The Guidelines For Water and Sanitation Services in Liberia

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 41

THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA

OCTOBER 2010

THE GUIDELINES FOR WATER


AND SANITATION SERVICES IN
LIBERIA
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS

In Collaboration with The Liberia WASH Consortium and


UNICEF
MINISTERS FOREWORD

Liberia is striving to correct its past performance in the water, sanitation and hygiene
sector. The past has been characterized with a fragmented yet decentralized structure
of water governance. This state of fragmentation has led to a lack of effective
implementation in the absence of technical and procedural standards. This is reflected
in the high rate of failures and non-functional (35 to 45%) WASH facilities across the
Country at any given time. Given the lack of capacity at community-level and the
unsuitability of any central structure to deal with the huge backlog of maintenance
problems nation-wide, breakdown downtime is often over a year or more for the vast
number of facilities, thus increasing the likelihood of communities returning to traditional
pollution sources of water supply and open defecation.

A milestone in the era of the Poverty Reduction Strategy is the promulgation of policies
and policy instruments to govern various sectors. For the water, sanitation and hygiene
sector, the Government of Liberia through the Cabinet has endorsed Integrated Water
Resources Management (IWRM) and Water Supply & Sanitation (WSS) Policies as the
basic foundations of creating uniformity and centralizing water governance. With the
imminent prospect of being approved by the National Legislature, efforts are now
concentrated on the mechanisms of operationalizing these documents.

These documents have unanimously sounded the necessity of a uniformed and


standardized operational procedure for implementing water, sanitation and hygiene
programs and projects in Liberia. This is against the background that past attempts
(1999 and 2004) to establish and implement standards have been weak and narrow in
scope, not addressing all aspects of the sector.

These improved guidelines have come as a result of the dedicated work of water and
sanitation professionals with wide range of knowledge in the planning, execution,
monitoring and evaluation of WASH projects worldwide. Our heartfelt gratitude goes to
such individuals who tirelessly supported and worked to the completion of these
guidelines

The guidelines are therefore intended to add value to the sector by instituting a state-of-
the art technology in conducting business in Liberia.

Honorable Attorney Samuel Kofi Woods, II

Minister of Public Works

REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA

2
THE GUIDELINES FOR WATER AND SANITATION
SERVICES IN LIBERIA

INTRODUCTION

Many years before 2007, the implementation of water, sanitation and hygiene activities
was un-guided by standards, with the main implementer being the public sector. At the
same time technology options were equally limited, whereas hygiene issues were at
their lowest ebb. Much has transpired with more technology options, the involvement of
private and non-governmental organizations leading the implementation of WASH
activities.

This should in its true application place more authority in the hands of the public
institutions to leverage resources into monitoring, supervision and evaluation. In order
to perform this important role, standards need to be established and agreed upon for
effective monitoring and enforcement for the good of the Liberian population. Such
standards must exhibit best practices and be state of the art.

In 1999, the first of any attempt to organize standards to govern WASH activities were
introduced into the sector. These were later modified in 2004, with mere considerations
on alternative designs for sanitation facilities without recommending additional options
for facilities. A review of both documents proved limitations and thus a unanimous
attempt to broaden the scope the combined guidelines to incorporate other options was
agreed.

The Water and Sanitation Technical Guidelines is aiming at covering a large territory of
options for implementing water and sanitation activities in Liberia, with the necessary
hygiene components being the foundation for achieving success. The Guidelines are
meant to be used as tools for technicians, as a guideline for monitors and evaluatorsand
for decision-makers.

3
INDEX

1. Hand dug wells ................................................................................................................... 9

1.1 Hand dug well site selection ....................................................................................... 9

1.2 Hand dug well design and construction ...................................................................... 9

2. Drilled wells ...................................................................................................................... 18

2.1 Drilled wells .............................................................................................................. 18

2.2 Drilled well design and construction .......................................................................... 18

2.3 Well protection.......................................................................................................... 19

2.4 Handpump ................................................................................................................ 20

3. Excreta Disposal .............................................................................................................. 21

3.1 Choosing the right technolgy .................................................................................... 21

3.2 Latrine Site Selection ................................................................................................ 21

3.3 Alternating pit institutional Latrine Design and Construction ..................................... 21

4. Family Latrine................................................................................................................... 29

List of Figures

Figure 1.1: Details of hand dug well ......................................................................................... 12

Figure 1.2: Details of well construction ..................................................................................... 13

Figure 1.3: Well Technical Scheme ......................................................................................... 14

Figure 1.4: Schema of Reinforcement for Apron & Pump Base ............................................... 15

Figure 1.5: Well Apron/Head R.C Slab Framing Plan & Details .............................................. 16

Figure 1.6: Scheme of surface Area & Soak Away .................................................................. 17

Figure 3.1: Alternative Pit Institutional Latrine .......................................................................... 24

Figure 3.2: Alternative Pit Institutional Latrine with 4 cubicles .................................................. 25

Figure 3.3: Alternative Pit Institutional Latrine with 5 cubicles .................................................. 26

Figure 3.4: Roofing plan for alternating pit institutional latrine .................................................. 27

Figure 3.5: Family Sanplat (Reinforced Concrete) ................................................................... 28

4
Annexes

Annex 1 Water Points Constructed /Rehabiliated & Assessment Form .................................... 31

Annex 2 Handing Over form for Drilled Well ........................................................................... 33

Annex 3 Borehole Report ......................................................................................................... 34

Annex 4 Disinfecting a well by sperchlorination ........................................................................ 37

Annex 5 Testing the yield of well ............................................................................................. 39

Annex 6 Pit Latrine Construction/ Rehabilitation/ Assessment Form ....................................... 40

5
Glossary of Terms

Annulus - the space between a well casing and the wall of a dug or drilled hole (shaft) in the
ground

Apron - a concrete platform placed around the top casing of a well to provide sanitary protection.

