Business Research Methodology: Chapter 05: Methods of Data Collection
Business Research Methodology: Chapter 05: Methods of Data Collection
Business Research Methodology: Chapter 05: Methods of Data Collection
I N S T R U C T O R : D R . S AY E D U L A N A M
A S S I S TA N T P R O F E S S O R
D E PA R T M E N T O F B U S I N E S S A D M I N I S T R AT I O N
D A F F O D I L I N T E R N AT I O N A L U N I V E R S I T Y
Learning Objectives
• Disadvantages
1. It is a very expensive method, specially when large and widely spread
geographical sample is taken.
2. There remains the possibility of the bias of interviewer as well as that of the
respondent
3. Certain types of respondents such as important officials or executives or people
in high income groups may not be easily approachable under this method.
4. This method is relatively more-time-consuming, specially when the sample is
large and recalls upon the respondents are necessary.
Telephone interviews
Advantages:
1. It is faster and cheaper than other methods
2. Recall is easy; callbacks are simple and economical.
3. There is a higher rate of response than what we have in mailing method; the
non-response is generally very low.
4. Interviewer can explain requirements more easily.
5. Representative and wider distribution of sample is possible.
Disadvantages:
6. Little time is given to respondents for considered answers.
7. Surveys are restricted to respondents who have telephone/internet facilities.
8. It is not suitable for intensive surveys where comprehensive answers are
required to various questions.
9. Possibility of the bias of the interviewer is relatively more.
10. Questions have to be short and to the point; probes are difficult to handle.
QUESTIONNAIRES
Disadvantages:
1. Low rate of return of the duly filled in questionnaires; bias due to no-response is
often indeterminate.
2. It can be used only when respondents are educated and cooperating.
3. There is inbuilt inflexibility because of the difficulty of amending the approach
once questionnaires have been dispatched.
4. It is difficult to know whether willing respondents are truly representative
SECONDARY DATA
1. Reliability of data: The reliability can be tested by finding out such things
about the said data:
(a) Who collected the data? (b) What were the sources of data? (c) Were they collected
by using proper methods (d) At what time were they collected?(e) Was there any bias of
the compiler? (t) What level of accuracy was desired? Was it achieved ?
2. Suitability of data: The data that are suitable for one enquiry may not
necessarily be found suitable in another enquiry. Hence, if the available data are
found to be unsuitable, they should not be used by the researcher. In this context, the
researcher must very carefully scrutinize the definition of various terms and units of
collection used at the time of collecting the data from the primary source originally.
Similarly, the object, scope and nature of the original enquiry must also be studied. If
the researcher finds differences in these, the data will remain unsuitable for the present
enquiry and should not be used.
3. Adequacy of data: If the level of accuracy achieved in data is found
inadequate for the purpose of the present enquiry, they will be considered as
inadequate and should not be used by the researcher. The data will also be considered
inadequate, if they are related to an area which may be either narrower or wider than
the area of the present enquiry.