degradation. Provision of drainage system and water MRFC, MMT,
management structure at the periphery of MEPEO, TSHES Audits
the construction site. Engineering
Sedimentation and siltation in Consider >20m Buffer Zone between the ISO
local rivers and creeks. Areas of Disturbance and Rivers and 14001:2015
Creeks. MEPEO Certification
Establishment of Drainage Maintenance
Committee. MTF, RCF
Changes in drainage patterns. Limited clearing and earth movement
according to the approved Site Development Mines
Plan. Department
Progressive Rehabilitation of inactive
disturbed areas by area stabilization and MEPEO
vegetative cover placement (as applicable).
Water quality degradation due to Requiring of Spill Kit in heavy equipment.
Mines Dept.
potential leaks or spills of oils and
Contractors,
fuels from equipment. Execute preventive maintenance as
PCO
planned.
Air and Noise Dust Generation Consider >20m Buffer Zone from mine area
Resources to the nearest community.
Deployment of Water Trucks for Dust
MEPEO
Suppression (1 Water Trucks will at least
have 5 Trips Per Shift with a total of at least
10 Water Trucks Daily)
Noise generation from equipment Provision of PPEs to employees directly Safety
operation working at the Crushing Plant. Department
Chemical emissions and related Efficient equipment utilization, achieve the
health and climate change same volume of work while maintaining Mines Dept,
impacts. lower diesel consumption for lower gas Contractor
emissions


Guarantee or
Project Phase/ Environmental Management Plan for Prevention, Mitigation and Responsible Cost
Activity Component Enhancement Entity Allocation
Agreements
Pre stripping Land Change in surface landform, Topsoil conservation, storage, and AEPEP Annual
activities at the Resources topography, terrain and slope. management. Cost Environmental
quarry site Topsoil is minimal due to the geomorphology of Protection
the deposit location, it varies from none to 15 and
cm. There is no overburden to strip, however, MEPEO Enhancement
any incidental topsoil would be removed and Plan (AEPEP)
stockpiled for future use.
Disturbance of flora and fauna Landscaping and revegetation activities
during clearing and roads Following slope stability techniques during MRFC, MMT,
development construction (i.e. benching). TSHES
Increased soil erosion from Progressive Rehabilitation of inactive disturbed Audits
exposed soil surface areas by area stabilization and vegetative cover MEPEO
placement (as applicable). ISO
Loss of vegetation and topsoil Limited clearing and earth movement according 14001:2015
and exposure of soil materials to the approved Site Development Plan. Mines Dept. Certification
Land contamination due to Requiring of Spill Kit in heavy equipment. Mines Dept.
potential leaks or spills of oils Contractors,
and fuels from equipment. PCO MTF, RCF
provide slope stability.
MEPEO
Soil amelioration and conditioning during
revegetation
Water Threat to aquatic resource Installation of sediment control materials (i.e silt MEPEO, PCO
Resources biodiversity traps, gabions, silt fence, wattlings, etc.) along Engineering
Aquatic Resource & habitat waterways to prevent flow of silt and Dept.
degradation. contaminants to natural water bodies.
Threat to aquatic resource Regulate barges and conduct IEC on Barge and
MEPEO, PCO
biodiversity Vessel Crew Regarding Company Policies on
Water Resource
Aquatic habitat degradation. Provision of drainage system and water MEPEO,
management structure at the periphery of the Engineering
construction site.
Sedimentation and siltation in Provision of Buffer Zone of >25m between the
local rivers and creeks. Areas of Disturbance and Rivers and Creeks. MEPEO,
Establishment of Drainage Maintenance Engineering
Committee.


Guarantee or
Agreements
Pre stripping Land Changes in drainage patterns. Limited clearing and earth movement according to Mines AEPEP Annual
activities at the Resources the approved Site Development Plan. Department Cost Environmental
quarry site Progressive Rehabilitation of inactive disturbed Protection
MEPEO
areas by area stabilization and vegetative cover and
placement (as applicable). Enhancement
Water Water quality degradation due to Requiring of Spill Kit in heavy equipment. Mines Dept. Plan (AEPEP)
Resources potential leaks or spills of oils Contractors,
and fuels from equipment. PCO
Execute preventive maintenance as planned. Engineering MRFC, MMT,
Contractors TSHES
Air and Noise Dust Generation Consider >20m Buffer Zone from mine area to the Audits
nearest community.
Deployment of Water Trucks for Dust MEPEO ISO
Suppression (1 Water Trucks will at least have 5 PCO 14001:2015
Trips Per Shift with a total of at least 10 Water Certification
Trucks Daily)
Noise generation from Provision of PPEs to employees directly working at Safety
equipment operation the Crushing Plant. Dept. MTF, RCF
Chemical emissions and related Efficient equipment utilization achieves the same
Mines Dept.
health and climate change volume of work while maintaining lower diesel
Contractors
impacts. consumption for lower gas emissions.
Construction of Land Change in surface landform, Topsoil conservation, storage, and management.
Additional Roads Resources topography, terrain and slope. Topsoil is minimal due to the geomorphology of the
Mines Dept.
deposit location, it varies from none to 15 cm.
Contractors,
There is no overburden to strip, however, any
MEPEO
incidental topsoil would be removed and stockpiled
for future use.
Disturbance of flora and fauna Landscaping and revegetation activities
during clearing and roads Following slope stability techniques during MEPEO
development construction (i.e. benching).
Increased soil erosion from Progressive Rehabilitation of inactive disturbed
exposed soil surface areas by area stabilization and vegetative cover MEPEO
placement (as applicable).
Loss of vegetation and topsoil Limited clearing and earth movement according to Mines
and exposure of soil materials the approved Site Development Plan. Department


Guarantee or
Agreements
Construction of Land Land contamination due to Requiring of Spill Kit in heavy equipment. Mines Dept. Annual
Additional Roads Resources potential leaks or spills of oils Contractors, Environmental
AEPEP
and fuels from equipment. PCO Protection
Cost
Reduction in soil fertility Installation of erosion control materials to provide and
MEPEO
slope stability. Enhancement
Soil amelioration and conditioning during Plan (AEPEP)
MEPEO
revegetation
Water Threat to aquatic resource Installation of sediment control materials (i.e silt MEPEO,
Resources biodiversity traps, gabions, silt fence, wattlings, etc.) along PCO MRFC, MMT,
Aquatic Resource & habitat waterways to prevent flow of silt and contaminants Engineering TSHES
degradation. to natural water bodies. Dept. Audits
Threat to aquatic resource Regulate barges and conduct IEC on Barge and
MEPEO
biodiversity Vessel Crew Regarding Company Policies on ISO
PCO
Water Resource 14001:2015
Aquatic habitat degradation. Provision of drainage system and water Certification
MEPEO,
management structure at the periphery of the
Engineering
construction site. MTF, RCF
Sedimentation and siltation in Provision of drainage system and water
MEPEO,
local rivers and creeks. management structure at the periphery of the
Engineering
construction site.
Establishment of Drainage Maintenance
MEPEO
Committee.
Changes in drainage patterns. Limited clearing and earth movement according to
Mines Dept.
the approved Site Development Plan.
Progressive Rehabilitation of inactive disturbed
areas by area stabilization and vegetative cover MEPEO
placement (as applicable).
Water quality degradation due to Requiring of Spill Kit in heavy equipment. Mines, PCO,
potential leaks or spills of oils Contractors
and fuels from equipment. Execute preventive maintenance as planned. Engineering
Contractors
Air and Noise Dust Generation Consider >20m Buffer Zone from mine area to the
MEPEO
nearest community.
Deployment of Water Trucks for Dust
Suppression (1 Water Trucks will at least have 5 MEPEO
Trips Per Shift with a total of at least 10 Water PCO
Trucks Daily)


Guarantee or
Agreements
Construction of Air and Noise Noise generation from equipment Provision of PPEs to employees directly Safety Dept. AEPEP Cost Annual
Additional Roads operation working at the Crushing Plant. Environmental
Chemical emissions and related Efficient equipment utilization, achieve the Protection
health and climate change impacts. same volume of work while maintaining Mines Dept. and
lower diesel consumption for lower gas Contractors Enhancement
emissions. Plan (AEPEP)
Construction of Land Change in surface landform, The Plant will be installed on an existing
Crushing Plant, Resources topography, terrain and slope during Stockyard Area of ANLP. Minimal
Explosive Magazine construction of Plant. Excavation will be made. MRFC, MMT,
MEPEO
Area TSHES
Continuously implement the existing Audits
Erosion control and surface grading.
Loss of vegetation and topsoil and Limited clearing and earth movement ISO
Mines
exposure of soil materials according to the approved Site 14001:2015
Department
Development Plan. Certification
Water Water quality degradation due to 1. Development of proper benching to
Resources potential leaks or spills of oils and address the water drainage and minimize MTF, RCF
fuels from equipment. erosion
Sedimentation and siltation in local 2. Peripheral drains around the mines,
rivers and creeks. stockpiles, and waste dumps
Mines Dept.
Changes in drainage patterns. 3. Divert water run-off from hills away from
MEPEO
Aquatic habitat degradation. the sedimentation area, active mining
Engineering
areas and dumps waste dumps for low
quality limestones and fines raised at 10-
meter lifts
4. Silt ponds for sediment removal prior to
discharge of the clear water to the sea.
Air and Noise Dust Generation During Construction Deployment of Water Trucks for Dust
Phase Suppression (1 Water Trucks will at least MEPEO
have 5 Trips Per Shift with a total of at PCO
least 10 Water Trucks Daily)
Noise generation from equipment Provision of PPEs to employees directly
Safety Dept.
operation During Construction working at the Crushing Plant.
Chemical emissions and related Efficient equipment utilization, achieve the
health and climate change impacts. same volume of work while maintaining Mines Dept.
lower diesel consumption for lower gas Contractors
emissions

Table 3-2- Environmental Management Plan Mine Development Phase

Guarantee or
Agreements
Clearing and Land Resources Loss of topsoil and exposure of Topsoil is minimal due to the geomorphology AEPEP Annual
Grubbing soil materials of the deposit location, it varies from none to Cost Environmental
Change in surface landform, 15 cm. There is no overburden to strip, MEPEO Protection
Ore Extraction topography, terrain and slope. however, any incidental topsoil would be and
(Loading, Hauling) removed and stockpiled for future use. Enhancement
Increased soil erosion from Progressive Rehabilitation of inactive Plan (AEPEP)
MEPEO
exposed soil surface disturbed areas/ mined out area.
MEPEO
provide slope stability. MRFC, MMT,
Soil amelioration and conditioning during TSHES
MEPEO
revegetation Audits
Vegetation Loss Limited clearing and earth movement
according to the approved Mine ISO
Mines Dept.
Development Plan; phasing of activities (if 14001:2015
possible) Certification
Earth balling and transplanting of viable
MEPEO
regenerations MTF, RCF
Faunal migration Consider >20m Buffer Zone from the mine
MEPEO
disturbed area and natural faunal habitat.
Loss of biodiversity (Flora & Flora and Fauna Monitoring MEPEO
Fauna) Third Party
Tenurial/ Land Use Issues with Execution of MOA on temporary MEPEO
the CBFMA holders (Land relinquishment of overlapping areas; Legal Dept.
Ownership) Partnership with local Peoples Organization
to improve the CBFMA areas outside the ComRel
areas of overlap.
Water Resources Higher flow velocities and peak Provision of drainage system and water
MEPEO,
discharges during rainfall events management structure at the periphery of
Engineering
the construction site.
Potential downstream flooding Installation of sediment control materials (i.e
MEPEO, PCO
silt traps, gabions, silt fence, wattlings, etc.)
Engineering
along waterways to prevent flow of silt and
Dept.
contaminants to natural water bodies.
Land Resources Solid waste generation from Implementation of Solid Waste Management MEPEO
domestic, office, and industrial Program PCO
activities Good Housekeeping MEPEO, HRAd
Land contamination Implementation of Hazardous Waste MEPEO
Management Program PCO

Table 3-3- Environmental Management Plan Mine Development Phase (continued)

Guarantee or
Agreements
Port Land Chemical and fuel use from daily Chemical and Fuel Storage areas equipped AEPEP Annual
Operations Resources operational activities with spill kits and secondary containment. MEPEO Cost Environmental
(Barging, Proper handling and storage of Hazardous PCO Protection
Shipping) Wastes and
Land Soil and water contamination from Regular spill drills to train employees and Enhancement
Resources accidental spillage of fuel and contractors of proper spill management. MEPEO Plan (AEPEP)
chemicals from the storage area Hazardous waste disposal and treatment by PCO
DENR accredited facilities.
Soil and Water Quality Monitoring MRFC, MMT,
Water Alteration of natural drainage pattern Limited clearing and earth movement TSHES
Resources according to the approved Mine Audits
Mines Dept.
Development Plan; phasing of activities (if
possible) ISO
Reduced infiltration and water holding Construction of drainage control facilities for MEPEO 14001:2015
capacity of the affected watershed. stormwater management Engineering Certification
Higher flow velocities and peak Recharge Monitoring
MEPEO
discharges during rainfall events MTF, RCF
Potential downstream flooding Installation of sediment control materials (i.e.
MEPEO, PCO
silt traps, gabions, silt fence, wattlings, etc.)
Engineering
along waterways to prevent flow of silt and
Dept.
contaminants to natural water bodies.
Domestic water Quality Water sources separate from community
MEPEO
water source.
Industrial Water Quality Conditional Water Rights is secured from MEPEO
NWRB Permitting
Water supply competition Water conservation measures MEPEO
Wastewater generation and potential Installation of septic tanks in buildings for
Engineering
water quality degradation domestic wastewater treatment
Water run-off contamination due to Installation of erosion control materials along
exposed rocks and lose sediments slopes (coconets, gabion basket, stop logs, MEPEO
wattlings, and fascines)
Recharge of contaminated water in Establishment of drainage system (road
shallow aquifers berms, interceptor canals) around active
disturbed areas for runoff management. MEPEO
Siltation of draining creeks Construction of water retention/ treatment Engineering
facilities (silt/ sediment ponds) at catchment
areas.


