A Review Based On The Synthesis of Carbon Quantum Dots: Top-Down, Bottom-Up Approaches and Their Properties
A Review Based On The Synthesis of Carbon Quantum Dots: Top-Down, Bottom-Up Approaches and Their Properties
A Review Based On The Synthesis of Carbon Quantum Dots: Top-Down, Bottom-Up Approaches and Their Properties
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Sheetal Nancy
Department of Biosciences and Technology, Department of Biosciences and Technology,
Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to Be) University, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to Be) University,
Mullana, Ambala 134003, India Mullana, Ambala 134003, India
A. Top-down route
Top-down approaches begin with a complicated
structure. Large structures are crumbling into smaller ones
along this route. The precursor has a bulk structure that is
broken down into materials with nanostructures using various
techniques. Graphites, nano-diamonds, carbon-soot, carbon-
Fig. 1 . showing the structure of carbon quantum dots nanotubes are complex structure of carbon which are
converted into quantum dots. Large carbonaceous materials
These nanoparticles have many advantages in biomedical can be broken down into nano-structures using this processes
sciences. CQDs are used in bio-imaging, bio-sensors and bio- like as acidic oxidation, arc-discharge, laser-ablation, and
molecule, energy storage, energy conversion, in cancer ultrasonics.
therapies they used for drug delivery and also used for tumor
targeting fluorescence imaging sensors. These are also used in
the detection of high toxic and carcinogenic metal ions. As
CQDs acquire good bio-compatibility and photo-stability
properties, so it is used as excellent bio-imaging and pattering
agent. CQDs are the nanoparticles which are derived from the
several carbon sources. CQDs synthesize from two sources –
green or agricultural source and chemical source.
Comparison between the different sources of C-QDs obtained from hydrothermal method at different temperature (TABLE I.)
Sr. no. Carbon precursor Temperature Particle size References
1 Lemon extract 240 0C 50 nm [25]
2 Tulsi leaves 200 0C 5 nm [26]
3 Grass 180 0C 0 – 10 nm [27]
4 Corn stalk 270 0C 1 – 3 nm [28]
5 Water hyacinth leaves 180 0C 1 – 4 nm [29]
6 Neem leaves 150 0C 1 – 5.5 nm [30]
7 Maple tree leaves 190 0C 2 – 10 nm [31]
8 Banana peel 200 0C 4 – 6 nm [32]
9 Apple juice 180 0C 1 – 3 nm [33]
10 Pomelo peel 200 0C 2 – 4 nm [34]
In TABLE II. different kinds of methods are compared which show the comparison between quantum yield that was obtained.
TABLE II.
Sr. No. Carbon Precursor Method of Synthesis Yield obtained Refrences
1 Fullerene carbon soot (FCS) Acidic oxidation 3-5 % [11]
2 Chinese ink Acidic oxidation 60-80% [12]
3 Graphite Arc discharge _ [15]
4 Crude soot Arc discharge 16% [16]
5 Soyabean Ultrasonic 16.7% [59]
6 Glucose Ultrasonic 7% [23]
7 Graphite Laser ablation 3-8% [18]
8 Nano carbon material Laser ablation _ [19]
9 Graphite powder Laser ablation 4-10% [5]
10 Carbon glassy Laser ablation 15% [21]
11 Lemon extract Hydrothermal method 21.37% [25]
12 Tulsi leaves Hydrothermal method 3.06% [26]
13 Grass Hydrothermal method _ [27]
14 Corn stalk Hydrothermal method 16% [28]
15 Water hyacinth leaves Hydrothermal method 3.3% [29]
16 Neem leaves Hydrothermal method 27.2% [30]
17 Maple tree leaves Hydrothermal method _ [31]
18 Banana peel Hydrothermal method 20% [32]