Comprehensive Table - Jealousy
Comprehensive Table - Jealousy
Comprehensive Table - Jealousy
Attachment theory,
Drouin M., Miller D., investment model N = 148, 73.6% female, mean
12 2014 Dibble J. theory age = 20.59 years (SD = 4.66)
uncertainty
reduction theory,
Stewart M., Dainton M., relational N = 281, 33.6% female, mean
13 2014 Goodboy A. maintenance theory age = 20.05 years (S.D = 1.72)
Uses &
gratifications N = 189, 56.5% female, mean
16 2015 Dainton M. & Stokes, A. framework age =21.36 years (S.D = 2.30)
power perspective,
evolutionary
perspective of
gender differences,
theory of evolved
gender differences,
cognitive theory N = 846, 61% females, mean
36 2018 Demirtaş-Madran H. of jealousy age = 27.34 years (S.D = 9.12)
parental investment
(PI) theory,
inclusive fitness N = 76, 57.9% female, mean
43 2019 Dunn M., Ward K. theory age = 21.5years (S.D = 4.01)
Dual-factor model
(need to belong N1 = 93, 75.3% females, mean
&self- age = 26.91 years (S.D =
presentation), 9.57), N2 = 255, 58.8 %
Seidman G., Langlais M., belongingness/con females, mean age = 32.87
45 2019 Havens A. nection framework years (S.D = 9.25)
Study design platform Investigated variables DV
Romantic jealousy
(cognitive, surveillance
behaviour), age, gender,
FB intrusion, length of
relationship, length of fb
membership, time spent Relational
survey facebook on fb (hours/week), satisfaction
monitoring behaviour,
trait jealousy, need for
popularity, SNS use
(profile maintenance,
grooming), relationship SNS jealousy, SNS
satisfaction, login relationship
survey social media frequency, SNS intensity happiness
Study 1: anxious
attachment, avoidance
attachment, gender;
ethnicity; study 2:
attachment, anxiety,
avoidance, Global (trust,
satisfaction, comittment,
study 1: cross-sectional intimacy, passion, love),
survey, study 2: survey fb minutes, fb checking, FB jealousy,
& diary facebook ethnicity survelliance
gender, Fb privacy emotions
settings, presence of (jealousy, anger,
experiment facebook couple photos hurt, disgust)
face to face
communication
avoidance, feeling
socio-demographics, intimate with
attachment style, jealousy, others during SNS
survey social media envy, survelliance use
ten jealousy
evoking scenarios
jealousy emotions (threat, of partner
survey internet betrayal-anger), gender behaviour
gender, condition of
relationship, fb search jealousy, search
study 1: experiment, behaviour, trait jealousy, behaviour,
study 2: daily trust, simulated fb site use, attachment
experience study fb jealousy (in two anxiety, partner
(diary) facebook studies) monitoring
relationship
maintenance
behaviour
(facebook
jealousy (trait, emotional, openness,
cognitive, facebook), positivity,
maintenance motive, assurance,
survey facebook facebook use monitoring)
N1 themes: Technology
contributed to romantic
jealousy, Mistrust
propagated partner
monitoring, surveillance,
and controlling behaviors,
technology alerted others
to unhealthy romantic
relationships, N2 themes:
Jealousy & mistrust,
instant communication &
harrasment, platforms
focus group, contributed to
observation ICT misunderstanding -
themes: managing
inappropriate or annoying
content, being
tethered, lack of privacy
and control, social
comparison and jealousy,
relationship tension and
focus group facebook conflict. -
Fb use intensity,
relational
certainity, SNS
strategic
maintenance, SNS
routine
maintenance,
partner
survellience, Fb
jealousy,commitm
long distance relationship, ent, relationship
grographically close satisfaction, and
survey facebook relationship, gender trust
gender, individualism,
collectivism; Jealousy
casual themes: Infidelity,
Expectations of time and
commitment, Social emotional &
mixed method social media Media Self-Esteem sexual infidelity
themes: relationship
characteristics, app usage,
percieved benefits and
drawbacks to app usage,
app usage in relationship
