Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Belize Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,993,101 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.827. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Immigrants from Belize. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 20.6 Immigrants from Belize.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 21.0%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $38,614, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $87,229, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $51,223, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $37,056, a difference of 8.9%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $42,339, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 32.6%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 29.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.2%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.6%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.3%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and family households (64.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 39.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.51%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 58.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.2%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.95%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Belize communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.70%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.2%).