Chapter 3
Chapter 3
Chapter 3
The below has been prepared to help all research students with the writing and organising of research
papers and reports including dissertations and theses. The first four pages, to the end of Methods,
• Describes research work in sufficient detail for it to be verified (and maybe repeated or at least
• Places research questions and conclusions in context of related research work in the field
• Avoid bias in language2 – scholarly writing should be free of implied or irrelevant evaluation of
• Contemporary science and scholarship use the active voice as much as possible
• Use the past tense for things already done, eg, research methods, tests applied, etc.; use the
present tense for things that live on, eg, the findings and conclusions drawn
• The quality of your written communication will influence your reader’s understanding
• Follow a standard style guide – EBS and most of the social/environmental sciences worldwide
• For dissertations and theses being submitted in Australia, use Australian spelling and
punctuation throughout; for manuscripts being submitted to a journal, follow the journal’s
guidelines
Research terminology:
• Use appropriate research terminology
• Subdivisions with headings and subheadings (two levels are quite sufficient)
• All factual statements supported by references to peer-reviewed research or by data from this
study
1 Parts of the first four subsections have been used by permission of Dr Meloni Muir, “Practical Report
Writing”,
2 See the APA Publications Manual (5th edition), section 2.12, pp 61-76 for an excellent set of guidelines
for
Structure:
The structure and content of a research paper, report or thesis should be appropriate to your research
topic. A classic research report, in any field, contains four basic sections (though the names and the
• Methods
• Results
Plus of course references, acknowledgments and maybe appendices (in a report, but not in a paper)
Below is an outline for a typical Hons, MPhil, PhD or Post-doc research paper, report or thesis:
Title Page
• Title: The title summarises the main idea of the paper simply and, if possible, with style
o A concise statement of the main topic of the research
o Identify the actual variables or theoretical issues under investigation and the relations
between them
o A good title easily compresses to the running head used for published papers
o Titles are commonly indexed and compiled by abstracting and indexing services into
reference works; therefore avoid words that serve no useful purpose, eg, the words
‘method’ and ‘results’ do not normally appear in a title, nor should such redundancies as ‘a
• By-line: Author(s) name and institutional affiliation, eg, Environment, Behaviour & Society
• Date submitted
• Running head: Abbreviated title recommended to the publisher as a running head; limited to
Table of Contents
Abstract
• Ending with the significance of the research (very important for research proposals; frowned
• Concise
• Self-contained (eg, define all abbreviations, or do not use them; spell out names, do not use
acronyms, etc.)
• Non-evaluative
• Coherent and readable, eg, use active rather than passive voice
The introduction is likely one-quarter of the paper or thesis – the purpose, background and review of
3 For additional details on some of the below items, see the APA Publication Manual (5th edition).
• The purpose and potential significance of the study, ie, the problem under investigation,
• Comprehensive
• Integrative
• Critical
• Subdivide into several sections, each dealing with a different body of relevant prior
research
• Review and critique major research methods previously used in this domain
• In total, tell your reader what is known and what is not known (gaps) in the domain of your
research topic
• Leads logically to and supports the research questions or hypotheses
• Flowing from the above review – the specific research questions, and hypotheses if
• The gaps in current knowledge turned into researchable questions and/or hypotheses
Methods
Another ca one-quarter of the paper or thesis – the what and how of the research:
• Describe how the study was conducted and why the methods used were appropriate
• Enable the reader to evaluate the appropriateness of your methods, and therefore the
• Tell the reader what you did and how you did it in sufficient detail so that a reader could
• Subdivide into several labelled sections and subsections, each dealing with a different part of
the research methodology, depending on topic, but include at least the following sections and
subsections:
o Research Design
• The mode of inquiry that was deemed most appropriate for this research, ie, into which
• Overall plan of the research – two stages, preliminary and main study, etc (as
appropriate).
• This section is unusual in sciences where everyone follows the same received
bench sciences, but is needed in our field as the range of modes of inquiry or
methodologies varies widely; it is therefore necessary to indicate and justify the basic
methodology selected
o Pilot Study(ies)
• Details of any pilot studies conducted to refine and test instruments, etc.
