The Detrimental Effects of Personal Distraction
The Detrimental Effects of Personal Distraction
The Detrimental Effects of Personal Distraction
Students are probably aware that spending their attention and energy has an effect on
the quality of their work. Having love relationship with other individual has been part of
lifestyle for most students today. Prioritizing their relationship with their love partners
makes their time less spent especially on their subjects and to other school activities
which affects their performance. With the new technology of cell phones and laptops,
students can miss whole lessons.
Distraction is something that distracts you from focusing to one object or a thing that
prevents someone from concentrating. Focus is important because it is what causes us
to actively look for resources to guarantee our success so we should learn how to control
ourselves to focus on something that may distract us.
This study is to help the students to determine their personal distractions and help
them to find ways on handling their distractions.
Statement Of The Problem
The ultimate concern of this study is to raise awareness of the Junior
High school students of St. John Academy of Manila Foundation Inc. School
Year 2018-2019 about the detrimental effects of personal distractions on their
academic performance, physical wellness, and socialization skills.
Specifically, the researcher sought to answer the following research questions;
1. What are the causes of distractions on the Junior High School Students of
St. John Academy of Manila Foundation Inc. School Year 2018-2019?
2. What are the detrimental effects of distractions to the academic
performance of the Junior High School Students of St. John Academy of
Manila Foundation Inc. School Year 2018-2019?
3. What are the detrimental effects of distractions to the physical wellness of
the Junior High School Students of St. John Academy of Manila Foundation
Inc. School Year 2018-2019?
4. What are the detrimental effects of distractions to the socialization skills of
the Junior High School Students of St. John Academy of Manila Foundation
Inc. School Year 2018-2019?
5. What are the ways of the Junior High School Students of St. John Academy
of Manila Foundation Inc. School Year 2018-2091 to handle distractions?
Goals and Objective
With the given statement of the problem, the researcher aims to;
To d r a w c o n c l u s i o n f o r t h i s s t u d y, t h e
researcher constructed a research questionnaire.
The respondents for this research are 30 officially
enrolled Junior High school students of St. John
Academy of Manila Foundation Inc. School year
2018-2019. The obtained data for this study are from
the perceptions and knowledge of the mentioned
research respondents.
Significance of the Study
The researchers have seen it fit to conduct a research to examine the
effects of personal distraction to the academic performance of the selected
Junior high school students. Thus, this study in the researcher’s viewpoint will
be beneficial to the following:
Students- They will benefit in this study because they will gain awareness
about the effects of distraction that can also help the students to overcome their
fears and to focus on what is really needed to give a lot of attention. They will
also be informed that it is also an important factor affecting their learning and
achievement.
Teachers - They will be aware that distraction plays a big role in student’s
learning and understand the importance of distraction in an educational
environment.
Parents- They will be informed about their child’s distraction and be able to
support their children’s physical and mental behavior.
Administrators – They will support the teacher’s goal in helping the students
to avoid the things that they know may distract them.
Future Researchers – They may use this research study as a reference in
gathering data.
Research Paradigm
The paradigm of this study organizes its variable so that it will be easier for the
researchers to understand the study. The study can be illustrated as follows using the I-
P-O model.
This chapter cites a significant number of related literature and studies that aid
the researchers in the acquisition of accurate data. This related literature and
research findings have been taken from both local and foreign sources.
Distraction
Distraction is the process of diverting the attention of an individual or
group from a desired area of focus and thereby blocking or diminishing the
reception of desired information. Distraction is caused by: the lack of ability to
pay attention; lack of interest in the object of attention; or the great intensity,
novelty or attractiveness of something other than the object of attention.
Distraction can be defined as the driving force behind all the actions of an
individual when it caught someone’s attention. The influence of an individual's
needs and desires both have a strong impact on the direction of their behavior.
Distraction is based on your emotions and achievement-related goals whether
you avoid things that may distract or you’ll control it. There are different forms
of distraction including extrinsic, intrinsic, physiological, and physical. There are
also more negative forms of distraction. Distraction, it’s something that happens
to all of us in today’s modern society.
It can be enjoyable at times. The way we talk about
distraction has always been a little self-serving we say, in
the passive voice, that we’re “distracted by” the Internet,
and this makes us seem like the victims of our own
decisions. As urban living spreads portable technology, like
smart phones and tables, allow us to bring that city-like
experience with us. We allow our devices to distract us, or
we can choose to be mindful of the way we use technology.
According to Pascal (n.d), the first theory has been
around for ages, dating back at least to the seventeenth
century when Pascal said, “all men’s miseries derive from
not being able to sit in a quiet room.” Are we simply trying
to distract ourselves from the loneliness or emptiness that
we feel inside? The spiritual theory of distractions asks are
we distracting ourselves from our troubled souls?
According to Simmel (n.d), the second theory
is that our urban, technology reliant society is the
cause of our distraction. This material theory has
been around since about 1903. That in cities that
are being overrun with technology, “stimulations,
interests and taking up of time and attention” are so
abundant that it’s become a “stream” that doesn’t
require much effort for its ongoing. On the other
hand, living out in the country where technology is
less abundant, you have to find entertainment for
yourself—distraction does not come as easily.
According to Piliavin and Festinger (n.d), the
concept that distractions could enhance the
persuasiveness of a message came in the wake of
a methodological error in an experiment.
According to the Bottleneck (n.d), theory of attention,
attention can be allocated to only one task at a time. Thus,
multitasking is a myth; instead, the mind switches between
tasks. Stimuli arrives at a processing ‘bottleneck,’ at which
only one item can be processed at a time (Broadbent, 1958
and Maslovat 2013). Because attentional resources are
limited, filtering of stimuli must occur. The bottleneck
postpones aspects of processing of the secondary task
until the primary task is completed.