Aquifer – a water bearing geologic formation that yield sufficient water to wells and springs

Artesian aquifer- an aquifer whose water is under pressure greater than atmospheric pressure

Casing – material used to seal off a well shaft from the earth surrounding it, for example concrete
rings, PVC, steel, etc

CLTS – Community Led Total Sanitation – a participatory approach of improving sanitaion


conditions, where the community takes the lead to find its own solutions to mak the area free of
open defecation

Collar- the reinforced concrete beam placed around the latrine pit as a footing for the walls of the
latrine to prevent caving in of the pit

Concrete- a mixture of water, cement, sand and crushed rocks or pebble usually expressed in a
ratio or three numbers representing cement, sand and crushed rocks, either by volume or weight

Cone of depression- a conical dimple in the water table which develops when there is draw
down in a well

Conglomerate- a sedimentary rock made up mostly of rounded gravel

Consolidated – to be made hard or solid

Drawdown- the magnitude of the lowering of the water surface in a well, and of the water
adjacent to the well, resulting from withdrawal of water from the well by pumping or other forms of
extraction

Drilled well – a well constructed of small diameter using auger or mechanized drilling equipment

Downtake pipe – A vertical pipe fitted to a gutter to carry water from the gutter to the ground or a
storage tank

Effluent – the liquid coming out of a waste water treatment process

formation – the formal unit for the classification of lithologic sequences, which for Liberia are
Quaternary Sands, Edina sandstone, Farmington River Formation, Jurassic Diabase, Paynesville
Sandstone and Precambrian Granite Basement

Ferrocement – A technique of building structures using steel mesh, steel bars and cement-sand
mortar

Ferrocement tank – A water tank constructed using ferrocement technology

Gravel- sediments with grain size between 0.2 centimeters (0.08 inch) and 205 centimeters (81
inches)

Gravity water supply scheme – an arrangement for water supply where the source of water is
at a higher elevation from the point of delivery. Structures are bilt to tap the source and pipes are
laid from the source to the delivery point to transport water. Water supply is usually provided
through taps

6
Gutter – A channel that collects and transports water. Genrally referred in the context of channels
fitted on walls to collect flow from roof

Hand dug well- a manually constructed well, with diameter larger than 0.6 meter, which is
usually lined with concrete and sealed

In-site- 1) in its original place 2) occurring at the location where it was formed

Institutional latrine – a latrine with multiple accesses for use at an institution usually a school or
health center

Laterite a tropical soil rich in aluminium and iron formed under condition of good drainage

Latrine – a toilet with a pit or trench in the ground, and which is covered by a slab or seat with an
access hole

Lining – The protection of walls of an excavation or a channel

Lithologic – of or relating to lithology

Lithology – the physical description of the occurrence, distribution and classification of rocks

Log- a time and / or depth specific record of rocks penetrated, conditions met and activities
carried out during the construction of well

Manhole- a covered opening on top of the well to allow access to the well

Mortar- a mixture of water, sand and cement expressed as a ratio of two numbers representing
cement and sand, either by volume or weight

Operation and Maintenance – the day to day running of services including regular and minor
repair works

PVC – poly vinyl chloride

Permeability- the ability for water (or a liquid) to flow through a rock or formation

Radius of influence- the distance from the center of a well to the outer limit of its cone of
depression

Rain water harvesting – The method of collecting runoff from rainwaterfor use as water for
human consumption. Generally used when runoff from a roof is collected and stored for future
use

Safe drinking water – Potable water that meets the quality criteria accepted in the country

Sandstone – a sedimentary rock made up mostly of sand

Sedimentary- particles and fragments that have been transported by water, wind or gravity

Spring – The area or location wherever ground water meets the earth‟s surface, and converts to
a surface flowing stream

Spring Box – The structure built to protect a spring and collect water from the spring for suplying
to a community

Soakaway pit-a pit of porous construction with unlined walls which is backfilled with crushed
rocks to allow water from the hand pump or well to seep into the ground

7
Static water column- the depth of water in a well under static water conditions

Static water level (SWL) – (1) the elevation of the water table or pressure surface when it is not
influenced by pumping or other forms of extraction from the ground water body (2) the level of
elevation to which the top of a water column may rise, if afforded the opportunity to do so, from
an artisan aquifer

Super chlorinate- the addition of chlorine solution to water to establish a „free chlorine residual‟
of 5 milligrams per litre after 30 minutes of contact time

Telescoped well- a well constructed with at least two different sizes of casing usually with the
smaller diameter casing used to extend the depth of the well

Water seal – An arrangement provided in flushed toilets or latrines where a U bend is provided in
the pipe which retauns water. It prevents flies and smell from entering the cubicle

Well- a hole or drilled in the ground , usually fitted with a pump, for the withdrawal of water

8
1. Hand dug wells
1.1 Hand dug well site selection

a. In siting a well potential sources of groundwater contamination must be clearly


established including: pit latrines, septic tanks, sewage lines, garbage dump sites,
animal lots, unprotected, open or abandoned wells, old and/or existing cemetery or
burial sites, buried fuel - diesel, gasoline, kerosene tanks and any other sources of
contamination such as chemical depots, industrial waste.

b. A well must be sited at least 98 feet (30 meters) above potential sources of
contamination. In fractured formations special care should be taken and where possible
the radius of influence of the well should be calculated.

c. The local community and local authorities should be involved in the process of well site
selection.

1.2 Hand dug well design and construction

Detailed technical drawings of a hand dug well are presented in Figures 1.1, 1.2 and
1.3. The following paragraphs give the specifications for the construction of hand dug
wells in Liberia.

1.2.1 Manhole

A hand dug well should have an access manhole with the following dimensions: 14
inches by 14 inches (35.6 by 35.6 centimeters). The manhole should be sealed
immediately after the well is completed and disinfected – see below. The manhole
should only be opened in emergency to allow access when the hand pump is not
1
operating . The manhole cover should be sealed with cement on a 0.5 inch (1.3
centimeters) high footing to prevent water from seeping into the well. The well cover
slab must have a 4 inch (10 centimeters) PVC pipe extending 12 inches (30
centimeters) above the slab for hand pump installation.

1.2.2 Well lining

A hand dug well must be fully lined with: concrete rings fabricated with a concrete
mixture of 1:2:3 and reinforced with wire mesh; and/or an in-situ lining with a concrete
mix of 1:2.5:5 and 8 mm diameter re-rods (Watt and Wood, 1979).

In low yielding stable consolidated formations2 perforated culverts can be used at the
intake section of the well to increase well recharge rates – seepage holes can be
inserted by casting lengths of oiled re-rod or wooden pegs in to the rings at an upward
(to reduce the risk of fine sand being drawn from the aquifer, through the seepage
holes, in to the well) angle toward the inside of the well, and removing them before the
concrete is completely set – see Fig 1.3.

1
Well rehabilitation should be conducted by removing the well cover-slab.
2
In unconsolidated formations porous concrete (1:1:4) can be used for the intake section,
however these rings are weaker and consequently unless the well has been lined in situ, this
method is not recommended.
9
1.2.3 Diameter and annulus

The inner diameter of a hand dug well must be at least 4 feet (1.2 meter). In the case
of a telescoped well, the inner diameter of the telescoped concrete ring must not be
less than 3 feet (0.9 meter).

