Central American Indian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,674,897 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.962. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 70.1 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,699 compared to $52,649, a difference of 39.7%), median family income ($88,034 compared to $120,301, a difference of 36.6%), and median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $63,498, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $52,783, a difference of 8.5%), median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $43,941, a difference of 22.3%), and wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 112.8%), family poverty (13.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 88.0%), and receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 87.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 16.0%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 27.7%), and single father poverty (21.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 31.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 41.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 36.9%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.2%), births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 40.6%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.8%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.11, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 36.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 84.5%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 71.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 53.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.8%).