Brazilian vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,320,542 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 11.4 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($106,942 compared to $121,202, a difference of 13.3%), median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $64,253, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $117,814, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $54,266, a difference of 0.13%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $44,695, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.9%), single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.38%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.58%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.4%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%).