Australian vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,730,598 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.770. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.474% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 473.8 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $72,178, a difference of 49.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $77,850, a difference of 45.8%), and per capita income ($52,074 compared to $35,720, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $43,266, a difference of 24.2%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $34,317, a difference of 26.2%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 29.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 56.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 54.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 45.7%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 24.6%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (62.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 61.6%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 50.4%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%), male disability (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.2%).