DPT1
DPT1
DPT1
◼ Gravity wall
derive stability mainly from their
weight
◼ Reinforced Earth
As the name implies, rely almost entirely upon their weight for stability.
· They usually have wide bases.
· Their construction is rigid, e.g. masonry, mass or reinforced concrete.
· They tend to fail by sliding or rotating.
After the wall is constructed, the back fill is • The wall is not constructed directly against
compacted in layers. cut soil, but against a gravel/stone drainage
• Temporary propping may be required to prevent blanket.
displacement during the compaction of back-fill. • Drains are usually installed along the heel of
• Drains are usually installed along the heel of the wall.
the wall. • Further drainage of the back-fill can be
• Further drainage of the back-fill can be afforded afforded by weep holes.
by weep holes.
Gravity Walls:
◼ Types of Gravity Wall:
– Reinforced concrete cantilever wall
• Reinforced concrete cantilever walls are the commonest modern form of gravity wall.
• Can be L-shaped or an inverted T-shaped cross-section; with a vertical cantilever
slab.
• Simple cantilevers, some utilizing the weight of backfill on the heel portion of the slab
are suitable for walls up to 6m in height.
• For greater heights, counter forts or buttresses walls are incorporated.
• To improve resistance to sliding a downward-projecting key is often incorporated into
the base.
Reinforced concrete cantilever wall
L-shaped RC wall Propped RC wall
• The down stand nib improves resistance to • The figure shows a reinforced concrete
sliding basement wall.
• The RC ground floor slab acts as a prop,
eliminating cantilever bending.
• The RC basement floor slab provide
resistance to sliding
Reinforced concrete cantilever wall
RC cantilever backfilled wall
• A gravity wall structure formed with interlocking pre-cast concrete units (or sometimes
timber for temporary works).
• Stretchers run parallel to the wall face and headers are laid perpendicular to the wall
face.
• The outer face is usually constructed to a slope of between 1h:8v and 1h:6v, except
when the wall height is less than the header length, when a vertical face is permitted.
• The space formed within the cribs is filled with free-draining fill, such as stone rubble,
cobbles or gravel.
Reinforced Earth Walls:
• Mesh reinforcement is often geosynthetic mesh or grid, which have low deformation
moduli.
• Mesh reinforcement is suitable in cohesive back-fill
• Faces are formed by wrapping the mesh over and into the layer above.
Reinforced Earth Walls:
◼ Types of Reinforced Earth Wall:
– Types of wall - Soil nailing
• An in-situ soil reinforcement method developed in the last twenty years or so.
• Steel bars, angles or other metallic elements are driven in (or grouted in) drilled holes
(but not pre-stressed); they are typically 3-5m long and at spacings of 0.5-2 m.
• The facing of the soil-nailed mass is often simply a layer of shotcrete 100-150 mm thick
(although pre-cast concrete panels are also used). It has no structural function, but
serves to protect the face from weathering.
• Primarily used for temporary works, but may be suitable for some permanent structures
with non-corrodable nails.
Embedded Walls:
• Alternate piles, usually about 1m in diameter, are drilled at closer spacing than
the pile diameter and the concrete placed.
• While the concrete is still quite weak (after 2 or 3 days), intermediate holes
are drilled along a parallel, but slightly offset, line so that the holes cut into the
already installed piles.
• Subsequent concreting produces a continuous wall, which is water-tight and
strong.
• Alternatively, steel columns are grouted in the first set of holes, with the
intermediates being quickly drilled and cast-in-place concrete piles formed to
complete wall.
Embedded Walls:
◼ Types of Embedded Wall:
– Diaphragm
h
H
H/3
D
◼ Stabilitas global
Modes of failure
◼ Sliding/translation failure along its base
◼ Overturning/rotation about its toe
◼ Ground yielding or settlement
◼ Structure Failure
◼ Overall slip stability
◼ Lateral bottom heave
◼ Vertical base heave
◼ Settlement behind the wall
Perkiraan Dimensi Komponen
Retaining Walls (Braja M. Das):
Heel Dmin = 60 cm
Toe
Perkiraan Dimensi Komponen
Retaining Walls:
Dmin = 60 cm
0.1H
Bagan empiris untuk penentuan
beban lateral dinding penahan:
• The wall must not slide along its base, nor along any lateral joint.
• Forces tending to cause sliding are due to active pressures and the
net sum of horizontal structural or applied loads.
