Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,897,596 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.711. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.612% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 612.4 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $64,298, a difference of 3.6%), and median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $43,099, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $61,422, a difference of 0.33%), median family income ($114,392 compared to $114,826, a difference of 0.38%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $105,522, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.21%), single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.4%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.33%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 45.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.8%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.2% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.47%).