Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,894,858 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Immigrant from Southern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Southern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Southern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,027 compared to $35,999, a difference of 33.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,486 compared to $78,168, a difference of 32.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,775 compared to $82,287, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.5%), householder income over 65 years ($61,902 compared to $53,060, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,484 compared to $45,450, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 45.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 41.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.75%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 65.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 36.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 55.9%), master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 50.7%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.1% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.32%), 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 54.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 52.9%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 20.2%).