Guarantee or
Project Phase/ Environmental Management Plan for Prevention, Responsible Cost
Activity Component Mitigation and Enhancement Entity Allocation
Agreements
Port Operations Water Freshwater habitat degradation Regular maintenance of the drainage and MEPEO AEPEP Annual
(Barging, Shipping) Resources water management facilities. Engineering Cost Environmental
Impediment in the natural biological Freshwater Ecology Monitoring MEPEO Protection
processes of freshwater organisms Third-Party and
Nutrient influx from water run-off Installation of silt fences along waterways Enhancement
contaminated with domestic wastes. to capture silt/ sediment materials MEPEO Plan (AEPEP)
discharged in the creeks.
Marine Biodiversity and Water Installation of erosion control materials
Quality along slopes (coconets, gabion basket, MEPEO MRFC, MMT,
stop logs, wattlings, and fascines). TSHES
Marine Biodiversity: Siltation of near Establishment of drainage system (road Audits
shore marine water due to erosion berms, interceptor canals) around active MEPEO
and ore spillage during loading disturbed areas for runoff management. Engineering ISO
activities. 14001:2015
Marine habitat degradation from Installation of silt fences, silt curtain along Certification
siltation waterways to capture silt/ sediment MEPEO
materials discharged in the waterways. MTF, RCF
Health effects on marine animals Installation of raft under the loading ramp
MEPEO
to catch ore spill.
Change in current pattern and littoral Careful site selection of Port location
drifts due to alteration of wave considering the discharge flow of creeks MEPEO
refraction; Engineering
Erosion of shorelines
Change in waterfront drainage Installation of gabion baskets to serve as
MEPEO
sea wall to prevent erosion.
Accelerated sediment deposition at Installation of silt curtain to capture silt/
the sea bottom due to water sediment materials discharged in the MEPEO
stagnation behind the Port facility. ocean.
Clearing and Land GHG emissions from fuel Carbon sequestration from reforestation
MEPEO
Grubbing Resources consumption activities.
Dust generation from equipment Water truck deployment and speed limit MEPEO
Ore Extraction operation regulation. PCO
(Loading, Hauling) Noise generation from equipment Regular road maintenance
Engineering
use
Port Operations Human health impacts from air and Provision of Personal Protective
(Barging, Shipping) Safety Dept.
noise pollution Equipment (PPE) for employees.


Guarantee or
Agreements
Clearing and Land Faunal migration due to noise Restrict access to mining areas without AEPEP Annual
Grubbing Resources pollution proper PPE. Safety Dept. Cost Environmental
Maintenance of >20m Buffer Zone in Protection
Ore Extraction and
Project area periphery MEPEO
(Loading, Hauling) Enhancement
Establishment of vegetation along roads as Plan (AEPEP)
Port Operations ecological curtain. MEPEO
(Barging, Shipping)
Other Activities: Land Change in surface landform, Contract an Accredit Third Party MRFC, MMT,
Exploration
Drilling Resources topography, terrain and slope. Slope Contractor to Conduct Drilling Activity TSHES
Dept.
Stability Caused by Drilling and Audits
Third-Party
Vibrations
Air and Noise GHG emissions from fuel Carbon sequestration from reforestation MEPEO ISO
consumption activities. PCO 14001:2015
Dust generation from equipment Water truck deployment and speed limit PCO Certification
operation regulation. Safety Dept.
Noise generation from equipment Regular road maintenance Engineering MTF, RCF
use Dept.
Human health impacts from air and Provision of Personal Protective
Safety Dept.
noise pollution Equipment (PPE) for employees.
Faunal migration due to noise Restrict access to mining areas without
Safety Dept.
pollution proper PPE.
Maintenance of >20m Buffer Zone in
MEPEO
Noise Pollution Due to usage of Project area periphery
Heavy equipment, it leads to noise Establishment of vegetation along roads as
and vibration generation MEPEO
ecological curtain.
Generation of Dust and Deposition Deployment of Water Trucks for Dust
of dust to the plants that leads to Suppression (1 Water Trucks will at least
MEPEO
growth reduction as well as inhaling have 5 Trips Per Shift with a total of at
PCO
polluted air that leads to health least 10 Water Trucks Daily)
problem


Guarantee or
Agreements
Other Activities: Air and Noise Noise generation from equipment Drilling machine shall be fitted with dust AEPEP Annual
Drilling use (Drill Rig) suppression, collection and disposal Cost Environmental
arrangement. Protection
and
Deep wetting of drilling zones shall be Enhancement
Exploration
done by water sprinkling before starting Plan (AEPEP)
Dept.
drilling.
During the drilling operations efforts shall MRFC, MMT,

be made to reduce dust generation by TSHES
taking appropriate measures Audits
Blasting Land Change in surface landform, Contract an Accredited Third Party to
Resources topography, terrain and slope. Conduct Drilling and Blasting Activity Mines Dept. ISO
Slope Stability Caused by Drilling Third-Party 14001:2015
and Vibrations Certification
"Faunal migration due to noise Restrict access to mining areas without
Safety Dept.
pollution proper PPE. MTF, RCF
Maintenance of >20m Buffer Zone in
MEPEO
Noise Pollution Due to usage of Project area periphery
Heavy equipment, it leads to noise Establishment of vegetation along roads as
and vibration generation" MEPEO
ecological curtain.
Fly Rock Contract an Accredited Third Party to
Air and Noise Generation of fines and dust is Conduct Drilling and Blasting Activity. Mines Dept.
influenced by several blasting and Parameters such as, Drill hole spacing, Third-Party
rock parameters Max Overburden limit, Stemming, Depth
Release of Fumes and Width of Drill Holes has to be fulfilled
Explosives handling and blasting to do Controlled Blasting.
operations high consequence risk


Guarantee or
Agreements
Crushing Air and Noise Generation of Dust during Crushing Deployment of Water Trucks for Dust AEPEP Annual
of Material Suppression (1 Water Trucks will at least MEPEO Cost Environmental
have 5 Trips Per Shift with a total of at PCO Protection
least 10 Water Trucks Daily). and
Issues of Structural stability of the All plants will undergo detailed stability Enhancement
Plant (Occupational Hazards) analysis. Plan (AEPEP)
These calculations take into consideration MEPEO
the machines expected operating MRFC, MMT,
configuration, envelope, and approved TSHES
operating conditions (i.e. slope) Audits
Land Structural Failure Structural analysis takes into consideration
Resources a number of foreseeable forces including ISO
Engineering
gravitational (based on rated capacity), 14001:2015
dynamic, wind and manual forces. Certification
Water Higher occurrence of soil erosion Reduce siltation by implementing all
MEPEO
Resources established water resources management MTF, RCF
PCO
and strategies
Air and Noise Generation of Dust and Deposition Deployment of Water Trucks for Dust
to the plants that leads to growth Suppression (1 Water Trucks will at least MEPEO
reduction as well as inhaling polluted have 5 Trips Per Shift with a total of at PCO
air that leads to health problem least 10 Water Trucks Daily)
Generate gases thru equipment use Require regular maintenance of equipment
during operation both inhouse and Contractors
Engineering
Execute preventive maintenance as
planned.
Efficient equipment utilization, achieve the
Engineering
same volume of work while maintaining
Safety Dept.
lower diesel consumption
Stockpiling Air and Noise Generation of Dust during Transport Deployment of Water Trucks for Dust
of crushed of Material Suppression (1 Water Trucks will at least MEPEO
have 5 Trips Per Shift with a total of at PCO
least 10 Water Trucks Daily)
Water The stockpile will absorb rainwater To prevent creep, an expanding footprint
Resources and lose strength (Stability) and possible catastrophic failure, set the
Mines Dept.
stockpile properly and cover when
necessary


Guarantee or
Agreements
Stockpiling Land Stockpiling may affect the water Stockpile Locations will be constructed at MEPEO, AEPEP Annual
Resources bodies around the vicinity least 25m away from Natural Water Bodies Mines Dept Cost Environmental
Protection
Installation of drainage and ponds within and
the Area to prevent direct flow of water to MEPEO Enhancement
shorelines, creeks or rivers Plan (AEPEP)
Dust blowing to adjacent land Covering stockpiles to prevent dust and
Air and Noise fines from blowing
MRFC, MMT,
Set the stockpile Location with Natural TSHES
Wind Barrier Audits
Degradation of air quality due to dust
generation from extraction activities, Dust Suppression by Deployment of Water MEPEO, ISO
loading and movement of hauling Trucks (1 Water Trucks will at least have 5 Mines Dept 14001:2015
vehicles Trips Per Shift with a total of at least 10 Certification
Water Trucks Daily)
MTF, RCF
Enforce appropriate speed limit to hauler
trucks and heavy equipment
Increase in noise generation caused Provide silencers and mufflers to minimize
by pile drivers, hammer, heavy noise
Contractors,
equipment and other noise generating
Mines Dept
equipment used for earth moving
activities
Increase of air emissions due to the Consider >20m Buffer Zone near
combustion of carbon-based fuel communities; development of green
coming from hauling vehicles and belt/plantation in the safety zone
heavy equipment MEPEO
Progressive rehabilitation thru tree planting Contractors,
to sequester carbon emissions from quarry Mines Dept
and transport operations
Proper and regular maintenance of vehicles

and heavy equipment

Table 3-4- Environmental Management Plan Abandonment Phase

Guarantee or
Agreements
Disposal of Land Reduced impacts during Closure Phase AEPEP Annual
Equipment and Resources Permanent changes in landform due to previous Progressive Rehabilitation MEPEO Cost Environmental
Scrap Materials. Program. Protection
Petrochemical spills (Soil Quality) Implementation of Soil Remediation and
Soil Contamination from Equipment/ program (as necessary) prior to Enhancement
Structure Removal. (Landform Stability) Revegetation. Plan (AEPEP)
Conduct of research on site species
Face/ slope instability resulting to matching and phytoremediation
landslides (Land Use) Design slope with correct elevation and MEPEO MRFC, MMT,
level of benches for land stability TSHES
Exposure of Decommissioned Conduct Geotechnical slope stability Audits
Structures. (Aesthetic Value) analysis prior to final rehabilitation
Waste generation (debris from Revegetation activities based on approved ISO
decommissioning of structures) Final Land Use Plan of the Area. 14001:2015
Benching, grading Water Localized Erosion from the Operation and maintenance of the drainage Certification
and earthwork for Resources Decommissioning and Rehabilitation system and water management structures
the closure of the activities as long as applicable.
disturbed areas Increased surface water run-off (Water MTF, RCF
(surface mine, Quality)
water management Potential Water Quality Degradation
structures, etc) from Siltation and erosion of
MEPEO
contaminated soil (Aquatic Habitat)
Health impacts from water
contamination
Freshwater and marine habitat
degradation
Health impacts to near shore marine
habitat
Air and Noise Air pollutants (dust and chemical Regular equipment maintenance
exhaust) from earth moving and MEPEO,
equipment operation Mines,
Noise generation from equipment use Continuous dust suppression activities Engineering,
Health Impacts from air pollution Provision of Personal Protective Equipment Contractors
to workers

Table 3-5- Environmental Management Plan Abandonment Phase (continued)

Guarantee or
Agreements
Decommissioning People Theft of dismantled facilities/ Maintenance of a Security group regularly Security AEPEP Annual
or Rehabilitation of components with residual value patrolling the area Dept. Cost Environmental
Mine Facilities Intrusion of outsiders/ illegal claimants Security checkpoints to control access to Protection
(Office and Housing in the Project area the area and
Buildings, Community Relations Office to remain Enhancement
Motorpool, Storage during the Mine Closure Rehabilitation Plan (AEPEP)
Areas, Nursery, Period
and Pier
MRFC, MMT,
TSHES
Audits
ISO
14001:2015
Certification
MTF, RCF

3.2. Cost of Environmental Management Programs
Funding of the EPEP will be done internally and will be part of the Environmental Management costs
budgeted by the company during operations. Approval of the annual programs and costs is under the
direction of the MRFC and monitoring of the expenditures is performed by the MMT. The minimum
expenditures are expected to be 3% to 5% of the direct mining costs. The total minimum projected
EPEP expenditures for the Agata Limestone Project would be in the range of Php 186 million to Php
310 million. The Rehabilitation Cash Fund will remain intact to the government bank, instead of frequent
replenishment. The cost and expenditures for AEPEP are allocated to seven (7) sectors of
environmental Management as shown on Table 3-4.
Table 3-6- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Plan (EPEP) Budget Allocation
Components Budget Cost Budget Cost per ton
1. Land Resource Management $ 1,614,374 $ 0.05
2. Water Resource and Quality $ 803,080 $ 0.03
3. Air Quality $ 914,277 $ 0.03
4. Noise and Vibration $ 6,172 $ 0.00
5. Conservation Values $ 106,579 $ 0.00
6. Environmental Research $ 33,065 $ 0.00
7. Training and Other Activities $ 276,229 $ 0.01
TOTAL $ 3,753,776 $ 0.12
The EPEP budget presented in the above table was computed from the direct mining cost based on the
Feasibility Study.
Land resource management is composed of Progressive and temporary rehabilitation, erosion

control/slope stabilization, maintenance of the plantation, thematic landscaping, and reforestation/NGP
maintenance.
Water Resource and Quality component contains activities for settling pond/silt collector sump
maintenance like desilting or improvement, Costal resource management, sewage treatment, water
quality management, solid and hazardous waste disposal.
Air Quality component is consisting of dust suppression, air quality monitoring, source emission
monitoring, and maintenance of pollution control devices. Constant monitoring of the noise level under
Noise and vibration components.
For Conversation Values, Environmental Research, trainings, and Other activities are part of the
AEPEP programs.
The funding source will shift to FMRD Fund when the mine closure phase commences. Based on the
provisions of the Mining Act, for a 15- year project, the deposit of FMRD Fund to a government bank
shall start during the third year of mine operation and shall be completed by the thirteenth year. This is
to ensure that funding is available anytime in case of other closure scenario prior to the scheduled mine
closure.
A more detailed list of activities, along with the corresponding cost estimates, shall be included in the
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Plan and Final Mine Rehabilitation and Decommissioning
Plan (EPEP/FMRDP) to be submitted to DENR-MGB after the issuance of the ECC.

