Chippewa vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,704,829 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 2.5 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,539 compared to $106,057, a difference of 50.3%), median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $68,960, a difference of 48.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $124,188, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 17.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $57,818, a difference of 23.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $70,103, a difference of 30.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 76.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 67.6%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 101.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 59.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 72.7%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.3%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.86%), family households (62.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 81.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 82.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 68.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 58.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.6%).