Central American Indian vs Immigrants from Portugal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,011,233 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Immigrants from Portugal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 98.2 Immigrants from Portugal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 17.8%), median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $55,182, a difference of 16.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,355 compared to $95,512, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,232 compared to $55,924, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $39,788, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $54,105, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 67.4%), family poverty (13.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 41.5%), and single male poverty (17.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 12.5%), single female poverty (25.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 16.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 7.8%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 0.55%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.6%), college, 1 year or more (53.5% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and 5th grade (95.7% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.8%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.58%), female disability (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.3%).