Pima vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,567,576 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.735. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.039% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 39.0 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $44,479, a difference of 45.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $105,070, a difference of 43.2%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $90,261, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $56,052, a difference of 8.8%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,234, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $98,886, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 115.4%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 109.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 99.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.5%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 40.4%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 56.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 151.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 107.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 105.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 75.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 63.4%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 65.4%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 65.2%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 73.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 63.8%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.7%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.2%).