Bioreactor Design

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 31

1(31)

Finmed 2006, March 27-31,


Saariselkä, Finland

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING ASPECTS


OF BIOREACTOR DESIGN
Marko Laakkonen, Pasi Moilanen, Olli Visuri,
Juhani Aittamaa

Laboratory of Chemical Engineering


Helsinki University of Technology
Finland
2(31)

NEW DESIGN TOOL FOR BIOREACTORS


(2004–2005), NEOBIO,

TKK, Lab. of applied


thermodynamics
3(31)

OUTLINE
1. Motivation
2. Modelling transport phenomena in agitated,
aerobic fermenters
3. Model validation against experiments
3.1 Mixing times & Flow fields
3.2 Bubble size distributions
3.3 Gas-liquid mass transfer
4. Bioreactor simulations
4.1 Effects of mixing on xanthan fermentation dynamics
4.2 Simulating 70 m3 xanthan fermenter with CFD
5. Conclusions
4(31)

AEROBIC FERMENTATION
fermentation broth

BUBBLE nutrients,
substrates,...
O2 O2

CO2
products CELL
5(31)

REACTOR SCALEUP
r t a nt
g l y impo
i n
i nc r ea s
com e
na be
o me
ort phen
s p
T ran

Mixing, mass and heat


transfer limitations?
6(31)
TYPICAL QUESTIONS RELATED TO
REACTOR DESIGN
mixing
Is there enough dissolved
oxygen?
Are oxygen and nutrients
evenly distributed?
A damage of microbial
growth due to mechanical
agitation?
Agitation speed?
Gas feed rate?
Vessel geometry?
gas sparger
7(31)

CRITICAL PHENOMENA FOR


REACTOR OPERATION?
Flow fields TRANSPORT
Population
Mass transfer PHENOMENA
balances
Heat transfer
Physical
properties
Design &
scaleup

Reaction REACTOR
Laboratory kinetics MODEL
Experiments
8(31)

GAS-LIQUID MASS TRANSFER

RATE = FLUX × AREA


Two-film theory, Population
multicomponent balances for
diffusion, gas- bubbles (size
liquid equilibrium distributions)
9(31)

BUBBLE PHENOMENA
coalescence

growth
breakage

bubble slip
velocity
10(31)
REACTOR MODELLING -
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
Solve mass, momentum
balances & turbulence
Î Flow fields
11(31)

MULTIBLOCK REACTOR MODEL


Consists of
ideally mixed,
connected
subregions

Considers
dispersion
Inhomogeneity

Computationally efficient
12(31)
EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF
Model system: MODELS
Aqueous xanthan 200 dm3
Investigated quantities: stirred tank
Liquid viscosity
Power consumption
Overall gas holdup
Local bubble size distributions
Gas-liquid mass transfer
Flow fields & mixing times
Variables:
Stirring speed (0.1 – 3 W/kg)
Gassing rate (0 – 0.9 vvm)
Xanthan concentration
Vessel geometry
13(31)

VISCOSITY MEASUREMENTS
200
xanthan conc.
180 0.25 w-%
0.50 w-%
160
1.0 w-% measured
2.0 w-%
4.0 w-%
140 0.25 w-%
0.50 w-% fitted

viscosity (Pas)
120 1.0 w-%
2.0 w-% model
tähän kuva 100 4.0 w-%

80 τ yield
µ eff = + kγ n −1
60 γ
40

20

0
0.1 1.0 10.0
shear rate (1/s)
14(31)

FLOW FIELDS
CFD simulation PIV measurements
Cavern 0.5 m/s
Formation

Impeller tip speed 1.35 m/s, 0.4 w-% xanthan solution


15(31)

MIXING TIME MEASUREMENTS

0.25 w-% xanthan 2 w-% xanthan


16(31)

BUBBLE SIZE MEASUREMENT

Capillary probe
Phase Doppler
Anemometry (PDA)

30 mm
45 mm

Photography
Optical probe
LOCAL BUBBLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS 17(31)

AIR – WATER
d32 [mm]

measured
D E multiblock
(CFD)

C
impeller

measured A
ideally mixed
multiblock
CFD(32k) gas sparger
18(31)
LOCAL BUBBLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS
AIR – AQUEOUS XANTHAN

d32 = 8.1 7.8


8.0 mm

4.9
[2.3] 6.2 6.7
xanthan
3.1
[2.6] 4.2 4.8

1.3*/ 3.9#/
2.1 1.3 5.8
[2.0] 1.8

3.0 4.3
3.3 3.7
[2.8]
sparger

Markers = Measured
0mm 3.6
22mm 3.7
Lines = Simulated
19(31)

EFFECT OF STIRRING SPEED


BUBBLE GAS
SIZE HOLDUP

2 w-% GAS FEED


aqueous 0.7 vvm
xanthan
20(31)

EFFECT OF GAS FEED


BUBBLE GAS
SIZE HOLDUP

2 w-% STIRRING
aqueous SPEED
xanthan 390 rpm
21(31)
SIMULATION OF GAS-LIQUID
HYDRODYNAMICS WITH CFD
0.25 w-%
xanthan
390 rpm
0.7 vvm

gas holdup
10 vol-%
isosurface
22(31)

GAS-LIQUID MASS TRANSFER


varying
gas feeds 0.25 w-%
& stirring xanthan
speeds

0.0 w-%

Markers =
measured
0.25 w-%
Lines =
0.75 w-% multiblock
simulation
23(31)

PREDICTED LOCAL kLa [·103 s-1]


0 w-% xanthan 0.25 w-% xanthan 0.75 w-% xanthan
k L a' = 0.0073 s −1 k L a' = 0.0015 s −1

impeller impeller impeller

sparger sparger sparger


24(31)
EFFECTS OF MIXING ON XANTHAN
FERMENTATION DYNAMICS
300 rpm
350 rpm S2
S2
400 rpm
450 rpm
475 rpm S1

S1, 300 rpm

S2, xanthan
S2
S1, xanthan

S1 & S2, biomass S1


25(31)

LOCAL CONDITIONS IN THE FERMENTER


Bubble size Mass transfer Diss. oxygen Reaction rate
d32 [mm] kLa’ [103/s] DO [sat-%] rX [gX/L/h
26(31)
DISTRIBUTION OF NUTRIENT
PULSE IN 70 M3 FERMENTER
BAFFLES

RUSHTON
IMPELLERS

GAS FEED
27(31)

DISTRIBUTION OF GAS PULSE


IN 70 M3 FERMENTER
1s 3s 5s 10 s 20 s 30 s
28(31)

DISSOLVED GASES
IN 70 m3 XANTHAN FERMENTER
DO2 DCO2
[mg/L] [mg/L]
LOCAL CONDITIONS 29(31)

IN 70 M3 XANTHAN FERMENTER
Xanthan
kLa [s-1]
Reaction
rate [g/(L•h)]
30(31)

CONCLUSIONS

Physical reactor modeling provides


• means to see ’inside’ industrial
bioreactors
• tools for
Reactor design and scaleup
Production planning and optimisation
Trouble-shooting
31(31)

CONCLUSIONS

Mixing, mass and heat transfer


often important in all scales

Detailed reactor studies can be


made based on simple physical
property measurements

You might also like