Section 4 – Environmental Risk Assessment and Emergency
Response Policy Guidelines
4.1. Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA)
The risks identified relative to the Limestone Project served as the basis for the development of the
Safety Management Plan. The goal is to be able to develop proactive measures to avert incidents and
to establish protocols and calibrated responses in case of emergency situations.
Based on the technical scoping conducted, a Risk Screening approach to ERA is required for the
proposed Limestone Project.
Identified hazards associated with the mine operations can be grouped into the following categories:
• Flammable and Explosive Materials

• Toxic Chemicals and Substances
• Occupational Health Hazards
4.1.1. Explosive Materials
Explosives are substances capable of undergoing extremely rapid combustion/decomposition, which

may propagate thermally below the speed of sound (“deflagration”), or via a supersonic shock wave
(“detonation”). Many explosives produce large volumes of gas and high temperatures on explosion.
Explosion may cause severe physical damage directly from the shock wave or extreme peak pressures,
and indirectly from projectiles. Explosive materials also are prone to fire and burn hazards.
Blasting will be done to defragment the limestone materials before feeding to the crusher. The blasting
design will utilize the staggered V pattern to maximize breakage of ore and minimize crushing
operations. If the limestone material is amenable to dozer-ripping, then blasting will not be employed.
The primary type of explosives to be used is the mixture of ammonium nitrate and fuel oil (ANFO).
ANFO is a mixture of ammonium nitrate (used also as a fertilizer) and fuel oil. Neither of which are
intrinsically explosive in nature by themselves. ANFO is considered a dry blasting agent since no water
is used in the formulation and cannot be used in watery conditions. Ammonium nitrate is soluble in
water and therefore not water resistant. ANFO explosives are blasting agents that requires a primer
and booster to initiate and intensify the explosive reaction. Technical properties of ANFO are presented
in Table 4-1. During mining operations, dry blast holes will be charged with ANFO and primed with Cast
Primer. Blasting activities will be conducted by a third-party licensed blasting contractor
Table 4-1 Properties of ANFO

Parameter ANFO
Density (kg/m3) 960

Detonation velocity (m/s) 2, 500 – 4, 800
Gas production (L/kg) 970
Explosion Heat (MJ/kg) 3.8
Strength/unit weight (%) 100
Strength/unit volume 0.7 – 0.8
Source: Surface Drilling and Blasting by Tamrock, 1988

4.1.1.1. Risk Characterization of Explosion Incident
A common accident scenario related to explosive materials involves the misfire of an explosive charge
and generation of fly rocks during blasting. These can result to personal injuries that can sometimes be
fatal.
The Explosives Magazine where blasting materials are stored may also accidentally explode if safety
protocols are not strictly implemented.
The impacts associated with an explosion are the effects of thermal radiation and air pressure. When
an explosive charge is fired, it generates heat accompanied by a loud noise called airblast. Airblast is
not simply the sound that is heard, but a change in atmospheric pressure to the immediate surrounding
area. The change in atmospheric pressure and the sound produced can cause damage to men and
resources nearby if not properly managed.
Table 4-2 summarizes the effects of an explosion to the surrounding area.
Table 4-2 Effects of Explosion Overpressure

Parameter ANFO
7 kPa (1 psi) Damage to internal partitions and joinery of structures.
Probability of injury is 10%. No fatality.
14 kPa (2 psi) A house maybe uninhabitable due to severe cracks.
21 kPa (3 psi) Reinforced structures are distorted, storage tanks may collapse, and there is 20%
chance of fatality to a person inside such affected building.
35 kPa (5 psi) Structure maybe completely damaged. Eardrum damage, 50% chance of fatality
for a person in the building and 15% chance of fatality for a person in the nearby
open area.
70 kPa (10 psi) Lung damage. 100% chance of fatality for a person in the building or in the
nearby open area. Complete destruction of structures.
Source: Hazardous Industry Planning Advisory: Paper No.2
4.1.1.2. Hazard Control for Explosives and Blasting Materials
A. Storage/ Transport Explosion
• Proper and safe storage of all explosives and blasting material in Explosives Magazines that
are constructed for such purpose and must comply with all mandated safety measures.
• Explosives shall be stored and used on a first-in-first-out (FIFO) basis.
• Explosives and blasting accessories shall be stored separately in the following manner (a)
dynamite, detonating cord, and primer (b) blasting caps, connectors, delay (c) fuse, or safety
fuse (d) ANFO.
• Inspection of all personnel upon entry to the storage area to prevent carrying of match box,
lights, mobile phones, or cigarette lighters that can trigger uncontrolled explosion.
• The storage shall have the following additional features: signages on no open flame, restricted
access, interior shall be kept clean and dry, walls are painted white, the floor is provided with
matting (preferably wood), the outside surface shall be provided with lightning arrester and with
an adequate fire extinguisher.
• The storage of the explosives and its transfer to and from the quarry area shall be strictly in
accordance with the conditions set by the Government.
• Explosives shall be conveyed using special containers.
• Explosives and detonators shall not be carried in the same container.

• The vehicle to be used for transport shall be posted with warning signs that indicate the
explosive contents and are signs are visible from all sides.
• During transportation a multipurpose (dry chemical powder) fire extinguisher (at least two units)
shall be provided in the vehicle. Such firefighting device shall be provided for extinguishing fires
involving ammonium nitrate.
• In the event of fire at the Explosive Magazine Area, try to extinguish using a fire extinguisher if
safe to do so. Make sure that a fire extinguisher especially for ammonium nitrate fire are readily
available. Call immediately the attention of the ERT-Fire Brigade and First Aid Team to assess
and act on the matter.
B. Injuries related to Misfire and Flyrock Generation
• Blasting shall be conducted only during favorable weather conditions and only during the
daytime at specified and regular hours.
• Public announcements ahead of time shall be made on the blasting schedule, location, and size
of the blasting operations and on the precautions that needs to be taken by the public. Blasting
notice boards/signs shall be placed in areas leading to the blasting site. It shall be updated by
the Shot firer every morning with details of the blasting activity.
• Before charging the blastholes, clear and audible warning signals by sirens will be sounded
so that people nearby can take the necessary precautions.
• All roads that will lead to the blasting area shall be blocked or closed temporarily for at least
fifteen (15) minutes prior to blasting.
• Blast hole geometry shall strictly follow the drill and blast pattern designed for such blast area.
• Blast site shall, as much as possible, be wetted before blasting to minimize dust generation and
after blasting operations to dissolve any unexploded ANFO.
• Follow strictly the explosives charge weight per blast hole and assure to place the minimum
stemming column length relative to the explosives charge weight.
• The quantity of explosives to be used in blasting near structures or human habitations shall just
be enough so as not to damage the structures/houses.
• Only competent blasters with issued blasters permit shall handle the explosives and conduct
the blasting operations.
• The charged blast holes shall not be left unattended at any time until blasting is completed.
A Security Guard should stand duty until blasting is completed.
• All affected workers shall be secured in a safe location prior to the conduct of blasting. The
shelter area should be at least 200m distance from the blast area. Controlled blasting shall be
undertaken near structures, community or public areas.
• The Shot-firer shall inspect the blast for misfires fifteen (15) minutes after firing and shall
advice the Blast Controller of the after-blast status. If a misfire occurred, it shall be handled
only by the Blasting Engineers and Safety Officers. The safest way to handle a misfired blast
hole or shot is to fire it again at the earliest opportunity. Other ways to handle a misfire shall
be based on the type of explosives used and safety guidelines as prescribed by the
Government.
• If there are no visible misfires, the Blast controller shall broadcast the “All Clear” signal on the
radio to notify all concerned that nearby areas can resume their activities.
• Throughout the blasting process the Safety and Health Department shall be on standby with
its ERT to respond to any untoward incident.

4.1.2. Flammable Substances
Flammable and combustible materials in the mine site are normally the oil and lubricants for the
equipment and machineries, including the crushing plant and fuel oils such as diesel and gasoline that
are used for electric power generators, heavy equipment, and mine vehicles.
Diesel fuel consists of aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic hydrocarbons. Generally, it is combustible with a
flash point of 75°C and may contain carcinogenic components. Exposure to the substance may cause
eye irritation upon direct contact. Prolonged or repeated skin contact may cause defatting and
dermatitis. However, as long as normal precautions in handling fuel oils are observed and good
standards of industrial and personal hygiene are maintained, no significant safety and health hazard is
expected. Accidental spills and leakages to water resources may be harmful to aquatic organisms and
may cause long term adverse effects to the aquatic environment.
Gasoline fuel contains non-lead additives. It is highly flammable with a flash point of -56°C and like
diesel fuel, may contain carcinogenic components. Storage and handling requirements for gasoline fuel
requires stringent safety measures due to its flammability properties.
The primary purpose of lubrication is to reduce wear and heat between contacting surfaces in relative
motion. Lubrication is also used to reduce oxidation and prevent rust; to provide insulation in between
the surface of the machine, to transmit mechanical power in hydraulic fluid power applications; and to
seal against dust, dirt, and water. All lubricant starts with a base oil. It can be mineral, synthetic, and
vegetable, the operation of crushing plant various mechanical parts will deal with mineral and synthetic
types of lubricant (gear and hydraulic oil, greases, penetrating lubricants).
Oil is thin liquids made of long polymer chains, with additives for various combined properties. Common
additives include antioxidants to keep the oil from oxidizing, corrosion inhibitors to prevent parts from
corroding and detergents to keep deposits from forming. These long chains are hard to squeeze out
from between surfaces, making oils useful as a smooth barrier between them. The oil comes in different
weights such as 5W or 10W which correspond to viscosity. The lower the number, the thinner the oil
and the more easily it will flow.
Greases are made by using oil (usually mineral oil) and mixing it with thickeners (such as lithium-based
soap). It can be also contained additional lubricating particles such as graphite, molybdenum disulfide
or polytetrafluoroethylene. Greases can even act as a barrier, protecting the surfaces from
contaminants that can cause corrosion or damage. Like oils, greases come in a range of consistencies
from thin to thick characteristic. Some downside to grease is that because of its thickness and
stickiness, sometimes it can cause resistance in small or fast-moving mechanisms.
Penetrating lubricants are well known in the usage of loosening years of rust and debris in minutes for
some stuck parts such as bolts. Different from the substances oil and grease, these penetrating oils are
not designed for long-lasting lubrication, instead, they are low-viscosity oils with additives that are
specifically designed to infiltrate the tiny cracks between surface, add lubrication and break-up the rust.
Fuel will be provided by commercial, third party suppliers and the same with requirements of the gear
oil and lubricants. All fuel suppliers have their own existing storage tanks and dispensing unit located
at the fuel depot. The storage facilities satisfy the applicable Philippine regulations for the storage of
flammable liquids. A total of six (6) cylindrical diesel fuel storage tanks with a combined capacity of
96,000 liters will be maintained at the fuel depot. All tanks will be provided with safety control devices
such as leak alarm monitors and flow regulators to prevent leaks. The storage area, where the fuel
tanks are located, have bund walls with sump, serving as secondary containment for any accidental
release. The storage area for gear oil and other lubricants which happened to be the warehouse shall

also be equipped with an adequate control for safety such as containment, label, proper ventilation, and
fire prevention controls.
4.1.2.1. Risk Characterization from Fire Incident
Risk of fire incidents are higher during the construction phase due to hot works. Hot work is any work
that has the potential to ignite nearby combustible, flammable or explosive material. Common hot work
tasks include welding, cutting, grinding and heat treatment. Hotworks activities have the potential to
ignite fires that can travel beyond site boundaries, such as grass or bush fires. Fires may also start well
after the completion of any hot work activities due to residual heat.
Fire hazards create a serious risk to employees' health and safety that can lead to injury, illness, and
death. Common incidents can include burns from heat radiation or contact with flames, sparks, molten
metal or hot surfaces, and exposure to hazardous fumes.
On a more severe scenario, one possibility is the occurrence of fire resulting from ignition of flammable
fuel oil in the fuel storage area. Several forms of fire can occur and include jet fires, pool fires, flash
fires and boiling liquid expanding vapor explosions. The last is sometimes referred to a fireball and is
the most serious of different forms. This particular event was selected as the worst-case scenario for
study.
The accidental release of petroleum product can create a pool, which if ignited will cause a pool fire.
Hazard related to the pool fire is the thermal radiation (heat) emitted. If the level of thermal radiation is
sufficiently high, other objects which are flammable can be ignited and human health may be at risk.
The damage caused by thermal radiation can be calculated from the dose of radiation received. A
measure of the received dose is the energy per unit area of the surface exposed to the radiation over
the duration of the exposure.
Potential impacts to properties and human from thermal radiation is described in Table 4-3.
Table 4-3 Estimated Explosion Overpressure Effects at Distance

Incident Influx, Qt Damage to Equipment Damage to Human/Public Health
(kW/m2)
100% fatality in 1 minute. 1% fatality in 10
37.5 Damage to process equipment
sec.
Minimum energy to ignite wood at 100% fatality in 1 minute.
25.0
indefinitely long exposure w/out flame Significant injury in 10 seconds.
Minimum energy to ignite wood with a 30% fatality in 1 min. 1st degree burns in
12.5
flame; melts plastic tubing. 10 sec.
Source: World Bank Technical Paper No. 55

4.1.2.2. Hazard Control against Flammable Substances
The following control measures will be in place to minimize the impacts from the combustion of
flammable materials.
• Fuel storage area is secured, adequately ventilated, and is equipped with secondary
containment to prevent material leakage.
• Identify any potentially flammable or combustible materials in the workplace area, such as fuel
oils, rubbish, dust, lubricants and oils, grease, rubber, plastics, or other substances that could
be potential fuel sources or generate dust explosions.
• Before starting hot works, remove any flammable or combustible material in the area. If
materials cannot be removed use flame proof covers or screens or wet the materials down
before and during the work.
• Conduct post hot work inspections for smouldering material prior to leaving the area. For
example, before a break, at the end of a shift or at the completion of work.
• Ensure employees are wearing appropriate non-flammable personal protective equipment for
hot works activities.
• Ensure the availability of adequate firefighting equipment in the storage area and in hot works
area.
• Establish and train all personnel on emergency and evacuation procedures.
• Establishment and maintenance of firebreaks in reforestation areas to prevent bush fire.
4.1.3. Toxic Chemical Substances
Processing of ore will be mechanical in nature and will not involve addition of chemicals listed under
the Priority Chemical List by the DENR, which are those determined to potentially pose unreasonable
risk to public health, workplace & the environment.
Hazardous substances associated in the limestone project will be in the form of the hazardous wastes
generated from the mine operations and domestic activities. The hazardous wastes identified to be
potentially generated from the project operations is listed in Table 4-4.
Table 4-4 Hazardous Waste from ALP

Waste Hazardous Waste ID
Solvent and aqeous based paints E601 and E602

Grease trap wastes G801
Waste Oils I101
Contaminated containers J201
Medical/clinic waste M501, M503
Ink cartridge F699
Lead car batteries D406
Source: DAO 2004-36
These are substances without safe commercial or economic usage but can present unreasonable risk
to health and safety of people and the environment. Some possible health hazards can be through
contact or exposure that can lead to irritation, sensitization, and in worst case carcinogenetic. Physical
hazards such as flammability, corrosion, and explosibility is also a risk.

Health effects on exposed individual is relative to the nature of the material, degree of concentration,
the route into the body, and the amount absorbed by the body (the dose). Individual susceptibility or
bearing capacity of the user also plays a role. Effects may also occur immediately, or manifest in the
long-term.
For environmental impacts in case of accidental release to the environment, there will be potential
contamination of environmental media, such as soil, surface water, and groundwater.
Risk related to hazardous wastes will be addressed by the Hazardous Waste Management Program.
This will include proper storage, handling, and transport of the wastes until it is treated and disposed
through DENR accredited facilities.
4.1.3.1. Hazard Control against Hazardous Substances
The following control measures will be in place to minimize the impacts from hazardous waste
generation
• Hazardous Waste Management Program in place and is communicated to all employees and
service contractors.
• The use of the Hazardous Waste Storage Area that meets regulatory requirement (i.e enclosed,
secured, well ventilated, impermeable flooring, equipped with secondary containment, spill kits,
fire extinguisher, etc.)
• Proper identification, segregation, labelling of wastes, and posting of the Material Data Safety
Sheet
• Following protocol in the collection, inventory, and consolidation of wastes from the service
contractor to the central facility.
• Regular inspection for leaks, and compliance to the hazwaste storage protocols.
• Decontamination of containers prior to storage
• Oil water separator required for motorpools
• Regular maintenance of grease traps
• Disposal and treatment via DENR accredited facilities
• Regular awareness training and drills for emergency preparedness related to spills/
uncontrolled release.
4.1.4. Occupational Hazard
Occupational health is about protecting the general welfare of employees within their working
environment. In addition to preventing ill health, other important aspects of occupational health include:
• Ensuring fitness and physical capability to perform a job safely.