• Resistance to sliding will be provided mainly by friction under the
base.
• Passive resistance (Pp) in front of the wall should only be considered
when excavation or surface disturbance can be discounted.
STABILITAS GESER
A
1
1
FS geser =
F
R'
c1 Fd
V H’
Ph
H’/3
D
Pp
R’
2
B
2
c2
Tegangan geser
di dasar dinding s = tan 2 + c2
Gaya geser di
dasar dinding = R' = s(luas dasar dinding ) = s( B 1) = B tan 2 + Bc 2
R ' = ( V ) tan 2 + Bc 2 V
STABILITAS GESER
A FS geser =
F R'
1 F d
1
= (V ) tan 2 + Bc 2 + Pp
c1
V H’ F R'
Ph
D
Pp
H’/3 F d = Pa cos
R’
B 2 , 2 , c 2
FS sliding =
( V ) tan 2 + Bc 2 + Pp
Pa cos
Reduksi:
2 1
2 hingga 2 2
2 3
c2 1 2
c2 hingga c2
2 3
MEMPERTINGGI STABILITAS GESER
A FS geser =
F
R'
Fd
1
1
c1
H’
V
Ph
H’/3
D
Pp
R’
R ' = ( V ) tan 2 + Bc 2
2
B 2
c2
Tegangan geser
di dasar dinding s = tan 2 + c2
Stabilitas Guling
(overturning)
• The wall must not overturn and therefore the moment balance about
any point must be favourable to stability.
• For rigid gravity and RC walls the moment balance about the toe of
the wall should be checked.
• For diaphragm and sheet-pile walls, overturning should be checked at
either the theoretical or actual bottom of the wall.
Kontrol
Stabilitas Guling A
1
1
c1=0
Pv Pa H’
Ph
H’/3
D
Pp
C
2
q2 2
q1 c2
B
A Stabilitas Guling
1
Ph = Pa cos ;
1
c1=0
Pv
Pa H’
Pv = Pa sin ;
Ph
D
= kemiringan backfill
Pp
C
2 M v = Pv B = Pa sin B
2
c2
B
1
Pp = K p 2 D 2 + 2c2 K p D K p = tan 2 (45 + 2 / 2)
2
M H'
= 0 h 3
=
R
FSoverturning M P
M O
Weight/unit Moment arm
Section Area length of wall measured from C Moment about C
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
1 A1 W1=1 A1 X1 M1
W2=1 A2
M
2 A2 X2 M2
3 A3 W3=1 A3 X3 M3 Calculation of R
4 A4 W4=c A4 X4 M4
5 A5 W5=c A5 X5 M5
Pv B Mv
SV S MR
A Stabilitas Guling
1
1
c1=0 FSoverturning =
M R
Pv
Pa
M O
H’
H'
D
Ph
M 0 = Ph 3
Pp
C
2
M1 + M 2 + M 3 + M 4 + M 5 + M v
2 FS =
c2 H'
B Pa cos
3
M v = Pv B = Pa sin B
STABILITAS GESER
A FS geser =
F
R'
Fd
1
1
c1
H’
V
Ph
H’/3
D
Pp
R’
R ' = ( V ) tan 2 + Bc 2
2
B 2
c2
Tegangan geser
di dasar dinding s = tan 2 + c2
Yielding or settlement
• If the ground bearing pressure beneath the base exceeds the allowable
bearing capacity, some settlement may occur.
• If the ultimate bearing capacity is exceeded, yielding will occur.
• Thus, the wall may rotate and be displaced. The maximum bearing
pressure will generally occur beneath the toe and should not exceed the
allowable bearing capacity.
• The form of calculation depends on whether the pressure distribution is
trapezoidal or triangular.
