Canadian vs Kiowa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,476,957 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.906. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.220% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 219.7 Kiowa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $74,815, a difference of 39.8%), median household income ($87,769 compared to $65,914, a difference of 33.2%), and median family income ($106,597 compared to $80,885, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $34,074, a difference of 16.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $44,733, a difference of 17.0%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 52.3%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 49.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.5%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 49.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 35.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.70%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.3%), and family households (64.4% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 38.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.7%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 44.8%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 48.4%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 47.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 11.2%).