Immigrants from Indonesia vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,600,424 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Indonesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Indonesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Indonesia corresponds to an increase of 5.8 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,521 compared to $51,737, a difference of 7.3%), per capita income ($48,195 compared to $50,914, a difference of 5.6%), and median household income ($97,297 compared to $93,602, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($115,162 compared to $114,826, a difference of 0.29%), median earnings ($51,715 compared to $51,555, a difference of 0.31%), and median female earnings ($43,412 compared to $43,099, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 8.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.14%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.9%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and family households (66.0% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.13, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.6%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and master's degree (17.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.40%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.2%).