• Health education and promotion.
• Providing medical services including health surveillance.
• Rehabilitation after illness or injury.
The following subsections will discuss the identified risks to occupational health at the mine site:

4.1.4.1. Dust Exposure
Dust is inevitable in all quarrying and opencast mining operations. While it is often considered to be
more of an environmental issue, dust is a potential health risk and it is the nature of the dust that
determines the associated risk. A larger particle of dust can be an irritant to the eyes and throat, while
smaller respirable dust particles (less than 5 microns) can be inhaled, deposited in the lungs, and cause
respiratory problems. The highest risk is presented by crystalline silica particles as these are toxic to
defensive cells in the lungs and can lead to silicosis. Crystalline silica, or quartz, is found in varying
amounts in sand, clays, muds, shale, and rocks such as granite. Long-term exposure to high levels of
respirable crystalline silica can also lead to an increased risk of developing lung cancer.
4.1.4.2. Vibration
Exposure to vibration can lead to physical injury in two ways: whole-body vibration (WBV) that produces
symptoms such as back and neck pain; and hand–arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). In the quarrying
industry, crushing plant operation, heavy equipment operation, and blasting, are the potential sources
of whole body vibration. Hand-arm vibration syndrome is attributed to powered hand tools and can
cause damage to the blood circulatory system, nerves, and joints, which may result in severe pain and
numbness in the fingers, and loss of sense of touch.
4.1.4.3. Noise
Noise is regarded as unwanted sound and has the potential to interfere with communication or damage
a person’s hearing. The quarrying operation is a significant source of noise. Health effect of being
exposed to high levels of noise in the long term is noise-induced hearing loss.
4.1.4.4. Control against Occupational Hazards
Occupational health hazards identified will be generally prevented primarily by the following measures:
• Use of Personal Protective Equipment by the workers; proper fit and comfort to be considered.
• Provide regular IEC to workers on the hazards, risks and controls of dusty tasks. This will be
discussed in the daily toolbox meetings prior to deployment to workstation.
• Safety orientation, operation instructions and trainings for workers.
• Supervision by foreman and availability of safety inspectors/ officers in the mine site.
• Limited exposure to occupational hazards through worker rotation, job task changes, rest
periods, etc.
• Regular maintenance of equipment
• Regular inspection of work tools and replenishment, as necessary.
• Identification of tools and equipment that is most appropriate to the task; to consider
ergonomics.
• Maintenance of conducive and safe working environment (adequate ventilation, lighting, safety
signages, ergonomics considered)
• Availability of medical professionals (doctor and nurses) on site for consultations, first aid, or
health condition management.

4.2 Emergency Response Plan
An Environmental Emergency Response Preparedness and Response Plan (ERPP) is developed to

provide guidelines on how to react positively and effectively to specific environmental emergencies that
may have an impact on the environment, health, and safety of the stakeholders. This document is
integral to the Integrated Management System (IMS) implemented by the Company under its ISO 9001,
14001, and 45001 compliance.
Identified emergency situations and their potential impacts to environment and people are summarized
in Table 4-5.
Table 4-5 Possible Safety and Environmental Emergency Scenarios
Possible Scenario Possible Scenario Possible Scenario
 Partial or total loss of properties such as building,

equipment and machinery.
Natural /
Fire/ Explosion  Injuries and loss of lives of personnel.
Man-made
 Loss of vegetation and disturbance to wildlife in
cases of forest/bush fires
 Pollution of the river system.
Release of Hazardous Human error/
 Damage of freshwater ecology
Material (Spill) Mechanical Failure
 Groundwater contamination
 Partial or total destruction of properties and
facilities, including environmental controls.
 Injuries and fatalities to workers and resident of
Storm / Typhoon Natural Calamity
the surrounding communities.
 Loss of lives and properties including resident/s in
 Partial or total destruction of properties and
facilities, including environmental controls
 Injuries and fatalities to workers and resident of
Earthquake Natural Calamity
 Loss of lives and properties including resident/s in
 Rock falls during mining operations.
 Landslides in the mining area.
Collapse of Mine Natural (Typhoons,  Loss of lives and property.
Benches Earthquake)  Adverse effect on the environment from siltation
 (i.e. disturbance/ damage of marine and
freshwater ecology)
 Adverse effect on the environment from siltation
Failure / Collapse of Natural (Typhoons,
 (i.e. disturbance/ damage of marine and
Siltation Ponds Earthquake)
freshwater ecology)

4.2.1 Emergency Response Team
The Emergency Response Team (ERT) will be established, trained, and convened to respond to cases
of an emergency. They will be composed of staff and employees that have been provided with training
specific to the roles that are assigned to them. The ERT composition and responsibilities are presented
in Table 4-6.
Table 4-6 Emergency Response Team Roles and Responsibilities

Designation Responsibility
 Senior Safety Officer shall act as the incident commander.

 Responsible for overall management response operation.
Incident Commander  Check if adequate safety measures are in place.
 Establishes priorities in consultation with the members.
 Determine incident objective and strategies.
 Shall check if the EEPRP is updated
 Shall act as the leader of the Spill Response Team and other environmental
Environmental Manager
incidents.
 Serves as the primary contact person responsible for
coordination of all emergency actions
 Exercises overall supervision of response teams
Safety Officer  Attends to the scene as appropriate
 Alerts every one of the emergencies
 Shall act as the ERT Leader for the rescue and fire fighting
 Submits formal report to the GM and to MGB.
 Responsible for planning services.
Planning Team
 Collects situation and resources status information,
(Environment, Engineering
evaluates, and process them.
Services/Mines, Spill Team,
 Develops incident action plan to accomplish objectives.
Safety)
 Maintains resource and situation status.
Operations Team (ERT: First  First group possibly deploy in the incident location.
Aider, Fire Fighting, Rescue,  Responsible for directing, coordinating all tactical operations at the
Spill Team) Safety, Security. incident.
 Maintains communication with the General Manager and other
department heads
Public Affairs Officer  Designates spokesperson for media communication
 Primarily responsible for statement release to media and the public
 Controls false information to the public.
 Exercises overall supervision and control of the evacuation operations
Security Force Section  Alerts every one of the emergencies.
(SFS) Security Officer
 Shall act as the leader of traffic and crowd control.
 Initiates remedial repair of engineering structures damaged as
General Engineering appropriate.
Services/Mines Department  Responsible for the availability and possible deployment of heavy
equipment as needed.
Logistic Team (Admin,  Provide resources and all other services needed to support the
Material Mgt., Health emergency, example; transportation, supplies equipment, fuel, food
Section, Mobile services, medical services
Section)  Provides logistics and medical support to the ERT.
 Monitor incident costs.
Finance Department
 Maintain financial records.

Community Relations  Control spreading of false information to the public
Department
Company Nurse  Shall lead the operation of the medical team.
 Full compliance to this manual
 Understanding of the emergency processes and the locations of
assembly and muster locations.
 Fully comply with instructions and direction of supervisors unless
unsafe to do so.
Employees  Evacuate in an orderly calm manner.
 Stay at muster point until instructed to leave by Incident
Commander.
 Report any information of the incident to the Incident Commander
thru the immediate supervisor.
4.2.2 Emergency Communication Protocol
Emergency response will start upon notification of an emergency incident. Depending on the
emergency, evacuation may be required. It is critical that an early warning of the emergency be
communicated to all employees and members of the immediate community and timely evacuation from
the hazard area is executed. An alarm system is used to signal the occurrence of an emergency. A
secondary means of notification is by telephone from an area not involved in the emergency or by hand-
held portable radio if available. Upon signal of an emergency, initial management and response will be
handled by the Incident Commander or the immediate supervisor available at or near the location of the
incident. The ERT will be deployed upon the instruction of the Incident Commander.
In case of evacuation, personnel is to gather in designated muster points, wherein it is safe from danger
but is close enough to be controlled. The primary Muster Point identified is the basketball court within
the Administration area. An alternate Muster Point is at the old exploration camp near the Administrative
area.
4.2.3 Safety and Environmental Emergency Response
The general response procedures for different safety and environmental emergencies are identified
in the following subsections:
4.2.3.1 Personal Injury
These injuries such as minor cuts or burns are common in the workplace but there can be injuries as
severe as hazardous effects of chemical exposure or serious incidents such as overpressure from
explosion and severe burns. Injuries can also be obtained from sudden loss of control as in the case of
heart attacks or strokes. The following procedures are intended to limit injuries and prevent further
damage should personal injuries occur:
A. First Aid Cases
• Locate the First Aid Kit. Supplies in a First Aid Kit can be used to treat minor scratches, cuts, and
burns.
• Render assistance to persons involved and remove them from exposure to further injury, if
necessary.
• Warn personnel in adjacent areas of potential hazards to their safety.
• Inform a First Aid Team Member of the injury.
• Turn off nearby electrical apparatus and remove flammable materials from the area.

B. Medical Emergencies
• In the case of a medical emergency, remain calm and do only what is necessary to protect life.
• Inform supervisor or call the ERT-First Aid Team, Camp Nurse and or the Physician.
• Do not move an injured person unless they are in further danger.
• Keep the injured person warm. If feasible, designate one person to remain with the injured person.
• If clothing is on fire, knock the person on the ground and roll them around to smother the flames or
douse under a safety shower. A fire blanket should only be used as a last resort.
• After the administration of first aid, a nurse or physician qualified to handle medical emergencies
should provide further examination and treatment.
C. Severe Injury Procedures
• In cases of severe injury, trained personnel (First Aid Team Member) should quickly perform the
following steps:
• Do not move the victim unless imminent danger exists. Examples include fire, structural damage,
chemical spills, toxic fumes, explosion danger, etc.
• Keep the victim still and comfortable.
• Ask the victim, “Are you okay? What is wrong?”
• Check breathing and give artificial respiration if necessary.

• Follow Red Cross guidelines for exposure to pathogens.
• Control bleeding by direct pressure on the wound.
• Look for an emergency medical ID on the victim.
• Question witnesses and be ready to give all information to the paramedics when they arrive.
D. Fire
• After the emergency notification, the observer may attempt to extinguish the fire using fire
extinguisher if it safe to do so. If there is any risk of personal safety, the primary requirement
is to evacuate the area and wait for the ERT.
• All personnel and visitors shall immediately evacuate to the nearest muster point
• Shut off any electrical connections.
• The first arriving Fire Brigade member shall fight the fire applying extinguishing method
appropriate to the class of fire.
• Other members of the ERT shall assist in the evacuation of employees and visitors and
proceed with appropriate mitigating measure whenever possible.
• ERT – Medical shall check the physical and medical condition of evacuees.
• Notify BFP- Municipality of Jabonga, Santiago, and Tubay, if the fire has the potential to go
beyond the control or capability of in-house Fire Brigade.
• Security shall provide a person on standby, preferably at the site entrance, to meet and direct
incoming fire trucks from BFP.
• Establish a telephone response line for incoming inquiries from employee and visitor
relatives concerning site activities.
• After the evacuation, Security Officer shall determine the headcount of employees and visitors
and shall notify the Incident Commander for further instruction.
• Safety Officer to submit incident report to the highest Officer on site.

E. Chemical Spill
• Alert personnel in adjacent areas.

• ERT – Spill Response Team shall respond immediately upon receiving the advice from the
incident commander, or hearing the alarm securing availability of the spill equipment.
• Confine the spill and evacuate nonessential personnel from spill area.
• ERT – First Aider Team shall attend to contaminated personnel, if any. First aid measure is carried
out as prescribed in the SDS. First, protect yourself, and then remove injured person or persons
to fresh air, if safe to do so.
• If spilled material is in flame, extinguish flames and all other sources of ignition
• Never assume gases or vapors do not exist or are harmless because of lack of smell
• Do not touch the spill without protective clothing; wearing gloves is a must
• If flammable vapors are involved, do not operate electrical switches. Try to turn off or remove heat
sources, where safe to do so.
• Secure appropriate cleanup supplies. Use specific-classified absorbents to collect its appropriate
substances. Reduce vapor concentrations and control enlargement of the spill area by covering
the surface of a liquid spill with absorbent.
• During cleanup, use appropriate personal protection.
• A copy of the chemical’s SDS shall accompany the victim when brought to the hospital as basis
for further treatment.
F. Oil Spill
• The observer reports the incident to the immediate supervisor or to the responsible person
assigned in the area or calls the Safety Officer thru two-way radio communication.
• Upon arrival in at the area the Safety Officer and Spill Team will assess the situation and take
steps to prevent further product escape by closing the valves.
• All sources of ignition must be removed, and the area cordoned off and isolated to prevent entry
of other workmen and equipment.
• In case the spill is outside the secondary containment area, contain and limit spill from flowing to
the ground or water channels using the absorbent materials included in the oil spill kit or by
diverting flow to concentrate spillage within the premises.
• If necessary, stop the spill from entering storm water drains by blocking the drain inlet.
• Take the immediate steps to recover the product into the nearest available tank.
• Immediately place temporary catchment basin to contain leakage from valves, pipe or dispenser.
• Apply earth material such as saw dust to contain spillage. Scrape fuel / oil spilled to land and
place in salvage drums / container for proper disposal.
• Check if the area is free of all possible danger and effect ground or facility restoration activities
(total clean-up).
G. Structural Failure
This procedure intended to address all possible soil stability failures such as berm failure, slope failure,
siding slope of silt pond, etc. that may result in environmental damage.
• The observer should report immediately any possible suspected areas for erosion to
Environment, Safety Department, or with his immediate supervisor.
• During heavy rains, the Environment, Safety, Engineering Services, or Mines Department should
conduct immediate road and environmental structure (earth bund) assessment as soon as it is
safe to do so to identify eroded structures or those suspected for erosion.

