Chinese vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,038,298 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.054% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 54.2 Tlingit-Haida.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,922, a difference of 23.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $97,417, a difference of 19.2%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $83,968, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $55,914, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,513, a difference of 4.9%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $43,516, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 36.3%), single female poverty (16.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 36.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.15%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 250.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 61.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.6%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.16, a difference of 5.9%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.3%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 13.5%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.5% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.12%), 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.2%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.5%).