Spanish vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Spanish
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Spanish
Chinese
4,224
SOCIAL INDEX
39.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
203rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Spanish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,520,105 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Spanish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spanish corresponds to an increase of 42.8 Chinese.
Spanish vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,795 compared to $77,465, a difference of 27.4%), median household income ($83,343 compared to $98,496, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,554 compared to $116,156, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.8%), median male earnings ($53,576 compared to $56,872, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($45,432 compared to $48,836, a difference of 7.5%).
Income Metric | Spanish | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,249 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Fair $99,977 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,343 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,432 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,576 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,098 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,813 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,200 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,554 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,795 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Average 25.9% |
Spanish vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 44.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 43.7%), and family poverty (9.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 22.3%), and receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.4%).
Poverty Metric | Spanish | Chinese |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Fair 9.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Poor 20.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.1% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Spanish vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 54.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Spanish | Chinese |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Spanish vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Spanish | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.9% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.2% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.4% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.6% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.5% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Spanish vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.6%), family households (65.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Spanish | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.1% | Excellent 30.2% |
Spanish vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 11.8%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Spanish | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Spanish vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.4%), associate's degree (44.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and bachelor's degree (35.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.36%).
Education Level Metric | Spanish | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Good 94.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.4% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Fair 64.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.5% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 44.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.8% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Spanish vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spanish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.0%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Spanish | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.6% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |