Central American vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,289,679 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $43,266, a difference of 21.6%), median household income ($78,803 compared to $66,768, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,144 compared to $72,178, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $34,317, a difference of 6.3%), wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($42,280 compared to $39,169, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 23.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.010%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.9%), married-couple households (43.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 12.6%), and family households (66.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 0.21%), currently married (43.3% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.23, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 42.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and college, under 1 year (57.7% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.17%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.1%).