survey social media agreements -
themes: getting in
(initiating contact),
jealousy, monitoring,
partner imposed isolation,
focus group social media breaking off contact, -
user behaviour
(participants' fb use
extent, partner
surveillance), partner relational
behavior (frequency of maintenance
status updates, interaction behaviour (social
with attractive people, contact, response-
posts on walls, becoming seeking, and
friends with attractive relational
people unknown to assurances),
participant), rival negative coping
behvaiour (frequency of mechanisms
posts from unknown (intention to end,
attractive people, willingness for
interaction with ex- extra-dyadic casual
partners), Fb jealousy sex), cognitive
survey facebook inducing behaviour jealousy
self-esteem, partner
conflicts and coping
strategies (compromise,
avoidance, interactional
reactivity, separation,
donination, submission)
romantic partner jealousy,
survey facebook age, length of relationship Facebook jealousy
fb jealousy (validated
structure with three factors
- Insecurity, Inquisition,
and Infidelity), marital
survey facebook satisfaction -
depression,
pathological social media relational
survey social media use, social media use aggression
quiescent–agitated
Anxious/ avoidant ambivalence,
attachment, time spent on happy–dejected
survey facebook internet, age, gender ambivalence
Fb oriented relationship
behaviour (monitoring,
public display, excessive percieved
public display, private increased in
exchange), jealousy, relationship
survey facebook relationship satisfaction closeness,
mediator/
control
moderator
- -
me: romantic
jealousy,
survelliance
behaviour -
study 1 me:
relationship
quality
(intimacy,
satisfaction,
commitment,
passion, love,
trust). Trust
significant ;
Study 2: me:
trust; actor's study 1: relationship status;
daily jealousy study 2: trait neuroticism
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
fb jealousy -
- -
me: threat
perception,
emotions -
- -
- -
gender, amount of time spent
me: Fb mate on Facebook during a typical
retention tactics day
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
mo: partners'
social media use releationship characteristics
- -
- -
mo: partner trust -
- -
me: self-
regulation general social media use
- -
me: jealousy,
online idealized
persona, SNS
photo related age, gender, relatioship
conflicts length, selfies with partners
me: fb jealousy -
- -
- -
- -
- -
me: motive to
belong (directive
function), social
vigilance
(regulatory
function), fear of
being excluded
(control
function) -
me: online
surveillance, fb
realted jealousy
me: relationship
maintenance
activities
(excessive
public displays,
public displays Facebook-posting frequency,
and partner age, gender,relationship
surveillance) length
- -
- -
conceptualize and
Muise, Christofides & validate the Facebook
1 2009 Desmarais (Fb) Jealousy scale Canada
Evaluate Facebook
features and user
behaviours on Fb that
can adversely impact a
2 2010 Mod G.B.B.A romantic relationship Ireland
Examine intrusive
nature of Facebook and
its inducement of
negative relational
3 2011 Elphinston & Noller outcomes Australia
Explore association of
self-esteem with
negative and postive
4 2011 Utz & Beukeboom effects of SMP use the Netherlands
investigate correlation
of attachment style with
Marshall, Bejanyan, Di Fb jealousy and
5 2013 Castro & Lee survelliance UK
Utilise hypothetical
scenario to discern
gender differences in
experience of Fb
Muscanell, Guadagno, jealousy and associated
6 2013 Rice & Murphy emotions USA
investigate correlation
of attachment style with
SMP use, jealousy and
7 2013 Nitzburg G., Farber B. emotions expereinced USA
explore gender
differences in Fb
8 2013 McAndrew F., Shah S. jealousy USA
investiagte intensity of
and emotions associated
with jeaousy in context
Dijkstra P., Barelds, of SMP and offline