The first 10 feet (3 meters) of the annulus – the space between the concrete rings and
the wall of the hole in the ground – must be cement grouted to avoid entry of surface
runoff. The cement grouting should be of 1:1 ratio.

1.2.4 Filter bed

Crushed rocks or gravel must be used as a filter bed at the bottom of each hand dug
well. The filter bed of a well sited in unconsolidated sediments (or sandy formation)
must be graded to 0.25 inch (6.4 millimeters) crushed rock. In consolidated formations,
the filter must be of 0.5 inch (12.7 millimeters) crushed rock. The thickness of the filter
bed must not be less than 1 foot (30 centimeters). The annuals of the intake section - at
least the bottom 4 feet (1.2 meters) of the well - should be backfilled with crushed rock.

1.2.5 Apron

The apron of a hand dug well must have a 5 - degree slope in the direction of the
drainage channel and the soakaway pit. The apron must be circular in shape with a
distance from the edge of well-head to edge of drainage apron of 5 feet (1.5 meters)
and a thickness of at least 4 inches (10.2 centimeters). Reinforced concrete must be
used in apron construction, using 1:2:3 concrete mixture, reinforced with wire mesh.
The well head needs to be attached to the apron to ensure a sanitary seal. Either
reinforced concrete or blocks must also be used in apron rim and drainage construction.
The void spaces in the block must be filled with mortar. The drainage channel must be
plastered with a 1:3 mortar.

1.2.6 Drainage Channel

Hand dug well must be constructed with a drainage channel designed to carry water
from the apron to the soakaway. The drainage channel should be 10 inches (25
centimeters) wide by 6 inches (15 centimeters) deep by 16 feet (5 meters) long.

1.2.7 Soak away pit

The dimension of the soak away pit should be determined on the basis of a percolation
test but must be 3.2 feet (1 meter) in diameter and 6.5 feet (2 meters) deep, and must
be connected to the well apron by the drainage channel and be provided with a cover.

1.2.8 Minimum static water Column

Wells must have a sustainable yield3 of at least 264 gallons4 (1,000 litres) per hour. As
a proxy guideline for yield, any hand dug well constructed in the raining season- period

3
The sustainable yield of a well can be established by measuring the well‟s rate of discharge (in
gallons or litres/hour) over at least a 4 hour period at the point where the dynamic water level
stabilises at the level where the pump‟s intake will be installed. Care should be taken to dispose
of pumped water away from the well in order to minimise the chance of recharge/infiltration which
would reduce the validity of the results – a distance of >100m is recommended. Yield can be
measured using a flow meter on the pump‟s discharge pipe; or volumetrically by timing how long
10
from 1 May to 31 October – must have a static water column of at least 20 feet (6
meters). Any hand dug well constructed in the dry season – period form 1 November to
30 April- must have a static water column of at least 15 feet (4.5 meters).

1.2.9 Well Disinfection

Every hand dug well must be disinfected after it is constructed or after any repairs are
carried out on the well, before it can be used. This can be done by using 1 litre of 0.2%
strength chlorine solution for every 100 litres of water in the well, and allowing at least
30 minutes contact time before dewatering the well until chlorine levels are returned to
less than 0.5 mg/l of free residual chlorine. A detailed explanation for method of well
disinfection is given in Annex 2.

1.2.10 Inscription on well Apron

On completion of the well, the date of completion, the name of implementing and donor
agency, total depth of well and static water level must be clearly inscribed on the apron
of the well. The inscription should be done in an area which will not be disturbed often
by movement of people or water containers.

1.2.11 Water Quality test

Water quality test (chemical and bacteriological) should be done on all wells during and
after construction. Water should be tested for iron and other chemicals when the static
water level is reached and six months after completion of well. Such test results should
be properly documented and data kept with the community and county health
authorities.

Where a quality test proves the source unfit for consumption, the water source should
be sealed off and clearly marked as non-potable until remedial actions are taken.

1.2.12 Well Completion form

An electronic and printed Well Completion Form (Annex 1) must be submitted to the
Ministry of Public Works, District Commissioner, and community for all completed wells.

it takes to fill a container of known volume. Water levels can be measured using an electronic dip
meter, or a chalk covered tape with a weighted end.
4
Typical discharge rates for handpump vary but can be assumed to be in the range of 1,000
liters/hour (for deep well handpumps) - 2,000 liters/hour (for suction lift handpumps).

11
FIGURE 1.1 DETAILS OF A HAND DUG WELL
Afridev Hand Pump (or other approved make)

D12mm Ø bars spaced @


200mm bothways Manhole cover slab
0.10m thk reinf. concrete w / lifting hook
1 - No. D 12mm Ø circular well head (see details)
0.15 used 1:2:3 mix Manhole
Ground Level
0.15 1-No. D12mmØ circular

0.10
0.25
0.15m x 0.15m conc. curb 0.15 edge bar Ground Level
all around apron

0.54
used 1:2:3 mix
0.10

Figure 1.1: Details of hand dug well


0.10 0.70 0.10

0.33
0.30
D12mmØ bars spaced @
0.15 0.20m bothways
0.25

0.30 0.25
0.50

0.15 0.25
0.10m thick reinf. conc. X
apron with D12mmØ bars
DETAIL AT " X " space @ 0.20m bothways 120 internal dia. RCC culvert
with a 5 degree slope all around min thickness = 0.75m with 0.06m
backfill bars spaced @ 150mm bothways use 1:2:3 mix

excavation line
0.6m x 0.6m x 0.5m deep
3.90

water column
3.0m min in march to end of may mortar joint (0.20m to 0.25m) filled with pea gravel
(dry season) and 6.0m april to october
(rainy season )

foot valve

0.06m min crushed rock


REHAB WELLS 1 / 4" size

1. Refer to specification for full details of apron,


crushed rock backfill WELL SECTION
as shown
sanitary seal and well formation.
Aproximate depth of well depends
on the water table

2. Existing wells to be telescope / deepen shall used 0.9m (internal diameter ) 0.06m min filter coarse sand
culvert min thickness of 0.75m using 6mm bars spaced at 0.15m on center bothways.

