Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,603,211 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.118% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to an increase of 118.5 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($69,426 compared to $77,465, a difference of 11.6%), median male earnings ($63,099 compared to $56,872, a difference of 11.0%), and per capita income ($50,555 compared to $46,098, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($99,943 compared to $98,496, a difference of 1.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $116,156, a difference of 2.5%), and median family income ($120,263 compared to $116,188, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.6%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and single mother poverty (26.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.3%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.99%), currently married (48.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 44.2%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.3%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.6%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.9%), male disability (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.8%).