STABILITAS DAYA DUKUNG
A
1
1
c1=0
V R H’
Ph = Pa cos
X
H’/3
D
Ph
C
2
qmin 2
qmax e
c2
B/2 B/2
STABILITAS DAYA DUKUNG
M net
X = Titik tangkap gaya vertikal
V
B
e= −X Eksentrisitas gaya akibat momen
2
q=
V M net y Maksimum dan minimum presure
A I di bawah pondasi
e( V )
B
q max =
V + 2 = V 1 + 6e q min =
V 6e
1 −
(B )(1) (
1 3
B )
B B B B
12
STABILITAS DAYA DUKUNG
M Ada kalanya
H
tegangan kontak
yang terjadi berharga
W
negatif, hal ini terjadi
S bila pada pondasi
bekerja momen yang
besar, sehingga
mengakibatkan
X
d tegangan tarik pada
tanah.
q
d/3
STABILITAS DAYA DUKUNG
H
M V = 0 (gaya arah ke atas berharga positif)
W
(q / 2) d L − P − W = 0
S
M = 0 (momen searah jarum jam berharga positif)
M + H S − (q / 2) d L ( X − d / 3) = 0
X
d
q Tentukan harga q
dan d
d/3
STABILITAS DAYA DUKUNG
25 ton
30 ton.m
1.5 ton
20 ton
1.5 m 2.0 m
Tentukan:
a. SF Guling
y
b. Tegangan maksimum
c. Tegangan minimum
d. Bila terjadi harga negatif
x 50 cm 3.0 m
tentukan diagram
50 cm tegangan yang terjadi di
bawah pondasi
4.0 m
STABILITAS DAYA DUKUNG
25 ton
30 ton.m
10 ton
15 ton
1.5 m 2.0 m
Tentukan:
a. SF Guling
y
b. Tegangan maksimum
c. Tegangan minimum
d. Bila terjadi harga negatif
x 2.5 m
tentukan diagram
tegangan yang terjadi di
bawah pondasi
3.0 m
Overall slip stability
• A possible failure mode exists for propped RC walls and anchored sheet
walls having shallow penetration: the bottom of the wall may move forward
due to inadequate passive resistance or the buckling of a basement ground
slab.
• In such cases, an analysis is required involving a moment equilibrium check
about the prop or anchor attachment point.
• Also, the design of the ground slab acting as a prop must include
consideration of lateral buckling stability.
Vertical bottom heave
• In braced trenches, coffer dams and the like, instability may develop at the base of the
excavation in which a heave or uplift occurs. Two common mechanisms are:
- Instability due to piping
- Hydrostatic base heave
• Hidrostatic Base Heave: The base stability of excavations in saturated clays and silts
should be checked. If the vertical stress below the base due to the weight of adjacent soil
exceeds the undrained strength, an uplift type failure will occur. Some associated settlement
will also occur in the soil adjacent to the excavation.
• Any forward movement of the wall will result in corresponding settlement of the
retained soil.
• Various methods of elastic and plastic analyses are available for predicting
ground movement, but these are difficult and complex.
• For design purposes, it is probably better to use a simplified method based on a
database of observations.
Lokasi Kelongsoran
LOKASI LONGSORAN 1
(AREA JEMBATAN)
STA. 1+990
LONGSORAN 2
STA. 2+300 - 2+500
LONGSORAN 3
LONGSORAN 4 STA. 2+766
STA. 2+875
LOKASI LONGSORAN
THN 2003
(AREA COTTAGE)
N 0-1
N5
INDENES
N 20
FAKTOR KEAMANAN = 1.06 POTONGAN ME
(T
Kelongsoran pada Sta 2+300 s/d 2+400 (Jumat, 8 Desember 2006)
PELAJARAN DARI
KELONGSORAN LERENG TEBING
S. BARITO, DEPAN MAKODIM
MARABAHAN, KAL-TIM
(Agustus 2005)
Interpretasi Hasil Penyelidikan Tanah
⚫ Data sondir di lokasi (PT. Wijaya Karya)
Kelongsoran di Lokasi PT. Wijaya
Karya
Konstruksi miring dan bergeser
Tambahan tegangan
geser pada tanah
Awal Agustus 2005
Contoh Soal 1:
A gravity retaining wall, shown below is required to retain 5m of soil. The backfill is a
coarse-grained soil with sat = 18 kN/m3, ’cs = 30o. The existing soil (below the base)
has the following properties: sat = 20 kN/m3, ’p = 36o. The wall is embedded 1 m into
the existing soil and a drainage system is provided as shown. The groundwater level is
4.5 below the base of the wall. Determine the stability of the wall for the following
condition: Assume = 20o. c = 24 kN/m3
0.6 m
5.0 m
Drainage blanket
1.0 m
4.2 m
Contoh Soal:
q = 1.4 t/m2 ~
3.0 m
GWT
7.0 m
Sand
= 30 o
e = 0.65
G = 2.65
q = 1.4 t/m2 ~
3.0 m
GWT