9 2013 D.P.H, Groothof H.A.K infidelity the Netherlands
examine gender
differences in partner
Muise A., Christofides survelliance as response
10 2014 E., Desmarais S. to Fb jealousy Canada
explore association of
attachement style, non-
verbal cues and
negative emotions
Fleuriet C., Cole M., associated with jealousy
11 2014 Guerrero L. due to fb content USA
investigate Fb
solicitation, making /
accepting friends on Fb
Drouin M., Miller D., as potential predictors
12 2014 Dibble J. of jealousy USA
Study associations
among relational
maintenance behaviors,
uncertainity,
Stewart M., Dainton satisfaction and Fb
13 2014 M., Goodboy A. jealousy USA
investigate influence of
ambigious message and
Cohen E., Bowman N., access exclusivity on Fb
14 2014 Borchert K. jealousy USA
Study jealousy as a
consequence of
Lucero J., Weisz A., socially-interactive
Smith-Darden J., technology (SMP)
15 2014 Lucero S. abuse USA
Study effect of
declaring relational
Orosz G., Szekeres A., status on Fb on
Kiss Z., Farkas P., satisafaction and
17 2015 Roland-Levy C. jealousy Hungary
Study gender difference
Hudson B., Nicolas S., in expereince of Fb
Howser M., Lipsett K., jealousy due to use of
Robinson I., Pope L., emotions as non-verbal
18 2015 Hobby A., Friedman D. cues USA
Study associations
among Fb jealousy,
online mate retention/
gaurding and
Brem M., Spiller L., consequential
19 2015 Vandahey M. aggressive behaviour USA
investiagte cross-SMP
Utz S., Muscanell N., capacity to elicit
21 2015 Khalid C. jealousy Europe
Investigate effect of
SMPs on relationship
van Ouytsel J., van and consequences such
Gool E., Walrave M., as jealousy, monitoring
25 2016 Ponnet K., Peeters, E. and survelliance Belgium
Examine individuals'
perception of relational
Nongpong S., problems due to SMP
26 2016 Charoensukmongkol P. (Fb) use and activities Thailand
Cross-country study of
Moyano N., Sanchez- individual and relational
Fuentes M., Chiriboga factors associated with Spain, Columbia,
30 2017 A., Florez-Donado J. Fb jealousy Ecuador
Altakhaineh A.,
37 2018 Alnamer S. UAE
González-Rivera, J. A,
44 2019 Hernández-Gato, I Puerto Rico
Jealousy is a very complicated, multidimensional and multifactorial experience that must be handled as a
fear, envy) and reactions (aggression, violence)- Demirtaş-Madran
Jealousy is defined as the emotional reaction on a threat to the relationship - Pfeiffer & Wong, Utz & Beu
Jealousy, often defined as distrust or resentful- ness towards significant others due to suspected or know
with a rival or interloper, is inextricably linked with infidelity - Dunn & Ward 2019
Jealousy is defined, in part, by its relationship-threatening nature (Hupka, 1991; Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989),
directly undermines belonging needs. - Seidman et al 2019
Study
theory Sample characteristics gender data collection
design
study 1: N = 225,
89.3% female, mean
age of male = 21.44
years (SD = 7.02) ,
mean age of females =
22.53 (SD = 5.16; study 1:
Study 2: N = 68, mean cross-
study 1: attachment age male = 26.93 years sectional
theory , study 2: actor– (S.D = 5.11), mean age survey, study study 1: female,
partner interdependence female = 25.36 years 2: survey & study 2: online survey
model (APIM) (S.D = 4.84) diary balanced websites
N = 226, 69.9% female,
mean age = 19 years
- (S.D = 1.75) experiment female university
N = 312, 62.8%
female, mean age: men
(homosexual) = 28.1
years (S.D = 12.7),men
(heterosexual) = 29.3
years (S.D = 11.1),
women (homosexual) =
32.4 years (S.D = 15.3),
women (heterosexual)
= 28.2 years (S.D = social media,
- 12.2) survey female general
N = 145, 69.7 %
females, mean age =
20.81 years (S.D = mixed
- 6.04) method female university
N = 323, 0% females,
mean age = 40.1 years
- (S.D = 10.8) survey male general
N = 39, 46 % females,
mean age = n.r, age community
- range 14 - 19 years focus group male organizations
