Filipino vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,010,284 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 8.9 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($115,509 compared to $93,852, a difference of 23.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $105,223, a difference of 22.3%), and median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $61,228, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $53,552, a difference of 7.8%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $42,108, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.8%), receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and poverty (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 27.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 28.6%), divorced or separated (9.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.4%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.10, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 0.70%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 52.1%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.5%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.45%), high school diploma (91.6% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 34.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.77%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.1%).