3. The min depth to be excavated is 3m from the exisitng filter bed layer or
as per determine by concern field supervisor or water technician

12
FIGURE 1.2

DETAILS OF WELL CONSTRUCTION


Scale 1 / 40
Well Depth = 10 m (9 culv+4culv+1c.edge)

Fence Man hole 0.4 x0.4 m


Pump Base H = 0.3 m AFRIDEV
Well top H = 0.10 m

Apron H = 0.15 m
Steel rod 0.08 m

0.15m
0.10m
0.25m

Drainged area
with gravel

1.20 m
Rocks 0.15 m

1.40 m

Soil / Rock

Culvert 0.60 m

Argile cover
(or cement)

4.4M
WATER

Gravel pack 4 Perforated culvert 0.75 m


crushed rock 3/4"
0.50

1 Cutting edge (1m)

Gravel pack 0.30m


crushed rock 1/4"

Figure 1.2: Details of well construction

13
FIGURE 1.3

PERFORATED CULVERT CUTTING RING


Int. diam = 1.20 m Int. diam = 1.20 m
Ext. diam = 1.40 m Ext. diam = 1.40 m
H = 0.75 m H=1m

45° 45°

Mesh wire Mesh wire


0.75 1.00
Steel rod 6mm Steel rod 6mm
0.1
1.20
1.20

0.3

0.2

PERFORATED CULVERT CUTTING RING


Int. diam = 0.90m Int. diam = 1.20 m
Ext. diam = 1.10m Ext. diam = 1.40 m
H = 0.75 m H=1m

45° 45°

Mesh wire Mesh wire


0.75 1.00
Steel rod 6mm Steel rod 6mm
0.1
1.20
1.20

0.3

0.2

Figure 1.3: Well Technical Scheme

14
FIGURE 1.4
SCHEMA OF REINFORCEMENT
FOR APRON & PUMP BASE

Steel Rod 8 mm
30 bars of 2m

Steel Rod 8 mm
30 bars of 2m

Steel Rod 8 mm

Figure 1.4: Schema of Reinforcement for Apron & Pump Base

15
FIGURE 1.5 WELL APRON / HEAD R.C. SLAB FRAMING PLAN & DETAILS

D12mmØ bars spaced 0.20m


bothways

0.15
D12mmØ circular edge bar 150mmØ hole
for pump D12mmØ circular edge bar
D12mmØ bars spaced 0.20m 0.40 x 0.40m base plate
apart
R12mm handle

2.03
0.68
B B 4 afrldev anchor R12mm handle
bolts 0.33m on center

4.05
well head D12mmØ bars spaced
0.175m bothways
as shown

2.03
100mm thk, reinf, conc, apron
0.15 0.20 0.18 0.15

300x300mm ACCESS HOLE

0.15
WELL HEAD BAR SCHEDULE
DIAGRAM
APRON R.C.SLAB FRAMING PLAN

R12Ømm handle
1.35

D12mmØ handle 0.40 x 0.40m base plate


4 afridev
anchor bolts
0.05

D121mmØ bars spaced


0.10

D12mmØ bars spaced @ 0.175m bothways


0.20m apart D12mmØ bars spaced @ well head 1-No.D12mmØ circular SECTION AT "A"
0.20m bothways

Figure 1.5: Well Apron/Head R.C Slab Framing Plan & Details
opening edge bar SECTION A - A
0.15 1.20 1.35 1.20 0.15

Ground level D12mmØ bars space

0.10
at 0.15m c/c D10mmØ handle
0.25
0.30
0.23

A
0.15 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.23 0.23

SECTION "B - B" REINFORCEMENT PLAN TOP VIEW


All dimensions are in mtr.

16
Figure 1.6: Scheme of surface Area & Soak Away

17
2. Drilled wells
2.1 Drilled wells

2.1.1 Drilled well site selection

The criteria for site selection laid down in the section of construction of hand dug wells
(1.1 – Hand dug well site selction) also apply for drilled well site selection.

2.2 Drilled well design and construction

Detailed drawings giving design and construction details are given in Figures 2.1 and
2.2.

2.2.1 The Annulus

The annulus between the casing and drilled hope of a drilled well must not be less than
1 inch (2.5 cm). The first 10 feet (3 meters) of the drilled well annulus must be mortar
grouted to avoid entry of surface water. The inner diameter of the drilled well casing
must not be less than 4 inches (10.2 centimeters).

2.2.2 Casing for drilled wells

The top casing of a drilled well must extend at least 1 foot (0.3 meter) above the drilled
well apron to prevent the inflow of the surface water.

The location of the well screens should be determined by the depth and permeability of
the formations penetrated.

At least one screened section should be provided in the bottom one third of the well.

Only pressure PVC pipes and screens must be used in the completion of a drilled well.
Metallic casings are not accepted due to corrosion problems.

Two (2) types of borehole completion are recommended in Liberia according to the
geology:

For sedimentary and alluvial formations, full borehole lining must be used (Refer Figure
2.1). A sieve analysis should be conducted to determine screen slots size, the need and
design of an artificial gravel pack, however as a rough guideline for wells equipped with
handpumps a 0.5 to 0.75mm screen slot size, and gravel size 0.7mm – 1.25mm can be
used.

For soft granitic weathered rock, crack or fissures storing water, open hole completion
is recommended (Refer Figure 2.2).

2.2.3 Bottom Cap

A PVC sump of least 3 feet (1 meter) and bottom cap must be used to seal the bottom
of drilled wells (see Fig 2.1) to collect silt that may enter in the casing.

18
2.2.4 Borewell disinfection

Every completed drilled well must be disinfected (see above) and then sealed or capped
pending pump installation.

2.2.5 Apron, Drainage Channel and Soak away pit

The dimension of the drainage channel and soakaway pit for a drilled well are the same
as those of the hand dug well. (Refer figure 1.5 & 1.6).

The dimension of the drilled well apron are the same as those of hand dug well, except
when a submersible pump is installed in which case a drainage channel and soakaway
pit will not be necessary.

2.2.6 Well Yield

Wells must have a sustainable yield of at least 264 gallons (1,000 litres) per hour - if the
yield is found to be below this mark, the borehole should be considered as unusable.
Ideally a step-draw-down yield test should be performed on each drilled well. (Refer
annex 5 for details of a pump test)

2.2.7 Inscription on well Apron

On completion of the drilled well, the date of completion, the name of implementing and
donor agency, total depth of well and static water level must be clearly inscribed on the
apron of the well. The inscription should be done in an area which is not disturbed often
by movement of people or water containers.

2.2.8 Geologic log and well completion form

An electronic and printed Well Completion Form (Annex 1 & 2) and geological drilling
log (Annex 3) must be submitted to the Ministry of Public Works, District Commissioner,
and community for all completed drilled wells.

2.3 Well protection

2.3.1 An animal proof fence should be constructed around every completed well
which is intended for community or public use. Hedges or timber can be used
in constructing the fence.

