IGBSG Conference
IGBSG Conference
IGBSG Conference
, Yichang
China
Abstract—The high-efficiency, high-current and low-cost losses. Emerging GaN devices offer the opportunity to further
power solutions are required for data centers application, in order optimize the performance of LLC resonant converter at high
to reduce the transmission loss on cables, the high input-voltage dc frequency operation, GaN device’s superb characteristic of low
distribution power architecture has been adopted, the 380-12 V parasitic capacitor and low gate charge can significantly reduce
high output current isolated converter is widely used in this circulating current loss and gate driving loss compare to silicon
application. This paper presents a 300-kHz 1-kW LLC resonant MOSFET [8]. However, magnetics components losses including
converter using novel integrated transformer and Gallium nitride core loss, winding loss and gap loss are increased in high switching
device that are designed and optimized for the LLC resonant frequency operation and magnetic design become very critical.
converter. The novel integrated transformer structure is proposed In recent ten years, the matrix transformer is proposed and
and designed for reducing core-loss, secondary conduction-loss widely used [9]-[10], it is a good candidate for this application due
and achieving no gap-loss. In the end, a laboratory prototype is to its high current capability and high step-down ratio, besides, the
designed and tested. The experimental results have verified the flux cancellation method of matrix transformer can be utilized both
performance of the proposed LLC resonant converter with novel reducing core size and loss. Still, in LLC resonant converter design,
integrated transformer. magnetizing inductance is used to achieve ZVS and designed as a
small value especially at high frequency operation, although GaN’s
Keywords—gallium nitride, high frequency, integrated low output capacitance helps to minimum the current of
transformer, LLC resonant converter. magnetizing inductance with large magnetizing inductance, the
LLC resonant converter operate in high frequency still need lower
magnetizing inductance due to short excitation time, it means that
I. INTRODUCTION the air gap in transformer design can’t be reduce. Therefore, the gap
Recently, more and more electronic devices, such as memories, loss induced by air gap is unavoidable and unneglectable especially
chip sets, core processors and hardware drives are powered from a at high switching frequency operation.
12V bus. As the power capability increase, the conduction loss To maintain the benefits of matrix transformer and further
consideration become more critical nowadays. In order to reduce eliminate gap loss in the transformer, integrated magnetics
the conduction loss in the power distribution, the dc power technique is an effective way to reduce core loss, gap loss, and
distribution system is proved to be a good candidate compared with achieve high power density. In this paper, a new structure of
ac power distribution systems [1]. In order to further improve the integrated transformer with four columns core is proposed, this
system efficiency, a 380-12 V DC-DC transformer is used to structure can achieve flux cancellation between outer three columns
replace the multi-ended dc/dc converters in the dc distribution and flows together to the center column. Due to utilizing this flux
systems. The LLC resonant converters are widely used among cancellation method, both the flux flowing inside the core and the
power transfer for telecommunication and data center applications equivalent permeability acting on the core are naturally reduced,
since LLC resonant converters have high conversion efficiency, therefore, low or even no gap loss and lower core loss can been
simple structure and capability for high-frequency operation [2]-[3]. achieved on LLC resonant converter, furthermore, since the
In detail, LLC resonant converters have many advantages that proposed integrated transformer is designed to combine three
include ZVS capability from zero to full load range, low turn-off transformer core into one, the size of the transformer can be reduced
current of primary-side switches and zero-current switching for by integrating and modifying the column size, the current
synchronous rectifier (SR) devices [4]-[8]. Furthermore, the LLC distribution also becomes more evenly in secondary winding
resonant converter is suitable for this 380-12 V DC-DC stage, without additional compensation circuit due to reducing the
because it can operate at fixed frequency which is resonant tolerance of properties from different cores. Detailed descriptions of
frequency to maximum the converter’s efficiency. Therefore, the the proposed integrated transformer structure and practical design
LLC resonant converter becomes an excellent candidate for the next method are revealed in the following sections. A highly efficient
generation of high-efficiency isolated converters for data center 650 W, 300-kHz, 380-12 V LLC converter is built and verified.
applications.
For high power density requirement, the switching frequency of II. PROPOSED NOVEL TRANSFORMER STRUCTURE ON LLC
LLC resonant converter becomes much higher than before, because
RESONANT CONVERTER
it can reduce the size of magnetic components to achieve high
power density demand. However, the converter’s efficiency The LLC resonant converter is very suitable for high frequency
decreases due to high switching loss and high magnetic components dc-dc isolated 380-12 V converter [11-12]. It can achieve zero-
61
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Taiwan Univ of Science and Technology. Downloaded on November 17,2022 at 07:42:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2019 International Conference on Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG2019), 6-9 Sept., Yichang
China
voltage switching (ZVS) for primary switches and zero-current A. Theoretical analysis of proposed transformer structure
switching (ZCS) for secondary switches ensuring high efficiency To further illustrate and explain the benefits of the proposed
and high power density. In this application, since the demand of transformer structure on LLC resonant converter, the magnetic
converter’s switching frequency and power volume increasing, the reluctance model of proposed transformer structure are shown in
switching loss of primary switches, the loss of magnetic Fig. 3, Ro is the magnetic reluctances of three outer legs. Rc is the
components and conduction loss of secondary switches have to magnetic reluctance of the center leg, since the geometry of
further optimize particularly. Over the past few years, the matrix transformer structure is symmetric, magnetic reluctances in three
transformer is proposed and popular with using in LLC resonant outer legs are the same, Φ1, Φ2, Φ3, Φc are the flux in each legs and
converter. It has been widely study and discussion including core the magnetomotive forces (MMF) in three outer legs induced by
loss reduction, terminal loss reduction and structure optimization. primary current and secondary current, the magnetomotive forces
However, the gap loss improvement is seldom discussed although (MMF) at primary-side are divided into three in each outer leg, the
it can’t be ignored especially at high frequency operation. In this magnetomotive forces (MMF) at secondary-side are separated by
paper, the proposed integrated transformer structure is designed not positive conduction and negative conduction due to the secondary
only to optimize for improving of transformer gap loss but structure of center-tapped type.
employs the benefits on core loss and secondary conduction loss.
