Pima vs Kiowa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,305,432 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.966. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 41.2 Kiowa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $44,733, a difference of 15.1%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $35,102, a difference of 14.5%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $51,140, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $74,815, a difference of 2.0%), and median earnings ($38,285 compared to $39,232, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 93.6%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 71.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and single male poverty (20.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 131.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 95.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 84.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 49.7%), currently married (35.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 20.2%), and births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.58%), family households (65.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.4%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 22.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 24.3%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.1%), male disability (12.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.39%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 2.9%).