Comanche vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,045,639 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.256% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 256.2 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $105,070, a difference of 22.5%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $90,261, a difference of 22.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $98,886, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $40,234, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $62,766, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 37.2%), single male poverty (16.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.0%), and single female poverty (25.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 16.6%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (45.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.6%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 26.4%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.070%), 11th grade (91.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 49.7%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 45.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.7%).