• Identify the population that is relevant for the research under investigation
• Indicate how the sample was selected, including how the size of the sample(s) was
decided and what type of sample it was (simple random, stratified random, and why)
• Characterise the final sample along lines that will be most useful to determine how far the
data can be generalised, eg, numbers from different ethnic groups, or other analytic
• What type of information, evidence or data was collected to answer the research
• Articulate the constructs implied in the research questions and/or hypotheses and the
moderating variables and dependent variables), and how they relate to the constructs and
variables
• For text-based interpretive research, this would be the types of evidence used and how
• For field, laboratory or simulation research, this is the types of data collection methods
genrealisabilty/transferability
o Procedure
• Describe randomisation, counterbalancing and other control features of the design (as
appropriate)
• Most readers are familiar with standard procedures that are well published; don’t repeat
o Data/Information Analysis
• Describe the specific quantitative and/or qualitative data analysis methods that were used
to analyse or evaluate the data or information, and why they were appropriate4
• For qualitative and interpretive research, explain in detail how you evaluated the
• For prototype development research, give details of how you assessed the object
• For field or laboratory research, give details of quantitative and/or qualitative data analysis
methods employed
• Ensure your reader is clear what data analysis techniques you used to analyse the data
• Sometimes this section is put into results, as a description of the data analysis methods
used for each research question and associated findings, but it is preferable to put it in the
end of Methods to combine in one place all the methods used in the study
Results
Perhaps as much as one-third of the thesis, report or paper – what you found from the research:
• Summarise the data collected and the findings relative to each research question and/or
hypothesis
• Divide the section into several subsections, each reporting the findings in answer to one of the
research questions.
• Include all relevant results, including those that run counter to expectation
• For quantitative analyses, report levels of statistical significance and effect size/strength of
relationship indicators
• Include sufficient descriptive statistics so the direction of the findings and the nature of the
effect being reported can be understood by the reader
• For qualitative analyses, report sufficient detail to justify how you arrived at the results and so
• Just the “facts” here; do not discuss or interpret the data (that comes in the next section)
• Include tables and figures as appropriate (eg, ANOVA tables, figures or explanatory qualitative
• Tell the reader what to look for in tables and figures and provide sufficient explanation to make
4 See the APA Publication Manual, pp 21-26, 130-144 for additional information on the presentation of
statistics.
See Miles and Huberman (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (Thousand
Oaks,
CA: Sage) for some ways of presenting qualitative analyses. 5 See the APA Publication Manual, sections
3.62-3.86, for detailed information on tables and figures.
• Avoid using tables for data that can be presented easily in a few sentences in the text
• For multiple studies being reported in one paper or report, describe the method and results of
Maybe just one-sixth of the paper, report or thesis, but a critical part, putting the results into context:
• Summarise the most important findings from the study; open the section with a clear
statement of the support or non-support for the original hypotheses or the essential answers to
• Discuss similarities and differences between the results and the work of others
• Evaluate and interpret the findings, ie, interpret or give meaning to the findings, tying them
back to the research questions, hypotheses, theory(ies) and previous research reviewed
• Discuss the overall significance of the findings, ie, comment on the importance of the findings
• Discuss what would be the next steps in continuing research and development
References
• Include a list of archival references, in standard APA format, of all published work directly cited
in the paper
• If a reference is not in English, translate the title into English (in parentheses).
• Do not reference unpublished or internal reports, unpublished papers, conference papers that
have not been published, or papers or books in languages that are unlikely to be known to a
majority of readers.
• Minimise the use of on-line internet sources, as most are not refereed and do not constitute
information. For on-line refereed publications and major government reports, use the
Appendix(es)
• Helpful if the detailed description of certain material is distracting or inappropriate in the body
of the report
• Include research protocols, unpublished tests and its validation, new computer program
designed for your research, instruments, consent forms, etc. (include in reports, but usually
not in papers)
• Include disclosures, eg, that the study is based on a PhD thesis, the results were presented
earlier at a conference, and any relationships that raise the possibility of being perceived as a
conflict of interest