Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Immigrants from Lithuania

Excellent
Exceptional
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,925,666 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 68.6 Immigrants from Lithuania.
Czech Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $51,361, a difference of 15.2%), median household income ($86,164 compared to $96,836, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $108,149, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $55,028, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $66,087, a difference of 7.9%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income
Income MetricCzechImmigrants from Lithuania
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Exceptional
$51,361
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Exceptional
$118,053
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Exceptional
$96,836
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Exceptional
$52,769
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Exceptional
$63,346
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Exceptional
$43,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Exceptional
$55,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Exceptional
$108,149
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Exceptional
$114,336
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Exceptional
$66,087
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Tragic
28.6%

Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 18.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.27%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechImmigrants from Lithuania
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
17.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
12.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
13.1%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Exceptional
25.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.2%

Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechImmigrants from Lithuania
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.55%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechImmigrants from Lithuania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Exceptional
83.9%

Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.8%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.91%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechImmigrants from Lithuania
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Exceptional
27.7%

Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 42.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 22.0%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechImmigrants from Lithuania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.6%

Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.5%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.5%), and bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechImmigrants from Lithuania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
52.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Exceptional
44.6%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%

Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.1%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.3%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.83%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Czech vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability
Disability MetricCzechImmigrants from Lithuania
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%