Immigrants from Guyana vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,057,943 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to a decrease of 19.9 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 41.2%), householder income over 65 years ($56,495 compared to $77,465, a difference of 37.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,186 compared to $116,156, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,773 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $58,162, a difference of 4.4%), and median earnings ($45,204 compared to $48,836, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 82.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 78.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 73.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 7.0%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 58.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.6%), and female unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 41.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.5%), married-couple households (41.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.40 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 258.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 160.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 112.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 30.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 71.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 112.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 111.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.3%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 58.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.5%).