N = 196, 86.8 %
female, mean age =
White and Mullen’s 25.65 years (S.D =
jealousy model 7.69) survey female social media
N = 1144; n (spain) =
393, 65.1 % females,
mean age = 25 years
(S.D = 7.44); n
(columbia) = 600,
64.5% females, mean
age = 24.7 years (S.D =
7.50); n (ecuador) =
151, 58.9% females, social media
mean age = 22.3 years sites, university
- (S.D = 3.03) survey female website
N = 305, 51.3 %
female, mean age = n.r,
age range 18 - 65+,
self affirmation theory 55% aged 18–34 years survey balanced general
N1 = 1508, 86.14%
females, mean age =
20.51 years (S.D =
2.54); N2 = 92, 50 %
females, mean age =
Actor–partner 20.14 years (S.D = N1 = female,
interdependence model 2.16) survey N2 = balanced online platform
power perspective,
evolutionary perspective
of gender differences,
theory of evolved
gender differences, N = 846, 61% females, university,
cognitive theory of mean age = 27.34 years general,
jealousy (S.D = 9.12) survey female facebook
hyperpersonal model,
grounded theory
approach, social
comparison theory ,
theory of motivated N = 36, 58.3% females,
information mean age = 20.06 years
management (S.D = 1.29) focus group female university
N = 474, 78.06 %
female, mean age =
22.78 years (S.D =
- 5.24) survey female social media
N = 1053 , 59.1%
females, mean age =
Attachment theory, goal 21.94 years (S.D =
cognition theory 3.67) survey female university
N = 302, 51.3%
negative affect females, mean age =
hypothesis, self- 31.14 years (S.D =
selection hypothesis 5.45) survey balanced general
N = 257, 58.57%
females, mean age =
five factor personalilty 32.77 years (S.D =
model 9.18) survey female Mturk
N1 = 93, 75.3%
females, mean age =
Dual-factor model (need 26.91 years (S.D =
to belong &self- 9.57), N2 = 255, 58.8
presentation), % females, mean age =
belongingness/connectio 32.87 years (S.D = mTurk,
n framework 9.25) survey female university
descriptive
statistics, Facebook intrusion questionnaire,
correlation, Short-Form Multidimensional
young adult HMRA Jealousy Scale facebook
Experiences in Close
Relationships Scale–Revised
(ECR-R), Rosenberg' self -
esteem inventory, Perceived
Relationship Quality
Components (PRQC), Facebook
Study 1: (Fb) jealousy scale, facebok
descriptive surveillance (single item); study
statistics, 2: The Self-Liking Self-
correlation, Competence
study 1: young HMRA; Study 2: Scale, PRQC, ECR-R, Berkeley
adult, study 2: hierarchical linear Personality Profile; Fb jealousy
partner dyad modeling scale, facebook
young adult ANOVA 2 x 3 x 3 conditions facebook
ANOVA,
Kruskal-wallis,
descriptive
adult statistics Betrayal/Anger and Threat internet
t test,
ANOVA,chi
square,
descriptive
analytics,
adult thematic analysis - social media
descriptive
statistics, facebok jealousy scale, romantic
pearsons jealousy scale, Rosenberg self-
young adult, correlations, esteem scale, romantic partner
adult regression conflict scale facebook
correlation, problematic
descriptive use of mobile phones scale, self-
young adult statistics, regulation scale social media
young adult,
adult t test - facebook
Interpersonal Electronic
Surveillance Scale, Trust in Close
Relationships Scale, Facebook
pearson's Jealousy Scale, Comprehensive
young adult, correlation, t test, Marital Satisfaction Scale,
adult SEM Facebook Use Intensity facebook
Conflicts in Romantic
adult CFA Relationships Over FB Use Scale facebook
EFA, regression,
young adult HMRA - facebook
mediator/
Investigated variables DV control
moderator
gender, personality
factors (trait
jealousy, trust, self-
esteem) &
relationship factors
(relational
Time spend on Fb, Trust, trait uncertainty
jealousy, facebook jealousy - and commitment)
study 1 me:
relationship quality
Study 1: anxious attachment, (intimacy,
avoidance attachment, gender; satisfaction,
ethnicity; study 2: attachment, commitment,
anxiety, avoidance, Global passion, love, trust).
