Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,875,989 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.740. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.196% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 195.6 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $51,737, a difference of 4.7%), median household income ($96,292 compared to $93,602, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $105,522, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($115,880 compared to $114,826, a difference of 0.92%), median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $61,422, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,796 compared to $111,454, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.1%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.0%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 8.0%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 0.81%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and professional degree (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.31%), associate's degree (52.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.98%).