The proposed transformer structure using in the half-bridge LLC
resonant converter shows in Fig. 1. The GaNFETs Q1 and Q2 are
primary devices. The SR MOSFETS Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7 and Q8 are
secondary devices. Cr is the resonant capacitor. Lr is the leakage
inductance of the transformer while Lm1, Lm2 and Lm3 are the
magnetizing inductance. For optimal design in 380-12 V
application, the equivalent turns ratio is 15:1:1 which makes
converter operates near resonant frequency to reduce apparent
power loss, therefore, the turns ratio in each transformer is 5:1:1, Fig. 3. Magnetic reluctance model of proposed transformer structure
primary-side windings are in series, secondary-side windings are
Fig.4 shows the operation of proposed transformer structure in
center-tapped and connect in parallel.
magnetic reluctance model during de-coupled operation interval.
Integrated transformer
n1:1:1
Q4 When primary current(ip) is equal to magnetizing current(iLm),
Q5
secondary windings can’t conduct and primary current(ip) is in
Lm1
Q1 Coss1
Q6 freewheeling, the flux distribution can be cancelled and reduced by
Vgs1
Lr Cr
Q7
flux cancellation. Following equations show the amount of flux in
Vin
n2:1:1
Q8
Q9
the three outer legs and center leg, it can be written as,
Q2 Coss2 Lm2
Vgs2
Q10 Co Ro Vo
Q11
Lm=Lm1+Lm2+Lm3
Q12
n3:1:1
Q13
Lm3
Q14
Q15
62
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Taiwan Univ of Science and Technology. Downloaded on November 17,2022 at 07:42:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2019 International Conference on Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG2019), 6-9 Sept., Yichang
China
63
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Taiwan Univ of Science and Technology. Downloaded on November 17,2022 at 07:42:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2019 International Conference on Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG2019), 6-9 Sept., Yichang
China
Fig. 11. Total transformer loss between core loss and winding loss
64
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Taiwan Univ of Science and Technology. Downloaded on November 17,2022 at 07:42:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2019 International Conference on Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG2019), 6-9 Sept., Yichang
China
REFERENCES
[1] Bo. Feng, Dehong. Xu, “Design of 1 KW PFC converter with
minimum-voltage active-clamping,”in proc. IEEE Power Electronic
and Drive Systems, 2003, pp 1075-1080.
[2] Cervantes. I, Perez-Teniers. S, “Zero-Voltage-Transition control for a
class of resonant converter.” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 53, no.
(a) (b) 5, pp 1747-1749, 2006.
Fig. 12. Waveforms of Vgs2, VD21, and iLr at (a) PO = 120 W, (b) PO = 650 [3] Mandrek. S, Chrzan. P. J, “Quasi-resonant DC-link inverter with a
W and (c) PO = 650 W. (Vgs2: 10 V/div, VDS1: 200 V/div, iL: 5 A/div, Time: reduced number of active elements.” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol.
1 s/div)
54, no. 4, pp 2088-2094, 2007.
[4] Agamy. M. S, Jain. P. K, “A three-level resonant single-stage power
factor correction converter: analysis design and implementation.”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 2095-2107, 2009.
[5] Jung. Min. Kwon, Woo. Young. Choi, Bong, Hwan. Kwon, “Single-
switch quasi-resonant converter.” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56,
no. 4, pp. 1158-1163, 2009.
[6] V. Vorperian, “Quasi-square-wave converters: topologies and
Fig. 13. Waveforms of Vs1, Vs2 and Vs3 at PO = 650 W. analysis,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 183-191,
(Vs1: 20 V/div, Vs2: 20 V/div, Vs3: 20 V/div) 1998.
[7] Fei Yang, Xinbo Ruan, Qing Ji and Zhihong Ye, “Input Differential-
Mode EMI of CRM Boost PFC Converter,” IEEE Trans.
Power Electron., vol. 28, no.3, pp. 1177-1188, 2013.
65
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Taiwan Univ of Science and Technology. Downloaded on November 17,2022 at 07:42:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2019 International Conference on Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG2019), 6-9 Sept., Yichang
China
[8] Fei Yang, Xinbo Ruan, Yang Yang and Zhihong Ye, “Interleaved
Critical Current Mode Boost PFC Converter with Coupled
Inductor,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 26, no.9, pp. 2404-2413,
2011.
[9] Xinke Wu, Jianyou Yang, Junming Zhang and Ming Xu, “Design
Considerations of Soft-Switched Buck PFC Converter with Constant
On-Time (COT) Control,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron, vol. 26,
no.11, pp. 3144-3152, 2011.
[10] PWM Current-Mode Controller for Free Running Quasi-Resonant
Operation, On Semiconductor NCP1207 datasheet, Nov. 2007 Rev.
8.
[11] J. M. Kwon, W. Y. Choi, B. H. Kwon, “Single-switch quasi-resonant
converter.” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, no.4, pp. 1158-1163,
2009.
[12] Y. S. Lee, G. T. Cheng, “Quasi resonant zero current switching
bidirectional converter for battery equalization applications.” IEEE
Trans. Power Electron., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1213-1224, 2006.
66
Authorized licensed use limited to: National Taiwan Univ of Science and Technology. Downloaded on November 17,2022 at 07:42:12 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.