(trust, satisfaction, comittment, Trust significant ; study 1: relationship
intimacy, passion, love), fb Study 2: me: trust; status; study 2: trait
minutes, fb checking, ethnicity FB jealousy, survelliance actor's daily jealousy neuroticism
gender, Fb privacy settings, emotions (jealousy, anger,
presence of couple photos, hurt, disgust) - -
face to face
communication
socio-demographics, attachment avoidance, feeling
style, jealousy, envy, intimate with others
survelliance during SNS use - -
gender, condition of
relationship, fb search jealousy, search
behaviour, trait jealousy, trust, behaviour, attachment
simulated fb site use, fb jealousy anxiety, partner mo: gender; me:
(in two studies) monitoring attachment anxiety -
relational satisfaction,
uncertainty (behavioural,
mutual, definitional, future), fb
jealousy, relational maintenance
(positivity, openess, assurances, relational maintenance,
monitoring ) online monitoring - -
for jealousy:
intensity of
facebook use,
gender, love, for
love: jealousy,
length of
relationship, Fb use
facebook status, length of intensity, gender,
relationship, use intensity jealousy, romantic love - and age
emoticon presence, gender facebook jealousy - -
N1 themes: Technology
contributed to romantic jealousy,
Mistrust propagated partner
monitoring, surveillance,
and controlling behaviors,
technology alerted others to
unhealthy romantic
relationships, N2 themes:
Jealousy & mistrust, instant
communication & harrasment,
platforms contributed to
misunderstanding - - -
gender, individualism,
collectivism; Jealousy casual
themes: Infidelity, Expectations
of time and commitment, Social emotional & sexual
Media Self-Esteem infidelity - -
themes: relationship
characteristics, app usage,
percieved benefits and
drawbacks to app usage, app
usage in relationship agreements - - -
themes: getting in (initiating
contact), jealousy, monitoring,
partner imposed isolation,
breaking off contact, - - -
user behaviour (participants' fb
use extent, partner surveillance),
partner behavior (frequency of
status updates, interaction with relational maintenance
attractive people, posts on walls, behaviour (social contact,
becoming friends with attractive response-seeking, and
people unknown to participant), relational assurances),
rival behvaiour (frequency of negative coping
posts from unknown attractive mechanisms (intention to
people, interaction with ex- end, willingness for extra-
partners), Fb jealousy inducing dyadic casual sex),
behaviour cognitive jealousy mo: partner trust -
me: online
surveillance, fb
trust, fb use intensity marital satisfaction realted jealousy
me: relationship
maintenance
activities (excessive Facebook-posting
Big 5 (agreeableness, Fb related relationship public displays, frequency, age,
extraversion, neuroticism, difficulties (conflict and public displays and gender,relationship
conscientiousness, openness) jealousy). partner surveillance) length
message content (Sexual and
emotional infidelity), third party
rival (same sex sibling, friend, respondents' imagined
stranger), gender (male/female) level of jealousy - -
validated structure: Partner Fb
intrusion, Conflict over Fb use,
and Jealousy over Fb use - - -
Mod G.B.B.A
Marshall, Bejanyan, Di
Castro & Lee
Muscanell, Guadagno,
Rice & Murphy
Nongpong S.,
Charoensukmongkol P.