• If landslide occurred, the Incident Commander shall immediately deploy the ERT (Rescue Team),
together with the Safety Officer to assess the area and determine possible damage or casualties.
• The Response Team will secure the affected area and will wait for heavy equipment arrival.
• After the assessment, the Incident Commander will coordinate with the Engineering
Services/Mines Department for immediate deployment of necessary heavy equipment for
clearing, repair of slope or soil structure re-stabilization.
4.3.4. Terminating the Emergency Event
Proper termination of the emergency is critical to properly account all employees, staff, and community
residents and to check if the impact areas have been restored to a safe condition. Activities to be
performed during the post-emergency period are focused on the following:
• Recovery of Operations – The recovery of site operations and services will depend on the extent
of the damage suffered. The General Manager/OIC will prioritize activities that can be
accomplished with available staff and resources. Immediately following the emergency phase of
the incident, the management will begin the implementation of the site business recovery plan.
• Damage Assessment – Following the emergency crisis event and assessment of the damage
to property and equipment and remediation measures required to mitigate the impacts of the
event and restore the facility for operational use will be prepared.
• Incident Debriefing– The purpose of incident debriefing is to inform personnel about any
environmental hazards that may remain on the site property following the incident and to
identify unsafe conditions that may still exist. Some employees may be impacted by the
events surrounding the incident, especially those involving injuries or loss of life. It may be
necessary to provide critical- incident stress debriefing sessions following such incidents.
• Investigation– Following the investigation, a review of what actions took place during the
incident, both good and bad are done. This activity is not designed to place blame, but rather
to allow for the flow of ideas and recommendations to improve the emergency action plan
and the facility policies and procedures.
• Reporting– Environmental incidents must be reported to the Incident Commander. Additional

details of the incident are to be documented.
4.2.5 Emergency Response Trainings
Incident management training for the ERP members, employees, contractors, and the local community
will be provided on a regular basis. This will be done either through the Safety Department or in
partnership with local agencies. Emergency simulation and drills will also be conducted on-site to
practice the incident response procedures for improved retention and response times.

Section 5– Social Development Plan and IEC Framework
5.1. Social Development and Management Program
Agata Processing Inc. will develop a Five-Year Social Development and Management Program (SDMP)
for the Agata Limestone Project, upon securing the Notice To Proceed from Mines and Geosciences
Bureau.
SDMP is a comprehensive five-year plan of a mining contractor towards the sustained improvement in
the living standards of the host and neighboring communities by creating a responsible, self-reliant and
source-based communities capable of developing, implementing, and managing community
development programs, projects and activities in a manner consistent with the principle of people
empowerment.
Its implementation is based on: (a) Chapter X of R.A. 7942 (PH Mining Act of 1995); (b) Section 134,
Chapter XIV, DAO No. 96-40 (The Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations of R.A. 7942); (c)
DAO 2000-99 (Rules and Regulations on the Implementation of the Social Development and
Management Program (SDMP) for mining projects); (d) DAO 2010-13 (Amendments to Section 16
[Ancestral Lands] and to Chapter XIV [Development of Mining Communities, Science & Mining
Technology] of DAO 96-40; and (e) DAO 2010-21, (Consolidated DAO for the IRR of RA 7942).
API is mandated to allot a minimum of 1.5% of the operating costs annually, distributed as follows:
(a) 75% for implementation of SDMP;

(b) 10% for the development of mining technology and geosciences, as well as the
corresponding manpower training and development; and
(c) 15% for implementation of IEC programs
The primary impact barangays include two (2) barangays within the MPSA area, where the Agata
Limestone surface mine and the mine facilities will be located. These include Brgy. Lawigan and Brgy.
Tinigbasan, both within the Tubay Municipality. They will be the most susceptible to the direct and/or
indirect environmental impacts relative to the air and noise quality, watershed functions including stream
flows and water quality, and to disturbance of flora and fauna resources. They are also affected by
socio-cultural impacts, determined based on several qualitative factors such as livelihood, and cultural
impacts from the Project.
The impact areas and how they are affected by the Project is listed in Table 5-1. Location of the impact
areas are also shown in Figure 5-1.
Table 5-1 Project Impact Areas by Sector

Impact Impact Area Impact Impact Area
Land Resource Impacts Water Resource Impacts
Clearing of vegetation Brgy. Tinigbasan Siltation of waterways Brgy. Tinigbasan

Sedimentation of
Brgy. Tinigbasan Diversion of streamflow Brgy. Tinigbasan
agricultural lands
Overlapping tenurial
Brgy. Tinigbasan Social Impacts
instruments
Socio-cultural impacts to
Air Impacts CADT 237
IPs
Brgy. Tinigbasan, Brgy. Socio-cultural impacts to
Dust generation Brgy. Tinigbasan
Lawigan non-IP communities
Increase in Employment
Brgy. Tinigbasan, Brgy. Brgy. Tinigbasan, Brgy.
Exhaust emission and Business
Lawigan Lawigan
Opportunities
Brgy. Tinigbasan, Brgy.
Noise
Lawigan

Figure 5-1- Project Impact Area Map

The SDMP will be focusing on projects under Health, Education, Livelihood, Public Utilities/
Infrastructure, Socio-Cultural Activities, and Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (HELPS-Plus).
The budget for the livelihood program is identified to be the highest among the component sectors, at
37% of the total funding for the SDMP for the benefit of the Direct, Host and Neighboring Communities
(DHNC). Budget allocation per component sector is shown on Figure 5-2.
Figure 5-2 Percent (%) Distribution of DHNC Project
Percent Distribution of DHNC Project

Socio-Cultural
12% Health
18%
Public-Utilities
15%
Education
18%
Livelihood
37%
Health Education Livelihood Public-Utilites Socio-Cultural
The Table 5-2 shows generalized community development programs/activities the Proponent
envisages for the impact barangays. These are based on the SDMP that have been implemented in the
past. Detailed Programs/Projects/Activities will be provided as soon as the SDMP is finalized in
coordination with the impact barangays.

Table 5-2 Generalized community development programs under SDMP
Community Development Programs Beneficiaries Partner Institutions Proponent Indicative Timeline Source of Funds
Health programs: All residents of Brgy. Tinigbasan and Regional Health Unit Community As soon as the 18% of 75% of
Medical missions for two (2) Brgys Brgy. Lawigan Brgy. Health Center Relations Officer Project starts SDMP
Provisions of medicines BHW
Emergency Respoinse Training Members of Sanguniang Kabataan MDRMMC
SK Council
Educational programs: 2 Elementary Schools DepEd Community As soon as the 18% of 75% of
Assistance to Elementrary and High 1 High School Tinigbasan E/S Relations Officer Project starts SDMP
School Students Lawigan E/S
Scholarship Program for Mining Qualified High School Graduate of Tinigbasan Natl.
Engineering and Forestry Student Tinigbasan H/S HighSchool
CSU
Livelihood Projects; One-Pump Boat- TIFFA, LAFFA,LASFFA DA Community As, soon as the 37% of 75% of
One-Family Program; Seedlings Womens Organizations TESDA Relations Officer Project starts SDMP
propagation for tree plantation project DENR
Micro Enterprise TiFFA, LAFFA DTI
Public Infrastructures: BLGU of Brgys. Tinigbasan and Municipal Govt. of Community As soon as the 15% of 75% of
Improvement of Water System Lawigan Tubay Relations Officer Project starts SDMP
Improvement of Brgy. Hall Mun. Engineering
Office
Socio-cultural: Religious Sector Tubay Parish Community As soon as the 12% of 75% of
Support to Fiesta Chapels Religious Sector Relations Officer Project starts SDMP
Support to Araw celebration Church Church
Improvement of Church and Chapel BLGU MLGU
facilities Puroks BLGU
Emergency Preparedness : BDRRMC, MDRRMC PDRRMC Community As soon as the Part of Health
Trainings/ Seminars and Drills Relations Officer Project starts Programs
DMTG: Scholarship for students Deserving K12 Graduates from CSU Community As soon as the 10% of SDMP
taking mining and Forestry related Brgys. Tinigbasan and Lawigan Relations Officer Project starts
courses;

5.2. IP Royalty
The Mamanwa-Manobo IP sector has already acquired their Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title
(CADT) Number 237 giving this sector ancestral authority over areas within the Agata MPSA including
the ALP area. They have an existing Community Royalty Development Program (CRDP), which was
duly approved by the NCIP Commission En Banc and is basis of the Indigenous Cultural Communities’
development programs. The royalty payment, as well as the implementation of the CRDP will be done
during the mine life of the ALP.
The following tribal groups comprise the CADT 237 holders with their corresponding royalty shares:
• Mamanwa Tribal Management Organization – 23%

• Agata Mamanwa Tribal Organization – 23%
• Mamanwa Manobo Mapaso Tribal Sectoral Organization – 24%
• Coro Mamanwa Management Organization – 30%
Approximately PHP 45.5 million worth of royalty will be received by the IP beneficiaries for the first five
(5) years of the Project, as shown on Table 5-3.
Table 5-3 Estimated Royalty Payments (PHP)
IP Royalty 9,213,750 9,804,350 8,977,500 8,583,750 8,977,500 45,556,850
The royalty payments they will receive will be used for the implementation of their Community Royalty
Development Plan (CRDP). Fund allocation will be 50% for CADT governance and 50% for IP
community development program. The corresponding allocations per program groups is presented in
Figure 5-3 and Figure 5-4.
Figure 5-3 IP Royalty Allocation for Community Program

Figure 5-4 IP Royalty Allocation for Governance
5.3. Information and Education Campaign (IEC)
Information, Education and Communication campaign of the Agata Limestone Project will be
strengthened in order to address the misconception of the community pertaining to mining operations.
Strong and effective IEC programs will help address the disinformation propagated by the anti-mining
advocates regarding issues on the discoloration of waters and other coastal issues. Regular information
regarding the implementation of the SDMP will be enhanced. This will also help communities appreciate
the programs that alleviate their living condition.
Strong and effective Public Relations will also play a vital role in the Project’s effective development
strategies. Intensification IEC campaigns through regular interactions with all the stakeholders will be
given priority. The policy on Community Feedback implemented in the previous project will be continued
during the limestone operations. These are all part of the Company’s programs to promote transparency
in its dealings with the communities. The following are some of the identified strategies for IEC, and the
budget allocation planned for the first year of operations in Table 5-4.
A. Community Consultations
In the preparation and development of SDMP, the Host and Neighboring communities including their
People’s Organizations and identified stakeholders will be consulted as to their priority needs for
inclusion in the SDMP projects. These are discussed and rationalized to ensure PPAs will be most
effective.
B. Community Meetings
Meetings with Representatives of the Host and neighboring Communities (RHNC), sectoral groups and
other Local Government representatives will be convened regularly to review and approve identified
projects. Quarterly meetings will be called for projects updates, among others.

C. Public Awareness
Aside from regularly posting billboards and informative tarps in strategically located areas in the
communities, the Project will extensively use various social media platform to maximize its reach in
providing relevant information about the Project.
D. Information Center
An Information Center will be established in the Host and Neighboring Barangays. Coordination with
the Sangguniang Barangays will be strengthened for proper dissemination of information.
E. Publication of Information, Education and Communication Materials
Aside from the Project-owned community newsletter, publication of community events and development
will also be printed in local and national print media as the needs arise.
F. Radio Program
Constant airing of project’s development will be conducted at local radio stations at Surigao City and
Butuan City. Discussions on pressing issues of the Project and of the whole mining industry in general
will be tackled.
G. Stakeholders Complaint and Feedback Settlement
The Project will continue implementing its Community Complaint and Feedback policy to better respond
to issues and concerns from the stakeholders. Feedbacks from the community will be processed by the
CRO and submitted to Project/Site Management who in turn will assign the concerned Department to
act on the complaint for immediate settlement. CRO will be facilitating the complaint and feedback
process.

Table 5-4 Information, Education, and Communication Plan

Target Sector Identified Major Topic/s of concern in IEC Scheme/ Information Medium Indicative Timelines and Indicative Cost
as Needing Project IEC Relation to Project Strategy/Methods Frequency
1.Sanguniuang Bayan • Project Description • Group method • Audio Visual • 2 months prior to start of • 20,000.00 for meals
of Mun. of Tubay • EIA finding • Group method Presentation project construction and venue
• Primer • Quarterly update • 15 to include staff
• Brochures
2. Brgy. Development • Project Description • Group methods • Audio Visual • Monthly update • 15,000.00 for meals
Council • EIA Findings • Group method Presentation and snacks
• Focus Group discussion • 20 members
• Primer
• News paper
3. Community Assembly • Issues and concern on • Group method • Audio Visual • 120,000.00 for meals
water discoloration • Multimedia Presentation • Quarterly and snacks
• Hand outs • 900 participants per
• Posters Brgy.
• Flyers
• brochures
4. Peoples • Discussion on SDMP • Group Method • Focus group discussion • Quarterly • 15,000.00 for meals
Organization Programs and snacks
5. School faculty • Issues and concerns on • Group method • Focus group discussion • Monthly visitation • 1,000.00 for snacks
water discoloration • 15 faculties
• Discussion on School
assistance
6. Sanguniang • Project Description • Group method • Focus group discussion • Monthly visitation • 1,000.00 for snacks
Kabataan Council • EIA Findings • 15 Youth Council
• Discussion on Youth members
Programs
7.Represrentrative of • Project Description • Group method • Focus group discussion • Quarterly • 30.000,00 for meal and
Host and Neighboring • EIA Findings • Multimedia presentation snacks to include venue
Communities • Discussion on SDMP
Projects

Section 6 – Environmental Compliance Monitoring
6. Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMOP) and other Monitoring Modes
Effective monitoring of the environmental management performance of the Project includes both self-
managed programs and multi-sectoral involvement. The monitoring programs serve the need to
quantify the environmental impacts and assess the efficiency of the mitigating measures in place. Any
deficiencies or issues identified during the monitoring and audits are documented. The causes are then
identified and discussed with the responsible parties. Subsequently, corrective actions are scheduled
for implementation.
The most significant impacts previously identified, and the monitoring approaches being implemented
include:
• Geotechnical and Landform Stability

• Erosion and Sedimentation
• Habitat Modification
• Air Quality and Noise
• Water Quality of Surface Water, Groundwater, and Marine Water
• Health and Safety
6.1. Self-Monitoring Plan
The self-monitoring team will be composed of Agata personnel under the Environmental Department.
Representative from other departments will be engaged from time to time to provide assistance and
technical expertise. This will include personnel from the Assay Laboratory which will provide water
quality testing services on a regular basis, and coordination with the Mines and Port Operation for water
management activities, monitoring of discharge points and ensuring loading activities are
environmentally compliant.
The assistance of third-party consultants or experts in different fields of environmental management will
be included to provide additional specialized expertise and to remove any perceived bias that may be
associated with the self-monitoring aspect of the program.
6.2 Multi-Sectoral Monitoring Framework
Multi-sectoral monitoring provides for the participation of different stakeholders including government
regulatory agencies and civil society in monitoring the impacts of the project. This framework is identified
in Section 182 of DAO 2010-21: Providing for a Consolidated Department Order for the Implementing
Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 7942 and Section 16 of DAO 2017-15: Guidelines on Public
Participation Under the Philippine Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) System.
The key provision of this Section provides for the creation of a Mine Rehabilitation Fund Committee
(MRFC) and Multi-Partite Monitoring Team.
This MRFC shall have the following duties and responsibilities:
Conducts preliminary evaluation of the submitted Environmental Protection and Enhancement

Program (EPEP) and consults with credible experts, as may be required, to clarify proposals
and to
• Discuss the adequacy of control and rehabilitation measures. Manages, operates and monitors
the Mine Rehabilitation Funds and Final Mine Rehabilitation and
• Decommissioning Fund and ensures these funds are kept separate.