2.3.2 Wells are constructed as a point for collecting water. Water collected should be
utilized at home. Therefore, washing of clothes and household utensils and
bathing are prohibited near a well. Mixing of chemicals, washing of petroleum
product containers, and handling of potential pollutants near a well are also
prohibited. A 98 feet (30 meter) protection zone from the well must be
maintained. Cattle should not be allowed near public wells.

2.3.3 The community has direct ownership for the community or public well. The
community should protect the well and handpump from theft, vandalism and
misuse. The community is also responsible for maintenance through trained
handpump mechanics and caretakers identified by the community.

19
2.4 Handpump

2.4.1 Recommended handpump makes

The following hand pumps are recommended for installation on community and public
wells in Liberia: Afridev; India Mark II, Kardia type K-65.

Agencies installing hand pumps should ensure that quick moving spare parts are
available in communities to facilitate community driven maintenance.

Community or public hand pumps should not be removed from the well on which they
were installed without the written approval of the communities. This measure is
intended to protect the hand pump against theft.

2.4.2 Hand pumps should be installed with the foot valve set at least 1.6 feet (0.5
meter) above the filter bed and just above the bottom screen for drilled well.

20
3. Excreta Disposal
3.1 Choosing the right technolgy

While standerdised designs can be used for institutional latrines, implementing agencies
should encourage a „sanitation ladder‟ approach for family latrines. Through CLTS
approach, communities should be sensitised and galvanised into action to make their
community “Open Defecation Free” (ODF) and families should be encouraged to find
appropriate and affordable solutions for safe excreta disposal. However, in promoting this
approach, implementing agencies should effectively communicate key parameters that
ensure safe disposal of excreta, and ensure that the options being selected by the
community are:

a. Safe to use

b. Dispose excerta in a manner that does not pose a health risk

c. Provide adequate privacy.

The following are the guidelines for ensuring that the above parameters are met.
Options for an institutional latrine design to be implemented in Liberia and some basic
options for family latrines have been explained in the following section.

3.2 Latrine Site Selection

3.2.1 In selecting a site for a latrine, the location of wells and surface water sources,
for example ponds, swamps, creeks, rivers etc. must be clearly established.
The location of food markets, kitchen, cook shops and restaurants must be
clearly identified.

3.2.2 A latrine must be located at least 96 feet (30 m) below


(downslope/downstream) a well.

3.2.3 A latrine must not be located over a surface water body and should be at least
96 feet (30 m) from the edge of the flood plain of a surface water body.

3.3 Alternating pit institutional Latrine Design and Construction

Alternating pit latrines make use of latrine pits on a rotational basis. This means that a
permanent superstructure can be used.

Two pits are dug, each sized to store about two year‟s worth of excreta. Each pit has a
removable cover slab, providing access to the pit.

One pit only is put into use and filled over time. Once this pit is full, it is closed off for
storage, while the second pit is used. As the second pit fills, the first pit is emptied and
put back into use.

Given the right conditions of temperature, moisture content and pH, after 2 years
storage the excreta will have decomposed and the disease-causing organisms died off
sufficiently that the excreta to be manually handled. (WELL, 2006)

21
Drawings for latrine units with 1 cubicle, 4 cubicles and 5 cubicles are given in Figures
3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4.

3.3.1 Latrine Pit

Ideally each pit should be sized to store two year‟s worth of excreta; however as a
guideline the pit should be 7 feet (2.1 meters) deep.

The pit walls are fully lined with 6 inches (15 cm) solid concrete blocks from bottom to 1
foot (30 cm) above the ground. The pit bottom in not lined in order to allow infiltration of
liquids.

The pit is divided into underground compartments with partition walls of 6 inches (15
cm) solid concrete blocks.

The width of the pit is 7‟6” (2.3 m) and length is as per number of underground
compartments. Each compartment is 4‟3” (1.3 m) long with the exception of the two end
compartments which are 2.1 feet (0.65 meter).

The excavated portion outside the lining walls is to be backfilled.

3.3.2 Latrine Slab

There are two sizes of slab. Slab type A is 2‟2” (65 cm) x 4‟3” (130 cm) and slab type B
is 1‟7” (50 cm) x 4‟3” (130 cm). Each compartment is covered with 4 slabs- 2 of type A
and 2 of type B.

On each compartment out of the two type A slabs – one has two drop-holes and one
has a 6 “ (15 cm) hole for the vent pipe.

The drop-hole has a key-hole shape of 6” diameter with a stem length of 7” and width of
2”.

Both type A and type B slabs are minimum 3” (7.5 cm) thick cast in 1:2:3 concrete
reinforced with ½” (13mm) rods placed 4” (10cm) c/c both ways.

In every cubicle 1 drop-hole is operational at a time. The other drop-hole is kept sealed.

On filling of the compartment, the drop-hole is changed and the earlier one sealed.

The pit can be emptied by removing the rear type B slab which gives access to the pit –
see below.

The slabs are placed on the 6” concrete block walls and sealed using mortar.

N.b as an alternative to using three separate slabs, a single slab, cast in-situ, can be
used, with separate removable slabs used for the man-hole covers.

3.3.3 Super structure

Each cubicle rests over two underground compartments (Figure 3.2)

The recommended material for the superstructure walls are soil stabilised blocks (mud
blocks) or concrete blocks. The use of zinc coated sheets as wall material is not
recommended.

22
The inside of the cubicle should provide a minimum clear space of 4‟x3‟6” (Figure 3.3)

The superstructure height should be at least 7‟6” (2.3 m) in the front and 6‟6” (2m) at
the rear.

PVC Vent pipes of 6” (15 cm) diameter should be provided on each pit compartment.

The doors should be at least 2‟4” (0.7 m) wide and 6‟ (1.82 m) high.

Privacy walls should be provided in the front of the structure at a distance of 4‟6” (1.4
m).

The walls can be built for 4” thick concrete blocks and should be 6 ft high. With an
access way on each side at least 3 feet wide.

3.3.4 Roof

Roof should be made of 32 gauge corrugated zinc coated sheets, resting on roofing
wood of size 2”x2” (5cmx5cm) purlins @ 3‟9” (1.14m) c/c, 2”x4” (5cmx10cm) rafters @
4‟ (1.22m) c/c.

The roofing wood to be fixed to wall plate 2” x 6” (5cmx15cm) placed on top of the wall
and tied to the wall using ¼” (10mm) steel rod.

