Chippewa vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,971,723 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 56.9 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $72,178, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $43,266, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $34,317, a difference of 2.0%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $35,720, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($40,287 compared to $39,169, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.3%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.88%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and poverty (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 57.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 53.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.4%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.3%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.91%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 44.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.73%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 46.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 75.9%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.62%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.9%).