Notes On The Zulu Kingdom and The Colony of Natal
Notes On The Zulu Kingdom and The Colony of Natal
Notes On The Zulu Kingdom and The Colony of Natal
Home > Topic > The Zulu kingdom and the colony of Natal
In the second half if the 19th Century, Indians came to South Africa
in two categories, namely as indentured workers in 1860 and later
as 'free' or 'passenger' Indians. The former came as a result of a
triangular pact among three governments, which stated that the
indentured Indians were to work for the Natal colonial government
on Natal's sugar plantations. The 'free' Indians came to South
Africa mainly as traders alert to new opportunities abroad. These
'free Indians' came at their own expense from India, Mauritius, and
other places. However, emigration was stopped in 1914.
The Belvedere and The S.S. Truro were the first ships that left India
in the year 1860 for the shores of South Africa.
After serving their indentures, the first category of Indians were free
to remain in South Africa or to return to India. By 1910, nearly
26.85% indentured men returned to India, but most chose to stay
and thus constituted the forbearers of the majority of present-day
South African Indians.
Further reading
The first attack of the war took place on 12 January 1879, when the
position of Sihayo's kraal, situated in the Batshe valley, threatened
the successful advancement of the British column. Under
Chelmsford’s orders, the attacking force moved across the Batshe
to attack a rocky gorge into which Sihayo's men had retreated,
driving their cattle before them. The Natal Native Contingent
showed reluctance to face the Zulus, some of whom were armed
with rifles. In an attempt to thwart the attack, stones were also rolled
down onto the attackers and after sharp action, the Zulus retreated,
with 30 dead, 4 wounded and 10 captured. The British however,
suffered only 2 casualties, with 15 wounded.
One day later, a depot at Rorke's Drift was attacked against the
orders of Cetshwayo, who favoured a defensive strategy. After the
overwhelming victory over the British at Isandlwana, Zulu reserve
forces who were not involved in the previous day’s battle retaliated
with an attack on the “hastily erected fort” at the small garrison of
Rorke’s Drift. Here the British fought with ‘rifle fire and bayonets’
and the Zulu force, led by Prince Dabulamanzi, suffered 500
casualties in this fruitless engagement. This provided the British
with “much needed propaganda to counter the Zulu success at
Isandlwana”.
On the coast, the right column brushed aside Zulu resistance at the
Nyezane river, before advancing to occupy the deserted mission
station at Eshowe. The left column was also involved in heavy
skirmishing around the Hlobane mountain. When the central British
collapsed at Isandlwana, however, the left and right flanking
columns were left exposed. The Zulus managed to cut Colonel C.K.
Pearson’s right column off from the border, and Pearson's men
were besieged for three months at Eshowe. The left flank column,
however, managed to remain operative.
Chelmsford swiftly made his way back to Natal. The might of the
British army had suffered a severe repulse and any thoughts of a
quick British victory were put to rest. On the other hand, the Zulu
themselves suffered terrible casualties, and worse was to follow.
The war itself had not destroyed the kingdom, but subsequent
events served to divide the Zulu and undermine their economic and
social cohesion. Taking a leaf out of Shepstone’s 'native policy', Sir
Garnet Wolseley, the new British commander in Natal, divided the
kingdom into thirteen territories under appointed chiefs. They were
meant to represent the chiefly lineages of pre-Shakan times, which
was a shaky argument at best, especially since one of them was
John Dunn who had joined the British when hostilities began.
Others had either been outrightly opposed to Cetshwayo or had
shown little loyalty to him during the war. The chiefs’ allegiance was
to those who had appointed them, and Britain thus effectively
began to administer indirect rule over Zululand. Melmoth Osborn,
who enthusiastically supported Shepstone's views, was appointed
as British Resident in Zululand.
In addition, a hut tax was imposed, not only on each hut but on
every wife regardless of whether she occupied a hut. Wolseley's
infamous settlement of Zululand had not destroyed the Zulu
homestead-the basic productive unit in the kingdom's economy-
nor had the Zulu been deprived of their land. The hut tax, however,
served to divert some of the surplus accruing to an individual
homestead head to the British government. Subsequently over
70% of the annual cost of administering Zululand was derived from
this tax.
As the civil war intensified, the British realised that this settlement
was simply not workable. Cetshwayo, encouraged by Bishop
Colenso and his daughter Harriette- who both visited him in Cape
Town-petitioned the British government and was granted
permission to visit England to put forward his case for the
restoration of the Zulu monarchy. In Zululand similar petitions were
presented to the British Resident by the uSuthu.
When the Transvaalers tried to claim even more land than what
was agreed upon, the uSuthu refused. Having realised the extent
of the chaos in Zululand, the British intervened. Dinuzulu was
allowed to retain control of his portion of central Zululand, but the
Boers were also acknowledged as owners of the New Republic.
This lead to a Reserve area being set aside for those opposed to
the loyalists. In Natal, pressure mounted for the annexation of
Zululand, and almost inevitably it was annexed to the Crown in
1887. The promulgation of a Code of Laws placed Zululand under
a similar 'Native Policy' to that in Natal.
Already under stress from the imposition of the hut tax, many more
Zulu men were forced into the Witwatersrand labour market to
make ends meet and pay taxes. The gradual emergence of a
permanent labouring class alongside a traditional economy, based
on homestead production and cattle-keeping, led to new social
divisions in Zulu society.
Last updated : 02-Nov-2018