Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,070,500 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 25.5 Immigrants from Bangladesh.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $54,714, a difference of 12.5%), median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $39,910, a difference of 11.1%), and per capita income ($37,699 compared to $41,709, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $55,394, a difference of 4.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,764 compared to $92,208, a difference of 6.3%), and median family income ($88,034 compared to $94,665, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (21.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 33.4%), single male poverty (17.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.8%), births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 26.2%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.36, a difference of 0.49%), currently married (43.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 92.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 66.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 16.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 35.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 52.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 24.4%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.080%), 3rd grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and 5th grade (95.7% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 56.1%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.0%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.9%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 5.1%).