Czech vs Okinawan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Okinawan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Okinawans

Excellent
Excellent
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,907
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
39th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Okinawan Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,565,108 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Okinawans within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Okinawans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 14.6 Okinawans.
Czech Integration in Okinawan Communities

Czech vs Okinawan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $55,817, a difference of 25.2%), median household income ($86,164 compared to $106,624, a difference of 23.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $119,349, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $54,701, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $70,846, a difference of 15.7%).
Czech vs Okinawan Income
Income MetricCzechOkinawan
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Exceptional
$55,817
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Exceptional
$129,979
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Exceptional
$106,624
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Exceptional
$57,550
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Exceptional
$67,232
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Exceptional
$46,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Exceptional
$54,701
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Exceptional
$119,349
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Exceptional
$124,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Exceptional
$70,846
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Tragic
28.1%

Czech vs Okinawan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 15.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.1%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Czech vs Okinawan Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechOkinawan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Exceptional
26.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
8.9%

Czech vs Okinawan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.1%).
Czech vs Okinawan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechOkinawan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%

Czech vs Okinawan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 33.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.94%).
Czech vs Okinawan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechOkinawan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Good
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Tragic
32.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Good
83.0%

Czech vs Okinawan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.0%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (64.5% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Czech vs Okinawan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechOkinawan
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
62.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Exceptional
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Exceptional
26.9%

Czech vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 104.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 8.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 29.0%).
Czech vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechOkinawan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
86.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Tragic
51.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.5%

Czech vs Okinawan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 73.8%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 67.3%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.2% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.17%), high school diploma (91.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Czech vs Okinawan Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechOkinawan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
73.7%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Exceptional
69.0%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
57.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Exceptional
50.5%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Exceptional
22.6%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
3.3%

Czech vs Okinawan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 36.4%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.4%).
Czech vs Okinawan Disability
Disability MetricCzechOkinawan
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
20.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%