3.3.5 Manual Emptying

The man-hole slabs should be removed to provide access and improve air circulation.
Ideally the pit should be emptied by people standing at ground level and using shovels,
buckets and ropes to remove the excreta, without having to enter into the pit. If people
have to enter the pit they should wear a safety rope. Gloves, boots and other personal
protective equipment should be used to reduce the risk of contact with disease-causing
organisms that have not died off. (WELL, 2006)

3.3.6 Disposing of faecal sludge

Faecal sludge can be disposed of by composting or by burying in a shallow trench with


a large surface area and covered with soil.

To reduce the risk of contact with disease-causing organisms that have not died off, the
disposal site should be away from any water source and areas that are liable to
flooding. (WELL, 2006)

23
FIGURE 3.1 ALTERNATING PIT INSTITUTIONAL LATRINE 6" PVC PIPE 4 VENT

SINGLE CUBICLE

.15
.08
1
2 Ø 4" o.C 2.59
1.3 1.3

.51
.66

.48
6" Ø VENT HOLE

2.29
.07
.08 1.14 .08
1.3

.66
3" CONCRETE SLAB MAT DETAIL

2.29
.15
(SCALE 1:1 )

.66

.08
1.09
1.4
A A F.G
1
2 Ø 4" o.C
.08 1.14 .08 .71
.08

.48
3" CONCRENT SLAB
.33

.48

.15
.86 1.02

2.13
1.3
.08

.48 .15 .15 .48


1.32
3" CONCRETE SLAB MAT DETAIL BACL FILLING

(SCALE 1:1 ) FLOOR PLAN


(SCALE 1:1 )

6" BLOCK WALL

SECTION @ A-A
2.9 (SCALE 1:1 )

.15
2" X 4" X 14'-0" PURLIN @ 3'-9" o.c

.15
6" BLOCK WALL
.15

2" X 4" X 14'-0" PURLIN @ 3'-9" o.c


2.9

2.29

2.29
1.91
2" X 4" X 14'-0" RAFTER @ 4'-0" o.c
.61

.15

ROOFING PLAN .15

.15
(SCALE 1:1 ) RIGHT ELEVATION
(SCALE 1:1 )
FRONT ELEVATION
(SCALE 1:1 )
All dimensions are in meter.

Figure 3.1: Alternative Pit Institutional Latrine

24
FIGURE 3.2 ALTERNATING PIT INSTITUTIONAL LATRINE WITH 4 CUBICLES
6.48

1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3

0.15 PVC PIPE FOR VENT

.48
.15 Ø TOILET HOLE
.15

.66

.15
2.29

.15
.66

.46
1.37

1.07

A A

.48
.15

1.99
1.83
0.42 .25 .71 .25 .25 .71 .25 .25 .71 .25 .15 .25 .71 .25 .16 .42

.91
.15 .15 .15

1.37
.46
.16 2.57 .15 2.59 .16
RIGHT ELEVATION
(SCALE 1:1 )

FLOOR PLAN 0.01 Ø 0.1 O/C

.08
(SCALE 1:1 ) .08 1.14 .08

.08
.66

.51

.33

.48
0.15 PVC PIPE FOR VENT

.08
.07
1.3
.08 1.14 .08
1.3
CONCRETE SLAB MAT DETAIL
CONCRETE SLAB MAT DETAIL (SCALE 1:1 )
(SCALE 1:1 )

Ø.15

.18
2.29
.05
1.83

SQUAT HOLE DETAIL


(SCALE 1:1 )

FRONT ELEVATION
(SCALE 1:1 ) All dimensions are in meter.

Figure 3.2: Alternative Pit Institutional Latrine with 4 cubicles

25
ALTERNATING PIT INSTITUTIONAL LATRINE - 5 CUBICLES
FIGURE 3.3

0.15m PVC PIPE FOR VENT

.15 Ø TOILET HOLE

A A

FLOOR PLAN
(SCALE 1:1 )

6" PVC PIPE FOR VENT

0.15 VENT

FRONT ELEVATION
(SCALE 1:1 )
RIGHT ELEVATION
All dimensions are in mtr. (SCALE 1:1 )

Figure 3.3: Alternative Pit Institutional Latrine with 5 cubicles

26
0.05 x 0.10 x 4.2 - 0 RAFTER @ 1.20 - 0 C/C
FIGURE 3.4
0.05 x 0.05 x 4.2 - 0 PURLIN @ 0.90 - 0.22 C/C

0.6
0.6
ROOFING PLAN FOR ALTERNATING PIT INSTITUTIONAL LATRINE
All dimensions are in meter.

Figure 3.4: Roofing plan for alternating pit institutional latrine

27
FIGURE 3.5
FAMILY SANPLAT (REINFORCED CONCRETE)

1.20 m

Foot Rests
0.30m x 0.12m

Rad
0.8m

Squat Hole Circular Hole


0.38m x 0.12m
0.80m dia.
Ø 8mm rebar
every 0.18 m
(two layers)

Hole Cover
0.45m x
0.20m

Figure 3.5: Family Sanplat (Reinforced Concrete)

28
4. Family Latrine
Following a Community Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) approach, families should develop
their own latrine designs and construct them using local materials.

The aim of CLTS is for a community to be open defecation free. To enable this, designs
developed by community members should allow faeces to be buried and covered and
should be easy to keep clean.

As families and communities move up the sanitation ladder, they may wish to use
concrete squatting slabs or make other improvements.

A simple concrete 2 feet (0.6 meter) by 2 feet (0.6 meter) by 2 inch (5 centimeter)
squatting slab can be made using a 1:2:2 concrete mix, and a mould for the outside of
the slab and the drop-hole. A lid can also be cast, and foot-rests added to improve the
design. The recommended curing time for the slab is one week. (Brandberg, 1997)

Wood for supporting beams is generally not in short supply in Liberia, but where it is,
circular 4.9 foot (1.5 meter) diameter, 1.5 inch (4 centimeter) dome-shaped concrete
slabs can be made using a 1:2:2 concrete mix, and a mould for the outside and drop-
hole of the slab, cast over a mound of damp sand. The recommended curing time is
one week. (Brandberg, 1997)

In areas where soil is unstable, the pit can be made round and lined using rocks, bricks,
timber or sand filled bags to reduce the risk of pit collapse.

