Croatian vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,454,111 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Turks within Croatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.800. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Croatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.779% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Croatians corresponds to an increase of 778.8 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Croatian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,742 compared to $52,391, a difference of 9.7%), median household income ($90,685 compared to $99,389, a difference of 9.6%), and median female earnings ($40,993 compared to $44,695, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,662 compared to $54,266, a difference of 5.0%), and median male earnings ($59,715 compared to $64,253, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Croatian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Croatian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Croatian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Croatian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.18%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 41.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Croatian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.7%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Croatian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 36.0%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.050%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.7%).