Macapagal K.,
Coventry R., Puckett J.,
Phillips G., Mustanski
B.
Demirtaş-Madran H.
Altakhaineh A.,
Alnamer S.
Bevan J.L
Chang C.
Seidman G.
González-Rivera, J. A,
Hernández-Gato, I
Muscanell, Guadagno,
6 2013 Rice & Murphy USA -
uncertainty reduction
Stewart M., Dainton M., theory, relational
13 2014 Goodboy A. USA maintenance theory
Cohen E., Bowman N.,
14 2014 Borchert K. USA -
Miller M., Denes A., Diaz
15 2014 B., Buck R. Attachment theory
Nongpong S.,
28 2016 Charoensukmongkol P. Thailand -
power perspective,
evolutionary perspective
of gender differences,
theory of evolved gender
differences, cognitive
38 2018 Demirtaş-Madran H. Turkey theory of jealousy
negative affect
hypothesis, self-selection
43 2019 Iqbal F., Jami H. Pakistan hypothesis
Rozgonjuk D., Ryan T., jealousy not studied
44 2019 Kuljus J., Täht K., Scott G. Estonia empirically
González-Rivera, J. A,
45 2019 Hernández-Gato, I Puerto Rico -
Acronyms used: principal components analysis (PCA), structural equation modeling (SEM), hierarchical multiple regression ana
Sample characteristics Study design gender data collection sample focus
N = 323, 0% females,
mean age = 40.1 years
(S.D = 10.8) survey male general adult
N = 39, 46 % females,
mean age = n.r, age range qualitative community
14 - 19 years (focus group) male organizations adolescent
N1 = 1508, 86.14%
females, mean age =
20.51 years (S.D = 2.54);
N2 = 92, 50 % females,
mean age = 20.14 years N1 = female, N2 =
(S.D = 2.16) survey balanced online platform young adults
hierarchical multiple regression analysis (HMRA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), socially interactive t
Technique Instrument platform constructs
relationship
SNS intensity scale, facebook satisfaction,monitoring behaviour
jealousy scale , SNS relationship trait jealousy, login frequency, SNS
descriptive happiness scale, behavioural use profile, use grooming, need for
statistics, jealousy sub-scale, popularity scale, popularity, length of relationship,
regression Rosenberg scale social media gender
Experiences in Close
Relationships Scale–Revised (ECR-
R), Rosenberg' self - esteem
inventory, Perceived Relationship
Quality
Study 1: Components (PRQC), Facebook (Fb) Study 1: anxious attachment,
descriptive jealousy scale, facebok surveillance avoidance attachment, gender;
statistics, (single item); study 2: The Self-Liking ethnicity; study 2: attachment,
correlation, HMRA; Self-Competence anxiety, avoidance, Global (trust,
Study 2: Scale, PRQC, ECR-R, Berkeley satisfaction, comittment, intimacy,
hierarchical linear Personality Profile; Fb jealousy passion, love), fb minutes, fb
modeling scale, facebook checking, ethnicity
N1 themes: Technology
contributed to romantic jealousy,
Mistrust propagated partner
monitoring, surveillance,
and controlling behaviors,
Conflict in Adolescent Dating technology alerted others to
Relationships Inventory, unhealthy romantic relationships,
Acculturation Rating Scale for N2 themes: Jealousy & mistrust,
Mexican Americans–Short Form, instant communication &
thematic content mexican and Anglo orientation, harrasment, platforms contributed
analysis Partner Issues Checklist ICT to misunderstanding
need for popularity, need for self -
esteem, snapchat jealousy,
cronbach's alpha, popularity scale, facebook jealousy facebook, facebook jealousy, social media
correlation scale, rosenberg's self-esteem scale snapchat use characteristics, motives for use
- - social media -
correlation, problematic
descriptive use of mobile phones scale, self- pathological social media use,
statistics, regulation scale social media social media use, self-regulation
correlation, t test,
SEM, paired Facebook jealousy scale, revised facebook use, relationship length,
samplle t test conflict tactics scale facebook for both partners in study two
factor analysis (CFA), socially interactive technologies (SIT), n.r = not reported, mediator (me), moderator (mo)
mediator/
DV control findings
moderator
gender, personality
factors (trait jealousy,
trust, self-esteem) &
relationship factors Fb use predicts jealousy in romantic
(relational relationships, four themses from wualitatiev
uncertainty data: accessibility to information, relatonship
relational jealousy - and commitment) jealosy, fb addiction, lack of context
differences in
emotions of self-
disclosure in F2F vs.