29
ANNEXES

30
Annex 1 Water Points Constructed /Rehabiliated & Assessment Form
Water Point-ID (Official used only): _____________________

BASIC INFORMATION

County: ___________________District: ___________________________________

Clan:____________________Town/village/community:________________________

PCode: ____________ Population:______ Number of Households:_______________


School Population: # of Boys_____ # of Girls_____ Male-Teachers ____
Female-Teachers_______
GPS Coordinates (WGS84 system): X:______________ Y:______________

WORK DONE

Type of work done:  Construction  Rehabilitation  Assessment

Name of Agency (that did the work):_____________________________________

Type of Agency:  NGO  Govt  Private  Community

Date the work was completed Start Date [mm/dd/yyyy]: ___/____/___End Date [mm/dd/yyyy]
____/____/____

Number of pump mechanics trained in the community: Male:________ Female:_______

Number of WATSAN committees organized in the community:_________

Ownership of the water point:  Community  Private  School  Health Facility

Owner‟s ID: _______________ Name of the owner: ___________________________

WATER POINT DETAILS

Nature of the water point:  Borehole  Hand dug  Open Well  River/Stream,

 Unprotected spring catchments  Protected spring catchments  Others Specify

Water Static level:______ ft Total depth:________ ft Diameter of the well:_____________ ft

Installation depth of the pump:____________ ft

Lining or casing:  None  Concrete rings  PVC pipes  Metal pipes

Yield of water point: ________ l/h

Is bed rock been reached?  Yes  No,

If yes, at which depth? _________ ft

Is the well telescoped?  Yes  No,

If yes, from: ___________ft to:____________ ft Diameter of the telescoping:_________ ft

31
Technique of telescoping:  by drilling  by installing smaller culverts
Does the water point goes dry?  Yes  No
If yes, from (month):_______________ to (month): _____________
PUMP INSTALLATION DETAILS

Type of pump:  No pump  Manual / foot  Electrical (surface)

 Electrical (submersible)

Pump trade mark:  Kardia  Afridev  Consallen  Vergnet  Other: ___

Model:____________________________ Pump ID: ______________________________

Status of pump:  Works perfectly  Works but defective

 Does not work at all  Looted

If not working or not working perfectly:

Description of the problem:_______________________________________________

Spare parts needed (estimation):_________________________________________

Work planned (estimation):____________________________________________

REMARKS CONCERNING WATER

Is the water:  Dirty water  Milky colour  Reddish colour  Fine sand

 Bad odour  Rusty  Salty  Other:__________________________

Detail recorded on apron?  Yes  No

Apron condition:  Good  Fair  Bad

Materials needed:_________________________________________________________

Drainage condition:  Good  Fair  Bad

Materials needed:_____________________________________________________

Fence Condition:  Good  Destroyed  No fence

Bill Board:  Good  Destroyed  No board

Facility is funded by:__________________________________________________

Report prepared by (name):________________________ Date prepared:_________

Completion report verified by: School, Health, Camp or Community


(name):______________Date verified________

Name of verifier must be the following: School Principal/Vice Principal, Clinic OIC, Camp Manager/Leader,
Community Leader/Chairman

32
Annex 2 Handing Over form for Drilled Well
Name of Implementing Agency: ______________________________________

County: ________________________

District: ________________________

Community: ________________________

WORK DONE:

DESCRIPTION

Bore well: ______mm Total depth: _______ m

Pump type: ______________ hand pump

Water Test carried out: ______Yes / No

Water test results: Potable / Non Potable

Pum Test Carried out: Yes/ No Well Yeild: ___________ lit/hr

Starting date of the work: ________________

Ending date of the work: ____________

1. The work for construction of bore well has been carried out as per the bore well
completion sheet, and to the satisfaction of the community of _____________
____________________

2. The well is the property of the community. The maintenance of the hand pump and the
cleaning of the apron and the area of the bore well as well as fencing of the bore well are
under the responsibility of the Community Water Committee (CWC). Tools and training
have been given by _____________ for the sustainability of the construction.

Done on the ___/___/_______

For the Community of _______________

For implementing agency_________________

A copy of this handing over will be given to the DDC in charge of the area.

Water test results are available in ____________________ office, at (address)

__________ _______________ ______________________________________

33
Annex 3 Borehole Report

Borehole N° County

District
Community / camp / village
Bit typ / Drilling
depth dia time Equipment Geological log Description Water inflow
0 0 0
m m m Drilling date
from
to

5 5 5 Drill team
supervisor

assistant

10 10 10
Drill
technic

Drilling machine
15 15 15

Total depth drilled


meters

20 20 20 Casing
diam inches
lentgh meters

Screen

34
25 25 25 diam inches
lentgh meters
slot millimeters

Gravel
pack
30 30 30 from meters
to meters

Top cementation
from meters
35 35 35 to meters

Yield
during
drilling liters/hour
after devt liters/hour
after yield
40 40 40 test liters/hour

Water Static level


meters

35
Equipment legend Equipment legend

casing Jigged sand

screen gravel pack


°°
bottom cap °

Geological legend cementation

Clay

Granit ++++++++
++++++++

fractured granit + +/ / + + / /+ +
+ / / + + / /+ +

Sand

.............

Laterite .°.°.°.°.°.°.°.°.°.°
°.°.°.°.°.°.°.°.°.°.

Gravel °°°°°°°°°°°
°°°°°°°°°°°

36
Annex 4 Disinfecting a well by superchlorination
The water inside a well can gets polluted during well construction or when repairs are
carried out inside the well. It is advisable to disinfect the well before it is put to use.

The Most common method to do this is with Chlorine. Chlorine has the advantage that it
leaves a residue in the water which can prevent further contamination. Chlorine is also
easily available and is easy to measure.

Following are the steps to carry out well disinfection

1. Measure the Turbidity and PH of water in the well


a. Allow the well to recharge fully up to its static water level after the construction /
rehabilitation is complete.
b. Measure the pH and turbidity of water.
c. The Turbidity of water in the well should be 5 NTU or less. If the Turbidity is
more than 5 NTU the chlorination will not be effective.
d. If the Turbidity is high, pump all the water out and clean the lining of the well of
any impurities, and allow the well to recharge before measuring the turbidity.
2. Prepare a 1% chlorine Solution
Chlorine compound most commonly used is Calcium Hypochlorite as High Test
Hypochlorite (HTH). It is also widely available as Sodium Hypochlorite in liquid bleach or
bleaching powder form. Every type of compound has different chlorine content and the
chlorine concentration needs to be considered while preparing the solution. The best
compound to use is HTH which has 50 to 70% chlorine.

Based on the compound available, prepare 10 litres of 1% chlorine solution. The following
table and guidelines give the quantity of various compounds required for 1 litre of 1%
chlorine solution.

