Czech vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 379,685,264 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Finns within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 30.8 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $99,904, a difference of 3.6%), median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $54,721, a difference of 3.3%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $102,676, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $51,827, a difference of 0.79%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $94,610, a difference of 2.0%), and wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.2%), male poverty (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.5%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.09, a difference of 0.47%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and family households (64.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.70%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.9%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.91%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.2%).