Zimbabwean vs Choctaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,928,429 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.501. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.539% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 539.2 Choctaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $82,287, a difference of 29.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $84,835, a difference of 29.7%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $69,947, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $45,450, a difference of 12.8%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $47,729, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 54.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 54.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 33.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 28.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.8%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.46%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and family households (64.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.0%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 61.0%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 60.7%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 68.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 60.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.5%).