Chinese vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,411,906 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 20.6 Yugoslavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $58,243, a difference of 33.0%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $82,186, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $97,558, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.1%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $53,967, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,846, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 34.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 32.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.6%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 53.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.1%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.18%), male disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.9%).