• Resolves issues involving the progressive mine rehabilitation programs that shall be
implemented.
• Hires credible experts to perform independent studies and research on the environmental,
• engineering and socio-cultural impacts of the Project.
• Ensures that the approved EPEP and AEPEP’s shall be strictly implemented by the Proponent.
• Assembles and deputizes a Multi-Partite Monitoring Team (MMT) to serve as the monitoring
arm of
• the MRFC.
• Monitors and evaluates the performance of the MMT and reports on its functioning to the
• Contingent Liability Rehabilitation Fund Steering Committee (CLRF).
With reference to the assembly of the MMT, Section 17 of DAO 2018-18 states that an MMT shall be
deputized by the MRFC to serve as its monitoring arm. Pursuant to Section 16 of DAO 2017-15:
Rationalization of the Multi-Partite Monitoring Team Existence, Composition and Leadership and
Section, the MMT for this project shall be composed of the following representatives:
• Representative from the Municipal Environment and Natural Office (MENRO)

of Tubay, Agusan del Norte
• Barangay Captain of Tinigbasan, Tubay, Agusan del Norte
• Barangay Captain of Lawigan, Tubay, Agusan del Norte
• Chief Rural Health (DOH) Unit of Agusan del Norte
• Representative from an Environmental NGO
• Representative from the Affected Indigenous Cultural Community
• Representative from Locally Recognized Leaders- Tinigbasan Farmers and Fisherfolks
Association (TIFFA)
• Representative from the DENR – Provincial Environment and Natural Resources Office
(PENRO)
• Representative from the DENR-City Environment and Natural Resources Office (CENRO)
The team shall conduct quarterly audits to oversee the implementation of the environmental programs
relative to the submitted Annual EPEP and the conditions stipulated in the approved ECC. Another audit
team composed of MGB-13 representatives is responsible for the quarterly Integrated Safety, Health,
Environment and Social (ISHES) Validation to evaluate the company’s environmental, safety, and social
accomplishments.
Organizations that will form part of the MMT will be evaluated during discussions with the MRFC to
determine their validity and value to the MMT. It is important that organizations potentially affected by
the Project are represented in the MMT. Additional members may be included, with the approval of the
MRFC.
The MRFC itself is under the direction of the Contingent Liability and Rehabilitation Fund (CLRF)
Steering Committee which is convened at the National Level. This Committee has the responsibility of
final approval of the EPEP and the Final Mine Reclamation and Decommissioning Plan. An
organizational diagram of the different committees is shown on Figure 6-1.

Figure 6-1 Third Party Compliance Monitoring Organization
6.3. Summary of the Environmental Monitoring Plan
The Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMoP) is summarized in Table 6-1. The Environmental Quality
Performance Level (EQPL) values established by the proponent during this pre ECC stage is the “Limit
Performance Level”. The EQPL values are limited to the existing thresholds set by national agencies,
such as the ambient air and water quality standards by DENR and the ambient noise levels by the
National Pollution Control Commission (NPCC). The environmental management measures in place
are designed to meet the applicable standard limits. Monitoring results that will show deviation from the
prescribed values are verified, root-cause analysis performed, with the appropriate corrective action
identified and implemented. The post ECC EQPL commitments under the Action and Alert Levels will
be established later, after discussion with the members of the MMT and will be made part of the MMT
Operations Manual.
Sampling Maps for water and air and noise quality, freshwater ecology, and marine monitoring are
provided in, Figure 6-2, Figure 6-3, and Figure 6-4, respectively.

Table 6-1 Environmental Monitoring Program (EMoP)

EQPL Management Scheme
Key Environmental Aspect Sampling and Measurement Plan
Potential Parameters
Lead Person Annual Cost EQPL (Alert level) Management Scheme Management Measure
Impacts Monitored
Management
Sector Component Location Frequency ALERT ACTION LIMIT ALERT ACTION LIMIT
Measure
Land Access Erosion/ Soil Stability Mine Area Daily Visual Inspection Environment Php 70% good 60% good • 100% Good • Regular Immediate Immediate
Resources Roads/Haul loss Department 25,000 road condition road Road Condition road conduct of suspension of
Roads Siltation Area of Disturbance Monthly Survey Data Mines condition with the ff. mainte- repair to road transport
Structural Department monitoring achieve 100% and
nance
parameters;
Failure Good Road implement
• Crowning- 2.5%
slope from the • Speed limit Condition. road
center of the construction
road width to the • Drainage and
side manage- maintenance
• Longitudinal ment standard
Gradient- 10% operating
Slope
• Slope procedure.
• Road width- 12
m width min. - stabiliza-
Mine Haul Road tion
/ 10m - measures
service/secondar
y road • Erosion
• Super Elevation control
(Curve Slope)- measures
8% minimum
slope @ a speed
of 20kph loaded • Repair as
trucks needed.
• Curve Radius-
14 meters
minimum @ a
speed of 20 kph
loaded trucks
• Surface
Condition-
+10mm / -20mm
using 3.0 m
straight-edge
variation level of
surface
• 0.50-meter-thick
surfacing
materials
Ore Stockpiles Erosion/ Soil Stability Overburden/ Daily Visual Inspection Environment Php Bench height Bench height • Bench height < Bench Covering of Implementatio
and Waste loss Ore Sediment Pond Department 25,000 > 5m >8m 10m forming shall stockpiles n of the
dump Siltation Area of Disturbance Stockyards Erosion Control • Slope angle < be done in Provision of Standard
Structural Slope angle > Slope angle 80 degrees lifting the Drainage Operating
Failure Monthly Survey Data Mines 35 degrees > 45 degrees • No visible materials for. Procedure on
Department signs of stockpile with Ore Stock
instability more than 6 Piling and
(landslides, meters height Waste
damaged Dumping.
slopes and
benches)
Diversion Erosion/ Soil Stability, Surface Mine Monthly Water Environment Php Bench height Bench height • Bench height < Periodic Immediate Regular canal
Canals loss Clogging area Samples/Testing Department 25,000 > 5m >8m 10m Monitoring maintenance desilting and
Siltation Area of Disturbance Overburden/ • Slope angle < and and maintenance
Structural Ore Survey Data Mines Slope angle > Slope angle 80 degrees Evaluation Repair as Repair as
Failure Stockyards Department 35 degrees > 45 degrees • No visible every after- needed. needed.
Access signs of rain event.
roads instability
(landslides,
damaged
slopes and
benches)

Table 6-2 Environmental Monitoring Program (EMoP)- continued

Impacts Monitored
Management
Measure
Water Quality Erosion/ Soil Stability Surface Mine Monthly Water Samples/ Environment Php 25,000 Full at 60% Full at 65% Full at 75% • Conduct of • Slope • Implement-
Management loss area Testing Department capacity capacity capacity close stabilization ation of the
Ponds Siltation Capacity Access Discharge monitoring measures SOPs for
Structural roads Measurements and the
Failure Proper Drainage Overburden/ Survey Data Mines evaluation • Repair as construction
Aquatic Ore Department needed. and Mainte-
Habitat Stockyards Daily Visual Inspection • Regular nance of
Degradation pond Water Mngt.
Biodiversity desilting and Structures.
Loss maintenance • Regular
pond
desilting and
mainte-
nance
• Slope
stabilization
measures
• Repair as
needed.
Surface Mine Erosion/ Soil Stability Surface mine Monthly Survey Data Mines Php 25,000 • Bench height > • Bench • Bench • Proper • Proper Planned
loss area Water Department 5m height >8m height < establishme Bench Development
Siltation Area of Disturbance Samples/Testing Environment 10m nt of bench forming and Drainage
Structural Erosion Controls Department • Slope angle > • Slope forming overburden management
Failure Daily Visual Inspection 35 degrees angle > 45 • Slope stripping Slope
degrees angle < 80 • Provision of stabilization
degrees Drainage • Repair as measures
System needed Erosion
• No visible control
signs of measures
instability
(landslides
, damaged
slopes and
benches)
Nursery Biodiversity Seedling Production Agata Weekly Manual Inventory Environment Php 25,000 At least 60% At least 70% At least 90% Collection of • Site • Soil
Loss and Disposal Central Department survival rate survival rate survival rate representative Species conditioning,
Nursery per species Matching • Application
before removal • Soil of appro-
of vegetation. Ameliora- priate plant
tion propagation
• Cloning technology
Flora and Biodiversity Abundance MPSA Area Annual Quadrat Sampling Third Party/ Php 30% reduction of 40% No loss of Conduct of • Establish- • Mainte-
Fauna Loss Species Richness Netting, Herping, Environment 1,200,000 Species richness reduction of important period ment of nance of
Importance Value Observation Department and abundance species species Biodiversity Biodiversity buffer
Conservation Status Transects richness and Assessment Monitoring zones
abundance Plots • Establish-
ment of
• Preservatio Biodiversity
n of Bio- Monitoring
diversity Plots
Zones • Preserva-
tion of bio-
• Plantation diversity
of Endemic Zones
Species
• Plantation
of Endemic
Species

Table 6-1 Environmental Monitoring Program (EMoP)- continued

Potential Parameters EQPL (Alert level) Management Scheme Management Measure
Lead Person Annual Cost
Impacts Monitored
Management
Measure
Water Water Supply Water Streamflow Water Daily Weir Environment Php 100,000 30% 20% 10% reduction Conduct of Intensify • Intensify IEC
Resources Supply Measurements/ Sources measurements Department reduction in reduction in in water period water re Water
Shortage Discharge water supply water supply supply stream flow conservation conservation
monitoring measures measures
Intensify IEC Repair of • Water

re Water Leaks as Source
conservation needed Reforesta-
measures tion
Surface Water Surface BOD Local rivers Quarterly Water Sampling Environment Php Alert Level Action Level Limit Level Root cause Drainage • Pollution
Water Chloride and creeks and Third Party Department 2,000,000 Refer to Refer to Refer to analysis/ management control at
Quality Color (FW laboratory testing Table 6-3 Table 6-3 Table 6-3 investigation source
Degradation DO stations)
Biodiversity Fecal Coliform • Retesting
Loss Nitrate Station
pH Reference
Phosphate Figure 6-2
Coastal Marine Temperature Coastal Quarterly Water Sampling Environment Alert Level Action Level Limit Level Root cause Drainage • Pollution
Marine Water TSS stations and Third Party Department Refer to Refer to Refer to analysis/ management control at
Quality COD within laboratory testing Table 6-4 Table 6-4 Table 6-4 investigation source
Degradation Ammonia Butuan Bay
Biodiversity Fluoride Surfactants (MW • Retesting
Loss Trace Metals stations)
Hardness
Station
Reference
Figure 6-2
Groundwater Ground Groundwater Quarterly Water Sampling Environment Alert Level Action Level Limit Level Root cause Drainage • Pollution
and Springs Water/ Sources and Third Party Department Refer to Refer to Refer to analysis/ management control at
Potable (DW laboratory testing Table 6-2 Table 6-2 Table 6-2 investigation source
Water stations)
Quality • Retesting
Degradation Station
Reference
Figure 6-2
Marine Siltation Coral Cover Coral Semi- SCUBA Diving for Third Party Php 700,000 Water Quality Water Quality • Water Root cause Drainage • Pollution
Resources Biodiversity Colony Size of Relocation Annual visual inspection Marine Biologist/ Alert Level Action Level Quality Limit analysis/ management control at
Loss Relocated Corals Site and head count/ Photo Environment Refer to Refer to Level Refer investigation source
Marine Marine Species surrounding transect Department Table 6-4 Table 6-4 to Table
Habitat Inventory/ Survey Coral reefs Physical 6-4 • Retesting
Degradation Species Diversity Measurement
and Richness Station Silt Trap • No
Water Quality (pH, Reference: Measurement significant
Siltation Rate) Figure 6-4 species
Daily Visual Inspection mortality
compared to
baseline.
Freshwater Siltation Macroinvertebrate Payong- Annual 50-mTransect Third Party Php 400,000 Alert Level Action Level • Limit Level Root cause Drainage • Pollution
Ecology Biodiversity Assessment payong and Physical Freshwater Refer to Refer to Refer to analysis/ management control at
Loss Species Richness, Tinigbasan Sampling/ netting Ecology Expert/ Table 6-3 Table 6-3 Table 6-3 investigation source
Aquatic Abundance Creeks Environment
Habitat Diversity Index Physical Department • No • Retesting
Degradation Family Biotic Index Station Sampling/ netting significant
Fish Inventory Reference: Interviews with species
Endemicity Figure 6-3 local fisherfolks mortality
Conservation Status compared to
Morphometric baseline.
Character

Table 6-1 Environmental Monitoring Program (EMoP) - continued

Impacts Monitored
Management
Measure
Water Freshwater Siltation Macrofaunal Payong- Annual Physical Third Party Php 400,000 Water Quality Water Quality Water Quality Root cause Drainage • Pollution
Resources Ecology Biodiversity Assessment payong and Sampling/ netting Freshwater Alert Level Action Level Limit Level analysis/ management control at
Loss Species Richness, Tinigbasan Interviews with Ecology Expert/ Refer to Refer to Refer to investigation source
Aquatic Abundance Creeks local fisherfolks Environment Table 6-3 Table 6-3 Table 6-3
Habitat Diversity Index Department • Retesting
Degradation Endemicity Station
Conservation Status Reference:
Figure 6-3
Water Quality (pH, Annual In-situ
DO, Temp) measurement
Air Ambient Air Fugitive Dust Ambient Air: Stations: Quarterly 24-hr sampling Third Party Php Residential Residential NAAQS for Root cause Intensify • Pollution
Resources Quality Generation TSS Crushing 1,500,000 Area Area Residential analysis/ water control at
TSP Plant TSP PM-10: (Ambient Air investigation spraying source
Health Particulate Matter Causeway Gravimetric and Noise) TSP= 138- TSP= 161- TSP ≥ 230
Impacts to (10u) Barangay Analysis 160 µg/Nm3 229 µg/Nm3 µg/Nm3 • Retesting
employees Tinigbasan,
and nearby Additional PM10=90- PM10=105- PM10 ≥ 150
community. Station Parameters for 104 149 µg/Nm3
Reference Station A-4: µg/Nm3 µg/Nm3
Figure 6-2 SOx- NAAQS for
Pararosaniline Mining Area Mining Area Industrial
NOx- Griess
Saltzman TSP=180-209 TSP=210-299 TSP ≥ 300
CO- NDIR µg/N m3 µg/N m3 µg/N m3
PM10=120- PM10=140- PM10 ≥ 200

