Austrian vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,428,905 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.854. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 91.7 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 6.7%), median female earnings ($40,923 compared to $42,542, a difference of 4.0%), and median earnings ($49,501 compared to $51,038, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $52,540, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,470 compared to $65,326, a difference of 1.3%), and median male earnings ($59,359 compared to $60,350, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.22%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 11.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.84%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 48.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.3%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.8%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.0%).