Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,009,099 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.427. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 22.3 Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $110,398, a difference of 6.9%), median household income ($104,796 compared to $98,008, a difference of 6.9%), and median earnings ($56,183 compared to $53,334, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($53,806 compared to $53,154, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $67,626, a difference of 3.3%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.5%), births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.2% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.75%), married-couple households (48.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.6%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 33.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.3%).