139 199 µg/N m3
µg/N m3 µg/N m3
CO ≥ 10
CO=6.0-6.9 CO=7.0-9.9 mg/Nm3
mg/Nm3 mg/Nm3
SOx ≥ 180
SOx= 108- SOx= 126- µg/Nm3
125 µg/Nm3 179 µg/Nm3
NOx ≥ 150
NOx=90-104 NOx=105- µg/Nm3
µg/Nm3 149 µg/Nm3
Air Quality Chemical Source Emission: Genset Annual US EPA Sampling Third Party Php 750,000 PM= 120-139 PM= 140-199 DAO 2000-81 Conduct of • Maintenanc • Stop usage
(Stack) Carbon Monoxide, Stacks Methods mg/Nm3 mg/Nm3 for Diesel Periodic Air e of of source,
Emission Nitrogen Dioxide, Analysis: Genset: Quality Pollution subject to
Particulate Matter Assay Gravimetric SOx= 420- SOx= 490- Monitoring control maintenanc
Contribution 10 microns (PM10), Laboratory Barium Thorin 489 mg/Nm3 699 mg/Nm3 PM ≥ 200 device. e/ repair.
to GHG Sulfur Dioxide equipment Titration mg/Nm3
Emissions Phenol Disulfonic NOx= 1200- NOx= 1400- • Minimiza- • Root cause
Vehicle stack Acid 1399 mg/Nm3 1999 mg/Nm3 SOx ≥ 700 tion of air analysis/
NDIR mg/Nm3 pollution investigation
CO= 300-349 CO= 350-499 sources. .
mg/Nm3 mg/Nm3 NOx ≥ 2000 • Pollution
mg/Nm3 control at
source
CO ≥ 500
mg/Nm3

Table 6-1 Environmental Monitoring Program (EMoP) - continued

Impacts Monitored
Management
Measure
Noise and Ambient Noise Health Ambient Noise Stations: Quarterly Direct Third Party Php Community Community NPCC Root cause • PPE Stop usage
Vibration Quality Impacts to Levels Crushing Measurement of 1,500,000 (dB): (dB): standards analysis/ provision of source,
employees Plant Noise level using (Ambient Air investigation. subject to
and nearby Causeway Portable and Noise) Morning 30- Morning 35- • Community: • IEC to maintenance
community. Barangay Equipment at 4 34 49 Morning≥50dB users and / repair.
Tinigbasan, sampling periods Day 33-38 Day 39-54 Day≥55dB affected
Evening & Evening & Evening & community
Station Night 27-31 Night 32-44 Night≥45dB .
Reference
Figure 6-2 Industrial Industrial • Industrial:
(dB): (dB): Morning≥75dB
Evening≥70dB
Morning 45- Morning 53- Nighttime≥45
52 74 dB
Evening 42- Evening 49-
48 69
Nighttime 27- Nighttime 32-
31 44
Noise Blast Health Ground Vibration Quarry Area During Instrument Third Party c/o Peak Peak Peak Velocity: Discussion Root cause Impose
Vibration Impacts and blasting measurement Contractor Velocity: 4.0 Velocity: 4.5 5.0 mm/sec with analysis/ sanction/
Structural event (vibrometer) mm/sec mm/sec blasting investigation agreed
stability Noise Over contractor penalty with
Noise Over Noise Over pressure: s contractors.
pressure: pressure: 115 dB
110 dB 112 dB
Meteorology Hydrome- Climate Rainfall Project area Daily Meteorological Environment Php 25,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
teorology characteris- Evaporation station readings Department
Characteristics tics Temperature
Hydrologic Humidity
Conditions
Waste Solid Waste Health Waste Generation Project Site Daily Segregation Environment Php 25% increase >30% Waste • IEC on • Upcycling Intensify IEC
Management Impacts to Collection Department 1,000,000 in waste increase in generation Solid of re waste
Hazardous employees Inventory generation generation increase less Waste recyclable management
Waste and nearby level than 25% of Manage- waste.
community. average level. ment
Soil Policy • Implemen-
Degradation tation of
• Imposition Waste
of Fines Control
and
Penalties

Table 6-3 Environmental Quality Performance Level (EQPL) Used in Drinking Water Quality Monitoring
Monitoring Parameter Unit LIMIT ACTION ALERT
Mandatory Water Quality Parameters Reference DAO 2016-08 for PSIC O894 and OC3
Biological Oxygen Demand mg/L 3 2.1-2.9 1.8-2.0
Chloride, mg/L mg/L 250 175-249 150-174
Color, TCU TCU 50 35-49 30-34
Hardness (as CaCO3) mg/L 300 210-299 180-209
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) mg/L 5 3.5-4.9 3-3.4
Fecal Coliform MPN/ 100ml <1.1 <1.1 <1.1
Nitrate mg/L 7 5.0-6.9 4.2-4.9
pH 6.5-8.5 5.1-6.4 4.0-5.0
Phosphate mg/L 0.5 0.35-0.49 0.3-0.34
Temperature deg. Celsius 26-30 25-23 20-22
Total Suspended Solids mg/L 50 35 30-34
Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L 7 5.0 4.2-4.9
Ammonia mg/L 0.05 0.035 0.03-0.034
Flouride mg/L 1 0.7 0.6-0.69
Surfactants mg/L 0.2 0.15-0.19 0.12-0.14
Oil and Grease mg/L 1 0.7-0.9 0.6-0.69
Manganese mg/L 0.2 0.15-0.19 0.12-0.14
Iron mg/L 1 0.7-0.9 0.6-0.69
Arsenic mg/L 0.01 0.007-0.099 0.006-0.0069
Cadmium mg/L 0.003 0.0021 0.0018-0.002
Mercury mg/L 0.001 0.0007 0.0006-0.00069
Lead mg/L 0.01 0.007-0.009 0.006-0.0069
Applicable to Water Samples in Stations DW-2, DW-3
Source: DAO 2016-08 Water Quality Standards for Class A, Class C, and Class SC.
Table 6-4 Environmental Quality Performance Level (EQPL) Used in Surface Water Quality Monitoring
Biological Oxygen Demand mg/L 7 4.9-6.9 4.2-4.8
Chloride, mg/L mg/L 350 245-349 210-244
Color, TCU TCU 75 53--74 45-52
Hardness (as CaCO3) mg/L 300 210-299 180-209
Fecal Coliform MPN/ 100ml 200 150-199 100-149
Nitrate mg/L 7 5.0-6.9 4.2-4.9
pH 6.5-9.0 5.1-6.4 4.0-5.0
Phosphate mg/L 0.5 0.35-0.49 0.3-0.34
Total Suspended Solids mg/L 80 56-79 48-55
Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L 7 5.0-6.9 4.2-4.9
Ammonia mg/L 0.05 0.035-0.049 0.030-0.034
Flouride mg/L 1 0.7-0.9 0.6-0.69
Surfactants mg/L 1.5 1.05-1.49 0.9-1.04
Manganese mg/L 0.2 0.14-0.19 0.12-0.13
Iron mg/L 1.5 1.0-1.4 0.9-1.04
Arsenic mg/L 0.02 0.014-0.019 0.012-0.13
Cadmium mg/L 0.005 0.0035-0.0049 0.003-0.0034
Mercury mg/L 0.002 0.0014-0.0019 0.0012-0.0013
Lead mg/L 0.05 0.035-0.049 0.03-0.034
Applicable to Water Samples in Stations FW-11, FW-12,

Table 6-5 Environmental Quality Performance Level (EQPL) Used in Marine Water Quality Monitoring
Biological Oxygen Demand mg/L N/A N/A N/A
Chloride, mg/L mg/L N/A N/A N/A
Color, TCU TCU 75 53-74 45-52
Fecal Coliform MPN/ 100ml 200 150-199 100-149
Nitrate mg/L 10 7-9 6-6.9
pH 6.5-8.5 5.1-6.4 4.0-5.0
Phosphate mg/L 0.5 0.35-0.49 0.3-0.34
Total Suspended Solids mg/L 80 56-79 48-55
Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L 10 7-9 6-6.9
Ammonia mg/L 0.05 0.035-0.049 0.03-0.034
Flouride mg/L 1.5 1.05-1.49 0.9-1.04
Surfactants mg/L 1.5 1.05-1.49 0.9-1.04
Manganese mg/L 0.4 0.3-0.39 0.24-0.29
Iron mg/L 1.5 1.05-1.49 0.9-1.04
Arsenic mg/L 0.02 0.014-0.019 0.012-0.013
Cadmium mg/L 0.005 0.0035-0.0049 0.003-0.0034
Mercury mg/L 0.002 0.0014-0.0019 0.0012-0.0013
Lead mg/L 0.05 0.035-0.049 0.03-0.034
Applicable to Water Samples in Stations MW-2, MW-3

Figure 6-2- Sampling Map for Air, Noise, and Water Monitoring

Table 6-6 Sampling Location Reference Table (Reference Figure 6-2)

River/Creek Station No. Description
Water Monitoring Stations

Payongpayong Creek FW-11 Downstream Payongpayong Creek
Tinigbasan Creek FW-12 Confluence of Tributaries
Payongpayong, Tinigbasan DW-2 Sitio Payongpayong Water Source
Tinigbasan, Tubay DW-3 Brgy. Tinigbasan Water Source
Payongpayong Coastal Area MW-2 Coastal area at Sitio Payongpayong
Tinigbasan Coastal Area MW-3 Coastal area at Brgy. Tinigbasan
Ambient Air Monitoring Stations
Pier yard A-4 Near Limestone Crushing Plant
Pier yard near Causeway A-5 Stockyards at the causeway;
Brgy. Tinigbasan, Tubay A24-6 Near Brgy. Hall
SW- Surface Water, MW- Marine Water, DW- Drinking Water

Figure 6-3 Freshwater Ecology Sampling Map

Figure 6-4 Marine Resources Monitoring Location Map

6.4. Environmental Guarantee and Monitoring Fund Commitments
6.4.1. Mine Rehabilitation Fund
According to Section 181 of DAO 2004-54, “A Mine Rehabilitation Fund (MRF) shall be established and
maintained by each operating Contractor/Permit Holder as a reasonable environmental deposit to
ensure availability of funds for the satisfactory compliance with the commitments and performance of
the activities stipulated in the EPEP/AEPEP during specific project phase. The MRF shall be deposited
as a Trust Fund in a Government depository bank and shall be used for physical and social rehabilitation
of areas and communities affected by mining activities and for research on the social, technical and
preventive aspects of rehabilitation.”
The MRF is divided into two separate funds known as the Monitoring Trust Fund (MTF) and the
Rehabilitation Cash Fund (RCF). These two funds are established by the Proponent as a reasonable
environmental deposit to ensure availability of funds for satisfactory compliance with the commitments
and performance of the activities identified in the EPEP/ AEPEP during specific Project phases.
6.4.1.1. Monitoring Trust Fund
The Monitoring Fund is created for the exclusive use in the monitoring of environmental management
programs approved by the MRFC. The deposited amount is not less than Php 150,000. This fund is
intended to cover maintenance and other operating budgets for the transportation and travel expenses,
cost of laboratory analysis, cost of supplies and materials, cost of communication services, cost of
consultancy work and other reasonable expenses that may be incurred by the monitoring team. The
Proponent may be requested to increase the deposit amount by the MRFC.
6.4.1.2. Rehabilitation Cash Fund
The Rehabilitation Cash Fund is created to ensure compliance with the approved rehabilitation activities
and schedules, including research programs, as defined in the EPEP/ AEPEP. The RCF shall be
equivalent to 10% of the total amount needed to implement the EPEP or Php 5.0 million, whichever is
lower. The final amount to be deposited will be discussed and approved by the MRFC.
6.4.2. Environmental Trust Fund
The Environmental Trust Fund is created to use for payments to damages related to mine facilities
operation. The ETF is pegged, at a minimum, of Php 100,000. The final amount to be deposited will be
discussed and approved by the MRFC.
6.4.3. Final Mine Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Fund
Deposits to Final Mine Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Fund are made each year prior to the
ending or operations for the purpose of post mining rehabilitation and project decommissioning. The
total amount to be deposited will be based on the estimated cost to implement the programs to be
identified in the Final Mine Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Plan as approved by the CLRF Steering
Committee.
Based on the provisions of the Phil. Mining Act, a project with a 15-year mine life shall have a 11-year
payment accrual schedule to start by the third year of operations. Full FMRDF deposit shall be in place
by Year 13 or two years prior to the end of operations.

6.4.4. Annual Environmental Protection and Enhancement Program (AEPEP) Cost
Funding of the EPEP will be done internally and will be part of the Environmental Management costs
budgeted by the company during operations. Approval of the annual programs and costs will be under
the direction of the MRFC and monitoring of the expenditures is performed by the MMT. The minimum
expenditures are expected to be 3% to 5% of the direct mining costs. The total minimum projected
EPEP expenditures for the Agata Limestone Project would be in the range of Php 186 million to Php
310 million. The estimated budget for the various EPEP management components is provided in Table
3-4 in Section 3.

Section 7 – Abandonment Plan
7. Abandonment and Rehabilitation Program
This document provides the framework for the protection, conservation, enhancement and restoration
of the areas affected by the ALP and its auxiliary facilities. The Company has identified programs to
protect and restore the environment while optimizing the contribution to the sustainable development
of its host communities.
Since the ALP lies at the southwestern portion of the ANLP, there will be auxiliary facilities including the
causeway, roads, and stockyards which were originally planned to be rehabilitated after the mining life
of the ANLP but will be extended for the use of the ALP.
The scope of the Final Mine Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Plan (FMRDP) covers both the
restoration of the areas directly affected by the ALP and the decommissioning and rehabilitation of other
facilities originally built for the ANLP. These shall include the ALP surface mine area, existing causeway,
roads, camp facilities, processing plant, and stockyards.
The overall mine rehabilitation strategy to be implemented is shown on Figure 7-1.
7.1. Plan Objectives
The overall objective of the rehabilitation and closure plan is to rehabilitate the Project area in a manner
that promotes sustainable environment towards a self-reliant community. Key action items in this
process include the following:
 Implementation of a responsible and environmentally sound decommissioning process.

 Restoration of the floral and faunal biodiversity of the disturbed areas and preservation of
endemic species.
 Establish the sustainability of community programs implemented during the mine operation.
 Promote a self-reliant and sustaining community after the closure of the mining Project by
establishing income generation projects for the community as part of the final rehabilitation.
 Establish the final land use of the Project area such that long term environmental impacts are
prevented or eliminated in harmony with the ANLP Final Land use which will be the
transformation of mined- out areas into an Agroforestry-Tourism Site after the end of Mine Life.
7.2. Rehabilitation Criteria and Performance Standards
Adopted from the ANLP Rehabilitation plan, the following mine closure and general performance
standard shall be the basis in evaluating the success and efficiency of the rehabilitation;
• Water, noise, and air quality sampling results are within the standards set by the DENR.
• Minimal soil erosion is visible in all disturbed areas.
• Minimal siltation of rivers, creeks and other water bodies.
• Disturbed areas are densely vegetated with a seedling survival rate of not less than 80%.
• Terrestrial floral and faunal species are visible within the rehabilitated areas.
• Members of the People’s Organization handling the reforestation program are actively
monitoring the rehabilitated area and are generating income from their agricultural products.
• The community is sustainably managing the livelihood projects being implemented through the
SDMP prior to the end of the mine operations.