Schuur and colleagues (2015), suggest two opposing
consequences of media multitasking with regards to
cognitive control, which they referred to as the scattered
attention and trained attention hypotheses. According to the
scattered attention hypothesis, long-term media
multitasking may lead to disrupted cognitive control in
which the individual gravitates towards the preferred task
rather than maintaining focus despite attentional
distractions.
Connection of Distraction to the
Academic Performance
Few studies include associations of emotions, or of individual
differences in emotionality, to academic competence, and there are virtually no
empirical data on when or why relations exist (or do not exist). The few studies
of emotion and achievement have largely focused on anxiety, but there has
been scant theoretical and empirical attention devoted to the treatment of other
emotions. It is suggested that considering the moderated and indirect effects of
students’ emotions on their academic functioning may provide an
understanding of whether and under what circumstances emotions are related
to achievement. This article briefly reviews findings linking situational and
dispositional negative or positive emotions to academic achievement and
suggests that researchers can learn much about relations between emotions
and achievement by considering the potential moderating role of effortful
control, as well as considering the mediating roles that cognitive processes,
motivational mechanisms, and classroom relationships play in linking emotions
and achievement. Liew (2012) provides a succinct review of progress on
understanding the relations between academic achievement and effortful
control.
The researchers explore why frequent Facebook use and texting
were linked to poorer academic performance, while instant messaging,
online searching and emailing were not: “This discrepancy can either
be explained by characteristics of the technologies themselves or by
qualitative differences in how the technologies are used by students
Facebook and texting are [perhaps] used for social purposes while
emailing and searching are used for academic purposes.” The study
calls for more research to explain this discrepancy.
Research Method
According to Calderon (2008), as cited by Alberto
et al (2011), descriptive method is also known as
statistical research, it describes data and characteristics
about the population or phenomenon being studied.
Population, Sample size and
Sampling Technique
Sampling may be defined as measuring a small portion of
something and then making a general statement about the whole thing.
(Bradfield and Moredock)Sampling technique is the technique used to
determine which element is to be included in the sample. The
researchers included 30 Junior High School students as respondents.
According to Shott (1990) in Cristobal, Jr. &Dela Cruz-Cristobal in
Research Made Easier A Step-by-Step Process, “sample sizes as small
as 30 are generally adequate to ensure that the sampling distribution of
the mean will approximate the normal curve (2013).” Thus, the
researchers pursued with the number of 30 as sample size out of the
64-total number of Junior high school students of SJAMFI.
Consequently, the researchers upon the advice of their research
adviser selected respondents through simple random sampling through
table of random digits to get the number of respondents per class.
Simple random sampling is a method of choosing samples in which all
the members of the population are given equal chance of being
selected (Cristobal, Jr. &Dela-Cruz-Cristobal, 2013).
Description of Respondents
The respondents are the officially enrolled students of SJAMFI in the
school year 2017-2018 from Grades 7, 8, 9, and 10.
The target respondents were:
Table 1
Distribution of Respondents per Class
P= N
This graph shows that 3 (10.00%) of the respondents is being distracted by their
family, 2 (6.67%) are telling that their friends can distract them and relationships also 3 (10.00%)
the same with the family but, 10 (33.33%) of the respondents are saying that computer games
can distract them, meanwhile 12 (40.00%) social media applications has the biggest percentage
among all the choices and it shows that it has a big part in the respondent’s distraction.
3. Effects of Distraction on your
AcademicFigure
Performance
4
Effects of Distraction on your Academic Performance
The figure tells that 9 (30.00%) of the respondents are experiencing sleep
deprivation 5 (16.67%) loss of appetite 7 (23.33%) are out of focus 5 (16.67%) is having
a poor sleeping pattern 4 (13.33%) has poor eyesight because of their personal
distractions.
5. Effects of Distraction on your
Socialization Skills
Figure 6
Effects of Distraction on your Socialization Skills
The graph shows that 10 (33.33%) lack of focus when talking to someone
And the other 10 (33.33%) unable to express one thoughts and ideas 7 (23.33%)
of respondents decreased their face to face communication skills some 3
(10.00%) shortened attention span because of their personal distraction.
6. Ways to Handle Distraction
Figure 7
Ways to Handle Distraction
Based on the respondents’ ideas 6 (20.00%) of them says that one should set
priorities straight to handle distraction 18 (60.00%) of them tells that practice time
management is important 3 (10.00%) knows that de cluttering your mind can help in
handling distraction and the other 3 (10.00%) is on the side of eliminating or minimize
negative people in one’s life.
Chapter V
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter also includes the summary of findings, conclusions made based on the results
and also the recommendations.
Summary of Findings
After the analysis and interpretation of data, the researchers were able to come up with the
following findings: the researchers found out that most of the respondents are males. Based on the
data gathered, most of the respondents are distracted by social media application. Moreover,
personal distractions can cause lack of focus on academics, sleep deprivation and hinder face-to-
face communication.
Conclusions
The Junior High school students of SJAMFI SY. 2018-2019 are distracted by different social
media applications. These social media applications can cause lack of focus on academics, sleep
deprivation, and lessen personal and face-to-face communication.
Recommendations
Anastasia D. Elder, Kaitlyn E. May. (2018). International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher
Education.
Kent, M. (2006). The Oxford Dictionary of Sports Science & Medicine . Oxford University Press.
Shott. (2013). Research made easier: A step by step process. Quezon City: C & E Publishing.