Burmese vs Finnish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Finnish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Finns

Exceptional
Good
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Finnish Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 365,294,985 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Finns within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.391. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 4.9 Finns.
Burmese Integration in Finnish Communities

Burmese vs Finnish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $83,607, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $99,904, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $94,610, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $51,827, a difference of 5.7%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $38,173, a difference of 17.6%).
Burmese vs Finnish Income
Income MetricBurmeseFinnish
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Average
$43,461
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Average
$102,676
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Fair
$83,607
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Fair
$45,940
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Average
$54,721
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$38,173
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Fair
$51,827
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Average
$94,610
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Average
$99,904
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Poor
$59,535
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
28.6%

Burmese vs Finnish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 23.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 3.8%), family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and female poverty (11.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 6.7%).
Burmese vs Finnish Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseFinnish
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Poor
21.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
30.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
10.2%

Burmese vs Finnish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.79%).
Burmese vs Finnish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseFinnish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

Burmese vs Finnish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 27.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Burmese vs Finnish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseFinnish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
43.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Excellent
83.1%

Burmese vs Finnish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 20.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.40%), married-couple households (49.8% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (65.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.5%).
Burmese vs Finnish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseFinnish
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
48.1%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.09
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Average
31.7%

Burmese vs Finnish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.0%).
Burmese vs Finnish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseFinnish
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
60.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
22.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.3%

Burmese vs Finnish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.0%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.3% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.55%).
Burmese vs Finnish Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseFinnish
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Exceptional
88.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Excellent
66.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Good
60.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Average
46.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Fair
36.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Poor
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Average
1.8%

Burmese vs Finnish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.59%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.90%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.3%).
Burmese vs Finnish Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseFinnish
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
2.4%