Internet based
therapy
me: romantic
jealousy,
survelliance Fb intrusion appears to inculcate
Relational satisfaction behaviour - disatisfaction through romantic jealousy
relational maintenance,
online monitoring - - fb jealousy related to relational maintenace,
consider ethnicity, sexual orientation &
relationship in demographics, find message
me: threat exclusivity (percieved intimacy or secrecy)to
behavioral response perception, affect negative emotions and motivation to
(confrontation) emotions - confront partners
me: social
comparison; mo:
percentage of
strangers
depressive symptoms followed -
me: motive to
quiescent–agitated/ belong, social study psyhological process of social goals
happy–dejected vigilance on FB, driving fb use for anxious attachement users,
ambivalent fear of being anxious orientation inculcates ambivalence
feelings, excluded - towards rellationships
)
implication Limitation future scope
suggest fb to provide
information which may induced time spent, triggers of jealousy, adults
jealousy and increase partner outside of university context, mechanism
survellience not reported of effect
females more prone to fb sample: limited scope & gender differences in fb induced
evoked jealousy small size emotions and jealousy
examine phenomenon for older couples,
women more prone to jealousy explore other fb information as potential
induced stalking, impact on trigger (fb information) for triggers, partners' reactions to fb info
relationship quality jealousy and impact on relationship qualilty
directionality of
relationship, sample
focus, self-reported (social
desirability bias), impact of use of fb to share private
geographical distance thoughts, self -reported motives, fb
fb's impact on maintenance of between partners, behaviour integral to relationship
romantic vis a vis other efficacy of traditional maintenance and uncertainty reduction,
relationships theoretical frameworks use of new frameworks and measures
jealousy decreases with age? Impact of
social tech integration with
communication norms and subsequent
changes in commnication connotations,
observational and retrospectie studies to
the receipt of message being causality, response to aim for ecological validation of
percieved as romantic rival, hypothetical situation, hypothetical scenario, impact of message
indirect impact of exclusivity and limited investigation of content as well as context on relational
ambiguity through emotions personalization outcomes
cultural considerations
(acculturation), technology as
platform for creating and mechanism of effect for trust and
resolving conflict, tonality of formation of relationships, difference of
communication lost, jealousy as relationships boundaries, observational
significant outcome, limited low acculturation, studies, youth population,
need for popularity, different
psychological impacts from
different social media, snapchat
may be chosen for more privacy
- smaller network. Private
commnications seen as threat to
relationship. Higher jealousy for unbalanced gender
receiving post for unknown post population, small sample underlying processes, longitudinal
on facebook, affordances of SNS size, appropriate studies, other interpersonal
characteristics respondents, consequences
convenience sampling,
college students only, systematic investigation of relationship
geographic proximity as generalizability, quality parameters, longitudinal and
detriment for relationship, SNS relationship parameters, experimental study, dyadic analysis
used for relationship adpated measures - (partner's reports also to be considered),
maintenance, intentional/ limited comparability of domestic/ international proximity, more
unintentional survelliance, results, nuanced SNS functions characteristics
non-probability sampling,
partners' use of social media cross-sectional study
