Austrian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,380,523 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 99.3 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($59,359 compared to $68,960, a difference of 16.2%), median household income ($91,339 compared to $106,057, a difference of 16.1%), and median earnings ($49,501 compared to $57,114, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,470 compared to $70,103, a difference of 8.7%), and per capita income ($48,116 compared to $52,660, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 21.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 21.6%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.33%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 25.8%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.7% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (64.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.19%), no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.1%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (91.0% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 40.3%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.070%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.5%).