Figure 7-1 Progressive Rehabilitation and Closure Activities Process Diagram
Annual Progressive Rehabilitation Area

Implement Annual Progressive
starting Year 2 of operations
Rehabilitation Programs
Landform Stability Enhancement and
Re-vegetation
Physical Resources
Biological and Ecological Resources
Mine Closure Impact Analysis Land Use Plans and Alternatives
Quality of Life
Social and Cultural Values
Sustainable Economic Development
Implementation of the FMRDP
Removal of Plant, Process Equipment

Decommissioning Plan and Infrastructure
Topography/Landform Information
Hydrology Information
Rehabilitation Plan
Biology Information
Rehabilitation Methods
Schedule of Activities
Research Programs
Employee Retrenchment Packages

Labor Support Programs
Social Plan Skills Training
Transfer of Social Assets
Community Livelihood Programs
IEC Programs
Active and Passive Mine Closure Stage Maintenance and Monitoring Plan
Years 1 to 4
Long-term Maintenance Period Years 5-10 Internal Monitoring Programs

Third Party Monitoring
Transfer of SDMP Programs
Objectives of the FMRDP Met? Issuance of the Final Certificate of

Third Party Environmental Audit and Reporting Relinquishment by the CLRF
on FMRDP Activities and Results Steering Committee
No
No
Partial Objectives Met? Continue Project Closure Programs
Yes
Issuance of Partial Certificate of

Relinquishment

7.3. Progressive Rehabilitation Program
The principle of progressive rehabilitation will be applied as mining progresses. Rehabilitation will be
undertaken in areas that are considered as inactive mining sites. While not considered as part of the
FMRDP activities, the progressive rehabilitation program will in effect constitute the start of the closure
activities. Given the mining plan, the rehabilitation of the quarry areas will happen after Year 15 and
rehabilitation of rest of the quarry sites will be carried out during final rehabilitation phase. The
rehabilitation of other disturbed areas outside the quarry site will be done progressively.
The progressive rehabilitation involves slope stabilization measures, revegetation, and reforestation to
reduce the long-term exposure of the disturbed area. This shall be implemented concurrent with the
mining operations.
It is estimated that by end of Year 15, approximately 95.97 hectares, or 18% of the total disturbed area
has been subjected to progressive rehabilitation. This includes the auxiliary facilities like road, stockpile
areas, and other surface mine areas. Vegetation established within these areas will be continuously
maintained all throughout the duration of the project. A map of the progressive reforestation and
rehabilitation areas is shown on Figure 7-2.
7.4. Closure and Decommissioning Plan
A ten (10)-year closure program has been established to meet the objectives of the FMRDP. The first
five (5) years are considered the active phase of rehabilitation and decommissioning period. This will
be followed by another three (3) years of the passive phase which consist primarily of monitoring, care
and maintenance and validation of the viability and long-term sustainability of the rehabilitation
programs. Internal and third-party monitoring programs will continue during this three (3) year period.
The processing of necessary documents for final relinquishment will commence on the remaining last
two (2) years of the final rehabilitation schedule. A map of the reforestation and rehabilitation during
abandonment is shown on Figure 7-3. The overall Final Mine Decommissioning and Rehabilitation Plan
is divided into five (5) major phases; Transition Period, Active Rehabilitation, Passive Rehabilitation,
Relinquishment and Post Rehabilitation Transition.
The Transition period will cover Years 2036-2037 which will be the end of Operations. This is where
consultation with relevant stakeholders in terms of the FMRDP implementation will take place and
decommissioning of mine facilities commences. Decommissioning is defined as the transitional period
that will begin with the end of the quarry operations and ends with the removal of all unwanted
infrastructure. Former active working areas and immovable structures that will no longer be functional
will be removed during the decommissioning activity. All movable structures such as heavy equipment,
generator set, and buildings will be removed from the project area except for selected equipment which
is intended for the mine rehabilitation. Decommissioning strategies and protocols for each mine
component will be developed. Included in these will be mitigating measures to assure that potential
adverse environmental impacts will be minimized during decommissioning period. All building
structures, recreational facilities, housing, pier and causeway will be turned over to the appropriate
Local Government Units.
The Active Rehabilitation Phase comes in the first five (5) years after operation, covering Year 2037
through Year 2041. Activities in this period will include rehabilitation and revegetation of the quarry
areas and camp facilities covering approximately 18.89 hectares. Overburden waste and topsoil
materials from the waste and topsoil stockpiles will be used to reclaim disturbed areas in preparation
for the rehabilitation and re-vegetation program. Structural improvements are considered to be items
necessary for erosion control, soil stabilization, revegetation and infrastructure support.

Figure 7-2 Annual Progressive Rehabilitation Schedule

API Agata Limestone Project November 2020- Rev00
Figure 7-3- Final Mine Rehabilitation Schedule

This will be followed by soil treatment to prepare areas for revegetation. Finally, the area will be
reforested based on the pre-determined Land Use Plan. Rehabilitation activities during the Closure
Period will be a continuation of the rehabilitation activities from the Operations Phase.
After five (5) years of active rehabilitation, Passive Rehabilitation shall then take place from Year 2042
through Year 2044. Care and maintenance of the rehabilitated areas will be continued. Environmental
control structures such as siltation ponds and silt fences will be maintained until the area is fully
rehabilitated. Decommissioning of these structures maybe considered after a final assessment to
determine if these structures will no longer be necessary in the long-term. Further, Environmental
Monitoring Program will be in place throughout the Mine Closure and Decommissioning Phase of the
Project. Periodic environmental monitoring and evaluation will be conducted to evaluate compliance
with regulations set by the DENR related to water, air and noise quality standards. The monitoring will
also include evaluation of the stability of the rehabilitated areas with regards to erosion, siltation,
progress of reforestation, and changes in the hydrologic conditions.
Relinquishment process will commence in Year 2045 once the rehabilitation plan is completed. A third-
party audit team will be commissioned by the Government thru the MRFC, CLRF-SC, and the Company
to determine compliance to the FMRDP. This audit shall continue until the post rehabilitation transition
where management of the entire concession area will be turned over to the Government or to
beneficiaries approved by the DENR and MRFC.
7.5. Mine Closure Team and Schedule
The Tenement and Mine Environmental Protection and Enhancement Office (MEPEO) will take lead
in the implementation of the Abandonment Plan and will oversee the monitoring and evaluation
activities. These activities will be performed for the final rehabilitation period until the Certificate of
Relinquishment is issued to the Company and the rehabilitated areas will be turned over to the host
communities.
An overall diagram of the entire process of rehabilitation and closure activities is shown on Table 7-1.
Table 7-1 Overall Final Rehabilitation Schedule

7.6. Final Land Use
Consistent to the final land use plan of the ANLP and ALP and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan
(CLUP) of the three (3) host Municipalities of Tubay, Santiago, and Jabonga all in the province of
Agusan del Norte, and the Community Resource Management Framework (CRMF) of the People’s
Organization, the Mining Cum Tourism Plan of Tubay, and the Memorandum of Agreement signed by
and in between the LGU of Tubay and the Company, the final land use of the ALP area would be a
Agroforestry-Ecotourism Land.
As envisioned by the Company and its stakeholders during the community consultation, the Project
area will be hosting the CARAGA Sustainable Agricultural Resource and Learning Center after mine
life thru the collective efforts of the Company, Local Government Units, the CBFMA-POs and the DENR.
This is in accordance with the vision of the host Municipalities to become the center of Agri-Tourism
and Responsible Mining Industry in the Province. Final Land Use Concept is shown on Figure 7-4.
The management zones within the Project area will be established depending on the identified land
use. Protection Zone will be areas with regulated human activities. These will include the headwater
sources and the biodiversity enrichment areas determined by the community. The established agro
forestry area will be part of the Production Zone. Resource extraction and livelihood activities will be
concentrated in this area.
7.7. Mine Closure Cost
In accordance with Section 71 of RA 7942 and Item f, Section 1 of Executive Order No. 270-A, a Final
Mine Rehabilitation and Decommissioning Fund (FMRDF) will be established by the Proponent. This is
to ensure that the full cost of the approved FMRDP is accrued before the end of the operating life of the
mine. The cost estimates will be based on the closure methodology and concepts, taking in
consideration expected inflation and technology advances among other items. The estimates will also
cover full extent of work necessary to achieve the objectives of mine closure, such as but not limited to,
decommissioning, rehabilitation, maintenance and monitoring, and employee and other social costs,
including residual care, if necessary, over a ten-year period.
The Annual cash provisions shall be made based on the following formula:
Annual Provision = (Cost of Implementing the FMRDP) x (Percentage Required)
A project with a 15-year mine life will have a 11-year payment accrual schedule to start by the third year
of operations. Full FMRDF deposit will be in place by Year 13 or two years prior to the end of operations.
A detailed cost evaluation and expenditure schedule will be included as part of the FMRDP.

Figure 7-4 Proposed Final Land Use Concept

Section 8 – Institutional Plan for EMP Implementation-
8.1 Institutional Set-Up
The Tenements and Mine Environmental Protection and Enhancement Office (TMEPEO) is established
for the Project to implement and monitor the environmental management programs. The TMEPEO is
headed by the TMEPEO Manager who supervises approximately 50 personnel, including a Forester,
Environmental Compliance Officers, Pollution Control Officer, ISO Management, Tenements and
Liaison Officers and a contingent of rank and file employees. The unit will be part of the Tenements and
Permits and SHES group of the project (Table 1-30).
The Corporate Environment and Social Compliance group is also providing assistance to the Project
operations with regards to the technical and legal aspect of the implementation of the environmental
management programs. Coordination with regional environmental agencies is done by the site
Environment Department while coordination with environmental agencies located in Manila is done by
the Corporate Environment Department.
The functional and administrative head of the TMEPEO Department will be the Project General
Manager. Concerns and recommendations by government agencies, institutions and other interested
parties, relative to the environmental compliance and performance are both assessed and reviewed by
the Corporate and site Environment-Permitting Departments. Regular update on the environmental
performance of the Project is discussed on a weekly basis through the weekly management committee
meeting attended by the executives from the Corporate Office and by the Project GM. A separate
meeting, specific for monitoring of the overall legal compliance of the company, including environmental
compliance, will be scheduled also on a weekly basis.
In compliance with the requirements of the DENR, there will be a designated Pollution Control Officer
(PCO) under the TMEPEO to oversee the pollution control program of the company as mandated by
DENR. The implementation of the entire environmental monitoring program is also under the
supervision of the PCO. The Forester will be in charge of the nursery operations and overall
rehabilitation strategies. There will also be a separate Environmental Officer for structural rehabilitation
(i.e slope control and structural controls). And lastly, since the company intends to certify the ALP under
an Integrated Management System (ISO 14001- Environmental Management System; ISO 9001-
Quality Management System; and ISO 45001- Occupational Health & Safety Management System)
similar to the nickel operations, an ISO Compliance Officer will also be included as part of the MEPEO.
For the tenements side, there will be 2 liaison officers and an administration assistant.
The functional diagram of the MEPEO is shown on Figure 8-1.

Section 8 – Institutional Plan for EMP Implementation-
Figure 8-1 Mine Environmental Protection and Enhancement Office (MEPEO) Functional Diagram
Limestone Project
General Manager
Environment and Social
Compliance Makati- HO
TENEMENTS and
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGER (TMEPEO)
Clerks (2 Envi Admin Assistants,

1 Tenements Admin Assistant)
Rehabilitation and ISO Compliance Officer-

Reforestation Integrated Management Pollution Compliance Environmental Officer
FORESTER System Officer (PCO) (Rehabilitation)
Rehabilitation Nursery Document/ (2) Tenements Waste Environmental Erosion Structural

Operations Record Controller Liaison Officer Management Monitoring Control Controls


ALP EIS Main Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ALP EIS Main Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ALP EIS Main Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Table of Contents

Agata Processing Inc. · EIS Limestone Project

Section Title Page No.

Environmental Impact Statement Report Contents

2 Environmental Baseline Conditions for Critical Environmental Parameters, Impact

Environmental Impact Statement Report Contents

Environmental Impact Statement Report Contents

3 Environmental Management Plan

4 Environmental Risk Assessment and Emergency Response Policy Guidelines

5 Social Development Plan and IEC Framework

6 Environmental Compliance Monitoring

Environmental Impact Statement Report Contents

7 Abandonment and Rehabilitation Program

8 Institutional Plan for EMP Implementation

A- Sworn Statement of Proponent Accountability

Environmental Impact Statement Report Contents

Agata Processing Inc. · EIS Limestone Project

Table No Title Page No.

Environmental Impact Statement Report Contents

Environmental Impact Statement Report Contents

Table 3-1- Environmental Management Plan Construction Phase ...................................................... 3-2

Table 4-1 Properties of ANFO ............................................................................................................. 4-1

Table 5-1 Project Impact Areas by Sector ........................................................................................... 5-1

Table 6-1 Environmental Monitoring Program (EMoP) ........................................................................ 6-4

Table 7-1 Overall Final Rehabilitation Schedule…………………………………………………………...7-6

Environmental Impact Statement Report Contents

Table No Title Page No.

Figure 1-1 Agata Limestone Project Location Map .............................................................................. 1-3

Figure 2-1 Land Classification Map ..................................................................................................... 2-2

Environmental Impact Statement Report Contents

Figure 5-1- Project Impact Area Map ................................................................................................... 5-2

Figure 6-1 Third Party Compliance Monitoring Organization............................................................... 6-3

Environmental Impact Statement Report Contents

Figure 7-1 Progressive Rehabilitation and Closure Activities Program Diagram……………………...7-2

Figure 8-1 TMEPEO Functional Diagram………………………………………………………………….8-1

Environmental Impact Statement Report Contents

E.1 Project Fact Sheet

Table E-1 Basic Project Information

Project Name Agata Limestone Project (ALP)

Environmental Impact Statement Report Page | E-1

E.2 Process Documentation

E.2.1 EIA Team

Table E-2 Agata Limestone Project EIS Preparers

No. Name Field of Expertise

The Sworn Accountability Statement of the preparers is provided in the Appendices.

Environmental Impact Statement Report Page | E-2

E.3.2 EIA Study Schedule

Environmental Impact Statement Report Page | E-3

Table E-3 EIA Activities Schedule

July- August 2020 EIS Report Preparation

August 2020 First Draft Report Submission

September 25, 2020 Public Scoping Activity

October 25, 2020 Second Draft Report Submission

December 09, 2020 First EIARC Technical Review Meeting

December 18, 2020 Submission of First EIS Report Revision

February 01-19, 2021 EIS Report 2nd Revision Preparation

Environmental Impact Statement Report Page | E-4

Date of Implementation Environmental Study In Charge/ Data Source

July 2020 Geohazard Assessment API (In-house)

Terrestrial Flora and Fauna