Chinese vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,700,121 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 29.2 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $64,416, a difference of 20.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $103,705, a difference of 12.0%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $89,100, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.0%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,220, a difference of 1.9%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $55,712, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 35.0%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.25%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 51.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.6%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.6%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.5%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.9%).