Fijian vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,037,099 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 23.9 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $52,391, a difference of 42.8%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $64,253, a difference of 40.9%), and median family income ($87,387 compared to $121,202, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $54,266, a difference of 8.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $68,037, a difference of 19.9%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 39.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 37.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.53%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 35.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.0%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.4%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.3%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.3%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 136.3%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 112.1%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 93.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.69%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 37.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 7.4%).