compared to respondents, social (causality), unvalidated
media impact on interpersonal scales, self-report
communication, individual measures (subjective
characteritics (control variables) bais), cultural
significant in some ways considerations corss-cultural replication
self-presentation significant as a
significant characteristic of
media use, jealousy and self -
idealization as a mechnism of Halpern
effect, detrimental effect of self-reported, impact of cross-cultural generalizability, impact of D., Katz
visual communication modalities social desirability, mood, youth culture and local practices, direct J.E. &
on relationships memory, and motive observation of emotions Carril C
2016
2019
2013
2017
2010
sample focus theory
adult goal cognition theory
me: Facebook
related jealousy,
online
surveillance Belgium
me: motive to
belong, social
vigilance on FB,
fear of being
excluded Canada
me: romantic
jealousy,
survelliance
behaviour Canada
me: SCO Chile
me: self-
regulation Europe
me: social
comparison; mo:
percentage of
strangers
followed Hungary
me: surveillance,
excessive
displays Pakistan
me: threat
perception,
emotions Pakistan
me1: jealousy,
idealized
persona, photo
related conflicts Puerto Rico
mo: gender; me:
attachment Spain, Columbia,
anxiety Ecuador
mo: partner
trust Taiwan
mo: partners'
social media use Thailand
study 1 me:
relationship
quality
(intimacy,
satisfaction,
commitment,
passion, love,
trust). Trust
significant ;
Study 2: Trust as
mediator;
actor's daily
jealousy the Netherlands
the Netherlands
Turkey
UAE
UK
UK
UK
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
USA
S.No. Year Author Journal 2009
Altakhaineh A., Alnamer
1 2018 S. Social Sciences 0
2 2016 Baker C., Carreno P. Journal of Child and Family Studies 0
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social
3 2018 Bevan J.L Networking 0
Billedo C., Kerkhof P., Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social
4 2015 Finkenauer C. Networking 0
Brem M., Spiller L.,
5 2015 Vandahey M. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 0
Nongpong S.,
36 2016 Charoensukmongkol P. Family journal 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4
0 0 0 0 0 0 5 10 22 19
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 3 10 12 27 19
0 0 0 0 0 1 3 9 12 14
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 3 5 12 1 8
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 9 4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1 2 2 9 7 6 12
0 0 0 0 1 4 5 8 9 15
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 6 33 37 54 67 77 88 73
0 0 0 0 1 1 11 5 12 6
0 0 0 0 0 16 53 65 102 126
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7 9
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22
0 0 0 0 0 1 5 14 15 13
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 10 13 13 25
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 3 9
0 0 2 14 19 26 39 27 31 26
0 0 0 0 7 3 6 14 4 5
3 7 10 16 10 15 14 12 14 9
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 2 6 14 11 13 12
13 37 54 74 101 93 75 95 70 72
0 0 0 2 8 17 10 11 7 6
0 0 0 1 9 10 18 18 6 15
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 4
0 0 0 0 0 2 6 11 9 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 5 13 16 17
0 0 0 0 0 2 10 14 16 11
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4
0 0 0 0 3 7 10 10 11 6
2 2 12 24 33 42 47 53 31 40
0 0 0 0 0 4 23 55 59 63
0 0 0 0 0 0 5 8 4 11
18 46 84 165 233 313 470 602 637 698
2020
0
4
2
1
3
0
0
12
1
19
1
3
4
1
0
6
1
12
2
2
5
10
0
123
Journal
Social Sciences
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2009 0.1
2010 0.4
Average citations per annum
2011 1.0
2012 1.9 15.5
2013 3.7 14.2
13.4
2014 5.2
6 2015 7.0 10.4
5 5 5 2016 10.4
2017 13.4
7.0
2018 14.2
5.2
2019 15.5
3.7
2020 2.7 2.7
1.9
1.0
0.1 0.4
016 2017 2018 2019 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020