Preparing the chlorine solutions

Preparation of 1 litre of 1% chlorine solution (1% chlorine solution has 10g / litre, or
nd
10,000 mg/l, or 10 mg/ ml), Ref: Davies & Lambert, 2002, 2 Edition

Chlorine source Available Quantity Approx measure


chlorine % required
High Test Hypochlorite 70 14g 1 heaped teaspoon
(HTH) granules
Bleaching powder 34 30g 2 heaped teaspoons
Stabilized tropical bleach 25 40g 3 heaped teaspoons
Liquid household disinfectant 10 100ml 7 tablespoons
Liquid laundry bleach 5 200ml 14 tablespoons
Antiseptic solution 1 1 litre No need to adjust as it
is a 1% solution

Important tips for using chlorine

37
1. The strength of chlorine reduces quite rapidly over time and hence some allowances
should be made for the age of the chlorine.
2. Do not mix chlorine in a metal container as chlorine reacts with metal.
3. Chlorine is a hazardous chemical and should be handled with care. It can irritate skin
and eyes and HTH powder or strong solutions produce gases which are dangerous to
breathing.
4. Chlorine must be stored in a cool, dry, well ventilated and dark location and should not
be stored in the same room as one in which people sleep.

3. Determine the quantity of 1% Chlorine solution required


For disinfecting a well, the water should be treated with a chlorine solution which will leave
a free residual of 50mg/l in the well. The chlorine should be allowed to stand in the water for
at least 30 minutes, but preferably several hours, before it is pumped out from the well.

A 1% stock solution made up as in the table above, has approximately 10g/l = 10 mg/ml of
active chlorine.

In order to chlorinate 1000 lit (or 1 cum) of water with 50 mg /l dosage – the amount of 1%
solution required is

1,000 lit x 50 mg/l = 5,000 ml = 5 litres of 1% soln

10 mg/ml

Calculate the total volume of water in the well, and add 5 lit of 1% solution per 1 cum of
water in the well.

Example:
For a well with 1.2 m internal diameter and depth water as 5 m
2
Total water quantity in the well = 3.14 x 1.2 x 3 m = 3.39 cum OR 3390 lit
4
Quantity of 1% solution required = 5x (3390/1000) = 16.9 lit

4. Mix the chlorine solution in the well water.


To mix the chlorine solution in the well, use a clean rock on the end of a long rope and
move the rock around in the water, lifting it up and down while moving it around the well. An
alternative method to mix the solution is to use a bucket and keep on drawing water and
then pouring it back into the well.

5. Leave the chlorine in the well for at least 30 min and dewater the well completely.
6. Testing the chlorine residual
After disinfecting the well, dewatering and allowing the well to recharge, check the residual
free chlorine level. If the residual is equal to or less than 0.5mg/l then the well can then be
put back into use. If it is much higher than the 0.5mg/l then the well should be dewatered
again and the process repeated.

38
Annex 5 Testing the yield of well
Testing the yield of well is important to determine its capacity and to obtain information
to help aid in selecting a permanent pump. The yield of a well is generally tested using
a pump test. The recommended methodology for carrying out a pump test in Liberia is
given below:

1. Install a pump set on the well that can operate continuously for more than 4
hours at varying pumping rates.

2. Ensure that the suction pipe of the pump is long enough so that it can pump
from the depth at which the permanenet pumps intake will be installed.

3. Provide the delivery pipe with a flowmeter. In case flowmeter is not available
provide a 200 litre barrel to measure flow rate.

4. Pump the water from the well with pump running at maximum capacity.

5. If the water level is depleting keep a close observation of the following water
level and reduce a pumping rate near to the depth at which the pumps intake is
to be installed.

6. Adjust the pumping rate such that the water level remains constant.

7. Continue pumping at this rate for a period of at least four hours. Note that
water level is constant. If not, the flow rate has to be reduced.

8. Measure the flow rate using flow meter or by measuring the time taken to fill a
200 litre drum.

9. The flow rate at which the water level remains constant for nearly four hours
can be called as the sustainable yield of the well.

10. Care should be taken to dispose of pumped water away from the well in order
to minimise the chance of recharge/infiltration which would reduce the validity
of the results – a distance of >100m is recommended.

39
Annex 6 Pit Latrine Construction/ Rehabilitation/ Assessment Form
Pit-Latrine-ID (Official used only): _________________

BASIC INFORMATION ON THE LATRINE

County: ______________________________ District: ______________________________

Clan: _____________________ Town/village/community: _________________________

PCode: _____________Population: ____________ Number of Households:_______________

School Population: # of Boys______ # of Girls________ Male-Teachers ______

Female-Teachers_______

GPS Coordinates (WGS84 system): X:______________ Y:______________

WORK DONE

Type of work done:  Construction  Rehabilitation  Assessment

Name of Agency (that did the work):__________________________________________________

Type of Agency:  NGO  Govt  Private  Community

Date the work was completed Start Date [mm/dd/yyyy]: ___/____/___

End Date [mm/dd/yyyy] ____/____/____

Number of Hygiene Animators trained in the community: Male:__________ Female:________

Number of Hygiene Clubs organized: In Schools:_________ In Communities:_____________

Ownership of the Latrine:  Community  Private  School  Health Facility

Owner‟s ID: ________________ Name of the owner: ____________________________________

LATRINE DETAILS

Type of Latrine  Institutional (VIP)  Family  Emergency

Is there a latrine?  Yes  No

Is the Latrine functional?  Yes  No

Is there an apron around the latrine?  Yes  No

Are there pit details recorded on the apron?  Yes  No

Type of pit latrine (superstructure)  Tarpaulin  Mud brick  Concrete  None

Dimension of superstructure: Length ft Width _______ft Height ft

Dimension of pit: Depth: ft Length ft

Number of drop holes: __________________

Is the latrine pit lined?  Fully lined  Partial lined  Not Lined

40
Dept of lining ft

If mud brick or concrete, is it plastered?  Yes  No

Type of latrine slab used:  Plastic  Wood  Concrete  Steel sheet Metal

Is there a collar beam?  Yes  No

Type of roof  Zinc  Tarpaulin  Thatch  Not Roofed

Type of hand washing bin  Half-metal-drum  Bucket  Concrete

 Other Specify_________________________

Is the vent pipe (6‟) screened?  Yes  No  N/A

Type of doors used:  Timber  Zinc  Tarpaulin  None

Facility is funded by:____________________________________________________________

Report prepared by (name):___________________________ Date prepared:_____________

Completion report verified by: School, Health, Camp or Community (name):__________

Date verified____

Name of verifier must be the following: School Principal/Vice Principal, Clinic OIC, Camp Manager/Leader,
Community Leader/Chairman

41

You might also like