Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,218,186 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.826. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.214% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 214.2 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $43,464, a difference of 6.3%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $53,237, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $92,876, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $52,643, a difference of 0.39%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $39,186, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $100,141, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.7%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.4%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.47%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.82%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.1%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%).