Canadian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,749,395 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 64.6 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $37,857, a difference of 21.1%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $49,190, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $50,041, a difference of 4.6%), median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $36,841, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $56,722, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 30.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.6%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.5%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.22%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 44.7%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.20%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.0%).