Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Lithuanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 393,794,156 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Lithuanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 9.0%), householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $65,209, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $53,552, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($49,316 compared to $49,448, a difference of 0.27%), median male earnings ($60,958 compared to $61,228, a difference of 0.44%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,662 compared to $105,223, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 23.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 7.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.14%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 61.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (50.5% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 0.33%), bachelor's degree (42.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.3%).