Ethiopian vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ethiopians
Choctaw
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in Ethiopian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,349,272 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 14.6 Choctaw.
Ethiopian vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,569 compared to $35,999, a difference of 29.4%), wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 28.9%), and median household income ($89,640 compared to $69,947, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $47,729, a difference of 17.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $45,450, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $53,060, a difference of 22.5%).
Income Metric | Ethiopian | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,569 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,251 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,640 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,572 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,243 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,243 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,818 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,824 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,736 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,989 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 28.1% |
Ethiopian vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 53.0%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 52.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 20.3%).
Poverty Metric | Ethiopian | Choctaw |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Good 13.3% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.3% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Ethiopian vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 44.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Ethiopian | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Ethiopian vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 6.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ethiopian | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 69.3% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 82.0% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.2% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 78.2% |
Ethiopian vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 23.6%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.69%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Ethiopian | Choctaw |
Family Households | Tragic 61.2% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.2% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 36.9% |
Ethiopian vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.9%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 28.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ethiopian | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.1% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Ethiopian vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 65.9%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 62.9%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.43%), 11th grade (92.2% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.67%).
Education Level Metric | Ethiopian | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Fair 89.0% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.8% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.0% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Ethiopian vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 70.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 67.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.5%).
Disability Metric | Ethiopian | Choctaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.0% |