Immigrants from Laos vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,129,268 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 60.5 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $34,584, a difference of 44.7%), median household income ($78,327 compared to $54,644, a difference of 43.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $60,305, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 11.7%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $32,500, a difference of 13.4%), and median earnings ($42,884 compared to $36,876, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 93.5%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 89.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 41.5%), single female poverty (22.9% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 43.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 46.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 80.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 70.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 31.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 41.8%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.53%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 26.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 108.0%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.8%), and bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.9% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.15%), 9th grade (93.2% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 52.1%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 43.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.3%).